• Posting on my LC 475, What are you running?

    From denodster@denodster@gmail.com (denodster) to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Sat Nov 6 04:25:03 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    Posting on my LC 475 running Internews. This is my first time on Usenet
    and I'm thrilled to find this group. Running system 7.6.1 and MacIP via
    an old cisco router. It's been a fun project and I'm thrilled to get to
    use it like this.

    What kind of hardware are you all running? and how did you get it
    online?
    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From Jolly Roger@jollyroger@pobox.com to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Sat Nov 6 16:36:05 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    On 2021-11-06, denodster <denodster@gmail.com> wrote:
    Posting on my LC 475 running Internews. This is my first time on
    Usenet and I'm thrilled to find this group. Running system 7.6.1 and
    MacIP via an old cisco router. It's been a fun project and I'm
    thrilled to get to use it like this.

    Nice! I still have an LC 475 in the closet here. Love that pizza box
    case... : )

    What kind of hardware are you all running? and how did you get it
    online?

    My oldest Mac is a Mac SE/30 which was originally purchased by my father
    in the late 1980s. It was our first Mac. All of our other computers at
    the time ran their own specific command-line operating system with no
    graphical interface or mouse - just ugly text on an ugly screen. Home Computers back then either used tape drives for storage or had floppy
    drives with their own flavor of DOS.

    The Mac we brought home was completely different. It was relatively
    small compared to most computers of the time, was self-contained
    (screen, CPU, floppy drive, etc were all housed in the case) and could
    be carried with one hand. And unlike most, not only did it come with a
    mouse, but the mouse was actually *required* to use it.

    It completely changed the way I looked at computers for the better. And
    while I was very much into programming our trusty TRS-80s in Basic and
    Zilog assembly, the Mac with an OS geared from the ground up to be
    driven by the GUI, along with Apple’s rich APIs and Pascal / 68k
    assembly programming languages immediately took my attention and
    opened new worlds to me. And the Mac SE/30 was pretty fast for a
    computer at that time - hence the name. : )

    Zippy is old, but still runs fine. I've replaced the cooling fan,
    upgraded the RAM, and replaced the hard drive over the years. But other
    than that, the hardware all original. It's currently running system
    7.5.5, has an Asante MacCon 10 megabit Ethernet card installed in the
    PDS expansion slot for internet connectivity, and runs the MacHTTP web
    server full time, hosting a little website:

    <http://zippy.kicks-ass.org:9997>
    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR
    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From denodster@denodster@gmail.com (Denodster) to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Sat Nov 6 21:27:41 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    In article <iunp7lF31drU1@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    Nice! I still have an LC 475 in the closet here. Love that pizza box
    case... : )


    One of my favorite computer designs, It's too bad the only way to get a
    PPC is to find one of those elusive upgrades. Unfortunately mine has come plastic damage, maybe I'll acquire a non-working one at some point.


    My oldest Mac is a Mac SE/30 which was originally purchased by my father
    in the late 1980s. It was our first Mac. All of our other computers at
    the time ran their own specific command-line operating system with no graphical interface or mouse - just ugly text on an ugly screen. Home Computers back then either used tape drives for storage or had floppy
    drives with their own flavor of DOS.

    The Mac we brought home was completely different. It was relatively
    small compared to most computers of the time, was self-contained
    (screen, CPU, floppy drive, etc were all housed in the case) and could
    be carried with one hand. And unlike most, not only did it come with a
    mouse, but the mouse was actually *required* to use it.

    It completely changed the way I looked at computers for the better. And
    while I was very much into programming our trusty TRS-80s in Basic and
    Zilog assembly, the Mac with an OS geared from the ground up to be
    driven by the GUI, along with Apple’s rich APIs and Pascal / 68k
    assembly programming languages immediately took my attention and
    opened new worlds to me. And the Mac SE/30 was pretty fast for a
    computer at that time - hence the name. : )


    My first mac was a IIcx that my dad acquired at a surplus auction, with a portrait monitor. I remember being floored that it didn't have any
    scrolling text or command line the first time I booted it up. Apple was
    truly thinking different with these machines. As much as I believe they
    made the right decision with Unix being the basis of OS X, I can't help
    but feel like something was lost the day they added a terminal to the Mac.

    I've recently acquired Inside Macintosh Volumes 1-6 and I've been trying
    to think up a project I would like to work on. Web development is my day
    job and I know how to program in C, so I think I could come up with some classic mac apps.

    Zippy is old, but still runs fine. I've replaced the cooling fan,
    upgraded the RAM, and replaced the hard drive over the years. But other
    than that, the hardware all original. It's currently running system
    7.5.5, has an Asante MacCon 10 megabit Ethernet card installed in the
    PDS expansion slot for internet connectivity, and runs the MacHTTP web
    server full time, hosting a little website:

    <http://zippy.kicks-ass.org:9997>

    Love the website, it works pretty well on my LC 475, good work!
    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From Your Name@YourName@YourISP.com to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Sun Nov 7 14:53:25 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    On 2021-11-07 01:27:41 +0000, Denodster said:
    In article <iunp7lF31drU1@mid.individual.net>, Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:

    Nice! I still have an LC 475 in the closet here. Love that pizza box
    case... : )

    One of my favorite computer designs,

    Yep, a great case design from when Apple actually allowed people to
    upgrade their computers ... just pop the lid, no screws to bother with.
    It's basically a more flattened copy of the old Apple II design.



    It's too bad the only way to get a PPC is to find one of those elusive upgrades. Unfortunately mine has come plastic damage, maybe I'll
    acquire a non-working one at some point.

    If you've got a good condition case, you could always put a Mac Mini
    into it and have an Intel or Apple Silicon Mac ... it still wouldn't of
    course have expansion possibilities anywhere close to those old Macs.
    :-(



    My oldest Mac is a Mac SE/30 which was originally purchased by my father
    in the late 1980s. It was our first Mac. All of our other computers at
    the time ran their own specific command-line operating system with no
    graphical interface or mouse - just ugly text on an ugly screen. Home
    Computers back then either used tape drives for storage or had floppy
    drives with their own flavor of DOS.

    The Mac we brought home was completely different. It was relatively
    small compared to most computers of the time, was self-contained
    (screen, CPU, floppy drive, etc were all housed in the case) and could
    be carried with one hand. And unlike most, not only did it come with a
    mouse, but the mouse was actually *required* to use it.

    It completely changed the way I looked at computers for the better. And
    while I was very much into programming our trusty TRS-80s in Basic and
    Zilog assembly, the Mac with an OS geared from the ground up to be
    driven by the GUI, along with Apple’s rich APIs and Pascal / 68k
    assembly programming languages immediately took my attention and
    opened new worlds to me. And the Mac SE/30 was pretty fast for a
    computer at that time - hence the name. : )

    My first mac was a IIcx that my dad acquired at a surplus auction, with a portrait monitor. I remember being floored that it didn't have any
    scrolling text or command line the first time I booted it up. Apple was
    truly thinking different with these machines. As much as I believe they
    made the right decision with Unix being the basis of OS X, I can't help
    but feel like something was lost the day they added a terminal to the Mac.

    I've recently acquired Inside Macintosh Volumes 1-6 and I've been trying
    to think up a project I would like to work on. Web development is my day
    job and I know how to program in C, so I think I could come up with some classic mac apps.

    Depending on which version of Classic Mac OS you're aiming at, Pascal
    can be a option bet than C.



    Zippy is old, but still runs fine. I've replaced the cooling fan,
    upgraded the RAM, and replaced the hard drive over the years. But other
    than that, the hardware all original. It's currently running system
    7.5.5, has an Asante MacCon 10 megabit Ethernet card installed in the
    PDS expansion slot for internet connectivity, and runs the MacHTTP web
    server full time, hosting a little website:

    <http://zippy.kicks-ass.org:9997>

    Love the website, it works pretty well on my LC 475, good work!


    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From nospam@nospam@nospam.invalid to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Sun Nov 7 08:59:44 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    In article <sm7bil$1hbn$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Your Name
    <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:

    Nice! I still have an LC 475 in the closet here. Love that pizza box
    case... : )

    One of my favorite computer designs,

    Yep, a great case design from when Apple actually allowed people to
    upgrade their computers ... just pop the lid, no screws to bother with.
    It's basically a more flattened copy of the old Apple II design.

    mac pro is easily upgraded without any screws and in all sorts of ways.

    intel mac mini is also easy.


    I've recently acquired Inside Macintosh Volumes 1-6 and I've been trying
    to think up a project I would like to work on. Web development is my day job and I know how to program in C, so I think I could come up with some classic mac apps.

    Depending on which version of Classic Mac OS you're aiming at, Pascal
    can be a option bet than C.

    there is no advantage for pascal, or c for that matter.

    c++ would be the best choice.
    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From philo@philo@news.novabbs.com (philo) to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Wed Nov 10 23:40:40 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    I was recently given a Quadra running OS-8.

    Though I could put it on-line, I was more curious about setting up a printer.

    To my amazement I was able to use my networked laser printer. Though the printer is 15 years newer than the computer ...because of Postscript it worked!
    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From nospam@nospam@nospam.invalid to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Wed Nov 10 19:38:04 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    In article <52093edf8badc27bf88ad21504f402a4@news.novabbs.com>, philo <philo@news.novabbs.com> wrote:

    I was recently given a Quadra running OS-8.

    Though I could put it on-line, I was more curious about setting up a printer.

    To my amazement I was able to use my networked laser printer. Though the printer is 15 years newer than the computer ...because of Postscript it worked!

    every mac supports network printers via postscript, going back to the
    very first mac in 1984.
    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From Your Name@YourName@YourISP.com to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Thu Nov 11 14:12:50 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    On 2021-11-10 23:40:40 +0000, philo said:

    I was recently given a Quadra running OS-8.

    Though I could put it on-line, I was more curious about setting up a printer.

    To my amazement I was able to use my networked laser printer. Though
    the printer is 15 years newer than the computer ...because of
    Postscript it worked!

    Here's one the other way around ... some years ago I set-up a new iMac
    for someone who had upgraded from an old CRT iMac, a couple of years
    later I had to update the OS on it. Both times I thought they might
    have problems with their big, clunky, very ancient printer (no idea how
    old, but must have been one of the first USB printers from HP), but I
    plugged it into a USB socket and the new iMac recognised it and worked
    fine.

    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From Eli the Bearded@*@eli.users.panix.com to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Thu Nov 11 01:49:24 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    In comp.sys.mac.vintage, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    Yep, a great case design from when Apple actually allowed people to
    upgrade their computers ... just pop the lid, no screws to bother with.
    It's basically a more flattened copy of the old Apple II design.
    mac pro is easily upgraded without any screws and in all sorts of ways.

    After you break your wallet buying it.

    intel mac mini is also easy.

    As far as I can tell, that one may be easy but has a bunch of screws.

    The LC is probably between this IIsi and Quadra 610 in complexity, but
    ifixit doesn't have a guide for it so I can't be certain:

    https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Macintosh+IIsi+Disassembly/2748

    https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Macintosh+Quadra+610+Teardown/55176

    The IIsi and the 128K are the only "classic mac" they have guides for
    that I've taken apart myself. The IIci was virtually the same as the
    IIsi for opening / repair work. The IIe (not a Mac, but in the "Classic
    Mac" section" was easy to open, but used more screws.

    Depending on which version of Classic Mac OS you're aiming at, Pascal
    can be a option bet than C.
    there is no advantage for pascal, or c for that matter.

    I've programmed for System 7 in C. You definitely got the feel that a
    lot of stuff was written for Pascal, eg seeing Pascal style strings
    in places.

    c++ would be the best choice.

    What C++? The C++ of today is nothing like the C++ of the late 1990s.

    Elijah
    ------
    C has changed, too, but slower
    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From denodster@denodster@gmail.com (Denodster) to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Wed Nov 10 21:40:00 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    In article <52093edf8badc27bf88ad21504f402a4@news.novabbs.com>, philo@news.novabbs.com (philo) wrote:

    I was recently given a Quadra running OS-8.

    Though I could put it on-line, I was more curious about setting up a printer.

    To my amazement I was able to use my networked laser printer. Though the
    printer is 15 years newer than the computer ...because of Postscript it worked!

    I print from System 7.6 to a Brother laser printer from 2019 over tcp/ip.
    If you update Laserwriter 8 you can use a windows computer to extract a
    .PPD file from the windows driver and then copy it over to the mac and add
    it to the printer descriptions in the extensions folder. (I think I used
    res edit to specify the file type to ease the conversion) From there it
    just worked.
    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From D Finnigan@dog_cow@macgui.com to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Thu Nov 11 03:59:23 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    Denodster wrote:

    I've recently acquired Inside Macintosh Volumes 1-6 and I've been trying
    to think up a project I would like to work on. Web development is my day
    job and I know how to program in C, so I think I could come up with some classic mac apps.

    There's no time to lose. Better get started reading others' Macintosh code, even if you do nothing else. Check out the MacTutor/MacTech archives. Also
    the Apple Developer CD. Both include lots of sample code.

    The MacTutor archives should be online at this URL: https://preserve.mactech.com/articles/index.html

    I wasn't able to load it just now, so maybe it'll work later. :-/
    --
    ]DF$
    The New Apple II User's Guide:
    https://macgui.com/newa2guide/

    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From nospam@nospam@nospam.invalid to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Thu Nov 11 00:17:58 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    In article <eli$2111102049@qaz.wtf>, Eli the Bearded
    <*@eli.users.panix.com> wrote:

    Yep, a great case design from when Apple actually allowed people to
    upgrade their computers ... just pop the lid, no screws to bother with. >> It's basically a more flattened copy of the old Apple II design.
    mac pro is easily upgraded without any screws and in all sorts of ways.

    After you break your wallet buying it.

    people who need a mac pro are not concerned with its price because it
    pays for itself very quickly.

    it's a high end pro system for compute intensive tasks where time is
    money, not something home users would get for faster web surfing.

    the claim was that apple no longer allows people to upgrade macs. that
    is false. they have *never* prohibited it.

    some macs are more limited because most people never upgrade. there is
    no reason to include slots that will never be used.

    intel mac mini is also easy.

    As far as I can tell, that one may be easy but has a bunch of screws.

    it does not.

    the bottom plate twists off, no tools required:

    <https://support.apple.com/library/content/dam/edam/applecare/images/en_ US/macmini/macmini-memory-diagram-2010-12-rotate-cover-open.png> <https://support.apple.com/library/content/dam/edam/applecare/images/en_ US/macmini/macmini-memory-diagram-2010-12-remove-cover.png>

    the previous mac mini enclosure (white top, with both g4 & intel
    processors) needed a putty knife to snap the clips, at which point the
    top lifts off.

    The LC is probably between this IIsi and Quadra 610 in complexity, but
    ifixit doesn't have a guide for it so I can't be certain:

    the lc was extremely easy to open.

    the top lifted off via two tabs at the back, as did many macs of that
    era.

    there was a single screw to secure the lid, but that was not needed and
    rarely put back after opening it.

    <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2b/Macintosh_LC_%28ori ginal%29_-_rear.jpg>

    many macs were even easier.

    the side of the cheese-grater mac pro and powermac g5 was easily
    removed:

    <https://guide-images.cdn.ifixit.com/igi/LG2YPVaHQQ1nWjIE.medium>

    the side of the powermac g4 flipped down while the computer could
    remain powered and operational, which made it *very* easy to design
    hardware cards.

    <https://guide-images.cdn.ifixit.com/igi/usapiMdDDBFeDDhd.medium> <https://guide-images.cdn.ifixit.com/igi/6j1Fmc6PY2u6c6GG.medium>

    <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/ab/Apple_PowerMa c_G4_M8570_MDD_sideopen.jpg/800px-Apple_PowerMac_G4_M8570_MDD_sideopen.j


    https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Macintosh+IIsi+Disassembly/2748

    https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Macintosh+Quadra+610+Teardown/55176

    The IIsi and the 128K are the only "classic mac" they have guides for
    that I've taken apart myself.

    take-apart guides are not needed for macs of that vintage.

    The IIci was virtually the same as the
    IIsi for opening / repair work.

    the lid was easy to remove, but the similarity ends there.

    the iisi was a low end mac with a single pds slot, and an optional
    adapter for a true nubus slot.

    <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/99/Macintosh_IIsi_2.jp

    <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1a/Macintosh_IIsi_Port
    s.jpg>

    the iici, iicx and quadra 700 had nearly identical casings, all with
    three nubus slots in, differing in which external ports they had.

    the iicx lacked onboard video and required a video card, so it really
    had only 2 usable nubus slots for expansion.

    the iici was the first with onboard video, saving a nubus slot, with an additional video connector on the back.

    the quadra 700 was intended for vertical use, with the labeling on the
    front being rotated, plus the feet on what would have been the side
    rather than the bottom. this was to match the bigger quadra 900 tower.

    <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ca/Macintosh_IIcx.jpg> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/63/Macintosh_IIci.png> <https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/39/Macintosh_Quadra_70
    0.png>

    The IIe (not a Mac, but in the "Classic
    Mac" section" was easy to open, but used more screws.

    the apple ii series were very easy to open and modify.

    Depending on which version of Classic Mac OS you're aiming at, Pascal
    can be a option bet than C.
    there is no advantage for pascal, or c for that matter.

    I've programmed for System 7 in C. You definitely got the feel that a
    lot of stuff was written for Pascal, eg seeing Pascal style strings
    in places.

    most of classic mac os was originally written in pascal, with many core routines in hand-optimized assembly.

    that meant that strings were pascal style, however, that was not an
    issue whatsoever for app development with c.

    pascal strings are also more robust than c strings, so this was a
    feature, not a bug.

    think/lightspeed c was *extremely* popular, as was codewarrior, which
    supported both pascal, c, c++ and inline 68k assembly in the same ide.

    c++ would be the best choice.

    What C++? The C++ of today is nothing like the C++ of the late 1990s.

    so what?

    computers of today are nothing like computers of the late 1990s.

    anyone writing apps for classic mac os would be best served using c++.

    codewarrior's powerplant was a fantastic framework for writing apps,
    written in c++, source code included.
    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From Your Name@YourName@YourISP.com to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Thu Nov 11 19:09:52 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    On 2021-11-11 01:49:24 +0000, Eli the Bearded said:

    In comp.sys.mac.vintage, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    Yep, a great case design from when Apple actually allowed people to
    upgrade their computers ... just pop the lid, no screws to bother with.
    It's basically a more flattened copy of the old Apple II design.
    mac pro is easily upgraded without any screws and in all sorts of ways.

    After you break your wallet buying it.

    Some models of Mac Pro and PowerMac towers require hinging out sections
    to get to other sections, so not as easy as the old LC 'pop the lid and
    you're in'.


    intel mac mini is also easy.

    As far as I can tell, that one may be easy but has a bunch of screws.

    There was one Mac Mini model where the base could be turned to get it
    off, but that only allowed limited access. Anything else did require unscrewing bits and sliding the motherboard out the back.

    Many of the Mac Mini models aren't very upgradable, if at all, anyway
    because Apple now tends to solder everything down. :(



    The LC is probably between this IIsi and Quadra 610 in complexity, but
    ifixit doesn't have a guide for it so I can't be certain:

    https://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Macintosh+IIsi+Disassembly/2748

    https://www.ifixit.com/Teardown/Macintosh+Quadra+610+Teardown/55176

    The IIsi and the 128K are the only "classic mac" they have guides for
    that I've taken apart myself. The IIci was virtually the same as the
    IIsi for opening / repair work. The IIe (not a Mac, but in the "Classic
    Mac" section" was easy to open, but used more screws.

    Depending on which version of Classic Mac OS you're aiming at, Pascal
    can be a better option than C.
    there is no advantage for pascal, or c for that matter.

    I've programmed for System 7 in C. You definitely got the feel that a
    lot of stuff was written for Pascal, eg seeing Pascal style strings
    in places.

    Early versions of the Mac OS were written in / for Pascal programming.
    MacOS 8 was when C really took over, so if you're planning to write
    programs for earlier than that, you're best to use Pascal. Lightspeed /
    Think Pascal is my personal favourite programming environment, even
    today there's still nothing that comes close to its ease-of-use.

    <https://softwareengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/178038/what-language-was-standard-for-apple-development-before-objective-c>




    c++ would be the best choice.

    What C++? The C++ of today is nothing like the C++ of the late 1990s.

    Elijah
    ------
    C has changed, too, but slower


    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From nospam@nospam@nospam.invalid to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Thu Nov 11 02:18:52 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    In article <smic3g$d1q$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Your Name
    <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:


    Some models of Mac Pro and PowerMac towers require hinging out sections
    to get to other sections, so not as easy as the old LC 'pop the lid and you're in'.

    nope. the side of the g4 tower flips down and the side of the g5/mac
    pro can be removed entirely.

    There was one Mac Mini model where the base could be turned to get it
    off, but that only allowed limited access. Anything else did require unscrewing bits and sliding the motherboard out the back.

    several models, actually.

    Many of the Mac Mini models aren't very upgradable, if at all, anyway because Apple now tends to solder everything down. :(

    nope.

    the 2014 mini was the only one with soldered memory, not that it
    matters since very few people upgrade after purchase.

    the m1 mini has memory on the soc itself, which applies to all m1 macs
    and is much faster than what dimms can provide.


    Early versions of the Mac OS were written in / for Pascal programming.

    it was written in pascal and assembly.

    programming could be done using assembly, pascal, c, c++ and in any combination. basic was also available, along with some less common
    languages available, such as scheme.

    MacOS 8 was when C really took over,

    nope. it was much, much earlier than that.

    in fact, mac native c compilers predated mac native pascal compilers,
    including aztec c, consulair c and megamax c, somewhere around late1984
    or early 1985.

    so if you're planning to write
    programs for earlier than that, you're best to use Pascal.

    nope to that too. see above.

    Lightspeed /
    Think Pascal is my personal favourite programming environment, even
    today there's still nothing that comes close to its ease-of-use.

    codewarrior was *significantly* better, and not just its ide, but also
    the powerplant framework.
    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From denodster@denodster@gmail.com (Denodster) to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Thu Nov 11 11:12:57 2021
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    In article <dog_cow-1636603162@macgui.com>, D Finnigan
    <dog_cow@macgui.com> wrote:

    Denodster wrote:

    I've recently acquired Inside Macintosh Volumes 1-6 and I've been trying
    to think up a project I would like to work on. Web development is my day job and I know how to program in C, so I think I could come up with some classic mac apps.

    There's no time to lose. Better get started reading others' Macintosh code, even if you do nothing else. Check out the MacTutor/MacTech archives. Also the Apple Developer CD. Both include lots of sample code.

    The MacTutor archives should be online at this URL: https://preserve.mactech.com/articles/index.html

    I wasn't able to load it just now, so maybe it'll work later. :-/

    works for me, thanks for the link.
    --- Synchronet 3.19a-Linux NewsLink 1.113
  • From Sebastian P.@info@cornica.org to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Thu Sep 28 13:28:42 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    In article <sm502u$nbh$2@dont-email.me>,
    denodster@gmail.com (denodster) wrote:

    Posting on my LC 475 running Internews. This is my first time on Usenet
    and I'm thrilled to find this group. Running system 7.6.1 and MacIP via
    an old cisco router. It's been a fun project and I'm thrilled to get to
    use it like this.

    What kind of hardware are you all running? and how did you get it
    online?

    I'm using MT-Newswatcher 2.4.4 on my Mac IIci. As far as I know, it's
    the last version for 68k Macintoshes. It works really nice! The IIci
    sports 32 MB RAM (who'd ever need that much RAM anyway, right?)

    Recently invested into a PiSCSI (RaSCSI) add-on that provides my IIci
    with an internet connection and a virtual CD drive by sacrificing an old Raspberry Pi I had left.

    I'm really excited how well the IIci and Usenet communicate together.
    Feels natural.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Thu Sep 28 22:24:32 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    Sebastian P. <info@cornica.org> wrote:

    In article <sm502u$nbh$2@dont-email.me>,
    denodster@gmail.com (denodster) wrote:

    Posting on my LC 475 running Internews. This is my first time on Usenet
    and I'm thrilled to find this group. Running system 7.6.1 and MacIP via
    an old cisco router. It's been a fun project and I'm thrilled to get to
    use it like this.

    What kind of hardware are you all running? and how did you get it
    online?

    I'm using MT-Newswatcher 2.4.4 on my Mac IIci. As far as I know, it's
    the last version for 68k Macintoshes. It works really nice! The IIci
    sports 32 MB RAM (who'd ever need that much RAM anyway, right?)

    Recently invested into a PiSCSI (RaSCSI) add-on that provides my IIci
    with an internet connection and a virtual CD drive by sacrificing an old Raspberry Pi I had left.

    I'm really excited how well the IIci and Usenet communicate together.
    Feels natural.

    I'm currently using a G3 with OS 8.6 and MacSOUP 2.4.6 . So fast and user-friendly that I can't think of any improvements it needs.
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From denodster@denodster@gmail.com (Denodster) to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Sun Dec 17 03:39:36 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    In article <info-ACF699.13284228092023@nntp-new.eternal-september.org>, "Sebastian P." <info@cornica.org> wrote:

    In article <sm502u$nbh$2@dont-email.me>,
    denodster@gmail.com (denodster) wrote:

    Posting on my LC 475 running Internews. This is my first time on Usenet
    and I'm thrilled to find this group. Running system 7.6.1 and MacIP via
    an old cisco router. It's been a fun project and I'm thrilled to get to
    use it like this.

    What kind of hardware are you all running? and how did you get it
    online?

    I'm using MT-Newswatcher 2.4.4 on my Mac IIci. As far as I know, it's
    the last version for 68k Macintoshes. It works really nice! The IIci
    sports 32 MB RAM (who'd ever need that much RAM anyway, right?)

    Recently invested into a PiSCSI (RaSCSI) add-on that provides my IIci
    with an internet connection and a virtual CD drive by sacrificing an old Raspberry Pi I had left.

    I'm really excited how well the IIci and Usenet communicate together.
    Feels natural.

    You're right, Newswatcher is a much better experience, using that now.
    I connect using a Farallon Etherwave serial to ethernet appletalk bridge.
    It's a pretty nifty peice of hardware. Saves my PDS Slot for other
    nonsense like a IIe card.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From scole@vintageapplemac@gmail.com to comp.sys.mac.vintage on Sat Mar 30 11:00:58 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.vintage

    In article <denodster-1712230339400001@192.168.1.200>, Denodster <denodster@gmail.com> wrote:

    In article <info-ACF699.13284228092023@nntp-new.eternal-september.org>, "Sebastian P." <info@cornica.org> wrote:

    In article <sm502u$nbh$2@dont-email.me>,
    denodster@gmail.com (denodster) wrote:

    Posting on my LC 475 running Internews. This is my first time on Usenet and I'm thrilled to find this group. Running system 7.6.1 and MacIP via an old cisco router. It's been a fun project and I'm thrilled to get to use it like this.

    What kind of hardware are you all running? and how did you get it
    online?

    I'm using MT-Newswatcher 2.4.4 on my Mac IIci. As far as I know, it's
    the last version for 68k Macintoshes. It works really nice! The IIci sports 32 MB RAM (who'd ever need that much RAM anyway, right?)

    Recently invested into a PiSCSI (RaSCSI) add-on that provides my IIci
    with an internet connection and a virtual CD drive by sacrificing an old Raspberry Pi I had left.

    I'm really excited how well the IIci and Usenet communicate together. Feels natural.

    You're right, Newswatcher is a much better experience, using that now.
    I connect using a Farallon Etherwave serial to ethernet appletalk bridge. It's a pretty nifty peice of hardware. Saves my PDS Slot for other
    nonsense like a IIe card.

    I'm using YA-NewsWatcher, Version 4.2.5, on my PowerMac G4 MDD running
    OS9.

    I have been using Thoth recently, too, which was the evolution of
    YA-NW, and also developed by Brian Clark. I've seen people in the past
    talk about Thoth as the apotheosis of Mac newsreader software and it is hellishly fully-featured, but it's pretty fiddly. That said, I was
    getting used to it and it was starting to feel quite intuitive but a
    couple of weeks ago I had a major system collapse on this machine,
    massive instability and kernel panics all over the damn place. I
    couldn't troubleshoot it easily so I simply wiped the drive and started
    again, much less stressful (well, if you ignore the whole headache of
    trying to install bootable OS9 on this machine without a OSX partition,
    but that's a saga for another day!).

    I installed Thoth again but it's asking for registration and I have no
    clue where I got the serial from last time... So, I figured I'd try
    YA-NW instead as I used this a few years ago and... so far so impressed
    tbh! It's a nice piece of software, feels simpler than Thoth by a long
    way, and runs like lightning on this machine!
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114