On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote <XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:
I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.
So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.
So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.
https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm
Notice on one part it says "Criminal"
On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.
While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.
Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.
Thanks for proving my point.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
<XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:
I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.
So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.
So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.
https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm
Notice on one part it says "Criminal"
On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.
While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.
Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.
Thanks for proving my point.
LOL!
Proving your point?
Which one would that be?
Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
Remember that one Brock?
the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
Yes that shows up as well.
Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.
Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law. Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
You are stone cold dead in de market. https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu
You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
<XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:
I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.
So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.
So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.
https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm
Notice on one part it says "Criminal"
On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.
While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.
Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.
Thanks for proving my point.
LOL!
Proving your point?
Which one would that be?
Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
Remember that one Brock?
the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
Yes that shows up as well.
Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.
Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law. Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
You are stone cold dead in de market. https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu
You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.
On 09/12/2025 03:01, Roy S. wrote:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
<XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:
I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.
So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.
So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.
https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm
Notice on one part it says "Criminal"
On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.
While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.
Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.
Thanks for proving my point.
LOL!
Proving your point?
Which one would that be?
Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
Remember that one Brock?
the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your
criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
Yes that shows up as well.
Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.
Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records
regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law. >> Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
You are stone cold dead in de market.
https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu
You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.
Why are you telling folk a pack of lies, "Roy"?
Other folk can read your header information. You do KNOW that, eh?
"David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> news:mpqi7tFbb9kU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 09 Dec 2025 12:15:57 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 09/12/2025 03:01, Roy S. wrote:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:693787bf$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Dec 8, 2025 at 6:28:27 PM MST, ""Roy S."" wrote
<XnsB3AFD0465E55112345678@62.164.182.28>:
I was asked by David B to post the information I recieved via a FOI
request to the Arizona court clerk.
So being that one of the conditions of the court clerk emailing the
case information to me is that I will not share it either
electronically or physically.
I suspect the documents are watermarked so I'm not going down that
path.
So here is some information taken from the document from the court
which shows that snit did indeed have an order of protection filed
against him by his ex wife Anne Glasser.
1. A screenshot of part of the document.
Take note of the case number.
https://ibb.co/n8K2nSTm
Notice on one part it says "Criminal"
On another it says "DR" -- Domestic Relations. That is Civil.
While I do not see any obvious proof that other "screenshot" *COULD
NOT* be real (Carroll talked about using the Console to just modify a
real one at one point), this one is clearly and obviously faked.
Going to ignore most of this nonsense... but in this case it was
trivial to show the image is faked.
Thanks for proving my point.
LOL!
Proving your point?
Which one would that be?
Maybe where you denied that a government site was posted?
Remember that one Brock?
the post is not nonsense, it's just the tip of the iceberg regarding your >>> criminal offenses against your ex wife, who BTW is a common-law wife.
Yes that shows up as well.
Oh and she is no angel either. That shows up too.
Like I said already, it's trivial for anyone to request court records
regarding your criminal, and quite frankly flagrant disregard for the law. >>> Your lies and denials will not work this time Brock.
You are stone cold dead in de market.
https://youtu.be/Xn72TyJkDS8?si=YPgI-itsT4mj9AUu
You cannot squirm your way out of this one Brock.
Why are you telling folk a pack of lies, "Roy"?
Other folk can read your header information. You do KNOW that, eh?
David the dumbass, you do realize people can verify what he shared is true don't you? It doesn't take much effort. He practically provided step by step instructions. Face the facts, dishonest shitstain on the underwear of life - you can't help snit fix his reputation as a very well known lying, obnoxious troll, no matter how hard you try to lie and cover for him.
That's all you're doing here. You aren't helping Snit a bit by doing this. You aren't helping the new comer establish any credibility here with this ruse, either, bro.
It's becoming very obvious as it does with others you've 'invited' here that you gave him your version of the lay of the land prior to his arrival. As I told him the other day/night? If it wasn't for two people I greatly respect vouching for him, I'd already consider him as yet another troll that you're responsible for bringing here.
So whats the end game with this one, anyhow? Is it really about tech discussions, or did you have something else in mind for him to be doing?
Keep in mind, he's already partially exposed...
"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork> news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, 09 Dec 2025 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake' routine.
On 10/12/2025 01:36, Gremlin wrote:
"Roy S." <ukmanchU@uke.ork> news:XnsB3AFE0220500A12345678@62.164.182.25 Tue, >> 09 Dec 2025 03:01:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
LOL! As I suspected, snit opts to try the 'it's not real; it's all fake'
routine.
I've been looking into this too. *The truth WILL out*!
Please comment, if you will, on this conclusion:-
https://i.ibb.co/RGrs1SFS/Screenshot-2025-12-10-at-13-00-58.png
The link they gave:
https://apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess/caselookup.aspx
*IS* a real Arizona Judicial Branch website.
But anyone can tell you “type this case number in” — and if a case does or doesn’t appear, they can spin a story.
The site itself does not confirm that the story told in the post is true
— it only verifies whether such a case number exists.
I was told the lookup and needed a VPN to appear in the USA.
That is already suspicious — the site normally works worldwide without a VPN, or so I have been told elsewhere.
On Dec 9, 2025 at 6:37:01 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB3B0D1BA0AC1DHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
David the dumbass, you do realize people can verify what he shared is
true don't you? It doesn't take much effort. He practically provided
step by step instructions. Face the facts, dishonest shitstain on the
underwear of life - you can't help snit fix his reputation as a very
well known lying, obnoxious troll, no matter how hard you try to lie
and cover for him.
That's all you're doing here. You aren't helping Snit a bit by doing
this. You aren't helping the new comer establish any credibility here
with this ruse, either, bro.
It's becoming very obvious as it does with others you've 'invited' here
that you gave him your version of the lay of the land prior to his
arrival. As I told him the other day/night? If it wasn't for two people
I greatly respect vouching for him, I'd already consider him as yet
another troll that you're responsible for bringing here.
So whats the end game with this one, anyhow? Is it really about tech
discussions, or did you have something else in mind for him to be
doing? Keep in mind, he's already partially exposed...
There is an effort to leave the nonsense in the past. Can you join us in being a part of the solution?
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> news:6938d21b$4$21961$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 10 Dec 2025
01:51:24 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On Dec 9, 2025 at 6:37:01 PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3B0D1BA0AC1DHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
David the dumbass, you do realize people can verify what he shared is
true don't you? It doesn't take much effort. He practically provided
step by step instructions. Face the facts, dishonest shitstain on the
underwear of life - you can't help snit fix his reputation as a very
well known lying, obnoxious troll, no matter how hard you try to lie
and cover for him.
That's all you're doing here. You aren't helping Snit a bit by doing
this. You aren't helping the new comer establish any credibility here
with this ruse, either, bro.
It's becoming very obvious as it does with others you've 'invited' here
that you gave him your version of the lay of the land prior to his
arrival. As I told him the other day/night? If it wasn't for two people
I greatly respect vouching for him, I'd already consider him as yet
another troll that you're responsible for bringing here.
So whats the end game with this one, anyhow? Is it really about tech
discussions, or did you have something else in mind for him to be
doing? Keep in mind, he's already partially exposed...
There is an effort to leave the nonsense in the past. Can you join us in
being a part of the solution?
That's the second time you've mentioned "us" - who is us specifically?
David makes people look like fools with ease. He's been doing it for years. He has zero credibility as a good guy but that hasn't stopped him from inviting people who don't know any better and blindly accept whatever he's already told them about some of us in advance.
You don't need to continue pretending that you're an honest joe who's being unfairly picked on at this point. YOu were able to do what you sought to do. If anything, you owe David Brooks a thank you for making the process as simple for you.
On 12/12/2025 07:44, Gremlin (aka Dustin J. Cook)
David makes people look like fools with ease. He's been doing it for
years.
He has zero credibility as a good guy but that hasn't stopped him from
inviting people who don't know any better and blindly accept whatever
he's
already told them about some of us in advance.
I tell folk the truth Dustin Cook!
I can even show them! Here's your name "up in lights" as I've said before! https://i.ibb.co/sdnRtsq7/Dustin-Cook-name-in-lights-copy-edited.jpg
I also try my best to verify what other folk tell me. Example:-
https://i.ibb.co/DgTYvxkd/For-Dustin.jpg
You don't need to continue pretending that you're an honest joe who's
being
unfairly picked on at this point. YOu were able to do what you sought
to do.
If anything, you owe David Brooks a thank you for making the process as
simple for you.
Brock McNuggets has been nothing but helpful to me on most of the
occasions when I've asked him for help.
I asked him to come to ACW specifically because he *WAS* being picked
upon in other Usenet groups.
On 12/12/2025 07:44, Gremlin (aka Dustin J. Cook)
David makes people look like fools with ease. He's been doing it for
years. He has zero credibility as a good guy but that hasn't stopped
him from inviting people who don't know any better and blindly accept
whatever he's already told them about some of us in advance.
I tell folk the truth Dustin Cook!
I can even show them! Here's your name "up in lights" as I've said
before!
https://i.ibb.co/sdnRtsq7/Dustin-Cook-name-in-lights-copy-edited.jpg
I also try my best to verify what other folk tell me. Example:-
https://i.ibb.co/DgTYvxkd/For-Dustin.jpg
You don't need to continue pretending that you're an honest joe who's
being unfairly picked on at this point. YOu were able to do what you
sought to do. If anything, you owe David Brooks a thank you for making
the process as simple for you.
Brock McNuggets has been nothing but helpful to me on most of the
occasions when I've asked him for help.
I asked him to come to ACW specifically because he *WAS* being picked
upon in other Usenet groups.
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
You were trying to recruit me to help you get even with those
server admins.
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
You were trying to recruit me to help you get even with those
server admins.
Not so. You NEVER listen.
On Dec 13, 2025 at 3:44:59 PM MST, ""David B."" wrote <mq68jbFa4d9U1@mid.individual.net>:
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
You were trying to recruit me to help you get even with those
server admins.
Not so. You NEVER listen.
Gremlin is not doing well. Something is stuck in his head... multiple things. Things which are not true.
* He denies my AIM chat bot code is mine. But it is. No reason to think otherwise and plenty of reason to think it is (who else would use AppleScript for such a purpose, LOL!)
* He denied numbers show up in call logs. They do.
* He insists bizarre things like discounts at shops in MY area (WTF?1?!?)
* He thinks quoting him is somehow "lying".
* He insists my business had no license.
* He insists he should not apologize even for doxxing complete strangers.
Just insanity... and worse he keeps repeating these things. He cannot move on.
I warned him how Carroll would chew him up and spit him out... and we are seeing the proof -- again -- of how I was right.
I wish he could pull himself out from under Carroll's thumb and be his own man. And do as he said he wanted and move forward in peace. You have known him
longer than I have -- did he used to be this "stuck" and unable to move forward from his own delusions?
David, you strut around like you’re some sage of credibility, but
watching you try to act like a “good guy” is like watching a toddler play chess—you don’t understand the board, you don’t understand the pieces, and yet you insist on lecturing everyone else. You’ve done
nothing but flail, point fingers, and hand out fake praise while Gremlin
has been doing the actual work, verifying facts, showing receipts, and keeping names straight. But of course, in your world, someone showing evidence is “being mean,” while your ego gets a free pass. Classic.
And Snit-please. His idea of helping is like a broken GPS: he shows up sometimes, acts like he's guiding people, and then vanishes the moment
it gets tricky. He's useless, you sidekick in incompetence, and somehow still think that makes you heroic. Every “helpful” thing he does is just a cameo in the chaos you contribute to.
Meanwhile, Gremlin is out here making things transparent, exposing the nonsense, and keeping everyone honest. You two? You’re a comedy duo no
one asked for: one puffing up his ego, the other fumbling around like a paperweight trying to look useful. Honestly, it’s impressive how consistently you both manage to make yourselves irrelevant while
claiming the moral high ground.
On 13/12/2025 20:35, Gremlin wrote:
You weren't really emailing me requesting support for
BugHunter.
When did I EVER claim I wanted help with BugHunter?
You were trying to recruit me to help you get even with those
server admins.
Not so. You NEVER listen.
DataPatrol99,
I have stated quite openly that I regard myself as a good guy. I dont
mean that as a claim to sainthood, merely as a statement of intent: I
try to act honestly, verify what Im told, and treat people fairly
unless given a reason not to.
Being a good guy doesnt mean avoiding disagreement or uncomfortable
facts. It means not inventing motives, not relying on abuse, and not >mistaking volume for evidence.
I judge people Gremlin and Snit included by how theyve interacted
with me and by what I can independently verify. That approach has been >consistent for years.
If you have evidence that contradicts anything Ive said, present it. If >there are errors, point them out.
This is indistinguishable from trolling, and I wont be engaging further.
Since I know you
On 14/12/2025 21:20, Kelly Phillips *LIED* again.
Since I know you
No, you don't!
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,090 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 177:36:37 |
| Calls: | 13,923 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 187,023 |
| D/L today: |
10,240 files (2,896M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,455,923 |
