• Re: did this group die?

    From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Fri Nov 1 16:42:34 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    John Hill wrote on Fri, 1 Nov 2024 08:01:46 -0000 (UTC) :

    You will never get trolls to buy in; otherwise they wouldn't be trolls.

    You are correct that the Apple trolls like Alan Baker, Joerg Lorenz, Chris, Alan Browne, Jolly Roger, Hemidactylus, nospam, Lewis, et al., will always defend Apple to the death, no matter the truth - because... hmmm.. Why?

    They'll always make inane excuses for why Apple has more zero-day exploits,
    or why Apple didn't have call recording, or why Apple doesn't allow interoperability, or why Apple products don't have basic hardware, or why Apple always is chintzy on basics such as RAM & battery capacity, etc.

    Why do the Apple trolls inundate this newsgroup with those inane apologies?

    I know why.
    Do you?

    HINT: Message-ID: <vg2vg8$2huv$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
    <https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=17514&group=misc.phone.mobile.iphone#17514>
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Tom Elam@thomas.e.elam@gmail.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 2 16:27:24 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11/1/2024 12:42 PM, Andrews wrote:
    John Hill wrote on Fri, 1 Nov 2024 08:01:46 -0000 (UTC) :

    You will never get trolls to buy in; otherwise they wouldn't be trolls.

    You are correct that the Apple trolls like Alan Baker, Joerg Lorenz, Chris, Alan Browne, Jolly Roger, Hemidactylus, nospam, Lewis, et al., will always defend Apple to the death, no matter the truth - because... hmmm.. Why?

    They'll always make inane excuses for why Apple has more zero-day exploits, or why Apple didn't have call recording, or why Apple doesn't allow interoperability, or why Apple products don't have basic hardware, or why Apple always is chintzy on basics such as RAM & battery capacity, etc.

    Why do the Apple trolls inundate this newsgroup with those inane apologies?

    I know why.
    Do you?

    HINT: Message-ID: <vg2vg8$2huv$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>
    <https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=17514&group=misc.phone.mobile.iphone#17514>

    But Android owners upgrade phones more often than iPhone owners.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/it-s-official-android-phone-owners-upgrade-more-often-than-iphone-users/ar-AA1seZ2t?ocid=entnewsntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=acd4d3617ea848eb984eda2761425876&ei=28

    Explain that
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From sms@scharf.steven@geemail.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 2 15:37:59 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11/2/2024 1:27 PM, Tom Elam wrote:

    <snip>

    But Android owners upgrade phones more often than iPhone owners.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/it-s-official-android-phone- owners-upgrade-more-often-than-iphone-users/ar-AA1seZ2t? ocid=entnewsntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=acd4d3617ea848eb984eda2761425876&ei=28

    Explain that

    Here are some reasons that I can postulate:

    1. Android device makers tend to introduce new features at a more rapid
    pace than Apple does for the iPhone. Apple meters out new features
    slowly to encourage updates but many of those features are not
    sufficiently attractive to warrant an upgrade.

    2. Apple removes features from their devices causing many iPhone owners
    to delay upgrades because they don't want to lose features.
    a)What are the best selling iPhones of all time? The 6/6+ and
    6s/6s+, the last two models that had a headphone jack.

    b) A lot of U.S. iPhone users have stuck with the 13/13 Pro because
    they don't want to lose the physical SIM card slot.

    3. iPhones are more expensive than comparable Android phones so the
    Android owner is more willing to spend the money on an upgrade.

    4. Battery replacement on iPhones is relatively inexpensive and widely available and you get a recently manufactured battery, not NOS (new old
    stock) that has deteriorated.

    5. iPhone users care less about features like higher-quality music
    playback while Android users want the latest aptX or LDAC codec. Since
    Airpods don't support these codec anyway, there's no reason to worry
    about the phone having that codec.

    6. Carriers offer better upgrade deals on Android devices than iOS
    devices. You can often get a "free" Android phone, even on prepaid
    carriers, while iPhones have subsidy but much lower.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@hugybear@gmx.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 2 22:20:28 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 02.11.24 18:37, sms wrote:
    On 11/2/2024 1:27 PM, Tom Elam wrote:

    <snip>

    But Android owners upgrade phones more often than iPhone owners.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/it-s-official-android-phone-
    owners-upgrade-more-often-than-iphone-users/ar-AA1seZ2t?
    ocid=entnewsntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=acd4d3617ea848eb984eda2761425876&ei=28

    Explain that

    Here are some reasons that I can postulate:

    (Crap snipped)

    You are a speculating idiot and Troll not delivering the smallest piece
    of evidence for anything.
    --
    "De gustibus non est disputandum."
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From *Hemidactylus*@ecphoric@allspamis.invalid to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sun Nov 3 02:26:32 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote:
    On 02.11.24 18:37, sms wrote:
    On 11/2/2024 1:27 PM, Tom Elam wrote:

    <snip>

    But Android owners upgrade phones more often than iPhone owners.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/it-s-official-android-phone-
    owners-upgrade-more-often-than-iphone-users/ar-AA1seZ2t?
    ocid=entnewsntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=acd4d3617ea848eb984eda2761425876&ei=28

    Explain that

    Here are some reasons that I can postulate:

    (Crap snipped)

    You are a speculating idiot and Troll not delivering the smallest piece
    of evidence for anything.

    +1

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sun Nov 3 03:36:00 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Sun, 03 Nov 2024 02:26:32 +0000 :

    Here are some reasons that I can postulate:

    What I find interesting is how the Apple trolls like Hemidactylus, Joerg,
    Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Jolly Roger, et. al are *desperate* to find something (anything!) they can say is better on an iPhone than Android.

    These Apple trolls scour the Internet to find something to be proud of.
    Why?

    Because their ego is wrapped up in their choice of paying through the nose. They need to justify horrendous costs of Apple products (& lack of value).

    So what do they pick to justify that they "belong" to a crowd of people who willingly pay twice what the iPhone is actually worth & then hold on to it?

    This...
    *It's official: Android phone owners upgrade more often than iPhone users*
    <https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/it-s-official-android-phone-owners-upgrade-more-often-than-iphone-users/>

    Which is based on this...
    *iPhone Owners Hold on to Their Phones Longer than Android Owners*
    <https://cirpapple.substack.com/p/iphone-owners-hold-on-to-their-phones>

    HINT: If I paid twice what an iPhone was worth & got half the value, I'd
    not want to buy another one all that soon either - so I'm with you guys.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Tom Elam@thomas.e.elam@gmail.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sun Nov 3 08:18:59 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11/2/2024 6:37 PM, sms wrote:
    On 11/2/2024 1:27 PM, Tom Elam wrote:

    <snip>

    But Android owners upgrade phones more often than iPhone owners.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/it-s-official-android-phone-
    owners-upgrade-more-often-than-iphone-users/ar-AA1seZ2t?
    ocid=entnewsntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=acd4d3617ea848eb984eda2761425876&ei=28

    Explain that

    Here are some reasons that I can postulate:

    1. Android device makers tend to introduce new features at a more rapid
    pace than Apple does for the iPhone. Apple meters out new features
    slowly to encourage updates but many of those features are not
    sufficiently attractive to warrant an upgrade.

    2. Apple removes features from their devices causing many iPhone owners
    to delay upgrades because they don't want to lose features.
       a)What are the best selling iPhones of all time? The 6/6+ and
    6s/6s+, the last two models that had a headphone jack.

       b) A lot of U.S. iPhone users have stuck with the 13/13 Pro because they don't want to lose the physical SIM card slot.

    3. iPhones are more expensive than comparable Android phones so the
    Android owner is more willing to spend the money on an upgrade.

    4. Battery replacement on iPhones is relatively inexpensive and widely available and you get a recently manufactured battery, not NOS (new old stock) that has deteriorated.

    5. iPhone users care less about features like higher-quality music
    playback while Android users want the latest aptX or LDAC codec. Since Airpods don't support these codec anyway, there's no reason to worry
    about the phone having that codec.

    6. Carriers offer better upgrade deals on Android devices than iOS
    devices. You can often get a "free" Android phone, even on prepaid
    carriers, while iPhones have subsidy but much lower.

    As a former long-time Android phone and tablet user and defender I can postulate too. Android feature roll-outs and OS versions happened
    slowly, if at all, and were very uneven across device brands. I never
    got more than one OS version update on the many HTC, Moto and Samsung
    devices I owned. I had to upgrade to get the latest, and even then new
    phones often did not have the latest OS installed.

    I have had to replace a battery on my iPhone 14. That was because I
    tried wireless charging in the car that overheated the phone. The
    replacement was easy. I took it to the local Apple Store and they had it
    back to me in 2 hours. That was 6 months ago and battery life is still
    100%. The cost? $0. AppleCare+ took care of it. No questions asked. I
    have owned iPhones and iPads since the iPhone 6s era. That's the only
    battery replaced spanning 8 years and 6s, SE and 14 Pro versions.

    I'll never go back. There is no Android Store 15 minutes away. My phone
    and tablet get annual OS updates on the day they are released, and
    regular feature and security updates too that.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sun Nov 3 15:14:10 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Tom Elam wrote on Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:18:59 -0500 :

    As a former long-time Android phone and tablet user and defender I can postulate too. Android feature roll-outs and OS versions happened
    slowly, if at all, and were very uneven across device brands. I never
    got more than one OS version update on the many HTC, Moto and Samsung devices I owned. I had to upgrade to get the latest, and even then new phones often did not have the latest OS installed.]

    FACTS. Not propaganda please.

    You are wrong. More to the point, your data is old. It's no longer valid. You're five to ten years behind in all your data - so you're just wrong.

    If you used Android only two or three years ago, you won't recognize
    Android of today because that's how much has changed in a short time.

    a. The iPhone has far more bugs than Android now (and far more exploits!).
    b. The iPhone has far shorter operating system support than Android now.
    c. With respect to fragmentation, even that is very old data.

    More Samsung devices alone are sold than iPhones are, where the
    "fragmentation" you decry doesn't exist if you stick with Pixels &
    Samsungs.

    To complain that other brands provide valuable choices isn't really a fair complaint because you don't get ANY of those choices with Apple.

    And Apple's puny five years of promised supprot pales in comparison to the Samsung and Pixel promise of seven years of full hotfix support.

    Remember, of all common consumer operating systems, Apple is the only one
    with support so bad they only fully support a single release at a time.

    Those are facts. Modern facts. Not facts from ten years ago.
    Those are facts from today.

    You're welcome to form a strong opinion based on old data, but just say
    that your data doesn't take into account the reality of today's devices.

    I have had to replace a battery on my iPhone 14. That was because I
    tried wireless charging in the car that overheated the phone. The replacement was easy. I took it to the local Apple Store and they had it back to me in 2 hours.

    That's absurd. My Android debuted around the time of the iPhone 12, and
    it's still going strong. But it has a modern-sized battery.

    No iPhone in the world has a batter as big as the one in my free phone.
    That's the main reason iPhone batteries need to be replaced more often.

    Last we checked Apple replaces almost fifteen million batteries in the USA alone per year. Think about that. It's huge. Apple batteries are crap.

    Not a single iPhone battery is even close in capacity to that of my free Android phone (which only retailed for about two hundred dollars MSRP).

    That was 6 months ago and battery life is still
    100%. The cost? $0. AppleCare+ took care of it.

    Remember I said that the Apple trolls are ignorant? Remember?
    Guess what? How did you get that AppleCare+ without paying for it?

    No questions asked.

    I have a question for you.

    Since almost nobody on Android pays for any extra warranty, why do most
    Apple iPhone owners pay for AppleCare+ when it's never needed?

    Think about that.

    Apple owners are so terrified of the horrendous repair costs, that they'll
    pay any amount of subscription fees just to not have to worry about them.

    have owned iPhones and iPads since the iPhone 6s era. That's the only battery replaced spanning 8 years and 6s, SE and 14 Pro versions.

    The Apple iPads actually have decently sized batteries as it's only the
    iPhone that uses comically cheap chintzy batteries in terms of capacity.

    Every time you replace a battery (and millions are replaced every year!),
    Apple is laughing at you AppleCare+ owners all the way to the bank.

    I'll never go back. There is no Android Store 15 minutes away. My phone
    and tablet get annual OS updates on the day they are released, and
    regular feature and security updates too that.

    The one thing you're right about is that there is no such thing as an
    "Android Store", which nobody on Android needs - but iPhone owners do.

    I have plenty of Apple devices and when I take them to the Genius Bar, the "Genius" at the Apple Store asks me what a Decibel is when I tell him that
    I teste the iPhone side-by-side with my free Samsung & the Wi-Fi stinks.

    These "Genius" Bar employees don't know how things work in the real world
    as you can't test Wi-Fi without knowing what a Decibel means.

    All the Genius Bar employees do is test the phone for basic stuff (like
    water penetration) and recommend a new iPhone if it fails their tests.

    Remember, Apple lost the lawsuits for exactly that reason.

    Even Apple didn't tell its Genius Bar employees that they purposefully
    lowered the life of the iPhone (which they paid a criminal fine for!).

    Still... the free Apple Store Genius Bar (and free classes) are a nice
    touch because Apple knows owners are petrified by the complexity of tech.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Nick Cine@nickcine@is.invalid to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sun Nov 3 10:44:53 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:14:10 -0000 (UTC), Andrews wrote:

    Tom Elam wrote on Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:18:59 -0500 :

    As a former long-time Android phone and tablet user and defender I can
    postulate too. Android feature roll-outs and OS versions happened
    slowly, if at all, and were very uneven across device brands. I never
    got more than one OS version update on the many HTC, Moto and Samsung
    devices I owned. I had to upgrade to get the latest, and even then new
    phones often did not have the latest OS installed.]

    FACTS. Not propaganda please.

    You are wrong. More to the point, your data is old. It's no longer valid. You're five to ten years behind in all your data - so you're just wrong.

    If you used Android only two or three years ago, you won't recognize
    Android of today because that's how much has changed in a short time.

    a. The iPhone has far more bugs than Android now (and far more exploits!).
    b. The iPhone has far shorter operating system support than Android now.
    c. With respect to fragmentation, even that is very old data.

    More Samsung devices alone are sold than iPhones are, where the "fragmentation" you decry doesn't exist if you stick with Pixels &
    Samsungs.

    To complain that other brands provide valuable choices isn't really a fair complaint because you don't get ANY of those choices with Apple.

    And Apple's puny five years of promised supprot pales in comparison to the Samsung and Pixel promise of seven years of full hotfix support.

    Remember, of all common consumer operating systems, Apple is the only one with support so bad they only fully support a single release at a time.

    Those are facts. Modern facts. Not facts from ten years ago.
    Those are facts from today.

    You're welcome to form a strong opinion based on old data, but just say
    that your data doesn't take into account the reality of today's devices.

    I have had to replace a battery on my iPhone 14. That was because I
    tried wireless charging in the car that overheated the phone. The
    replacement was easy. I took it to the local Apple Store and they had it
    back to me in 2 hours.

    That's absurd. My Android debuted around the time of the iPhone 12, and
    it's still going strong. But it has a modern-sized battery.

    No iPhone in the world has a batter as big as the one in my free phone. That's the main reason iPhone batteries need to be replaced more often.

    Last we checked Apple replaces almost fifteen million batteries in the USA alone per year. Think about that. It's huge. Apple batteries are crap.

    Not a single iPhone battery is even close in capacity to that of my free Android phone (which only retailed for about two hundred dollars MSRP).

    That was 6 months ago and battery life is still
    100%. The cost? $0. AppleCare+ took care of it.

    Remember I said that the Apple trolls are ignorant? Remember?
    Guess what? How did you get that AppleCare+ without paying for it?

    No questions asked.

    I have a question for you.

    Since almost nobody on Android pays for any extra warranty, why do most
    Apple iPhone owners pay for AppleCare+ when it's never needed?

    Think about that.

    Apple owners are so terrified of the horrendous repair costs, that they'll pay any amount of subscription fees just to not have to worry about them.

    have owned iPhones and iPads since the iPhone 6s era. That's the only
    battery replaced spanning 8 years and 6s, SE and 14 Pro versions.

    The Apple iPads actually have decently sized batteries as it's only the iPhone that uses comically cheap chintzy batteries in terms of capacity.

    Every time you replace a battery (and millions are replaced every year!), Apple is laughing at you AppleCare+ owners all the way to the bank.

    I'll never go back. There is no Android Store 15 minutes away. My phone
    and tablet get annual OS updates on the day they are released, and
    regular feature and security updates too that.

    The one thing you're right about is that there is no such thing as an "Android Store", which nobody on Android needs - but iPhone owners do.

    I have plenty of Apple devices and when I take them to the Genius Bar, the "Genius" at the Apple Store asks me what a Decibel is when I tell him that
    I teste the iPhone side-by-side with my free Samsung & the Wi-Fi stinks.

    These "Genius" Bar employees don't know how things work in the real world
    as you can't test Wi-Fi without knowing what a Decibel means.

    All the Genius Bar employees do is test the phone for basic stuff (like
    water penetration) and recommend a new iPhone if it fails their tests.

    Remember, Apple lost the lawsuits for exactly that reason.

    Even Apple didn't tell its Genius Bar employees that they purposefully lowered the life of the iPhone (which they paid a criminal fine for!).

    Still... the free Apple Store Genius Bar (and free classes) are a nice
    touch because Apple knows owners are petrified by the complexity of tech.

    But how much does that Apple Care added warranty cost anyways?
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sun Nov 3 09:55:25 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-03 09:44, Nick Cine wrote:
    On Sun, 3 Nov 2024 15:14:10 -0000 (UTC), Andrews wrote:

    Tom Elam wrote on Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:18:59 -0500 :

    As a former long-time Android phone and tablet user and defender I can
    postulate too. Android feature roll-outs and OS versions happened
    slowly, if at all, and were very uneven across device brands. I never
    got more than one OS version update on the many HTC, Moto and Samsung
    devices I owned. I had to upgrade to get the latest, and even then new
    phones often did not have the latest OS installed.]

    FACTS. Not propaganda please.

    You are wrong. More to the point, your data is old. It's no longer valid.
    You're five to ten years behind in all your data - so you're just wrong.

    If you used Android only two or three years ago, you won't recognize
    Android of today because that's how much has changed in a short time.

    a. The iPhone has far more bugs than Android now (and far more exploits!). >> b. The iPhone has far shorter operating system support than Android now.
    c. With respect to fragmentation, even that is very old data.

    More Samsung devices alone are sold than iPhones are, where the
    "fragmentation" you decry doesn't exist if you stick with Pixels &
    Samsungs.

    To complain that other brands provide valuable choices isn't really a fair >> complaint because you don't get ANY of those choices with Apple.

    And Apple's puny five years of promised supprot pales in comparison to the >> Samsung and Pixel promise of seven years of full hotfix support.

    Remember, of all common consumer operating systems, Apple is the only one
    with support so bad they only fully support a single release at a time.

    Those are facts. Modern facts. Not facts from ten years ago.
    Those are facts from today.

    You're welcome to form a strong opinion based on old data, but just say
    that your data doesn't take into account the reality of today's devices.

    I have had to replace a battery on my iPhone 14. That was because I
    tried wireless charging in the car that overheated the phone. The
    replacement was easy. I took it to the local Apple Store and they had it >>> back to me in 2 hours.

    That's absurd. My Android debuted around the time of the iPhone 12, and
    it's still going strong. But it has a modern-sized battery.

    No iPhone in the world has a batter as big as the one in my free phone.
    That's the main reason iPhone batteries need to be replaced more often.

    Last we checked Apple replaces almost fifteen million batteries in the USA >> alone per year. Think about that. It's huge. Apple batteries are crap.

    Not a single iPhone battery is even close in capacity to that of my free
    Android phone (which only retailed for about two hundred dollars MSRP).

    That was 6 months ago and battery life is still
    100%. The cost? $0. AppleCare+ took care of it.

    Remember I said that the Apple trolls are ignorant? Remember?
    Guess what? How did you get that AppleCare+ without paying for it?

    No questions asked.

    I have a question for you.

    Since almost nobody on Android pays for any extra warranty, why do most
    Apple iPhone owners pay for AppleCare+ when it's never needed?

    Think about that.

    Apple owners are so terrified of the horrendous repair costs, that they'll >> pay any amount of subscription fees just to not have to worry about them.

    have owned iPhones and iPads since the iPhone 6s era. That's the only
    battery replaced spanning 8 years and 6s, SE and 14 Pro versions.

    The Apple iPads actually have decently sized batteries as it's only the
    iPhone that uses comically cheap chintzy batteries in terms of capacity.

    Every time you replace a battery (and millions are replaced every year!),
    Apple is laughing at you AppleCare+ owners all the way to the bank.

    I'll never go back. There is no Android Store 15 minutes away. My phone
    and tablet get annual OS updates on the day they are released, and
    regular feature and security updates too that.

    The one thing you're right about is that there is no such thing as an
    "Android Store", which nobody on Android needs - but iPhone owners do.

    I have plenty of Apple devices and when I take them to the Genius Bar, the >> "Genius" at the Apple Store asks me what a Decibel is when I tell him that >> I teste the iPhone side-by-side with my free Samsung & the Wi-Fi stinks.

    These "Genius" Bar employees don't know how things work in the real world
    as you can't test Wi-Fi without knowing what a Decibel means.

    All the Genius Bar employees do is test the phone for basic stuff (like
    water penetration) and recommend a new iPhone if it fails their tests.

    Remember, Apple lost the lawsuits for exactly that reason.

    Even Apple didn't tell its Genius Bar employees that they purposefully
    lowered the life of the iPhone (which they paid a criminal fine for!).

    Still... the free Apple Store Genius Bar (and free classes) are a nice
    touch because Apple knows owners are petrified by the complexity of tech.

    But how much does that Apple Care added warranty cost anyways?

    Do you notice the number of assertions that Andrew/Arlen makes that he declares are "facts"?

    "almost nobody on Android pays for any extra warranty"

    Etc.

    :-)
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.system on Mon Nov 4 00:06:24 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Sun, 03 Nov 2024 23:29:29 +0000 :

    2. Apple removes features from their devices causing many iPhone owners >>> to delay upgrades because they don't want to lose features.
    a)What are the best selling iPhones of all time? The 6/6+ and
    6s/6s+, the last two models that had a headphone jack.

    The SE (1st gen) was the last model launched with a headphone jack. Plus
    was significantly cheaper than either the 6 or 6s. So why didn't it have
    the highest sales figures?

    For those too behind the times to use Bluetooth headphones there are these Lightning adaptors that provide ancient headphone jack capacity. With Bluetooth I can walk around the house untethered to my phone. Progress.

    For those who never took a marketing class in college, Apple strategically removes functionality from its devices so that people have to buy it back.

    Apple made hundreds of millions of dollars each year by removing this basic functionality (where Apple laughs all the way to the bank with that money).

    It's Apple's marketing strategy to corral users by limiting their choices.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Tom Elam@thomas.e.elam@gmail.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Nov 4 08:42:11 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11/3/2024 10:14 AM, Andrews wrote:
    Tom Elam wrote on Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:18:59 -0500 :

    As a former long-time Android phone and tablet user and defender I can
    postulate too. Android feature roll-outs and OS versions happened
    slowly, if at all, and were very uneven across device brands. I never
    got more than one OS version update on the many HTC, Moto and Samsung
    devices I owned. I had to upgrade to get the latest, and even then new
    phones often did not have the latest OS installed.]

    FACTS. Not propaganda please.

    You are wrong. More to the point, your data is old. It's no longer valid. You're five to ten years behind in all your data - so you're just wrong.

    If you used Android only two or three years ago, you won't recognize
    Android of today because that's how much has changed in a short time.

    a. The iPhone has far more bugs than Android now (and far more exploits!).
    b. The iPhone has far shorter operating system support than Android now.
    c. With respect to fragmentation, even that is very old data.

    More Samsung devices alone are sold than iPhones are, where the "fragmentation" you decry doesn't exist if you stick with Pixels &
    Samsungs.

    To complain that other brands provide valuable choices isn't really a fair complaint because you don't get ANY of those choices with Apple.

    And Apple's puny five years of promised supprot pales in comparison to the Samsung and Pixel promise of seven years of full hotfix support.

    Remember, of all common consumer operating systems, Apple is the only one with support so bad they only fully support a single release at a time.

    Those are facts. Modern facts. Not facts from ten years ago.
    Those are facts from today.

    You're welcome to form a strong opinion based on old data, but just say
    that your data doesn't take into account the reality of today's devices.

    I have had to replace a battery on my iPhone 14. That was because I
    tried wireless charging in the car that overheated the phone. The
    replacement was easy. I took it to the local Apple Store and they had it
    back to me in 2 hours.

    That's absurd. My Android debuted around the time of the iPhone 12, and
    it's still going strong. But it has a modern-sized battery.

    No iPhone in the world has a batter as big as the one in my free phone. That's the main reason iPhone batteries need to be replaced more often.

    Last we checked Apple replaces almost fifteen million batteries in the USA alone per year. Think about that. It's huge. Apple batteries are crap.

    Not a single iPhone battery is even close in capacity to that of my free Android phone (which only retailed for about two hundred dollars MSRP).

    That was 6 months ago and battery life is still
    100%. The cost? $0. AppleCare+ took care of it.

    Remember I said that the Apple trolls are ignorant? Remember?
    Guess what? How did you get that AppleCare+ without paying for it?

    No questions asked.

    I have a question for you.

    Since almost nobody on Android pays for any extra warranty, why do most
    Apple iPhone owners pay for AppleCare+ when it's never needed?

    Think about that.

    Apple owners are so terrified of the horrendous repair costs, that they'll pay any amount of subscription fees just to not have to worry about them.

    have owned iPhones and iPads since the iPhone 6s era. That's the only
    battery replaced spanning 8 years and 6s, SE and 14 Pro versions.

    The Apple iPads actually have decently sized batteries as it's only the iPhone that uses comically cheap chintzy batteries in terms of capacity.

    Every time you replace a battery (and millions are replaced every year!), Apple is laughing at you AppleCare+ owners all the way to the bank.

    I'll never go back. There is no Android Store 15 minutes away. My phone
    and tablet get annual OS updates on the day they are released, and
    regular feature and security updates too that.

    The one thing you're right about is that there is no such thing as an "Android Store", which nobody on Android needs - but iPhone owners do.

    I have plenty of Apple devices and when I take them to the Genius Bar, the "Genius" at the Apple Store asks me what a Decibel is when I tell him that
    I teste the iPhone side-by-side with my free Samsung & the Wi-Fi stinks.

    These "Genius" Bar employees don't know how things work in the real world
    as you can't test Wi-Fi without knowing what a Decibel means.

    All the Genius Bar employees do is test the phone for basic stuff (like
    water penetration) and recommend a new iPhone if it fails their tests.

    Remember, Apple lost the lawsuits for exactly that reason.

    Even Apple didn't tell its Genius Bar employees that they purposefully lowered the life of the iPhone (which they paid a criminal fine for!).

    Still... the free Apple Store Genius Bar (and free classes) are a nice
    touch because Apple knows owners are petrified by the complexity of tech.

    Just a few replies.

    I dropped my iPad 9 and cracked the screen. AppleCare+ replaced the iPad.

    The Genius Bar people are incredibly helpful. I took an AirTag in that
    had stopped working. The tech checked it and recommended a different
    battery brand. That fixed it.

    I bought a M1 Macbook and it bricked after 14 days. The Genius Bar tech offered to get it fixed but I asked for and received a full refund.

    As for software and hardware support Apple far surpasses Android. But
    you don't have to believe me.

    https://news.techable.com/apples-software-support-for-iphones-how-long/

    "Apple typically provides iOS updates for iPhones for about six to eight years. For example, the iPhone 15 series, released in September 2023, is expected to receive updates until 2031. Similarly, the iPhone 14 series, launched in 2022, will be supported until 2029. Older models like the
    iPhone 8 and iPhone X, released in 2017, have recently reached the end
    of their update cycle as of 2023.

    Apple’s support isn’t limited to just software updates. The company also offers hardware support for about five to seven years after the last
    sale date of the product. This means users can get their devices
    serviced or repaired at Apple Stores and authorized service providers
    during this period. This dual support system ensures that iPhones remain functional and secure long after their initial release​.

    Most Android manufacturers, including major brands like Samsung and
    Google, typically offer around three to four years of updates. For
    instance, Google’s Pixel phones have started to offer five years of
    updates, but this still falls short of Apple’s standard. OnePlus offers three years of major updates and four years of security updates, while Motorola and Sony lag behind with even shorter support periods​​."

    https://www.businessinsider.com/guides/tech/iphone-vs-android

    "Apple has a consistent history of keeping older iPhone models secure
    against common security threats."

    "Android manufacturers have a comparatively poor history of keeping
    their phones supported with software and security updates."

    "Apple keeps more generations of iPhones supported with security updates
    than any Android phone maker we know about."

    But facts will never convince you.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Nov 4 16:14:12 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    "Tom Elam wrote on Mon, 4 Nov 2024 08:42:11 -0500 :

    Just a few replies.

    I dropped my iPad 9 and cracked the screen. AppleCare+ replaced the iPad.

    Hi Tom Elam,
    You don't seem to be like an Apple zealot so I converse with you assuming
    you own adult assessment skills (which is a normal way of conversing).

    All phones come with an initial free warranty from the OEM & the seller.

    And trust me, I *use* those free warranties! It's well known on this
    newsgroup T-Mobile gave me a handful of free Samsung Galaxy A32-5G phones
    in April of 2021, and within the two year warranty period, I broke two of
    them. And T-Mobile replaced both. For free. I'm on the third one still.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/YC1B906F/tmopromo01.jpg> A32-5G & iPhone 12 contract
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Xq5SpS4D/tmopromo02.jpg> $15/mo iPhone,$0/mo Android
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nhpbcP50/tmopromo04.jpg> $100 for 6 lines + $16 fees

    All under the seller's warranty. I didn't even have to go to Samsung.

    When T-Mobile replaces a phone under warranty, they insist (rightly so) on seeing the old phone in person (at the T-Mobile store - which is similar in concept but not in implementation to your vaunted "Apple Store").

    They charged me $20 for the first & $25 for the second (prices went up).
    But wait. I complained that it's not my fault the phone broke.

    So they credited me the amount ahead of time (before I even went to the
    T-Mobil Store (which is akin to your beloved "Apple Store" in this case).

    Free phone. Free replacement. Multiple free replacement. Under warranty.
    Free warranty too!

    The Genius Bar people are incredibly helpful. I took an AirTag in that
    had stopped working. The tech checked it and recommended a different
    battery brand. That fixed it.

    I never disagree with someone whose assessments are based on fact.

    I fully agree the Genius Bar blueshirts are "incredibly helpful" indeed.
    I've set up many an appointment for my aging aunt, for example, there.

    She *loves* visiting them as they are patient with her & explain it all.
    I can't do that with her. She drives me nuts. All those dumb questions.

    It's like she didn't live through the computer age that we all lived in.

    I started in the sixties with computers - and we didn't have Genius Bar
    help then - where I learned to figure things out when they didn't work.

    There is no doubt of the veracity of your assessment that the Genius Bar employees are "incredibly helpful" in testing your device (but only in the
    way they're taught to test it) and in recommending an Apple replacement.

    No doubt about it.
    They are incredibly helpful in testing & recommending a new device.

    That's their job, by the way.
    They're salesmen too.

    Do you doubt my assessment?
    Well then, are you aware of what has been in the news for many years?

    Apple even got sued over that exact practice we both agree on Apple does.
    Apple was even accused of a crime for exactly that same practice too.

    And Apple paid the fine for both of those (which is well known).
    a. One was half a billion dollars in settlement agreement.
    b. The other was a paltry few million dollars for the crime.
    c. But Apple had to publicly admit (for only 30 days) that they did it.

    After the 30 days expired, Apple took down the ad on their main French
    website that they had committed the crime and that they'd not do it again.

    This is well known as we've discussed this upmpteen times on this ng.

    I bought a M1 Macbook and it bricked after 14 days. The Genius Bar tech offered to get it fixed but I asked for and received a full refund.

    Again, I don't doubt the veracity of your fact above, but I might question
    your elation on the assessment that the Genius Bar is who did that for you.

    I bought a ton of iPads and Android tablets at Costco, for example.
    And I can return them for a "full refund" within three months.

    Three months is way better than your measly two weeks, right?
    No questions asked.

    In California, you can get a full refund after you buy a phone for a month
    (I think it's a month - but it could be only half a month).

    No questions asked.

    My point is I don't doubt the accuracy of your fact; I simply state your assessment that it's anything unusual to refund your money in full after a measly two weeks when I can get that same refund for much longer.

    Without the Genius Bar being involved at all.

    As for software and hardware support Apple far surpasses Android.

    Again, I ask you to question your assessment since I probably own more
    Apple mobile devices than you do, so I'm well aware of their support.

    I've worked with computers since the sixties so I'm not fooled at all by Apple's rather clever advertising on support. I happen to know the facts.

    What you are doing is you parrot exactly what Apple told you to parrot.
    But parroting Apple propaganda requires you to back up that propaganda.

    Let me ask you some simple factual questions to test your knowledge:
    Q: How many years does Apple have a written promise to support iPhones?
    [Please put a single-digit number of years here = ?]
    Q: How many years does Google have a written promise to support Pixels?
    [Please put a single-digit number of years here = ?]
    Q: How many years does Samsung have a written promise to support Galaxies?
    [Please put a single-digit number of years here = ?]

    Since two of those numbers are the same, we're only looking at two numbers. What are they?

    Apple full support = ?
    Google/Samsung full support = ?

    When you fill in that single digit, come back and tell us which company has
    the *worst support* in that mix. Tell us if it is Apple or Google/Samsung.

    But you don't have to believe me.

    If you're not an Apple troll like Jolly Roger, nospam, Lewis, JF Mezei,
    Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, et. al, then
    you will realize that I'm a normal person who believes in facts.

    My assessments are based on facts. Not (rather clever) Apple propaganda.
    Facts.

    As such, unlike the Apple trolls listed above, I *click* on all URLs.
    And I read them. Most importantly, I *understand* what they say.

    So let's click on your URL you scoured the Internet to find. Shall we?

    https://news.techable.com/apples-software-support-for-iphones-how-long/ "Apple typically provides iOS updates for iPhones for about six to eight years. For example, the iPhone 15 series, released in September 2023, is expected to receive updates until 2031. Similarly, the iPhone 14 series, launched in 2022, will be supported until 2029. Older models like the
    iPhone 8 and iPhone X, released in 2017, have recently reached the end
    of their update cycle as of 2023.

    Jesus Christ. Did you even *read* your own cite before you suggested it? Seriously.

    The fact is Apple has the *worst hotfix support* in the computer industry.
    Bar none.

    That's just a fact.
    It's not propaganda.

    No common consumer operating system has worse support than Apple.
    None.

    Everyone is better. By far. Linux. Android. Windows. All of them.

    You don't know the difference between "support" & "full support" do you?
    You don't have a clue, right?

    And yet, the difference between "support" & "full support" is astounding.

    Do you know Android typically provides updates to *all* Android phones over Android 10 over the Internet - every single month - that's "support".

    That's *billions* of Android phones being updated every single month.
    Forever. There is no End of Life (EOL) date. That's "support" for you.
    And even if there was an EOL date from Google - it's all open sourced.

    Likewise, do you know that Microsoft provides "support" for Windows 10
    since, oh, I don't know, basically fifteen years ago if you count that the operating system was updated for free since around about then.

    But even if you only count Windows 10, and if you limit the years to "full support", it's still clear Windows kicks everyone's ass, even Android.

    Google and Samsung promise 7 years of full support. It's in writing.
    Everyone knows this.

    Apple promises only 5 years of full support. That's in writing too.
    Everyone (but you) knows this too.

    Please learn the difference between "support" & "full support" please.

    In *both* cases, Apple's "support/full support" is the worst of all.
    Look it up. We've discussed this many times on this newsgroup alone.

    Apple's support isn't limited to just software updates. The company also offers hardware support for about five to seven years after the last
    sale date of the product. This means users can get their devices
    serviced or repaired at Apple Stores and authorized service providers
    during this period. This dual support system ensures that iPhones remain functional and secure long after their initial release'.

    The fact is nobody's "support" is "limited to just software updates".
    Not Microsoft. Not Google. Not Samsung. Not Apple.

    Windows has "hardware support" for over fifteen years for example.
    They're called drivers.

    The fact you don't know the difference is probably why you parrot
    propaganda which is fed to you by Apple (rather clever) marketing.

    Learn to understand facts.

    Apple's promised full support is only five years. Face it. That's a fact. Google & Samsung promise seven years of full support. That's just a fact.

    Microsoft doesn't promise, but they've fully supported Windows 10 since forever, so both the 5 & 7 years of phones pales in comparison to PCs.

    You clearly do not have a college degree because in order to pass any test,
    you need to be able to differentiate between things like mere "support"
    (which Apple's is the *worst* in the industry on) and "full support"
    (which, interestingly, Apple is still the *worst in the industry* on).

    Stop parroting Apple propaganda.
    State the facts.

    Most Android manufacturers, including major brands like Samsung and
    Google, typically offer around three to four years of updates.

    Remember I said all your assumptions were based on old data.
    Hence, remember I said everything you said is wrong?

    Well, it's wrong again.
    Look it up.

    We've discussed this many times on Android & Apple newsgroups.
    Google/Samsung both promise in writing 7 years of full support now.
    Apple only promises five in writing.

    With those current facts, whom do you think now has the *worst* support?

    For
    instance, Google's Pixel phones have started to offer five years of
    updates, but this still falls short of Apple's standard. OnePlus offers three years of major updates and four years of security updates, while Motorola and Sony lag behind with even shorter support periods''." https://www.businessinsider.com/guides/tech/iphone-vs-android

    As I repeatedly have shown to you, all your data is old.
    So all your assessments are wrong.

    Google & Samsung both promise in writing 7 years of full support.
    Apple only promises five.

    Those are facts.
    An adult makes his own assessments based on facts.

    Not propaganda.
    Please stop parroting Apple's (rather clever) propaganda.

    I do have a college degree. A few of them. I'm not stupid.
    You can't pass those hard tests parroting mere marketing propaganda.

    "Apple has a consistent history of keeping older iPhone models secure against common security threats."

    And yet, everyone knows that Apple has more exploits than Android.
    Lots more.

    Again, that's just a fact.
    It's a government statistic that is updated every single day by CISA.

    All you do is parrot Apple's (rather clever) advertising propaganda.
    You don't know any facts.

    Hence your assessment of Apple security is not based on the fact that Apple
    has more zero-day exploits than Android - by far - that's just a fact.

    We've covered this many times in this newsgroup. Look it up.

    "Android manufacturers have a comparatively poor history of keeping
    their phones supported with software and security updates."

    "Apple keeps more generations of iPhones supported with security updates than any Android phone maker we know about."

    But facts will never convince you.

    And yet, my assessments are based on the facts.
    Yours are based on old facts.

    All your assessments, by the way, Tom Elam, were true years ago.
    But they're all wrong now.

    Please base your assessments like an adult bases his assessments upon.
    Facts.

    Also, please learn the difference between "support" (which every computer manufacturer does) and "full support" (both of which it turns out, Apple
    has the *worst in the industry* on). Those are just facts, Tom Elam.

    Facts we've covered in tremendous depth on this newsgroup many times.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.ipad on Mon Nov 4 16:18:36 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:10:22 +0000 :

    In five years I'm on my third pair of BT earpods. In the flip side, I still >> have wired headphones that are decades old which work perfectly well.
    Progress?

    I have higher quality headphones not "pods". And they hold a charge for
    quite a time. Not being tethered is progress as is not using an auxillary cable in my car. Bluetooth has been reliable for me and sound quality ok. Again one can use an adaptor cable for the jack into headphones or aux in a car or into RCA adaptors for a home entertainment center. I've done the latter, playing my phone through a cable into a home system. The loss of a headphone specific hole in the phone is a non-issue seized upon by local miscreants for their trolling agenda.

    It's Apple's fundamentally basic marketing strategy to limit users' choice.
    By restricting users' choices, Apple ends up making *lots of money*.

    Chris is correct.

    He has the choice of either bluetooth or wired.
    You do not.

    The fact is there is nothing a phone without this basic functionality of a headphone jack can do that a phone with the headphone jack cannnot do.

    The *only* difference - is your choices are limited, Hemidactylus.
    Chris' choices are not.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From rlhamil@rlhamil@smart.net (Richard L. Hamilton) to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Nov 4 17:03:07 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    In article <vg30do$km$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com>,
    Andrews <andrews@spam.net> writes:
    John Hill wrote on Fri, 1 Nov 2024 08:01:46 -0000 (UTC) :

    You will never get trolls to buy in; otherwise they wouldn't be trolls.

    You are correct that the Apple trolls like Alan Baker, Joerg Lorenz, Chris, Alan Browne, Jolly Roger, Hemidactylus, nospam, Lewis, et al., will always defend Apple to the death, no matter the truth - because... hmmm.. Why?

    They'll always make inane excuses for why Apple has more zero-day exploits, or why Apple didn't have call recording, or why Apple doesn't allow interoperability, or why Apple products don't have basic hardware, or why Apple always is chintzy on basics such as RAM & battery capacity, etc.

    Why do the Apple trolls inundate this newsgroup with those inane apologies?

    I know why.
    Do you?

    Windows is excrement, always has been, always will be.

    Linux for better or worse doesn't need people bashing other OS's to support it, they can write their own damn code to support it or STFU.

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Nov 4 17:24:52 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Richard L. Hamilton wrote on Mon, 04 Nov 2024 17:03:07 GMT :

    Linux for better or worse doesn't need people bashing other OS's to support it,
    they can write their own damn code to support it or STFU.

    Having grown up on computers well before Linux existed, I've written in hex
    so I'm well aware that with Linux, you can do anything.

    I always wondered why Linux didn't kill Microsoft Windows.
    I think the real reason is Microsoft Office.

    In the early days of Microsoft Office it was crap on the Mac.
    But no more. Now it's the same on both the Mac and on the Windows PC.

    Linux has "alternatives" but Microsoft Office seems to be what people want. Companies too.

    Unless... of course, we talk server farms. Then Linux rules.

    Windows is excrement, always has been, always will be.

    There isn't anyone on the Windows newsgroups who wouldn't agree with you.
    Yet be careful with assessments as most would say Apple's PC is crap too.

    You'd have to think about that a bit to understand the world of PCs.
    If one is crap - it doesn't mean the other isn't just *different* crap.

    There are many components of that "crap", one of which is OS support.
    Right?

    For example, at least Microsoft fully supports concurrent releases.
    In fact, Microsoft currently supports *two* Windows releases (10 & 11).

    Apple has *never* fully supported more than a single release at a time.
    That's just a fact.

    Given Apple only fully supports a single MacOS release at a time...
    Q: Whose full-OS support is crap now?

    Note that assessments, to be reasonable, need to be based on facts.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.system on Mon Nov 4 10:04:45 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-03 16:06, Andrews wrote:
    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Sun, 03 Nov 2024 23:29:29 +0000 :

    2. Apple removes features from their devices causing many iPhone owners >>>> to delay upgrades because they don't want to lose features.
    a)What are the best selling iPhones of all time? The 6/6+ and
    6s/6s+, the last two models that had a headphone jack.

    The SE (1st gen) was the last model launched with a headphone jack. Plus >>> was significantly cheaper than either the 6 or 6s. So why didn't it have >>> the highest sales figures?

    For those too behind the times to use Bluetooth headphones there are these >> Lightning adaptors that provide ancient headphone jack capacity. With
    Bluetooth I can walk around the house untethered to my phone. Progress.

    For those who never took a marketing class in college, Apple strategically removes functionality from its devices so that people have to buy it back.

    The functionality was being able to plug in ear buds to your phone.

    It wasn't removed.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.ipad on Mon Nov 4 10:06:20 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-04 08:18, Andrews wrote:
    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Mon, 04 Nov 2024 11:10:22 +0000 :

    In five years I'm on my third pair of BT earpods. In the flip side, I still >>> have wired headphones that are decades old which work perfectly well.
    Progress?

    I have higher quality headphones not "pods". And they hold a charge for
    quite a time. Not being tethered is progress as is not using an auxillary
    cable in my car. Bluetooth has been reliable for me and sound quality ok.
    Again one can use an adaptor cable for the jack into headphones or aux in a >> car or into RCA adaptors for a home entertainment center. I've done the
    latter, playing my phone through a cable into a home system. The loss of a >> headphone specific hole in the phone is a non-issue seized upon by local
    miscreants for their trolling agenda.

    It's Apple's fundamentally basic marketing strategy to limit users' choice. By restricting users' choices, Apple ends up making *lots of money*.

    Chris is correct.

    He has the choice of either bluetooth or wired.
    You do not.

    Wrong.

    Simply, factually wrong.

    <https://www.amazon.ca/s?k=lightning+earbuds&crid=3OU842X7KFK27&sprefix=lightning+ear%2Caps%2C160&ref=nb_sb_ss_ts-doa-p_1_13>

    <https://www.amazon.ca/s?k=usb+c+earbuds&crid=384MZJRK653TE&sprefix=usb+c+ear%2Caps%2C165&ref=nb_sb_ss_ts-doa-p_2_9>
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Tom Elam@thomas.e.elam@gmail.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Nov 4 13:07:13 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11/3/2024 10:14 AM, Andrews wrote:
    Tom Elam wrote on Sun, 3 Nov 2024 08:18:59 -0500 :

    As a former long-time Android phone and tablet user and defender I can
    postulate too. Android feature roll-outs and OS versions happened
    slowly, if at all, and were very uneven across device brands. I never
    got more than one OS version update on the many HTC, Moto and Samsung
    devices I owned. I had to upgrade to get the latest, and even then new
    phones often did not have the latest OS installed.]

    FACTS. Not propaganda please.

    You are wrong. More to the point, your data is old. It's no longer valid. You're five to ten years behind in all your data - so you're just wrong.

    If you used Android only two or three years ago, you won't recognize
    Android of today because that's how much has changed in a short time.

    a. The iPhone has far more bugs than Android now (and far more exploits!).
    b. The iPhone has far shorter operating system support than Android now.
    c. With respect to fragmentation, even that is very old data.

    More Samsung devices alone are sold than iPhones are, where the "fragmentation" you decry doesn't exist if you stick with Pixels &
    Samsungs.

    To complain that other brands provide valuable choices isn't really a fair complaint because you don't get ANY of those choices with Apple.

    And Apple's puny five years of promised supprot pales in comparison to the Samsung and Pixel promise of seven years of full hotfix support.

    Remember, of all common consumer operating systems, Apple is the only one with support so bad they only fully support a single release at a time.

    Those are facts. Modern facts. Not facts from ten years ago.
    Those are facts from today.

    You're welcome to form a strong opinion based on old data, but just say
    that your data doesn't take into account the reality of today's devices.

    I have had to replace a battery on my iPhone 14. That was because I
    tried wireless charging in the car that overheated the phone. The
    replacement was easy. I took it to the local Apple Store and they had it
    back to me in 2 hours.

    That's absurd. My Android debuted around the time of the iPhone 12, and
    it's still going strong. But it has a modern-sized battery.

    No iPhone in the world has a batter as big as the one in my free phone. That's the main reason iPhone batteries need to be replaced more often.

    Last we checked Apple replaces almost fifteen million batteries in the USA alone per year. Think about that. It's huge. Apple batteries are crap.

    Not a single iPhone battery is even close in capacity to that of my free Android phone (which only retailed for about two hundred dollars MSRP).

    That was 6 months ago and battery life is still
    100%. The cost? $0. AppleCare+ took care of it.

    Remember I said that the Apple trolls are ignorant? Remember?
    Guess what? How did you get that AppleCare+ without paying for it?

    No questions asked.

    I have a question for you.

    Since almost nobody on Android pays for any extra warranty, why do most
    Apple iPhone owners pay for AppleCare+ when it's never needed?

    Think about that.

    Apple owners are so terrified of the horrendous repair costs, that they'll pay any amount of subscription fees just to not have to worry about them.

    have owned iPhones and iPads since the iPhone 6s era. That's the only
    battery replaced spanning 8 years and 6s, SE and 14 Pro versions.

    The Apple iPads actually have decently sized batteries as it's only the iPhone that uses comically cheap chintzy batteries in terms of capacity.

    Every time you replace a battery (and millions are replaced every year!), Apple is laughing at you AppleCare+ owners all the way to the bank.

    I'll never go back. There is no Android Store 15 minutes away. My phone
    and tablet get annual OS updates on the day they are released, and
    regular feature and security updates too that.

    The one thing you're right about is that there is no such thing as an "Android Store", which nobody on Android needs - but iPhone owners do.

    I have plenty of Apple devices and when I take them to the Genius Bar, the "Genius" at the Apple Store asks me what a Decibel is when I tell him that
    I teste the iPhone side-by-side with my free Samsung & the Wi-Fi stinks.

    These "Genius" Bar employees don't know how things work in the real world
    as you can't test Wi-Fi without knowing what a Decibel means.

    All the Genius Bar employees do is test the phone for basic stuff (like
    water penetration) and recommend a new iPhone if it fails their tests.

    Remember, Apple lost the lawsuits for exactly that reason.

    Even Apple didn't tell its Genius Bar employees that they purposefully lowered the life of the iPhone (which they paid a criminal fine for!).

    Still... the free Apple Store Genius Bar (and free classes) are a nice
    touch because Apple knows owners are petrified by the complexity of tech.

    I'm not impressed by your 15 million number. I cannot find any recent estimates. Please supply your source. It is known that some 15 million
    were replaced in about 2018 in the wake of the Iphone 6 fiasco.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 14:30:15 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Sat, 09 Nov 2024 10:42:54 +0000 :

    Given you're the one who doesn't even understand his own quotes. It's clear >> who's the troll.

    The troll has tiny man ego syndrome. Note how he feigns greater knowledge
    in any endeavor anyone else brings up whether mobile computing, BMWs or immunology. For the last one knowing about SHM is key.

    No. You Apple trolls understand nothing, not even basic sentences.

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer and a beemer and because of that, I know a *lot* about those two vehicles.

    And yet, you Apple trolls who own a bimmer know *nothing* about them.
    All you Apple trolls who own a bimmer know is what BMW MARKETING fed you.

    That's my point.

    It's not that I have "greater knowledge"; it's I have "normal" knowledge. Everyone (but you) knows what I know about bimmers for example.

    You Apple trolls don't even know Apple has the worst (by far!) customer
    support in the industry for example - you have no clue that's just a fact.

    You Apple trolls don't know anything. About anything.
    Least of all about Apple products.

    All you Apple trolls (Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) merely parrot Apple marketing.

    Which you then defend to the death, no matter what.

    Because your whole life you've been told you are stupid and yet Apple tells
    you that you're a genius for waiting outside the store in long lines.

    And you believe it.
    Because Apple feeds your ego.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From badgolferman@REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 15:05:28 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Andrews wrote:

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer
    and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those two
    vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    I may have mentioned this once. My mother who is German made sure I
    knew how to pronounce Audi correctly. She hated when people pronounced
    it "au-di" and said it's pronounced "ow-di".
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From *Hemidactylus*@ecphoric@allspamis.invalid to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 16:51:27 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:

    [snip raving lunatic]

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    I may have mentioned this once. My mother who is German made sure I
    knew how to pronounce Audi correctly. She hated when people pronounced
    it "au-di" and said it's pronounced "ow-di".

    Arlen is a pseudointellectual hack who introduces irrelevant asides into a discussion to parade why he thinks he’s more knowledgable than his many targets. Why else would anyone arbitrarily introduce Einstein into a
    discussion besides an exercise in pseudointellectual pretense? Only
    wackaloons do that.

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 17:23:15 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    badgolferman wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:05:28 -0000 (UTC) :

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer
    and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those two
    vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    I may have mentioned this once. My mother who is German made sure I
    knew how to pronounce Audi correctly. She hated when people pronounced
    it "au-di" and said it's pronounced "ow-di".

    I'm of German descent and I've always known what a bimmer & beemer are, badgolferman - but - I've owned both bimmers and beemers also.

    If I own something, I then learn what I need to learn to know everything I
    want to know about it. In the case of the beemer, my 525i happens to have a
    CCV valve, which happens to clog up, which happens to make it fail
    California emissions - which means - I have to learn how to replace it.

    You will *never forget* a CCV replacement badgolferman. Never.
    It's not possible to forget because you have to rip the engine bay apart.

    When you replace the cooling system, you will *never forget* that the Behr expansion tank is just about as complicated as they could have made it.

    When you replace the thermostat & waterpump, you will *never forget* the special 32mm tools you need just to spin off the radiator fan which has to
    be removed before you can get the serpentine belt off.

    To get the serpentine belt off, you will *never forget* how strongly and strangely designed the belt tensioners are that you have to also deal with.

    When you fail emissions again, you have to deal with the DISA valve, which
    is an expensive plastic piece of garbage that is on the intake manifold.

    When you adjust your (admittedly rather comfortable leather) driver seat,
    you will *never forget* the adjusting cable slips out of its clasp because eventually they all get "seat twist" which you then have to deal with.

    Speaking of the interior, the cupholders are a joke but you have to periodically replace them because they break on every single 525i owner.

    The trunk loom is a disaster just waiting to happen, depending on which
    wires chafe and then short out against the others, causing all sorts of
    strange electrical problems which are almost impossible to diagnose.

    Speaking of impossible to diagnose, when the ABS control module goes out,
    and it will because it fails on everyone - when you take it apart, you'll
    be appalled at the "angel hairs" inside which simply break off at the weld.

    All this - and more - is what will be inescapable to any bimmer owner who
    owned the particular model that I owned since these problems are universal.

    Those are just facts - but the *assessment* of those facts is my simple
    summary that BMW does not know how to make systems work together.

    Since *none* of those issues was in the drive train or suspension, I will
    say that BMW makes those two systems work beautifully together.

    Do you see what I'm trying to impart - which has nothing per se to do with
    BMW but to do with *understanding* things that a normal person should do.

    I (think I) understand how BMW thinks about the design of vehicles.
    a. The drive train & suspension are what BMW cares about
    b. Not anything else

    Back to your question, it's a running joke among *all* BMW aficionados that
    the noobs always come into the web site (such as bimmerfest.com) always
    trying to tell us how much they know about their vehicle.

    The instant they use the word beemer for a car, for example, we know
    they're completely clueless morons who are posers like Alan Baker is.

    If someone doesn't even know a beemer from a bimmer, they know nothing
    about BMW vehicles as only the posers confuse the two critically important terms (for most of us who own both - and I know you own a motorcycle too).

    If a person tells you that you "drive" that big heavy Honda you own, you
    would also instantly ascertain they know absolutely nothing about bikes.

    Am I right?

    The point here is the Apple trolls know nothing about Apple products.
    In fact, the Apple trolls know nothing about anything.
    They're all Dunning Kruger left of the first quartile on Mount Stupid.
    You know this. I know this. Everyone knows this.

    But those trolls themselves are who think they're geniuses for standing in
    long lines outside the Apple store waiting along with other likewise Apple geniuses to pay through the nose for a substandard product line from Apple.

    All the Apple trolls (Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) merely parrot Apple marketing.

    They don't actually know *anything* about the Apple products they love.
    Just like none of them know anything about BMWs (the bikes or the cars).
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 17:26:49 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Andrews wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 17:23:15 -0000 (UTC) :

    In the case of the beemer

    oops. bimmer. :)
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From RoadRacer@racer@nunya.biz to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 09:28:02 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-09 09:23, Andrews wrote:
    badgolferman wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 15:05:28 -0000 (UTC) :

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer
    and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those two
    vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    I may have mentioned this once. My mother who is German made sure I
    knew how to pronounce Audi correctly. She hated when people pronounced
    it "au-di" and said it's pronounced "ow-di".

    I'm of German descent and I've always known what a bimmer & beemer are, badgolferman - but - I've owned both bimmers and beemers also.

    If I own something, I then learn what I need to learn to know everything I want to know about it. In the case of the beemer, my 525i happens to have a CCV valve, which happens to clog up, which happens to make it fail
    California emissions - which means - I have to learn how to replace it.

    You incredible simpleton:

    Every engine is REQUIRED to have a crank case ventilation system.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 17:43:53 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Sat, 09 Nov 2024 16:51:27 +0000 :

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    Arlen is a pseudointellectual hack who introduces irrelevant asides into a discussion to parade why he thinks he's more knowledgable than his many targets. Why else would anyone arbitrarily introduce Einstein into a discussion besides an exercise in pseudointellectual pretense? Only wackaloons do that.

    What's interesting is the Apple trolls like Hemidactylus, who know nothing about anything, instantly assume that terms are for "pseudointellectuals".

    Notice that normal people (like badgolferman) simply ask why all BMW aficionados use these specific terms, while the hoi polloi don't know them.

    Yet these Apple trolls, who, of course, don't know BMW terms & yet they
    claim to own BMWs, call anyone who knows anything, a "pseudointellectual".

    Since badgolferman rides a Gold Wing (which Honda doesn't usually refer to
    as a "Goldwing" but many people do), he knows the terms "ride" & "drive".

    If someone walks up to him saying "I know everything about Goldwings
    because I drive one myself", badgolferman would know he is a poser.

    This is relevant because all th Apple trolls are posers.
    They're all on Mount Stupid to the left of the 1st Dunning-Kruger quadrile.

    Which is why it was important to destroy the poser who claimed to be a physicist and yet he didn't even realize gravity is not a force.

    Likewise with Alan Baker who claims to "teach racing" and yet Alan has no
    idea whatsoever of what a catenary is - which is a common term for curves.

    Similarly with Jolly Roger who claims that Apple fully supports older
    releases when the fact is even Apple says they have never ever done that.

    Same with Chris who claims to own a doctorate in the medical sciences and
    yet he ridicules common immunology terms like "vehicle" which everyone
    learns in their very first class in immunology or his claim that an RNA
    genome of 30K subunits is tiny - when in fact - it's HUGE for RNA virions.

    My main point is that all these Apple trolls are posers.

    All the Apple trolls (Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) merely parrot Apple marketing.

    They don't actually know *anything* about the Apple products they love.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From badgolferman@REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 18:09:39 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Andrews wrote:

    Yet these Apple trolls, who, of course, don't know BMW terms & yet
    they claim to own BMWs, call anyone who knows anything, a >"pseudointellectual".

    Since badgolferman rides a Gold Wing (which Honda doesn't usually
    refer to as a "Goldwing" but many people do), he knows the terms
    "ride" & "drive".

    If someone walks up to him saying "I know everything about Goldwings
    because I drive one myself", badgolferman would know he is a poser.


    Speaking of Goldwings, when I first got mine I noticed on various
    websites the spelling alternated between Goldwing, Gold Wing, and
    GL1800. Of course GL1800 is the official model of the motorcycle, and
    mine is a 2002 GL1800A which denotes one with ABS.

    I asked the guy who sold it to me whether it was a Goldwing or Gold
    Wing and he told me Goldwing. He referred me to the manual and the
    trim pieces on the bike which say Goldwing. I have seen the Honda
    website which says Gold Wing, but frankly I think that was designed or
    edited by someone who doesn't know the history of the motorcycle. I
    don't really know, other than what the LCD display, manual and placard
    on my bike say -- Goldwing.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From RoadRacer@racer@nunya.biz to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 10:12:03 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-09 09:43, Andrews wrote:
    *Hemidactylus* wrote on Sat, 09 Nov 2024 16:51:27 +0000 :

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    Arlen is a pseudointellectual hack who introduces irrelevant asides into a >> discussion to parade why he thinks he's more knowledgable than his many
    targets. Why else would anyone arbitrarily introduce Einstein into a
    discussion besides an exercise in pseudointellectual pretense? Only
    wackaloons do that.

    What's interesting is the Apple trolls like Hemidactylus, who know nothing about anything, instantly assume that terms are for "pseudointellectuals".

    Notice that normal people (like badgolferman) simply ask why all BMW aficionados use these specific terms, while the hoi polloi don't know them.

    I would wager large that most BMW aficionados have never heard most of
    the terms you've used.


    Yet these Apple trolls, who, of course, don't know BMW terms & yet they
    claim to own BMWs, call anyone who knows anything, a "pseudointellectual".

    Since badgolferman rides a Gold Wing (which Honda doesn't usually refer to
    as a "Goldwing" but many people do), he knows the terms "ride" & "drive".

    Honda doesn't, do they?

    <https://powersports.honda.com/motorcycle/touring/gold-wing>


    If someone walks up to him saying "I know everything about Goldwings
    because I drive one myself", badgolferman would know he is a poser.

    This is relevant because all th Apple trolls are posers.
    They're all on Mount Stupid to the left of the 1st Dunning-Kruger quadrile.

    Which is why it was important to destroy the poser who claimed to be a physicist and yet he didn't even realize gravity is not a force.

    Likewise with Alan Baker who claims to "teach racing" and yet Alan has no idea whatsoever of what a catenary is - which is a common term for curves.

    I know exactly what a catenary is and I also know that it is not a
    "common term for curves" in general, but rather a very specific term for
    the curve created by a rope (or chain) supported at both ends and pulled downward by gravity under it's own weight.

    I also know that that it has never been mentioned as the curve a racing
    car follows when going through a corner in any of the numerous books I
    have read on the subject.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 10:15:14 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-09 07:05, badgolferman wrote:
    Andrews wrote:

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer
    and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those two
    vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    I'll explain:

    Arlen tried to make a meal out of the fact that I own a BMW (2012 135i M
    Sport Edition in Lemans Blue to be precise) and didn't know
    that--according to him--one of those terms is use to refer to BMW
    motorcycles and the other for BMW cars.

    And from that he tried to claim that:

    1. I couldn't possibly own one.

    2. That I could possibly be a racing driver and road racing instructor.

    :-)

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From badgolferman@REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 18:25:11 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Andrews wrote:

    You will *never forget* a CCV replacement badgolferman. Never.
    It's not possible to forget because you have to rip the engine bay
    apart.

    When you replace the cooling system, you will *never forget* that the
    Behr expansion tank is just about as complicated as they could have
    made it.

    When you replace the thermostat & waterpump, you will *never forget*
    the special 32mm tools you need just to spin off the radiator fan
    which has to be removed before you can get the serpentine belt off.

    To get the serpentine belt off, you will *never forget* how strongly
    and strangely designed the belt tensioners are that you have to also
    deal with.

    When you fail emissions again, you have to deal with the DISA valve,
    which is an expensive plastic piece of garbage that is on the intake >manifold.

    When you adjust your (admittedly rather comfortable leather) driver
    seat, you will *never forget* the adjusting cable slips out of its
    clasp because eventually they all get "seat twist" which you then
    have to deal with.


    What you describe reminds me of the air filter replacement on my
    Goldwing. The joke is the designers started with an air filter and
    built the entire bike around it.

    An air filter is a routine maintenance item which Honda recommends
    replacing every 12K miles. You would think if a routine maintenance
    item should be replaced that frequently there would be easy access to
    it, like a latched door or something similar. But no, Honda buried the
    air filter so deep into the middle of the bike that it requires the
    entire dash, center fairings, ECU, and a hundred connectors removed
    before you can access the air box. The dealer charged me $350 to
    replace it last year. Hardly anyone will tackle this task, knowing the
    extent which the bike has to be torn down. As a result air filters on Goldwings rarely get replaced. At the time my bike had 100K miles and
    I didn't know if it had ever been done so I took it in for that and
    some other things.

    On the flip side though, taking the rear wheel off is fairly easy.
    Much like a car tire because it's shaft driven rather than chain or
    belt driven. Even a lift isn't required because there's a rear access
    panel which allows you to slide the wheel out. If only they had built
    in an access panel for the air filter...
    --
    "The word "genius" isn't applicable in football. A genius is a guy
    like Norman Einstein." ~ Joe Theismann
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From *Hemidactylus*@ecphoric@allspamis.invalid to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 18:32:21 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-09 07:05, badgolferman wrote:

    [snip troll]

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    I'll explain:

    Arlen tried to make a meal out of the fact that I own a BMW (2012 135i M Sport Edition in Lemans Blue to be precise) and didn't know
    that--according to him--one of those terms is use to refer to BMW motorcycles and the other for BMW cars.

    And from that he tried to claim that:

    1. I couldn't possibly own one.

    2. That I could possibly be a racing driver and road racing instructor.

    :-)

    Making an epistemic point here it is often the case those who have a knowledgable grounding in various topics exhibit some humility toward such topics. Those lacking a modicum of knowledge are quite braggadocious. Arlen obviously exhibits a pathological conceit of knowledge most anyone can recognize on the spot, except himself. Arlen lacks reflective
    self-awareness and the result is what we witness on a daily basis on
    usenet.

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From badgolferman@REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 18:42:40 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    RoadRacer wrote:

    Since badgolferman rides a Gold Wing (which Honda doesn't usually
    refer to as a "Goldwing" but many people do), he knows the terms
    "ride" & "drive".

    Honda doesn't, do they?

    <https://powersports.honda.com/motorcycle/touring/gold-wing>



    Umm...

    https://ibb.co/9V0zXVj
    https://ibb.co/XLSFWBh
    https://ibb.co/NxDGSht
    https://ibb.co/sRxQXBf
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 10:47:41 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-09 10:42, badgolferman wrote:
    RoadRacer wrote:

    Since badgolferman rides a Gold Wing (which Honda doesn't usually
    refer to as a "Goldwing" but many people do), he knows the terms
    "ride" & "drive".

    Honda doesn't, do they?

    <https://powersports.honda.com/motorcycle/touring/gold-wing>



    Umm...

    https://ibb.co/9V0zXVj
    https://ibb.co/XLSFWBh
    https://ibb.co/NxDGSht
    https://ibb.co/sRxQXBf

    Yes.

    That was MY POINT.

    Learn to read for comprehension.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From badgolferman@REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 19:32:58 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Alan wrote:

    On 2024-11-09 10:42, badgolferman wrote:
    RoadRacer wrote:

    Since badgolferman rides a Gold Wing (which Honda doesn't
    usually refer to as a "Goldwing" but many people do), he knows
    the terms "ride" & "drive".

    Honda doesn't, do they?

    <https://powersports.honda.com/motorcycle/touring/gold-wing>



    Umm...

    https://ibb.co/9V0zXVj
    https://ibb.co/XLSFWBh
    https://ibb.co/NxDGSht
    https://ibb.co/sRxQXBf

    Yes.

    That was MY POINT.

    Learn to read for comprehension.


    You made no point. You provided a link to the Honda website showing it
    say Gold Wing. Be more clear when communicating with other people.
    Right now the only point I see is the one on top of your head.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 19:44:21 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    badgolferman wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:09:39 -0000 (UTC) :

    If someone walks up to him saying "I know everything about Goldwings >>because I drive one myself", badgolferman would know he is a poser.

    Speaking of Goldwings, when I first got mine I noticed on various
    websites the spelling alternated between Goldwing, Gold Wing, and
    GL1800. Of course GL1800 is the official model of the motorcycle, and
    mine is a 2002 GL1800A which denotes one with ABS.

    I asked the guy who sold it to me whether it was a Goldwing or Gold
    Wing and he told me Goldwing. He referred me to the manual and the
    trim pieces on the bike which say Goldwing. I have seen the Honda
    website which says Gold Wing, but frankly I think that was designed or edited by someone who doesn't know the history of the motorcycle. I
    don't really know, other than what the LCD display, manual and placard
    on my bike say -- Goldwing.

    Hi badgolferman,

    You just made my point perfectly for me, in that I don't know a damn thing about Honda bikes - so I don't even know myself if it's a Gold Wing or not.

    I see Honda advertises at their bike site it as a "Gold Wing"... <https://powersports.honda.com/motorcycle/touring/gold-wing>

    But your point is well taken that I don't know a damn thing about GoldWings/Goldwings, and you can tell because I don't know the terms.

    Yet....

    I do know the difference between "riding" a bike and "driving" it.
    As do you.

    Anyone using the term "driving" a bike is a noob so if they then claim to
    know everything about it (as the Apple trolls do for so many things), then they're just posers.

    Which is my point.

    These Apple trolls (Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) merely parrot Apple marketing.

    They don't actually know anything - about anything.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 19:56:37 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    badgolferman wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:25:11 -0000 (UTC) :

    If only they had built
    in an access panel for the air filter...

    Same with the CCV on my 525i which is merely a PCV but with a far more
    complex design such that BMW decided to call it, instead, a CCV.

    It's horribly complicated.

    And as a result, it *always* eats itself up in just a few years.

    So *everyone* with that bimmer model has to replace it.

    Like your Gold%20Wing/Gold-Wing/Goldwing/etc. air filter joke, it's as if
    BMW started with a CCV and then built the entire engine around that one emissions component.

    It wouldn't be so bad if it didn't fail emissions - but it often does.

    So everyone who knows anything about that bimmer model is well acquainted
    with the CCV (among other horridly designed engine components).

    If they claim to be knowledgeable in that model, and if they don't know
    about the CCV, then it's clear that they're just posers playing games.

    Like Alan Baker who never knew what a catenary was until I explained it to
    him in terms of sweeping around curves at constant speeds.

    Alan Baker was so stupid, even after he looked it up - he thought it was
    about bridges - which proves yet again my point these Apple trolls are incredibly uneducated, and hence ignorant of everything - especially Apple products.

    Even when told a catenary had to do with taking curves at speed, these
    Apple trolls insisted a catenary has only to do with suspension bridges.

    That's how stupid these Apple trolls truly are.

    They read Wikipedia, which I'm sure mentions suspension bridges, and they
    don't have the education to flip the terms 90 degrees to sweeping out
    curves at constant speed.

    They're morons.

    Which is my point.

    My main point is that all these Apple trolls are posers.

    All the Apple trolls (Lewis, Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, JF Mezei et. al) merely parrot Apple marketing.

    They don't actually know *anything* about the Apple products they love.
    In fact, it's patently obvious they don't know anything about anything.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From RoadRacer@racer@nunya.biz to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Sat Nov 9 13:34:51 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-09 11:56, Andrews wrote:
    badgolferman wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:25:11 -0000 (UTC) :

    If only they had built
    in an access panel for the air filter...

    Same with the CCV on my 525i which is merely a PCV but with a far more complex design such that BMW decided to call it, instead, a CCV.

    It's horribly complicated.

    And as a result, it *always* eats itself up in just a few years.

    So *everyone* with that bimmer model has to replace it.

    Like your Gold%20Wing/Gold-Wing/Goldwing/etc. air filter joke, it's as if
    BMW started with a CCV and then built the entire engine around that one emissions component.

    It wouldn't be so bad if it didn't fail emissions - but it often does.

    So everyone who knows anything about that bimmer model is well acquainted with the CCV (among other horridly designed engine components).

    If they claim to be knowledgeable in that model, and if they don't know
    about the CCV, then it's clear that they're just posers playing games.

    Like Alan Baker who never knew what a catenary was until I explained it to him in terms of sweeping around curves at constant speeds.

    Except you don't "sweep around curves at constant speeds" when you're
    road racing, Arlen.


    Alan Baker was so stupid, even after he looked it up - he thought it was about bridges - which proves yet again my point these Apple trolls are incredibly uneducated, and hence ignorant of everything - especially Apple products.

    Nope. That's simply false.


    Even when told a catenary had to do with taking curves at speed, these
    Apple trolls insisted a catenary has only to do with suspension bridges.

    False again.


    That's how stupid these Apple trolls truly are.

    They read Wikipedia, which I'm sure mentions suspension bridges, and they don't have the education to flip the terms 90 degrees to sweeping out
    curves at constant speed.

    You don't take curves at constant speeds when racing, doofus.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From -hh@recscuba_google@huntzinger.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Mon Nov 11 12:46:20 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11/9/24 10:05 AM, badgolferman wrote:
    Andrews wrote:

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer
    and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those two
    vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    Looks like no one cleanly answered your question.

    FWIW, I always have to go look up this trivia, as I've never become
    invested enough in BMW to care enough to remember:

    Bimmer is the slang for BMW's automobiles;
    Beemer is the slang for BMW's motorcycles.


    I may have mentioned this once. My mother who is German made sure I
    knew how to pronounce Audi correctly. She hated when people pronounced
    it "au-di" and said it's pronounced "ow-di".

    Similarly, that Porsche is two syllables, not one.


    -hh
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Your Name@YourName@YourISP.com to comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Tue Nov 12 10:12:52 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-11 17:46:20 +0000, -hh said:

    On 11/9/24 10:05 AM, badgolferman wrote:
    Andrews wrote:

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer
    and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those two
    vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    Looks like no one cleanly answered your question.

    FWIW, I always have to go look up this trivia, as I've never become
    invested enough in BMW to care enough to remember:

    Bimmer is the slang for BMW's automobiles;
    Beemer is the slang for BMW's motorcycles.

    Doesn't work. Many people call the cars "Beemers".



    I may have mentioned this once. My mother who is German made sure I
    knew how to pronounce Audi correctly. She hated when people pronounced
    it "au-di" and said it's pronounced "ow-di".

    Similarly, that Porsche is two syllables, not one.

    It's likely mostly Americans who can't pronounce it properly. They have
    enough trouble with proper English, let alone any other language. :-p




    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Mon Nov 11 14:27:06 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-11 13:12, Your Name wrote:
    On 2024-11-11 17:46:20 +0000, -hh said:

    On 11/9/24 10:05 AM, badgolferman wrote:
    Andrews wrote:

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer
    and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those two
    vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
    maybe you can explain it to me.  Why don't people just say BMW?  It's
    not like that's a long acronym.

    Looks like no one cleanly answered your question.

    FWIW, I always have to go look up this trivia, as I've never become
    invested enough in BMW to care enough to remember:

    Bimmer is the slang for BMW's automobiles;
    Beemer is the slang for BMW's motorcycles.

    Doesn't work. Many people call the cars "Beemers".

    And normal people don't decide that people can't own a BMW...

    ...based on whether or not they know the slang terminology.

    :-)



    I may have mentioned this once.  My mother who is German made sure I
    knew how to pronounce Audi correctly.  She hated when people pronounced >>> it "au-di" and said it's pronounced "ow-di".

    Similarly, that Porsche is two syllables, not one.

    It's likely mostly Americans who can't pronounce it properly. They have enough trouble with proper English, let alone any other language.  :-p
    "Hey I finished painting, but you don't have a "porch"...

    ...you've got a Ferrari".

    :-)
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Jolly Roger@jollyroger@pobox.com to comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Tue Nov 12 01:36:27 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-11, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-11 13:12, Your Name wrote:
    On 2024-11-11 17:46:20 +0000, -hh said:
    On 11/9/24 10:05 AM, badgolferman wrote:
    Andrews wrote:

    I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a
    bimmer and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those
    two vehicles.

    I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer"
    so maybe you can explain it to me.  Why don't people just say BMW? 
    It's not like that's a long acronym.

    Looks like no one cleanly answered your question.

    FWIW, I always have to go look up this trivia, as I've never become
    invested enough in BMW to care enough to remember:

    Bimmer is the slang for BMW's automobiles;
    Beemer is the slang for BMW's motorcycles.

    Doesn't work. Many people call the cars "Beemers".

    And normal people don't decide that people can't own a BMW...

    ...based on whether or not they know the slang terminology.

    :-)

    Which slang to use isn't anywhere near a high priority for normal
    people. And the only reason Arlen mentions it is to belittle people he dislikes..
    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Tue Nov 12 02:27:38 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Your Name wrote on Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:12:52 +1300 :

    Bimmer is the slang for BMW's automobiles;
    Beemer is the slang for BMW's motorcycles.

    Doesn't work. Many people call the cars "Beemers".

    Just like nobody who owns a motorcycle "drives" it, anyone calling their
    car a "beamer" is instantly recognizable as a poser who knows nothing.

    Which was my point that Alan G. Baker claimed to own a bimmer and to teach racing and yet he doesn't know the very first thing about either topic.

    All you Apple trolls are posers (Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne,
    Chris, Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, et al.) who know nothing about anything.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Tue Nov 12 02:46:27 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Jolly Roger wrote on 12 Nov 2024 01:36:27 GMT :

    Which slang to use isn't anywhere near a high priority for normal
    people. And the only reason Arlen mentions it is to belittle people he dislikes..

    The point of bringing up the catenary or bimmer is that you Apple trolls
    don't know anything about anything - which is a trait you all possess.

    Both are the most basic terms *anyone* would know who knows anything.
    But not you Apple trolls.

    You know nothing.

    Apple trolls are squarely on top of Mount Stupid on everything, JR.

    None of you Apple trolls understands even the DK seminal papers, but in
    their terminology, you're all to the left of the first DK quadrile.

    "The Dunning-Kruger effect is strongest when we're in the
    first stage, unconscious incompetence. If we don't know what
    we don't know, the Dunning-Kruger effect says, then we're
    actually more likely to feel confident than others at higher
    stages of competence."

    You Apple trolls don't know the first thing about anything.

    Not cars. Not curves. Not immunology. Not even headers for God's sake
    <https://groups.google.com/g/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/c/EiNl6hyMBDo/>

    Who on earth is _that_ stupid? Nobody.

    Except you Apple trolls.

    All the Apple trolls (Jolly Roger, Alan Baker, Alan Browne, Chris,
    Haemactylus, Joerg Lorenz, et. al) know nothing about anything.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From RoadRacer@racer@nunya.biz to comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Mon Nov 11 19:01:47 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-11 18:46, Andrews wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote on 12 Nov 2024 01:36:27 GMT :

    Which slang to use isn't anywhere near a high priority for normal
    people. And the only reason Arlen mentions it is to belittle people he
    dislikes..
    The point of bringing up the catenary or bimmer is that you Apple trolls don't know anything about anything - which is a trait you all possess.

    And my point is that you know nothing about racing, because not a SINGLE experienced racing driver I've ever known has ever mentioned the
    catenary curve as being in any way related to the fastest line through a corner.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From RoadRacer@racer@nunya.biz to comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Mon Nov 11 19:03:50 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-11 18:27, Andrews wrote:
    Your Name wrote on Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:12:52 +1300 :

    Bimmer is the slang for BMW's automobiles;
    Beemer is the slang for BMW's motorcycles.

    Doesn't work. Many people call the cars "Beemers".

    Just like nobody who owns a motorcycle "drives" it, anyone calling their
    car a "beamer" is instantly recognizable as a poser who knows nothing.

    Which was my point that Alan G. Baker claimed to own a bimmer and to teach racing and yet he doesn't know the very first thing about either topic.
    I only "claim" it, because:

    I do--in fact--own a 2012 BMW 135i,

    and I do--in fact--teach road racing as well as race a 1998 Van Diemen RF98-2 Formula F Honda.

    :-)
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From -hh@recscuba_google@huntzinger.com to comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Tue Nov 12 14:15:44 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11/11/24 10:01 PM, RoadRacer wrote:
    On 2024-11-11 18:46, Andrews wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote on 12 Nov 2024 01:36:27 GMT :

    Which slang to use isn't anywhere near a high priority for normal
    people. And the only reason Arlen mentions it is to belittle people he
    dislikes..

    Yup. I've seen similar 'gotcha' attempts by gun nutz over terminology too.

    Of course they don't see outside of their little niche that those with
    equally deep but broader experience means that one's trivial knowledge includes different niche definitions of the same term. In such
    situations, the solution is to ignore the niche pedantry attempts.


    The point of bringing up the catenary or bimmer is that you Apple trolls
    don't know anything about anything - which is a trait you all possess.

    And my point is that you know nothing about racing, because not a SINGLE experienced racing driver I've ever known has ever mentioned the
    catenary curve as being in any way related to the fastest line through a corner.

    For motorsports, I've watched at least hundreds of races, and during all
    those decades, I've never heard any NASCAR/Indy/F1/etc race announcers
    ever mention the word "catenary" ...

    ... let alone used it in the alleged context herein of guidance for
    optimizing the line in a corner to minimize peak cornering forces.

    But I'm sure that Arlen can provide multiple youtube clips of TV
    broadcasts, with timestamps which show that I'm not misremembering.

    -hh
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Tue Nov 12 12:26:40 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-12 11:15, -hh wrote:
    On 11/11/24 10:01 PM, RoadRacer wrote:
    On 2024-11-11 18:46, Andrews wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote on 12 Nov 2024 01:36:27 GMT :

    Which slang to use isn't anywhere near a high priority for normal
    people. And the only reason Arlen mentions it is to belittle people he >>>> dislikes..

    Yup. I've seen similar 'gotcha' attempts by gun nutz over terminology too.

    Of course they don't see outside of their little niche that those with equally deep but broader experience means that one's trivial knowledge includes different niche definitions of the same term.  In such
    situations, the solution is to ignore the niche pedantry attempts.


    The point of bringing up the catenary or bimmer is that you Apple trolls >>> don't know anything about anything - which is a trait you all possess.

    And my point is that you know nothing about racing, because not a
    SINGLE experienced racing driver I've ever known has ever mentioned
    the catenary curve as being in any way related to the fastest line
    through a corner.

    For motorsports, I've watched at least hundreds of races, and during all those decades, I've never heard any NASCAR/Indy/F1/etc race announcers
    ever mention the word "catenary" ...

    ... let alone used it in the alleged context herein of guidance for optimizing the line in a corner to minimize peak cornering forces.

    But I'm sure that Arlen can provide multiple youtube clips of TV
    broadcasts, with timestamps which show that I'm not misremembering.
    He finally found his one reference...

    ...and it's about wooden toy cars running down a ramp!


    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Wed Nov 13 04:57:51 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    -hh wrote on Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:15:44 -0500 :

    I've never heard any NASCAR/Indy/F1/etc race announcers> ever mention the word "catenary" ...

    ... let alone used it in the alleged context herein of guidance for optimizing the line in a corner to minimize peak cornering forces.

    Had any of you uneducated Apple trolls taken even a single class in
    Physics, you'd know centripedal/centrifugal forces exist in the X plane.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Tue Nov 12 21:51:57 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-12 20:57, Andrews wrote:
    -hh wrote on Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:15:44 -0500 :

    I've never heard any NASCAR/Indy/F1/etc race announcers> ever mention the word "catenary" ...

    ... let alone used it in the alleged context herein of guidance for
    optimizing the line in a corner to minimize peak cornering forces.

    Had any of you uneducated Apple trolls taken even a single class in
    Physics, you'd know centripedal/centrifugal forces exist in the X plane.

    Everyone knows that, doofus.

    And it's "centripetal" force. With a "T".
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From -hh@recscuba_google@huntzinger.com to comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Wed Nov 13 08:10:15 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2024-11-12 20:57, Andrews wrote:
    -hh wrote on Tue, 12 Nov 2024 14:15:44 -0500 :

    I've never heard any NASCAR/Indy/F1/etc race announcers> ever mention
    the word "catenary" ...

    ... let alone used it in the alleged context herein of guidance for
    optimizing the line in a corner to minimize peak cornering forces.

    Had any of you uneducated Apple trolls taken even a single class in
    Physics, you'd know centripedal/centrifugal forces exist in the X plane.

    Everyone knows that, doofus.

    And it's "centripetal" force. With a "T".


    And why the sudden change by Arlen to centripetal forces, when his claims
    have used catenary?

    Maybe because he’s not found any TV video of race announcers using the
    term?
    Nah … too quick of a reply for that: he’s either profoundly lazy or
    he knows he’s lying.

    -hh
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Andrews@andrews@spam.net to comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Wed Nov 13 21:15:38 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    -hh wrote on Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:10:15 -0500 :

    And why the sudden change to centripetal forces, when his claims
    have used catenary?

    A catenary can be in any direction, horizontal or vertical, "hh".

    It's not the *direction* that defines the catenary but the uniformity of
    force over length - which - you'd have known if you had ever taken physics.

    My point is that the Apple trolls know nothing about anything, where one of
    the Apple trolls claims to "teach racing" yet he knows nothing of physics.

    They claim to get paid to help people with computers and yet they insist
    for weeks that the nntp header is impossible to change on your own.

    Who is that stupid?

    They claim to know bimmers and yet they don't even know what they're
    called, always my point being they are all on top of Mount Stupid.

    Their whole lives they're told they're stupid from everyone but Apple.
    Apple loves them.

    Apple tells these Apple trolls that they're geniuses for standing in long
    lines overnight at the Apple store waiting for new products to purchase.

    For that, these genius Apple trolls defend everything Apple to the death.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From RoadRacer@racer@nunya.biz to comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Wed Nov 13 17:38:48 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-13 13:15, Andrews wrote:
    -hh wrote on Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:10:15 -0500 :

    And why the sudden change to centripetal forces, when his claims
    have used catenary?

    A catenary can be in any direction, horizontal or vertical, "hh".

    No one here doesn't understand that, doofus.


    It's not the *direction* that defines the catenary but the uniformity of force over length - which - you'd have known if you had ever taken physics.

    The forces are NOT uniform, doofus.

    The ends of a catenary (in the typical, vertical form) have to support
    the weight of all of the chain or rope located beneath them; a force
    which diminishes as you approach the bottom of the curve.


    My point is that the Apple trolls know nothing about anything, where one of the Apple trolls claims to "teach racing" yet he knows nothing of physics.

    There is no one aside from you who doubts that I teach racing, doofus.

    Again, here are my credentials:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1K_iC3Vtkp5gP36T4lBZFc7rAkmzQ7x9u/view?usp=share_link>


    They claim to get paid to help people with computers and yet they insist
    for weeks that the nntp header is impossible to change on your own.

    No once insisted that, doofus.


    Who is that stupid?

    They claim to know bimmers and yet they don't even know what they're
    called, always my point being they are all on top of Mount Stupid.

    Not knowing that there is a difference between "bimmer" and "beemer"
    doesn't disqualify one from actually owning a 2012 BMW 135i M Sport:

    <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1RksO8IIHEzap0YkYbkLNReU2zKc5WhLw/view?usp=share_link>
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From -hh@recscuba_google@huntzinger.com to comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Thu Nov 14 15:20:31 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 11/13/24 4:15 PM, Andrews wrote:
    -hh wrote on Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:10:15 -0500 :

    And why the sudden change to centripetal forces, when his claims
    have used catenary?

    A catenary can be in any direction, horizontal or vertical, "hh".

    Pedantically, sure ...

    It's not the *direction* that defines the catenary but the uniformity of force over length - which - you'd have known if you had ever taken physics.

    ...but pragmatically, the reason why catenary doesn't apply to laeral non-gravitational based forces is because it is difficult for them to be sufficiently homogeneous: this theoretical doesn'tpragmatically occur in reality.

    Case in point, if this factor really was as significant as you're trying
    to imply that it is, then the real world ramifications are that during
    races, there would *never* able to be any passing in corners.


    My point is that the Apple trolls know nothing about anything, where one of the Apple trolls claims to "teach racing" yet he knows nothing of physics.

    But they're not who needs to think things through more completely, particularly in looking at theory vs applied.


    [more reams of butthurt whining ... snipped]



    -hh
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From RoadRacer@racer@nunya.biz to comp.sys.mac.advocacy,comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone on Thu Nov 14 13:13:31 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-11-14 12:20, -hh wrote:
    On 11/13/24 4:15 PM, Andrews wrote:
    -hh wrote on Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:10:15 -0500 :

    And why the sudden change to centripetal forces, when his claims
    have used catenary?

    A catenary can be in any direction, horizontal or vertical, "hh".

    Pedantically, sure ...

    It's not the *direction* that defines the catenary but the uniformity of
    force over length - which - you'd have known if you had ever taken
    physics.

    ...but pragmatically, the reason why catenary doesn't apply to laeral non-gravitational based forces is because it is difficult for them to be sufficiently homogeneous: this theoretical doesn'tpragmatically occur in reality.

    Case in point, if this factor really was as significant as you're trying
    to imply that it is, then the real world ramifications are that during races, there would *never* able to be any passing in corners.

    And he's simply wrong.

    The forces in rope/chain/etc. hanging between points (i.e. in a catenary curve) is most definitely NOT uniform.

    The the ends of rope/chain/etc. need to support the weight of all the
    material that hangs below, whereas the middle of the hanging whatever
    doesn't.

    (If he hadn't hidden himself away from me, I could easily write him a
    thought experiment by steps, where I could absolutely prove that fact so completely that he'd have to agree or shut his eyes to truth.


    Little Arlen is probably remembering what he was taught in high school
    physics where they say that the tension in an idealized rope
    (/chain/etc.) is the same everywhere *

    * and where there's probably a footnote that says "ignoring the weight
    of rope itself".

    Guys like him hear/read the first explanation of such phenomena they're
    give and never are able to move beyond it.

    :-)


    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114