• Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight

    From Bo Holt@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Sat Mar 7 08:00:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Greetings!

    I received my C64U Starlight Monday. I absolutely love this machine. I'm 45 and got a CoCo 2 for my fifth birthday and have been into computers my whole life. I'm living an alternate reality childhood had I gotten a Commodore instead of a CoCo. My oldest nephew is five, and he and his little brother LOVE all my retro tech. We played Nintendo for FOUR HOURS STRAIGHT last Saturday, first time I've done that since I was single-digit aged. I'm going to take the machine to them and teach them BASIC, all that good stuff.

    I've made a few videos this week with Commodore at youtube.com/bollingholt

    I'm hoping to attach my 1541 to it this weekend and go through some BOXES of disks I recently acquired with a TI-99/4A haul, but I think it's mainly Commodore software. Looking forward to it!!!

    Bo Holt

    ... Torture: The Ultimate Art Form.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Daniel@me@sc1f1dan.com to comp.sys.cbm on Sat Mar 7 01:26:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Bo Holt <usenet@vk3heg.net> writes:

    Greetings!

    I received my C64U Starlight Monday. I absolutely love this machine. I'm 45 and got a CoCo 2 for my fifth birthday and have been into computers my whole life. I'm living an alternate reality childhood had I gotten a Commodore instead of a CoCo. My oldest nephew is five, and he and his little brother LOVE all my retro tech. We played Nintendo for FOUR HOURS STRAIGHT last Saturday, first time I've done that since I was single-digit aged. I'm going to take the machine to them and teach them BASIC, all that good stuff.

    I've made a few videos this week with Commodore at youtube.com/bollingholt

    I'm hoping to attach my 1541 to it this weekend and go through some BOXES of disks I recently acquired with a TI-99/4A haul, but I think it's mainly Commodore software. Looking forward to it!!!

    Bo Holt

    ... Torture: The Ultimate Art Form.

    Good news. Tell us how you get along. I considered getting a c64 from perifractic but I can't get over the funky keyboard layout of the
    commodores. I have a mini and can't really find a good for it. And I'm
    not nostalgic for the games.

    I hope you find a treasure in that pile of floppies.

    Daniel
    sysop | air & wave bbs
    finger | calcmandan@bbs.erb.pw
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kalevi@kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) to comp.sys.cbm on Sat Mar 7 21:20:05 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Bo Holt <usenet@vk3heg.net> wrote:
    I'm going to take the machine to them and teach
    them BASIC

    Oh no! Keep the kids away from BASIC as it is
    one of the most horrendous programming languages
    ever invented.

    Better to fire up a Fedora Linux or FreeBSD VM and have
    the kids learn Python or anything saner than BASIC.

    Back in the 1980s BASIC was better than nothing, but
    should not be used again in 2026.

    br,
    KK
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bo Holt@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Mon Mar 9 01:00:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Good news. Tell us how you get along. I considered getting a c64 from perifractic but I can't get over the funky keyboard layout of the commodores. I have a mini and can't really find a good for it. And I'm
    not nostalgic for the games.

    I hope you find a treasure in that pile of floppies.

    Daniel
    sysop | air & wave bbs
    finger | calcmandan@bbs.erb.pw

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.12
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)
    I cut my teeh on a CoCo 2, so it's "new nostalgia" for me LOL. I didn't
    attach the floppy this weekend as plans changed, but I did go to my warehouse and grab the disks. Went tech thrifing though ;)

    Bo

    ... Gunpowder and alcohol DO mix - but it tastes awful!

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dr. What@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Mon Mar 9 01:00:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Daniel wrote to All <=-

    Good news. Tell us how you get along. I considered getting a c64 from perifractic but I can't get over the funky keyboard layout of the commodores. I have a mini and can't really find a good for it. And I'm
    not nostalgic for the games.

    I have to say that the C64U keyboard is much better than a real C64 keyboard.

    If you aren't in to Commodore, you won't have much use for a C64U.
    But then, the C64U was made for the Commodore fan base (which seems to be very large still).

    I hope you find a treasure in that pile of floppies.

    There's always treasure in a pile of floppies. It just depends on the person.

    I picked up a bunch of floppies cheap on eBay and went through them. Some I archived. Many were unreadable and unformattable. But there were a few that were "Oh wow! I remember buying this same disk back in 198x!"

    Memory Lane is always a pleasure to take a stroll down.


    ... In an empty head, you can hear forever....
    === MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Daniel@me@sc1f1dan.com to comp.sys.cbm on Mon Mar 9 15:44:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) writes:

    Bo Holt <usenet@vk3heg.net> wrote:
    I'm going to take the machine to them and teach
    them BASIC

    Oh no! Keep the kids away from BASIC as it is
    one of the most horrendous programming languages
    ever invented.

    Better to fire up a Fedora Linux or FreeBSD VM and have
    the kids learn Python or anything saner than BASIC.

    Back in the 1980s BASIC was better than nothing, but
    should not be used again in 2026.

    br,
    KK

    What horrible advice.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kalevi@kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) to comp.sys.cbm on Mon Mar 9 23:01:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> wrote:
    What horrible advice.

    Why do you say so? Python 3 is a nice and clean
    language with all the features you would expect
    from a good programming language. Fedora Linux
    and FreeBSD are millions of times more advanced
    than poor old C64. Programming in BASIC using
    the horrible C64 screen editor is nothing but
    a bad joke in 2026. I have to laugh thinking
    about it... Hahah!

    BASIC on a C64 lacks almost everything:
    no proper WHILE looping, no proper
    function calls, no proper data structures,
    identifiers are only valid for the two
    starting characters. C64 BASIC is beyond awful
    and should never be used in 2026. Why would
    anyone torture kids with that lame BASIC?

    C64 is a great platform for learning
    assembly programming though but even so
    you should write the code on Linux or FreeBSD
    using a proper text editor and a cross assembler,
    testing your program with VICE.

    br,
    KK
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Daniel@me@sc1f1dan.com to comp.sys.cbm on Tue Mar 10 10:51:57 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) writes:

    Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> wrote:
    What horrible advice.

    Why do you say so? Python 3 is a nice and clean
    language with all the features you would expect
    from a good programming language. Fedora Linux
    and FreeBSD are millions of times more advanced
    than poor old C64. Programming in BASIC using
    the horrible C64 screen editor is nothing but
    a bad joke in 2026. I have to laugh thinking
    about it... Hahah!

    BASIC on a C64 lacks almost everything:
    no proper WHILE looping, no proper
    function calls, no proper data structures,
    identifiers are only valid for the two
    starting characters. C64 BASIC is beyond awful
    and should never be used in 2026. Why would
    anyone torture kids with that lame BASIC?

    C64 is a great platform for learning
    assembly programming though but even so
    you should write the code on Linux or FreeBSD
    using a proper text editor and a cross assembler,
    testing your program with VICE.

    br,
    KK

    Many of us wet our feet on basic as children. In fact, many people
    progressed into the world of software development from that
    introduction. One could argue that it helped lead into the industry
    we have today.

    You told him not to introduce the kids to that same joy he
    experienced with an end-of-world urgency. As if they'll be irreparably
    harmed by it. Sheesh.

    He's doing it to bond with the kids. Maybe he will help them code their
    own games and get that satisfaction like he did. For years magazines
    supplied source code for games. I used to stay in the computer lab after
    school to code them myself, since we didn't have a computer at my
    home. We had atari game system.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kalevi@kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) to comp.sys.cbm on Tue Mar 10 19:24:12 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> wrote:
    Many of us wet our feet on basic as children. In fact, many people
    progressed into the world of software development from that
    introduction. One could argue that it helped lead into the industry
    we have today.

    My first programming language was indeed C64 BASIC in the latter
    half of 1984. We thought it was good because we did not know anything
    better.

    You told him not to introduce the kids to that same joy he
    experienced with an end-of-world urgency. As if they'll be irreparably
    harmed by it. Sheesh.

    Yeah, BASIC actually harms your brain and teaches you to write
    shitty spaghetti code filled with GOTOs. When you progress to proper programming language, you have to unlearn the bad habits you develop
    with a sad mess like C64 BASIC. Which sane programming languages use
    *line numbers* for fuck's sake? None!

    He's doing it to bond with the kids. Maybe he will help them code their
    own games and get that satisfaction like he did. For years magazines
    supplied source code for games. I used to stay in the computer lab after school to code them myself, since we didn't have a computer at my
    home. We had atari game system.

    All that can be done way better by using Python 3 or anything other
    than C64 BASIC which is quite possibly the worst programming language
    ever invented. From a practical point of view, just using the dreaded
    screen editor to write code is hell on earth.

    Linux and FreeBSD are paradise for programmers, beginners or advanced.

    Welcome to 2026.

    br,
    KK
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mortar M.@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Wed Mar 11 07:30:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Kalevi Kolttonen to All on Tue Mar 10 2026 13:30:01

    C64 BASIC is beyond awful and should never be used in 2026. Why would anyone torture kids with that lame BASIC?

    I think you're missing the point of retro-computing.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mortar M.@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Fri Mar 13 03:00:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Kalevi Kolttonen to All on Wed Mar 11 2026 10:00:02

    ...C64 BASIC which is quite possibly the worst programming language ever invented.

    You've never used Algol.

    Linux and FreeBSD are paradise for programmers, beginners or advanced.

    Those are OSes, not languages.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mortar M.@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Fri Mar 13 06:00:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Rug Rat to Mortar M. on Thu Mar 12 2026 10:51:01

    Come on... Let's split hairs. The first is a Kernel, the latter is an OS...

    Wasn't me, but you're right.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From kalevi@kalevi@kolttonen.fi (Kalevi Kolttonen) to comp.sys.cbm on Thu Mar 12 23:25:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Mortar M. <usenet@vk3heg.net> wrote:
    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Kalevi Kolttonen to All on Wed Mar 11 2026 10:00:02

    ...C64 BASIC which is quite possibly the worst programming language ever invented.

    You've never used Algol.

    True.

    Linux and FreeBSD are paradise for programmers, beginners or advanced.

    Those are OSes, not languages.

    No kidding? It was just shorthand for "Use systems like these which
    have tons of great programming languages and tools, not C64".

    br,
    KK
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dr. What@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Fri Mar 13 23:00:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Mortar M. wrote to Kalevi Kolttonen <=-

    You've never used Algol.

    Algol begat Pascal. Pascal is the mother language for pretty much every modern programming language today.


    ... Bathroom scale: Something you stand on and swear at.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mortar M.@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Sun Mar 15 03:00:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate
    By: Dr. What to Mortar M. on Fri Mar 13 2026 04:19:34

    Algol begat Pascal. Pascal is the mother language for pretty much every modern programming language today.

    My bad. I ment APL. Keep getting those confused.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Captain Nemo@Nemo@nowhere.nohow.com to comp.sys.cbm on Sun Mar 15 06:14:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    On 3/15/26 4:00 AM, Mortar M. wrote:
    My bad. I ment APL. Keep getting those confused.

    Ah, yes, APL. Like a British double-decker bus it processes rows and
    columns of stuff and gets them all their destinations. But it only
    drives in reverse but is instrumented in Greek.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bo Holt@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Wed Apr 8 05:30:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Oh no! Keep the kids away from BASIC as it is
    one of the most horrendous programming languages
    ever invented.

    Better to fire up a Fedora Linux or FreeBSD VM and have
    the kids learn Python or anything saner than BASIC.

    Back in the 1980s BASIC was better than nothing, but
    should not be used again in 2026.

    br,
    KK

    Basic is still fun to play with. They are only 5 and 3 anyway LOL. They were only interested in games anyway, for the time being. ;)

    ... Most have good aims in life, but few pull the trigger.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bo Holt@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Wed Apr 8 05:30:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    You told him not to introduce the kids to that same joy he
    experienced with an end-of-world urgency. As if they'll be irreparably harmed by it. Sheesh.

    He's doing it to bond with the kids. Maybe he will help them code their
    own games and get that satisfaction like he did. For years magazines supplied source code for games. I used to stay in the computer lab after school to code them myself, since we didn't have a computer at my
    home. We had atari game system.

    --- PyGate Linux v1.5.12
    * Origin: Dragon's Lair, PyGate NNTP<>Fido Gate (3:633/10)

    That's basically it (no pun intended). It's just a bonding exercise and sparking their interest seeing that they can write something that makes a computer follow their instructions. Unfortunately, they weren't really interested yet; they're only 3 and 5 ;)

    ... To quote the Librarian at Unseen University, "Oook!"

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dennis Katsonis@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Thu Apr 9 00:30:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Bo Holt to Kalevi Kolttonen on Tue Apr 07 2026 02:12 pm

    Oh no! Keep the kids away from BASIC as it is
    one of the most horrendous programming languages
    ever invented.

    Better to fire up a Fedora Linux or FreeBSD VM and have
    the kids learn Python or anything saner than BASIC.

    Back in the 1980s BASIC was better than nothing, but
    should not be used again in 2026.

    br,
    KK

    Basic is still fun to play with. They are only 5 and 3 anyway LOL. They we only interested in games anyway, for the time being. ;)

    ... Most have good aims in life, but few pull the trigger.
    Nah, python is better.

    BASIC really only makes sense if you are still using an 80s microcomputer.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Captain Nemo@Nemo@nowhere.nohow.com to comp.sys.cbm on Thu Apr 9 05:25:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    On 4/8/26 10:30 AM, Dennis Katsonis wrote:
    Nah, python is better.

    BASIC really only makes sense if you are still using an 80s microcomputer.

    You need to look at MMBasic and the PicoCalc then.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From marika@marika5000@gmail.com to comp.sys.cbm on Fri Apr 10 03:45:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Mortar M. <usenet@vk3heg.net> wrote:
    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Kalevi Kolttonen to All on Tue Mar 10 2026 13:30:01

    C64 BASIC is beyond awful and should never be used in 2026. Why would anyone
    torture kids with that lame BASIC?

    I think you're missing the point of retro-computing.


    Right?

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dennis Katsonis@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Fri Apr 10 23:30:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: marika to All on Fri Apr 10 2026 03:45 am

    Mortar M. <usenet@vk3heg.net> wrote:
    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Kalevi Kolttonen to All on Tue Mar 10 2026 13:30:01

    C64 BASIC is beyond awful and should never be used in 2026. Why would
    anyone
    torture kids with that lame BASIC?

    I think you're missing the point of retro-computing.


    Right?

    To be frank, C64 basic wasn't that great, even back then. My first computer was a VZ 200, which predated the C64 (I think it was sold as a V-Tech 200 in the US? Here in Australia it was popular), and even it had a version of basic where you could draw lines and do graphics.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mortar M.@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Sun Apr 12 05:30:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Dennis Katsonis to marika on Fri Apr 10 2026 22:44:14

    To be frank, C64 basic wasn't that great, even back then.

    Agreed. Considering the number of Commodore micros already in the wild, you'd think they'd have improved the BASIC for the VIC and 64, as these were intended for non-computer savvy people.

    My first computer was a VZ 200, which predated the C64 (I think it was sold as a V-Tech 200 in the US.

    I vaguely remember reading about this in magazines, but never actually seen one. After looking it up online, I can see why. It was only around for two year and had low specs. No way could it have competed with the likes of the C=64 or even the Atari 400. However, it did not pre-date the 64. The VZ-200 came out in '83, while the 64 came out a year earlier.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dennis Katsonis@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Sun Apr 12 12:00:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Mortar M. to Dennis Katsonis on Sat Apr 11 2026 01:41 pm

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Dennis Katsonis to marika on Fri Apr 10 2026 22:44:14

    To be frank, C64 basic wasn't that great, even back then.

    Agreed. Considering the number of Commodore micros already in the wild, you think they'd have improved the BASIC for the VIC and 64, as these were inten for non-computer savvy people.

    My first computer was a VZ 200, which predated the C64 (I think it was so as a V-Tech 200 in the US.

    I vaguely remember reading about this in magazines, but never actually seen one. After looking it up online, I can see why. It was only around for two year and had low specs. No way could it have competed with the likes of the C=64 or even the Atari 400. However, it did not pre-date the 64. The VZ-20 came out in '83, while the 64 came out a year earlier.

    I got the VZ200 in 1991, quite a bit after it release. My parents got it at a garage sale cheap (buying a new computer was a bit much back then, just for me to use). It was a bit dissapointing as I wanted the Atari 1040STE, but as I had just been introduced to BASIC at school, it was fun to try BASIC at home, and draw graphics and make basic games.

    Dick Smith started an electronics store called, Dick Smith Electronics, and the VZ 200 was their rebrand, sold with his face on it.

    A little later that year, they got a Vic 20 at a garage sale, which had better graphics, but lacked the drawing commands. A little later, the C64 came, again second hand. You could do sprites, but again, no graphics. Not without entering some other machine code subroutines.

    I suppose they had to get it out quick, and once it was out, you can't patch it.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bo Holt@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Mon Apr 13 02:00:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    |03Quoting message from |11Dennis Katsonis |03to |11Mortar M.
    |03on |1112 Apr 26 11:25:58|03.

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Mortar M. to Dennis Katsonis on Sat Apr 11 2026 01:41 pm

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Dennis Katsonis to marika on Fri Apr 10 2026 22:44:14

    To be frank, C64 basic wasn't that great, even back then.

    Agreed. Considering the number of Commodore micros already in the wild, yo think they'd have improved the BASIC for the VIC and 64, as these were inte for non-computer savvy people.

    My first computer was a VZ 200, which predated the C64 (I think it was s as a V-Tech 200 in the US.

    I vaguely remember reading about this in magazines, but never actually seen one. After looking it up online, I can see why. It was only around for tw year and had low specs. No way could it have competed with the likes of th C=64 or even the Atari 400. However, it did not pre-date the 64. The VZ-2 came out in '83, while the 64 came out a year earlier.

    I got the VZ200 in 1991, quite a bit after it release. My parents got it garage sale cheap (buying a new computer was a bit much back then, just fo to use). It was a bit dissapointing as I wanted the Atari 1040STE, but as had just been introduced to BASIC at school, it was fun to try BASIC at ho and draw graphics and make basic games.

    Dick Smith started an electronics store called, Dick Smith Electronics, an VZ 200 was their rebrand, sold with his face on it.

    A little later that year, they got a Vic 20 at a garage sale, which had be graphics, but lacked the drawing commands. A little later, the C64 came, second hand. You could do sprites, but again, no graphics. Not without entering some other machine code subroutines.

    I suppose they had to get it out quick, and once it was out, you can't pat it.
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Win32
    * Origin: MS & RD BBS bbsweb.mozysswamp.org (3:633/384)

    I am 45. My gradnfather got me a Timex Sinclair when I was 2, CoCo2 when I turned 5 (really cut my teeth on that one), then his hand-me-down Amstrad PC1512DD when I was in the fourth grade, and then in 192 started as an apprentice at our local computer store and learned to build machines and built my 486DX-33. I never stopped working in the field since I started in 1992,
    and I started BBSing back on the CoCo2. I never knew anyone with a Commodore when I was growing up, so I'm enjoying living an alternate-reality childhood with the C64U. I'm trying to spark an interest in computers with my nephews and nieces (they are much younger than 5 still), they already love allmy vintage electronics I bring, and it's fun to play with these things with them.

    ... Message sent. Destroy immediately upon receipt.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Daniel@me@sc1f1dan.com to comp.sys.cbm on Sun Apr 12 22:32:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Bo Holt <usenet@vk3heg.net> writes:

    |03Quoting message from |11Dennis Katsonis |03to |11Mortar M.
    |03on |1112 Apr 26 11:25:58|03.

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Mortar M. to Dennis Katsonis on Sat Apr 11 2026 01:41 pm

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Dennis Katsonis to marika on Fri Apr 10 2026 22:44:14

    To be frank, C64 basic wasn't that great, even back then.

    Agreed. Considering the number of Commodore micros already in the wild, yo
    think they'd have improved the BASIC for the VIC and 64, as these were inte
    for non-computer savvy people.

    My first computer was a VZ 200, which predated the C64 (I think it was s
    as a V-Tech 200 in the US.

    I vaguely remember reading about this in magazines, but never actually seen
    one. After looking it up online, I can see why. It was only around for tw
    year and had low specs. No way could it have competed with the likes of th
    C=64 or even the Atari 400. However, it did not pre-date the 64. The VZ-2
    came out in '83, while the 64 came out a year earlier.

    I got the VZ200 in 1991, quite a bit after it release. My parents got it garage sale cheap (buying a new computer was a bit much back then, just fo
    to use). It was a bit dissapointing as I wanted the Atari 1040STE, but as
    had just been introduced to BASIC at school, it was fun to try BASIC at ho
    and draw graphics and make basic games.

    Dick Smith started an electronics store called, Dick Smith Electronics, an
    VZ 200 was their rebrand, sold with his face on it.

    A little later that year, they got a Vic 20 at a garage sale, which had be
    graphics, but lacked the drawing commands. A little later, the C64 came, second hand. You could do sprites, but again, no graphics. Not without entering some other machine code subroutines.

    I suppose they had to get it out quick, and once it was out, you can't pat
    it.
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Win32
    * Origin: MS & RD BBS bbsweb.mozysswamp.org (3:633/384)

    I am 45. My gradnfather got me a Timex Sinclair when I was 2, CoCo2 when I turned 5 (really cut my teeth on that one), then his hand-me-down Amstrad PC1512DD when I was in the fourth grade, and then in 192 started as an apprentice at our local computer store and learned to build machines and built
    my 486DX-33. I never stopped working in the field since I started in 1992, and I started BBSing back on the CoCo2. I never knew anyone with a Commodore when I was growing up, so I'm enjoying living an alternate-reality childhood with the C64U. I'm trying to spark an interest in computers with my nephews and nieces (they are much younger than 5 still), they already love allmy vintage electronics I bring, and it's fun to play with these things with them.

    ... Message sent. Destroy immediately upon receipt.

    I spent most my childhood outdoors climbing trees or playing sports - or various other things kids used to do pre-internet.

    I would be inside during the rain. We had an Atari game console and had
    5-6 cartridges. One of them was defender and that was the best game we
    had. That game got old quite fast. Honestly, I was a bookworm. Video
    games were rather uninspiring to me until many years later. Our schools
    had Apple 2's because Apple donated them. I wasn't really inspired to
    learn programming because the teachers didn't TEACH us to
    program. Back in those days, our schools had one teacher per class for
    all day. And none of them were trained in computer science. It took
    years for the school system, at least in my area, to catch up with the
    times. Nowadays, these schools look like mini-college campii.

    We had pre-written basic games we'd spend a long time typing into the
    terminal. Assuming I didn't mess up somewhere, I'd have a few minutes to
    play hangman or whatever it was. Nothing to write home about. Nothing
    was saved and, all the work was gone when the computers were switched
    off.

    It just didn't hit me hard in those days. I preferred to spend recess
    time outside instead of in front of a computer typing line code I
    didn't understand. I had classmates who really soaked it in though and
    some would hand write basic code at home and do the work at
    school. Most of us didn't have computers - so our screen time
    was limited to school. And in the later elementary grade, girls were
    getting interesting to me and they weren't in the computer room.

    Anyway, my first computer at home was in the 90s after coming home from
    the navy. My brother took me with him to Fry's and I helped him select a computer case. The other components he had already identified before
    the trip. I watched a computer being built for the first time. I had no
    idea what was what. Everything looked alien to me. Times have changed.

    I follow the likes of the C64 community out of curiousity. I'm more of a
    lurker to be honest. My actual daily driver (as in constant use) for
    my writing hobby is a Tandy laptop. The model 200. I also have spare 100
    and 102's laying around for mod projects. It does what I set out to do,
    write. And I can do that well. The keyboard layout isn't all fucked
    up. I don't see a caps lock in the south pole and the " key isn't in boonyville. They're in the proper position.

    I bought a C64 mini on sale at gamestop 5-6 years ago. I played a few
    games for a bit and, well, it's in the closet somewhere. I tried to load
    other utilities via a flash card but nothing seemed to work without
    serious hacking. So, so, so not interested in that. The games were
    OKAY and I could understand what kids my age saw in it. My exposure to
    the Commodore platform came just a few years ago. Otherwise, it was just
    a subject in echonets when I dialed into BBSes.

    I'm currently considering the purchase of an Atari ST 800XL with a
    modern keyboard replacement. The original keyboard was a hunk of
    shit while the modern replacements use modern switches and the keys are
    in the modern locations. Still have a ton of reading to do about the
    platform and whether I wish to dive into it versus staying with my
    beloved Tandy.

    Daniel
    --
    sysop | air & wave bbs
    finger | calcmandan@bbs.erb.pw
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dennis Katsonis@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Tue Apr 14 00:30:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Bo Holt wrote to Dennis Katsonis <=-

    @MSGID: <69DBC6D4.1377.fidocbm@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
    |03Quoting message from |11Dennis Katsonis |03to |11Mortar M.
    |03on |1112 Apr 26 11:25:58|03.

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Mortar M. to Dennis Katsonis on Sat Apr 11 2026 01:41 pm

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Dennis Katsonis to marika on Fri Apr 10 2026 22:44:14

    To be frank, C64 basic wasn't that great, even back then.

    Agreed. Considering the number of Commodore micros already in the wild, yo think they'd have improved the BASIC for the VIC and 64, as these were inte for non-computer savvy people.

    My first computer was a VZ 200, which predated the C64 (I think it was s as a V-Tech 200 in the US.

    I vaguely remember reading about this in magazines, but never actually seen one. After looking it up online, I can see why. It was only around for tw year and had low specs. No way could it have competed with the likes of th C=64 or even the Atari 400. However, it did not pre-date the 64. The VZ-2 came out in '83, while the 64 came out a year earlier.

    I got the VZ200 in 1991, quite a bit after it release. My parents got it garage sale cheap (buying a new computer was a bit much back then, just fo to use). It was a bit dissapointing as I wanted the Atari 1040STE, but as had just been introduced to BASIC at school, it was fun to try BASIC at ho and draw graphics and make basic games.

    Dick Smith started an electronics store called, Dick Smith Electronics, an VZ 200 was their rebrand, sold with his face on it.

    A little later that year, they got a Vic 20 at a garage sale, which had be graphics, but lacked the drawing commands. A little later, the C64 came, second hand. You could do sprites, but again, no graphics. Not without entering some other machine code subroutines.

    I suppose they had to get it out quick, and once it was out, you can't pat it.
    --- SBBSecho 3.10-Win32
    * Origin: MS & RD BBS bbsweb.mozysswamp.org (3:633/384)

    I am 45. My gradnfather got me a Timex Sinclair when I was 2, CoCo2
    when I turned 5 (really cut my teeth on that one), then his
    hand-me-down Amstrad PC1512DD when I was in the fourth grade, and then
    in 192 started as an apprentice at our local computer store and learned
    to build machines and built my 486DX-33. I never stopped working in
    the field since I started in 1992, and I started BBSing back on the
    CoCo2. I never knew anyone with a Commodore when I was growing up, so
    I'm enjoying living an alternate-reality childhood with the C64U. I'm trying to spark an interest in computers with my nephews and nieces
    (they are much younger than 5 still), they already love allmy vintage electronics I bring, and it's fun to play with these things with them.

    I did get my daughters to enjoy a few Commodore 64 games on the
    emulator, mainly "Ducks Ahoy", "International Soccer" and "Decathlon".
    they watched my play "Beamrider" which was a favourite of mine too.


    Never got them into programming. They have Windows laptops now, and
    use those, but aren't that interested in learning how they actually
    work.

    Its hard to get them intersted, as there are so many distractions.
    One thing that helped our generation, was when you got those
    microcomputeres, there wasn't much eles you could to but program.
    Now, a new computer instantly has internet, YouTube, all the
    distractions. Back then, there was nothing, so may as well go through
    the manual.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mortar M.@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Tue Apr 14 06:00:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Dennis Katsonis to Mortar M. on Sun Apr 12 2026 11:25:58

    I suppose they had to get it out quick, and once it was out, you can't patch

    Nope. However, the BASIC and Kernal ROMs were socketed, so it is possible to replace the originals with new ones. However, Commodore was a very cost-conscious company so such an expense would've probably been rejected outright.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mortar M.@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Wed Apr 15 02:00:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate
    By: Dennis Katsonis to Mortar M. on Tue Apr 14 2026 23:48:00

    Nope. However, the BASIC and Kernal ROMs were socketed, so it is
    possible to replace the originals with new ones.

    The problem is you can't rework the already sold units.

    I believe I just indicated you could. If Commodore followed this path, the chips could've been sold as an upgrade, for those who wanted to make the change.

    Then you have incompatible BASIC variants, leaving the original buyers in the cold.

    Unlike business systems where compatibility is important, the home market at that time had no such need. As you indicated, there were already numerous BASIC dialects in the wild, by Commodore and third-party vendors and thanks to various sources like magazines, user groups, etc., most were supported in some fashion.
    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Dennis Katsonis@usenet@vk3heg.net to comp.sys.cbm on Wed Apr 15 01:00:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.cbm

    Mortar M. wrote to Dennis Katsonis <=-

    @MSGID: <69DD42CA.1380.fidocbm@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
    @REPLY: <69DAF4A6.1376.fidocbm@bbs.mozysswamp.org>
    Re: Re: Commodore 64 Ultimate Starlight
    By: Dennis Katsonis to Mortar M. on Sun Apr 12 2026 11:25:58

    I suppose they had to get it out quick, and once it was out, you can't patch

    Nope. However, the BASIC and Kernal ROMs were socketed, so it is
    possible to replace the originals with new ones. However, Commodore
    was a very cost-conscious company so such an expense would've probably been rejected outright.

    The problem is you can't rework the already sold units. Then you have incompatible BASIC variants, leaving the original buyers in the cold.

    The addon basics, like Simon BASIC were probably the best option,
    though I never used any seriously.

    --- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2