In message <10k2bri$272ps$1@druck.eternal-september.org>
druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 14:40, David Higton wrote:
Note that the RPi4 only does one wifi band; I don't know the RPi5.
The Raspberry Pi 3B+, 4 and 5 have both 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wifi bands, the
Zero W, Zero 2W and older Pi's only have 2.4GHz
Sorry, I should have been clearer. It only does one band at once.
There is only one radio.
David
But I have never seen it configured as a *bridge* to the network and
DHCP server via the Ethernet.
In message <10k2bri$272ps$1@druck.eternal-september.org>
druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 14:40, David Higton wrote:
Note that the RPi4 only does one wifi band; I don't know the RPi5.
The Raspberry Pi 3B+, 4 and 5 have both 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wifi bands, the
Zero W, Zero 2W and older Pi's only have 2.4GHz
Sorry, I should have been clearer. It only does one band at once.
There is only one radio.
On 11/01/2026 12:58, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
But I have never seen it configured as a *bridge* to the network and
DHCP server via the Ethernet.
I may be wrong and sometimes am but I thought all you needed to add was
edit /etc/sysctl.conf and ensure it contains "net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1",
save and reboot. Mine came with the line in there but commented out.
You need to allocate IP for ethernet and the TV manually and maybe play
with routing.
I have it running on a PI somewhere, I'll dig it out.
On 12/01/2026 20:16, David Higton wrote:
In message <10k2bri$272ps$1@druck.eternal-september.org>
druck <news@druck.org.uk> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 14:40, David Higton wrote:
Note that the RPi4 only does one wifi band; I don't know the RPi5.
The Raspberry Pi 3B+, 4 and 5 have both 2.4GHz and 5GHz Wifi bands, the
Zero W, Zero 2W and older Pi's only have 2.4GHz
Sorry, I should have been clearer. It only does one band at once.
There is only one radio.
You can always add another USB WiFi dongle if you want to act as an
access point on both bands simultaneously.
---druck
I may be wrong and sometimes am but I thought all you needed to add
was edit /etc/sysctl.conf and ensure it contains
"net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1", save and reboot.
Sorry, I should have been clearer. It only does one band at once.
There is only one radio.
David
Does that preclude 2 band operation?
I may be wrong and sometimes am but I thought all you needed to add was
edit /etc/sysctl.conf and ensure it contains "net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1",
save and reboot. Mine came with the line in there but commented out.
On 2026-01-13, mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> wrote:
I may be wrong and sometimes am but I thought all you needed to add was
edit /etc/sysctl.conf and ensure it contains "net.ipv4.ip_forward = 1",
save and reboot. Mine came with the line in there but commented out.
That is for IP routing, using seperate IP networks on the ethernet and wifi side. You can do that, but it may make the setup more complicated and cause problems with prototols that rely on broadcast/multicast packets, as these are not routed. Also, if your WIFI clients require internet access, you need to setup routes on your internet router so it can forward packages back to the WIFI gateway. You need to decide if routing or bridging best suits your needs.
"normal" WIFI access points usually operate in bridging mode.
For bridging, you need to set up a bridge device, with both the ethernet and wifi devices slaved to the bridge. In that scenario, the slave devices do
not get IP addresses assigned - the bridge device is the one with the IP address.
Looking at a running example (on custom hardware, not a raspberry),
with a single of the 3 wifi modules active, it looks like this (eth1 is the ethernet interface, phy0-ap0 is wifi):
root@lx6500-dev:~# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
br-lan 7fff.00a057802bee no eth1
phy0-ap0
root@lx6500-dev:~# ip l
4: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master br-lan state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:a0:57:80:2b:ee brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
5: br-lan: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:a0:57:80:2b:ee brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
6: phy0-ap0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-lan state DOWN mode DEFAULT group def0
link/ether 04:f0:21:bf:45:cc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
root@lx6500-dev:~# ip a
4: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq master br-lan state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:a0:57:80:2b:ee brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
5: br-lan: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 00:a0:57:80:2b:ee brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.1.1/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global br-lan
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::2a0:57ff:fe80:2bee/64 scope link proto kernel_ll
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
6: phy0-ap0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master br-lan state DOWN group default qlen 1000
link/ether 04:f0:21:bf:45:cc brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
Using that configuration, WIFI clients get addresses from the existing DHCP server on the LAN, and are in the same IP network as the LAN devices.
cu
Michael
4: nm-bridge: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 9000 qdisc noqueue
state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether d8:3a:dd:85:22:b1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes:
4: nm-bridge: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 9000 qdisc noqueue
state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether d8:3a:dd:85:22:b1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
Hmm, mtu 9000 on the bridge? That means jumbo frames and your
performance issue might be because something chokes on them. Your router
or whatever is in the other end. So try setting it to 1500 in your
chosen config tool.
On 19/01/2026 10:08, Anssi Saari wrote:
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes:
4: nm-bridge: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 9000 qdisc noqueue
state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
link/ether d8:3a:dd:85:22:b1 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
Hmm, mtu 9000 on the bridge? That means jumbo frames and your
performance issue might be because something chokes on them. Your router
or whatever is in the other end. So try setting it to 1500 in your
chosen config tool.
It made no difference. I added that in case it helped. It didnt.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,126 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 51:12:20 |
| Calls: | 14,414 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 186,401 |
| D/L today: |
10,485 files (2,847M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,548,925 |
| Posted today: | 1 |