• Re: FREE GAME: Car Mechanic Simulator 2018

    From candycanearter07@candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Mon Jun 8 15:00:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote at 16:19 this Friday (GMT):
    Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

    Awww yeah, we're getting back into free-games. The Number is
    salivating already.


    * Car Mechanic Simulator 2018
    https://store.steampowered.com/app/645630/Car_Mechanic_Simulator_2018/
    The best thing about this game is that you don't have to
    wonder what it's all about; the title tells you everything
    you need to know. It's basically yet-another-workplace-sim,
    this one focused on building cars. Is it the deepest
    simulator with revolutionary gameplay that will teach you
    how to build and maintain cars in real life? No, but you get
    to tinker with car parts and then drive your creation on the
    track to see how well you did. It's far better than a lot of
    the newer asset-flip workplace sims, anyway. So get out your
    grease guns, scrounge the junkyard for parts, and build
    that hotrod of your dreams that you never could in real life
    because of a lack of time, money, and space.


    You've got until the 27th to claim this freebie. Drive fast! Also,
    there's some free DLC available too, so be sure to grab that as well.




    No thanks, I played Frog Dissection on the C-64 and once was enough,
    I'll say.


    But consider all the technical advances in dissection in 30 years!!
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Spalls Hurgenson@spallshurgenson@gmail.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Mon Jun 8 11:57:17 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    On Mon, 8 Jun 2026 15:00:04 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> said this thing:

    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote at 16:19 this Friday (GMT):
    Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

    Awww yeah, we're getting back into free-games. The Number is
    salivating already.


    * Car Mechanic Simulator 2018
    https://store.steampowered.com/app/645630/Car_Mechanic_Simulator_2018/


    No thanks, I played Frog Dissection on the C-64 and once was enough,
    I'll say.

    But consider all the technical advances in dissection in 30 years!!

    I remember "Operation: Frog" on DOS. Well, saying 'remember' like that
    implies I played the game back when DOS was still a going concern;
    actually, I only discovered the game five or ten years back, as I was
    building up my collection of DOS games. Back when I had to actually
    dissect a frog, there were no computer games. We had to rip apart the
    poor beastie for real.

    Regardless, it made me wonder if there were any modern incarnations of
    that sort of game; perhaps an edutainment title for the kiddies of the
    2020s? And the best I found was a VR game for the Meta Quest headset.*
    Which, admittedly, is technically much advanced over the fairly static
    images from the DOS days... even if the actually frog still has a
    somewhat cartoony look to it. I guess you don't want to make things
    look TOO real when it comes to dissection.

    Although you have to wonder how many schools have VR headsets.


    * https://www.altlabvr.com/dissection-simulator-frog-edition
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Justisaur@justisaur@yahoo.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Tue Jun 9 09:55:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    On 6/8/2026 8:57 AM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    On Mon, 8 Jun 2026 15:00:04 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> said this thing:

    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote at 16:19 this Friday (GMT):
    Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

    Awww yeah, we're getting back into free-games. The Number is
    salivating already.


    * Car Mechanic Simulator 2018
    https://store.steampowered.com/app/645630/Car_Mechanic_Simulator_2018/


    No thanks, I played Frog Dissection on the C-64 and once was enough,
    I'll say.

    But consider all the technical advances in dissection in 30 years!!

    I remember "Operation: Frog" on DOS. Well, saying 'remember' like that implies I played the game back when DOS was still a going concern;
    actually, I only discovered the game five or ten years back, as I was building up my collection of DOS games. Back when I had to actually
    dissect a frog, there were no computer games. We had to rip apart the
    poor beastie for real.

    Regardless, it made me wonder if there were any modern incarnations of
    that sort of game; perhaps an edutainment title for the kiddies of the
    2020s? And the best I found was a VR game for the Meta Quest headset.*
    Which, admittedly, is technically much advanced over the fairly static
    images from the DOS days... even if the actually frog still has a
    somewhat cartoony look to it. I guess you don't want to make things
    look TOO real when it comes to dissection.

    Although you have to wonder how many schools have VR headsets.


    Seems like that's a better way to do frog dissection. My daughter had
    real dead frog dissection in her 7th grade class last year. They had it
    for open house, so we could go in and see the frogs being dissected.
    The smell was unpleasant, but not too bad for dead frogs.
    --
    -Justisaur

    ø-ø
    (\_/)\
    `-'\ `--.___,
    ¶¬'\( ,_.-'
    \\
    ^'
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Spalls Hurgenson@spallshurgenson@gmail.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Tue Jun 9 13:46:34 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    On Tue, 9 Jun 2026 09:55:08 -0700, Justisaur <justisaur@yahoo.com>
    said this thing:



    Seems like that's a better way to do frog dissection. My daughter had
    real dead frog dissection in her 7th grade class last year. They had it
    for open house, so we could go in and see the frogs being dissected.
    The smell was unpleasant, but not too bad for dead frogs.

    I'd rather they just did away with the thing entirely. I'm not really
    sure what an actual dissection --whether real or virtual-- really
    teaches kids over learning where the body parts are on a picture.
    Except maybe to identify the kids who get too much glee out of
    chopping apart living creatures so they can get the help they need?

    But if you gotta have it in junior high... ten points to the school
    that uses something like Surgeon Simulator* instead. It has about as
    much relevance and teaching possibility as a real dissection, but is
    cheaper and more fun ;-)





    * this game
    https://store.steampowered.com/app/233720/Surgeon_Simulator/

    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From phoenix@j63840576@gmail.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Tue Jun 9 12:04:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    On Tue, 9 Jun 2026 09:55:08 -0700, Justisaur <justisaur@yahoo.com>
    said this thing:



    Seems like that's a better way to do frog dissection. My daughter had
    real dead frog dissection in her 7th grade class last year. They had it
    for open house, so we could go in and see the frogs being dissected.
    The smell was unpleasant, but not too bad for dead frogs.

    I'd rather they just did away with the thing entirely. I'm not really
    sure what an actual dissection --whether real or virtual-- really
    teaches kids over learning where the body parts are on a picture.
    Except maybe to identify the kids who get too much glee out of
    chopping apart living creatures so they can get the help they need?

    But if you gotta have it in junior high... ten points to the school
    that uses something like Surgeon Simulator* instead. It has about as
    much relevance and teaching possibility as a real dissection, but is
    cheaper and more fun ;-)

    It taught me something. It taught me to slow the fuck down while doing
    stuff, because I caught my finger real good with the scalpel. That on
    top of rudimentary knowledge of organ placement.

    I could maybe agree with you on earthworm dissection -- here's an animal
    with basically zero (well one -- the heart) organs, and what am I really supposed to see?
    --
    The future has begun
    The waiting is over
    We have gained time
    For one blink of an eye
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Xocyll@Xocyll@gmx.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Wed Jun 10 05:30:41 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    Justisaur <justisaur@yahoo.com> looked up from reading the entrails of
    the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:

    On 6/8/2026 8:57 AM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    On Mon, 8 Jun 2026 15:00:04 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07
    <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> said this thing:

    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote at 16:19 this Friday (GMT):
    Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

    Awww yeah, we're getting back into free-games. The Number is
    salivating already.


    * Car Mechanic Simulator 2018
    https://store.steampowered.com/app/645630/Car_Mechanic_Simulator_2018/


    No thanks, I played Frog Dissection on the C-64 and once was enough,
    I'll say.

    But consider all the technical advances in dissection in 30 years!!

    I remember "Operation: Frog" on DOS. Well, saying 'remember' like that
    implies I played the game back when DOS was still a going concern;
    actually, I only discovered the game five or ten years back, as I was
    building up my collection of DOS games. Back when I had to actually
    dissect a frog, there were no computer games. We had to rip apart the
    poor beastie for real.

    Regardless, it made me wonder if there were any modern incarnations of
    that sort of game; perhaps an edutainment title for the kiddies of the
    2020s? And the best I found was a VR game for the Meta Quest headset.*
    Which, admittedly, is technically much advanced over the fairly static
    images from the DOS days... even if the actually frog still has a
    somewhat cartoony look to it. I guess you don't want to make things
    look TOO real when it comes to dissection.

    Although you have to wonder how many schools have VR headsets.


    Seems like that's a better way to do frog dissection. My daughter had
    real dead frog dissection in her 7th grade class last year. They had it
    for open house, so we could go in and see the frogs being dissected.
    The smell was unpleasant, but not too bad for dead frogs.

    Ooo flashback to grade 10 biology class, dissecting worms, frogs, fish.
    Hate the smell of formaldehyde.

    Xocyll
    --
    I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
    a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
    Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
    FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Spalls Hurgenson@spallshurgenson@gmail.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Wed Jun 10 11:57:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 05:30:41 -0400, Xocyll <Xocyll@gmx.com> said this
    thing:

    Justisaur <justisaur@yahoo.com> looked up from reading the entrails of
    the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:

    On 6/8/2026 8:57 AM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    On Mon, 8 Jun 2026 15:00:04 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07
    <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> said this thing:

    phoenix <j63840576@gmail.com> wrote at 16:19 this Friday (GMT):
    Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

    Awww yeah, we're getting back into free-games. The Number is
    salivating already.


    * Car Mechanic Simulator 2018
    https://store.steampowered.com/app/645630/Car_Mechanic_Simulator_2018/ >>>

    No thanks, I played Frog Dissection on the C-64 and once was enough, >>>>> I'll say.

    But consider all the technical advances in dissection in 30 years!!

    I remember "Operation: Frog" on DOS. Well, saying 'remember' like that
    implies I played the game back when DOS was still a going concern;
    actually, I only discovered the game five or ten years back, as I was
    building up my collection of DOS games. Back when I had to actually
    dissect a frog, there were no computer games. We had to rip apart the
    poor beastie for real.

    Regardless, it made me wonder if there were any modern incarnations of
    that sort of game; perhaps an edutainment title for the kiddies of the
    2020s? And the best I found was a VR game for the Meta Quest headset.*
    Which, admittedly, is technically much advanced over the fairly static
    images from the DOS days... even if the actually frog still has a
    somewhat cartoony look to it. I guess you don't want to make things
    look TOO real when it comes to dissection.

    Although you have to wonder how many schools have VR headsets.


    Seems like that's a better way to do frog dissection. My daughter had >>real dead frog dissection in her 7th grade class last year. They had it >>for open house, so we could go in and see the frogs being dissected.
    The smell was unpleasant, but not too bad for dead frogs.

    Ooo flashback to grade 10 biology class, dissecting worms, frogs, fish.
    Hate the smell of formaldehyde.


    Same. Although I think we did it younger than grade 10 (maybe grade
    7?)

    I don't recall actually LEARNING anything from the experience. The
    argument made by frog-dissection proponents is that the hands-on
    approach teaches kids anatomy better; that (to quote an article on the
    subject) you can see :

    "how the frog‘s three-chambered heart pumps blood
    cells through the circulatory system, winding oxygen
    through delicate alveoli capillaries in the lungs [and]
    tracing this path firsthand grants intuitive insight
    difficult to replicate otherwise."

    And I get the theory, but at least in my experience (and, in my
    memory, those of my fellow students), the goopy, gory nature of the
    experience interfered with actually seeing any of that. We were all
    too grossed out to really analyze what we we seeing, and mostly just
    following the rote instructions on HOW to cut into the beastie rather
    than looking at the various bits were we yanking out.

    Not to mention, the tiny, goopy bits of meat we were pulling out? They
    looked nothing like the clean diagrams in the books, and --at least in
    my case-- I had no hope of identifying a heart from a liver, much less
    figuring out that one had three-chambers or the other had a bile
    pouch. You could have told me the lung was a muscle and I'd have known
    no better.

    So I really don't buy into the idea that it's a better learning
    experience than anything you get from books. I can seriously say that
    I probably would have gotten a better learning experience about how
    organs fit together from Surgeon Simulator than the actual
    scalpel-to-flesh experience I had in school.

    Heck, I think I might have gotten a better learning experience from
    the GHOUL system used in the first "Soldier of Fortune" game. Shoot a
    bad-guy in the gut and learn, "oh, so THAT'S where the intestines
    are!" ;-)




    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From phoenix@j63840576@gmail.com to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Wed Jun 10 10:32:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    Heck, I think I might have gotten a better learning experience from
    the GHOUL system used in the first "Soldier of Fortune" game. Shoot a
    bad-guy in the gut and learn, "oh, so THAT'S where the intestines
    are!";-)

    C'mon, that's just retarded and crazy. You have zero legitimacy.
    --
    The future has begun
    The waiting is over
    We have gained time
    For one blink of an eye
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From candycanearter07@candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid to comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action on Mon Jun 15 13:40:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action

    Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote at 17:46 this Tuesday (GMT):
    On Tue, 9 Jun 2026 09:55:08 -0700, Justisaur <justisaur@yahoo.com>
    said this thing:



    Seems like that's a better way to do frog dissection. My daughter had >>real dead frog dissection in her 7th grade class last year. They had it >>for open house, so we could go in and see the frogs being dissected.
    The smell was unpleasant, but not too bad for dead frogs.

    I'd rather they just did away with the thing entirely. I'm not really
    sure what an actual dissection --whether real or virtual-- really
    teaches kids over learning where the body parts are on a picture.
    Except maybe to identify the kids who get too much glee out of
    chopping apart living creatures so they can get the help they need?

    I managed to dodge having to do it when i was in hs and im glad i did

    But if you gotta have it in junior high... ten points to the school
    that uses something like Surgeon Simulator* instead. It has about as
    much relevance and teaching possibility as a real dissection, but is
    cheaper and more fun ;-)





    * this game
    https://store.steampowered.com/app/233720/Surgeon_Simulator/


    Dunno if it would run on a school computer, but that would be nice ^^
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2