Currently, atomics are an all-or-nothing choice (via __SDTC_NO_ATOMICS__).
I'd like to see a third option: support atomics, except for the creation
of atomic_flag from allocated storage (or raw character arrays). This
would make it feasible to implement atomics for some low-end systems,
that otherwise can't support them efficiently.
Your opinions on the proposal and the proposed wording are welcome: http://www.colecovision.eu/stuff/proposal-atomic_flag.html
Philipp
I think it is fine to implement parts of the atomics - you just can't
define the __SDTC_NO_ATOMICS__ symbol unless you cover it all.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,089 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 151:20:05 |
| Calls: | 13,921 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 187,021 |
| D/L today: |
3,413 files (855M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,457,085 |