• Please to Test my apk at google play storehttps://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo

    From Jakub@jak74@interia.pl to comp.mobile.android on Tue Dec 2 10:57:44 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    Please to Test my apk at google play store

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marian@marianjones@helpfulpeople.com to comp.mobile.android on Tue Dec 2 11:04:20 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    Jakub wrote:
    Please to Test my apk at google play store

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo

    The app you linked is called Photo by developer Bober Jakub.

    It's apparently a simple photography tool that lets you take pictures with front or back cameras, add GPS location data, adjust resolution, use flash,
    and even automate photo-taking. The developer asks users if a QR code
    reader should be added. The developer states no data is collected and
    therefore no data can be shared with third parties.

    The November 25, 2025 updated add the GPS EXIF data tags.
    Website: jakub1.pl
    Email: jak74@interia.pl
    Location: Gdynia, Poland

    In the future, I'd compare it to "Open Camera", but it's not ready (yet)
    for that since Open Camera is an existing long-standing camera app and this
    is new.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Arno Welzel@usenet@arnowelzel.de to comp.mobile.android on Tue Dec 2 20:15:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    Jakub, 2025-12-02 10:57:

    Please to Test my apk at google play store

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo

    I understand, that you want to explore app development. But there are
    plenty of Camera apps - also open source ones like this:

    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.sourceforge.opencamera>

    <https://f-droid.org/packages/net.sourceforge.opencamera/>

    Source: <https://sourceforge.net/p/opencamera/code/ci/master/tree/>
    --
    Arno Welzel
    https://arnowelzel.de
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marian@marianjones@helpfulpeople.com to comp.mobile.android on Tue Dec 2 16:01:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    Arno Welzel wrote:
    Please to Test my apk at google play store

    https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=pl.jakub1.photo

    I understand, that you want to explore app development. But there are
    plenty of Camera apps - also open source ones like this: <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.sourceforge.opencamera> <https://f-droid.org/packages/net.sourceforge.opencamera/>
    Source: <https://sourceforge.net/p/opencamera/code/ci/master/tree/>

    When I had tested, oh, I don't know, scores or more of free camera apps,
    the one thing I'd like to see in Jakub's camera app is the ability to
    switch between flash & no flash in a simple on:off:on:off:on:off toggle.

    It has been years since I've tested all known free camera apps, but that's
    the one feature that I wanted most in a camera app. A simple flash on/off.

    Other than that, the next thing I want in a camera app is a simple button
    that sets the camera to a known set of settings instantly without fuss. Far
    too many times I find myself digging into the settings to reset something.

    But back to the flash button, it's shocking to me that a simple on:off
    flash is so hard to find in a camera app. Nobody thinks about the GUI. :(
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Arno Welzel@usenet@arnowelzel.de to comp.mobile.android on Wed Dec 3 00:49:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    Marian, 2025-12-03 00:01:

    [...]
    But back to the flash button, it's shocking to me that a simple on:off
    flash is so hard to find in a camera app. Nobody thinks about the GUI. :(

    I think one issue is the number of controls in the UI - when adding more controls, it gets harder to use since you may accidentally tap a button.
    That may be the reason why even the Google camera app in Pixel phones
    hides the flash option in a submenu.

    But otherwise - since Open Camera is open source, everyone is free to
    add this in the UI and create a pull request for it.
    --
    Arno Welzel
    https://arnowelzel.de
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marian@marianjones@helpfulpeople.com to comp.mobile.android on Thu Dec 4 19:33:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    Arno Welzel wrote:
    But back to the flash button, it's shocking to me that a simple on:off
    flash is so hard to find in a camera app. Nobody thinks about the GUI. :(

    I think one issue is the number of controls in the UI - when adding more controls, it gets harder to use since you may accidentally tap a button.
    That may be the reason why even the Google camera app in Pixel phones
    hides the flash option in a submenu.

    But otherwise - since Open Camera is open source, everyone is free to
    add this in the UI and create a pull request for it.

    I never disagree with any logically sensible viewpoint, which is that
    camera apps start to get complicated and then even easy stuff is hard to
    do.

    But the flash...

    The flash...

    Every camera app has a flash.

    It's shocking to me it's not just on:off for the controls.

    IMHO, it should be off, and then when you tap it, it should be on.
    If you tap it again, it should go off. And if you tap again, it goes on.

    Shockingly, that's NOT how most flash controls work.
    Do you know of any camera app whose flash works the way I want it to work?

    This is my main recommendation to the OP.
    Set up the flash to be single touch binary.

    If it's on, then a tap shuts it off.
    If it's off, then a tap turns it on.

    What's so hard about that?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From R.Wieser@address@is.invalid to comp.mobile.android on Fri Dec 5 07:57:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    Arlen,

    If it's on, then a tap shuts it off.
    If it's off, then a tap turns it on.

    What's so hard about that?

    https://thedailywtf.com/articles/The_Big_Red_Button

    Regards,
    Rudy Wieser


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to comp.mobile.android on Fri Dec 5 11:19:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    On 2025-12-05 03:33, Marian wrote:
    IMHO, it should be off, and then when you tap it, it should be on.
    If you tap it again, it should go off. And if you tap again, it goes on.

    Mine is tap flash, then choose auto, off, or on. It makes perfect sense
    to me.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marian@marianjones@helpfulpeople.com to comp.mobile.android on Tue Dec 9 19:22:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    Carlos E.R. wrote:
    IMHO, it should be off, and then when you tap it, it should be on.
    If you tap it again, it should go off. And if you tap again, it goes on.

    Mine is tap flash, then choose auto, off, or on. It makes perfect sense
    to me.

    Hi Carlos,

    Thanks for explaining how your camera app flash works, which is how most
    work, so I agree with your characterization of how most app flashes work.

    My point is to the developer who is asking us to test his camera app.
    My point is for him to strongly consider an on:off:on:off:on:off flash.

    The way I'd recommend he set it up, is he'd have in "Settings" a switch for
    SimpleFlashGUI=yes/no

    If the user wants the simple flash GUI described above, they set it to yes.
    If they want the GUI you described (which most camera apps do), they leave
    it at the default.

    Remember, I'm one of the few people on this ng who have tested every single free adfree camera app known to the group, where that's the one feature I
    found lacking in almost all of them.

    It's why I suggested it to the OP who is a developer of a camera app.
    He can add it and then his camera app is DIFFERENTIATED from the others.

    Everybody wins.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Arno Welzel@usenet@arnowelzel.de to comp.mobile.android on Fri Dec 12 12:57:40 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    Marian, 2025-12-05 03:33:

    [...]
    But the flash...

    The flash...

    Every camera app has a flash.

    It's shocking to me it's not just on:off for the controls.

    Because there are multiple options for it:

    - off
    - always on
    - automatic if needed

    And sometimes also additional features like filling flash or open or
    closing flash. When you are used to "real" cameras, you know, that a
    flash is not just a simple "on/off".
    --
    Arno Welzel
    https://arnowelzel.de
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marian@marianjones@helpfulpeople.com to comp.mobile.android on Fri Dec 12 10:24:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

    Arno Welzel wrote:
    It's shocking to me it's not just on:off for the controls.

    Because there are multiple options for it:

    - off
    - always on
    - automatic if needed

    And sometimes also additional features like filling flash or open or
    closing flash. When you are used to "real" cameras, you know, that a
    flash is not just a simple "on/off".

    Oh, I get it. I worked in the Silicon Valley on software that costs
    millions per seat, so I'm fully aware how software developers think.

    Since I have tested all the known free camera apps for Android, I'm well
    aware of how the flash GUI works because very few people actually think
    about reducing clicks.

    All I'm suggesting to the developer is he have the option of a "simple"
    mode where the flash goes on or off or back on and off with each tap.

    The default can still be the multiple-tap mode to turn a switch on. :)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2