From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

On 2024-07-16, Mickey D <mickeydavis078XX@ptd.net> wrote:

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 08:58:38 -0700, Alan wrote:

No iPhone battery problems. No problem at all. Keep moving. Mind the
gap.
https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/6/24028162/apple-batterygate-payments-issued-class-action-lawsuit

There was literally no problem with the batteries in that case that
is not a problem for every smartphone battery.

Except that it only affected Apple

Liar. Samsung was fined at the same time: https://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-slow-down-fine-2018-917806/

& even then, only some Apple phones,

Liar. It affected all iPhones running iOS 10.2.1 and later which is when
the feature was introduced.

Apple design was the problem.

Nope. No evidence of that baseless assertion.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

On 2024-07-17, Mickey D <mickeydavis078XX@ptd.net> wrote:

On 16 Jul 2024 22:57:46 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

Except that it only affected Apple

Liar. Samsung was fined at the same time:
https://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-slow-down-fine-2018-917806/

Apple was charged with both criminal and civil crimes, almost all of
which Apple had to settle for a total of well over 100 times that
Samsung fine.

Your claim that it only affected Apple is bullshit, little Arlen.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

On 2024-07-17, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2024-07-16 21:33, Mickey D wrote:

On 16 Jul 2024 22:57:46 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

Except that it only affected Apple

Liar. Samsung was fined at the same time:
https://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-slow-down-fine-2018-917806/

Apple was charged with both criminal and civil crimes, almost all of
which Apple had to settle for a total of well over 100 times that
Samsung fine.

So the size of the fine is important...

...why exactly?

So he can try to move the goal post.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

On 2024-07-17, Mickey D <mickeydavis078XX@ptd.net> wrote:

On 17 Jul 2024 16:31:57 GMT, Jolly Roger wrote:

Except that it only affected Apple

Liar. Samsung was fined at the same time:
https://www.androidauthority.com/samsung-slow-down-fine-2018-917806/

Apple was charged with both criminal and civil crimes, almost all
of which Apple had to settle for a total of well over 100 times
that Samsung fine.

So the size of the fine is important...

...why exactly?

So he can try to move the goal post.

You're the one who moved the goalpost to Samsung

No, child. You claimed this was an "only Apple" issue, and I showed your
to be wrong. Now you're desperately trying to move the goal post to
"yeah but Apple had more fines". You're a mental midget, little Arlen.

plonk

By all means, run away! The adults are talking.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

On 2024-07-17, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2024-07-16 11:17, Chris wrote:

None has ever even mentioned issues with the battery.

I would absolutely love having a phone with a four or five day
battery life as we used to get in the early days of smart phones.

What early "smart phone" had a battery that lasted four or five days?

I guess they are talking about dumb phones. I recall I was lucky to get
5 hours out of my Palm Treo back in the day.

It goes without saying most people would love a smartphone that lasted
several days on a charge - but they almost certainly would hate the
additional weight required with today's technologies.
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.mobile.android

On 2024-07-17, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:

On 2024-07-17 13:03, Andrew wrote:

Alan Browne wrote on Wed, 17 Jul 2024 14:40:18 -0400 :

What early "smart phone" had a battery that lasted four or five days?

One you charge and leave on the sideboard unused.

The iPhone *must* be charged every night because of the crappy battery.

And yet it is among the longest running smartphones...

<https://www.tomsguide.com/us/smartphones-best-battery-life,review-2857.html>

'The 14 Plus is the hardest iPhone 14 model to recommend, but battery
life is the big thing in its favour. This is a phone that can
comfortably last two full days of normal use, and potentially stretch to three if you only use it occasionally.'

This can't be. Arlen said it *must* be charged every night!

Maybe we should check with badgolferman...
--
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

JR
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114