Ah, would be interesting to have a look. This reminded me of how Feynman talks about some books in his first memoir, at least, what was it,
"Calculus for the Practical Man"?
On Mon, 22 Jun 2026 00:50:29 -0400, c186282 wrote:
Oh, we DID reach "the point" with knowledge. The so called
"Renaissance Man" can no longer exist - cannot even remotely put
*everything* into a single brain. Some of the Nature/Science articles
- they are SO hyper-detailed/focused on obscure chem/physics/math
that often the abstracts were as far as I could get. Specialists and
sub-specialists and sub-sub-specialists now and forever more until
the next big meteor hits.
I have a book on computational neuroscience that is headache inducing. I know something about neurophysiology but when you try to turn it into math
I get lost. Heidegger can also be headache inducing but as far as I can understand it he thought philosophy went to hell when the Pythagoreans
tried to turn everything into math.
- the math was much like the dreaded math textbooks that introduce a few basics on page 1, then on page 2 say "From this it is obvious that..."
and leap into the next universe.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,126 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 50:03:24 |
| Calls: | 14,414 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 186,400 |
| D/L today: |
10,397 files (2,824M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,548,892 |
| Posted today: | 1 |