From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy
On 2026-04-08 7:35 p.m., 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:
W dniu 9.04.2026 o 00:10, CrudeSausage pisze:
fil-c maintains compatibility with C/C++ yet provides safety.
So, the C/C++ are again safe and recommended?
Not exactly. Bryan Lunduke is simply pointing out that instead of
abandoning C and rewriting everything in Rust from scratch to supposedly
help with memory safety, it makes a lot more sense to simply recompile
code that is already written in C with fil-C which enhances memory
safety. Besides, the Rust rewrites of decades-old C utilities is
strikingly terrible.
--
CrudeSausage
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2