From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

Hello!

The good days are over also for Linux fan boyz! Read this thriller
review - probably this is near future!

<https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20260406#origami>
--
Have nice day!
Jacek Marcin Jaworski, Pruszcz Gd., woj. Pomorskie, Polska 🇵🇱, EU 🇪🇺;
tel.: +48-609-170-742, najlepiej w godz.: 5:00-5:55 lub 16:00-17:25; <jmj@energokod.gda.pl>, gpg: 4A541AA7A6E872318B85D7F6A651CC39244B0BFA;
Domowa s. WWW: <https://energokod.gda.pl>;
Mini Netykieta: <https://energokod.gda.pl/MiniNetykieta.html>;
Mailowa Samoobrona: <https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/pl>.
UWAGA:
NIE ZACIĄGAJ "UKRYTEGO DŁUGU"! PŁAĆ ZA PROG. FOSS I INFO. INTERNETOWE! CZYTAJ DARMOWY: "17. Raport Totaliztyczny - Patroni Kontra Bankierzy": <https://energokod.gda.pl/raporty-totaliztyczne/17.%20Patroni%20Kontra%20Bankierzy.pdf>
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

W dniu 8.04.2026 o 17:46, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 pisze:

I make typo in subject:

New night mare Linux distros approach!!! Origami 2026.06 review in last DistroWatch Weekly Issue 1167

Should be:

New night mare Linux distros approach!!! Origami 2026.03 review in last DistroWatch Weekly Issue 1167

NOTE: Origami 2026.03, not Origami 2026.06.
--
Jacek Marcin Jaworski, Pruszcz Gd., woj. Pomorskie, Polska 🇵🇱, EU 🇪🇺;
tel.: +48-609-170-742, najlepiej w godz.: 5:00-5:55 lub 16:00-17:25; <jmj@energokod.gda.pl>, gpg: 4A541AA7A6E872318B85D7F6A651CC39244B0BFA;
Domowa s. WWW: <https://energokod.gda.pl>;
Mini Netykieta: <https://energokod.gda.pl/MiniNetykieta.html>;
Mailowa Samoobrona: <https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/pl>.
UWAGA:
NIE ZACIĄGAJ "UKRYTEGO DŁUGU"! PŁAĆ ZA PROG. FOSS I INFO. INTERNETOWE! CZYTAJ DARMOWY: "17. Raport Totaliztyczny - Patroni Kontra Bankierzy": <https://energokod.gda.pl/raporty-totaliztyczne/17.%20Patroni%20Kontra%20Bankierzy.pdf>

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 4/8/2026 11:46 AM, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

Hello!

The good days are over also for Linux fan boyz!

They had good days?

Read this thriller
review - probably this is near future!

<https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20260406#origami>

"Using this distribution was like sandpapering my skin and underlines
how important it is to have multiple distributions in the world."

That should've been the first line of the review.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 17:46:03 +0200, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

The good days are over also for Linux fan boyz! Read this thriller
review - probably this is near future!

All GNU/Linux distros are fucking worthless junk because all distros
completely stifle the most important aspect of GNU/Linux which is
the ability to CONFIGURE.

Without the ability to configure a distro can only create a stunted
and hollow shell of an OS.

Of course, the motherfucking distro lackeys cannot care because all motherfucking distro lackeys are stupid and intellectually lazy fucks.

One of my machines, based on a 12-year-old Core i7-4770, can
rival any more recent machines due to superior configuration,
and this is proven beyond doubt via benchmarks.

Only Gentoo allows the user to configure.

Only Gentoo.

Brother, if you ain't using Gentoo then you are one sick fuck.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 4/8/26 11:46, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

Hello!

The good days are over also for Linux fan boyz! Read this thriller
review - probably this is near future!

<https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20260406#origami>

1) I don't love Fedora/RHEL derivs very much

2) Fuck "MOK" ... sounds like the Ubuntu scheme
to entrap everyone in their cloud services.

3) I'm not gonna buy all new hardware just to
run their distro (and half my computing is
on PIs these days anyhow).

You can build perfectly good and secure servers
on top of vanilla Debian, Arch derivs or even
Centos (if you can stand the Gnome DT (I can't))
or some of the BSDs. In short the world doesn't
need Origami or their weird schemes.

But then everybody thinks they have the Better Plan.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 2026-04-08 12:12 p.m., DFS wrote:

On 4/8/2026 11:46 AM, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

Hello!

The good days are over also for Linux fan boyz!

They had good days?

Late 90s. Windows 9x was so bad that a lot of people were excited at the prospect of a stable operating system. Little did they know that it was
often difficult to install and no more stable than what they were used to.

Read this thriller review - probably this is near future!

<https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20260406#origami>

"Using this distribution was like sandpapering my skin and underlines
how important it is to have multiple distributions in the world."

That should've been the first line of the review.

For many, looking for the right distribution is no easier than what
Indiana Jones goes through looking for a particular object of value.
--
CrudeSausage
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Wed, 08 Apr 2026 16:18:23 +0000, Distro Lackey wrote:

Only Gentoo allows the user to configure.

Only Gentoo.

Brother, if you ain't using Gentoo then you are one sick fuck.

I heard that Gentoo Sux though. Who wants to use a Linux distro that is universally disliked and ridiculed as much as Gentoo is? There must be something seriously wrong with Gentoo.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 17:46:03 +0200, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

The good days are over also for Linux fan boyz! Read this thriller
review - probably this is near future!

<https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20260406#origami>

Oh no! It’s based on Fedora, which comes from Red Hat, the company
that Lennart Poettering runs! This means that all our machines will automatically upgrade to running it next week!
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 4/8/2026 12:18 PM, Lameass Larry (aka Distro Lackey) wrote:

Only Gentoo allows the user to configure.

What if we consider it a waste of time to configure our software for
virtually no measurable improvement, physically or psychologically?

What if I'd rather chop and dig up 15 bushes in my front yard?

Do you get it, you deranged one-note dweeb?

GFIA



--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

W dniu 8.04.2026 o 23:04, Lawrence D’Oliveiro pisze:

Oh no! It’s based on Fedora, which comes from Red Hat

This is only half true: Since 2018-10-28, sun. Fedora belongs to evil
IBM corpo, which made German concentration camps available.

There is not so bad Jewish book about IBM and III Reich business:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust>

, but the book leave important/basic questions without answers. For eg.:
1. Why there is only one photograph IBM machine in whole book?
2. Why the photograph of IBM machine is silly described?
3. Why lack in the book complete photograph catalogue all IBM machines
used in concentration camps in III Reich?
4. Why lack in the book complete catalogue with description about all
tasks can be performed by IBM machines used in concentration camps in
III Reich?
5. Why lack in the book description how IBM machines were used every day
by concentration camps SS staff?
--
Jacek Marcin Jaworski, Pruszcz Gd., woj. Pomorskie, Polska 🇵🇱, EU 🇪🇺;
tel.: +48-609-170-742, najlepiej w godz.: 5:00-5:55 lub 16:00-17:25; <jmj@energokod.gda.pl>, gpg: 4A541AA7A6E872318B85D7F6A651CC39244B0BFA;
Domowa s. WWW: <https://energokod.gda.pl>;
Mini Netykieta: <https://energokod.gda.pl/MiniNetykieta.html>;
Mailowa Samoobrona: <https://emailselfdefense.fsf.org/pl>.
UWAGA:
NIE ZACIĄGAJ "UKRYTEGO DŁUGU"! PŁAĆ ZA PROG. FOSS I INFO. INTERNETOWE! CZYTAJ DARMOWY: "17. Raport Totaliztyczny - Patroni Kontra Bankierzy": <https://energokod.gda.pl/raporty-totaliztyczne/17.%20Patroni%20Kontra%20Bankierzy.pdf>

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 21:04:24 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:

Oh no! It’s based on Fedora, which comes from Red Hat, the company
that Lennart Poettering runs! This means that all our machines will automatically upgrade to running it next week!

Poettering doesn't have the brains to run a company. He doesn't
have the brains to program. Systemd is a piddling accomplishment
that could have equaled by any script kiddy.

What GNU/Linux requires is APPLICATIONS, but neither Poettering
nor RedHat could ever deliver.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 08/04/2026 23:55, Distro Lackey wrote:

On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 21:04:24 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:

Oh no! It’s based on Fedora, which comes from Red Hat, the company
that Lennart Poettering runs! This means that all our machines will
automatically upgrade to running it next week!

Poettering doesn't have the brains to run a company. He doesn't
have the brains to program. Systemd is a piddling accomplishment
that could have equaled by any script kiddy.

And that's why he now works for Microsoft

What GNU/Linux requires is APPLICATIONS, but neither Poettering
nor RedHat could ever deliver.

--
WOKE is an acronym... Without Originality, Knowledge or Education.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Thu, 4/9/2026 6:46 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

On 08/04/2026 23:55, Distro Lackey wrote:

On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 21:04:24 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:

Oh no! It’s based on Fedora, which comes from Red Hat, the company
that Lennart Poettering runs! This means that all our machines will
automatically upgrade to running it next week!

Poettering doesn't have the brains to run a company.  He doesn't
have the brains to program.  Systemd is a piddling accomplishment
that could have equaled by any script kiddy.

And that's why he now works for Microsoft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lennart_Poettering

Poettering worked for Red Hat from 2008 to 2022.[2][3]

He then joined Microsoft.[4][5][6][7]

In 2026, Poettering left Microsoft to cofound Amutable, <===
a company focused on integrity verification for Linux systems.[8][9]

And the review, is of the distro from Amutable.

Based on the three reviews on the Distrowatch page,
I would guess the "engine" of the OS is what they worked
on first. The rest of what you would want in a distro
is left for later.

https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=origami

Paul

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 2026-04-09 00:55, Distro Lackey wrote:

On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 21:04:24 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:

Oh no! It’s based on Fedora, which comes from Red Hat, the company
that Lennart Poettering runs! This means that all our machines will
automatically upgrade to running it next week!

Poettering doesn't have the brains to run a company. He doesn't
have the brains to program. Systemd is a piddling accomplishment
that could have equaled by any script kiddy.

Sure. Testified by the many people that have created working
alternatives or improved existing alternatives.

What GNU/Linux requires is APPLICATIONS, but neither Poettering
nor RedHat could ever deliver.

LOL.
--
Cheers, Carlos.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 4/8/26 4:42 PM, CtrlAltDel wrote:

On Wed, 08 Apr 2026 16:18:23 +0000, Distro Lackey wrote:

Only Gentoo allows the user to configure.

Only Gentoo.

Brother, if you ain't using Gentoo then you are one sick fuck.

I heard that Gentoo Sux though. Who wants to use a Linux distro that is universally disliked and ridiculed as much as Gentoo is? There must be something seriously wrong with Gentoo.

Gentoo is for experimenting, Larry is using it for the wrong purpose.
That's what makes it "sux".
--
Joel W. Crump
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Thu, 9 Apr 2026 14:07:54 +0200, Carlos E.R. wrote:

On 2026-04-09 00:55, Distro Lackey wrote:

Systemd is a piddling accomplishment that could have equaled by any
script kiddy.

Sure. Testified by the many people that have created working
alternatives or improved existing alternatives.

And nobody wants to recreate systemd on their own systems, do they?
Because they surely have something better already.

<https://github.com/InitWare/InitWare>
<https://github.com/Jamesits/SvcGuest>
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Thu, 9 Apr 2026 23:04:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:

And nobody wants to recreate systemd on their own systems, do they?
Because they surely have something better already.

I have.

But I have never bothered to publish it because it is so fucking simple.

Systemd is useful only to those who can't do anything for themselves,
i.e. a distro lackey.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 4/9/2026 9:01 PM, Distro Lackey wrote:

On Thu, 9 Apr 2026 23:04:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:

And nobody wants to recreate systemd on their own systems, do they?
Because they surely have something better already.

I have.

But I have never bothered to publish it because it is so fucking simple.

And because you lifted it directly from LFS.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

At Wed, 8 Apr 2026 17:46:03 +0200, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 <jmj@energokod.gda.pl> wrote:

Hello!

The good days are over also for Linux fan boyz! Read this thriller
review - probably this is near future!

<https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20260406#origami>

Why do you nutzos think people will want such a monstrosity?

ObReply:

I saw your comments, DFS, just haven't gotten caught up with
this group yet.
--
-v ASUS TUF DASH F15 x86_64 Mem: 15.9G
OS: Linux 6.17.0-19-generic D: Mint 22.3 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (6G) 580.126.09
"I'm not paranoid! Which of my enemies told you this?"
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

At Wed, 08 Apr 2026 16:18:23 +0000, Distro Lackey <dl@lackey.com> wrote:

On Wed, 8 Apr 2026 17:46:03 +0200, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

The good days are over also for Linux fan boyz! Read this thriller
review - probably this is near future!

All GNU/Linux distros are fucking worthless junk because all distros completely stifle the most important aspect of GNU/Linux which is
the ability to CONFIGURE.

SYSCTL(8) System Administration SYSCTL(8)

NAME
sysctl - configure kernel parameters at runtime

SYNOPSIS
sysctl [options] [variable[=value]] [...]
sysctl -p [file or regexp] [...]

DESCRIPTION
sysctl is used to modify kernel parameters at runtime.
The parameters available are those listed under
/proc/sys/. Procfs is required for sysctl support in
Linux. You can use sysctl to both read and write sysctl
data.
--
-v ASUS TUF DASH F15 x86_64 Mem: 15.9G
OS: Linux 6.17.0-19-generic D: Mint 22.3 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (6G) 580.126.09
"Remember, Subaru spelled backwards is U-R-A-BUS."
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 2026-04-10 03:01, Distro Lackey wrote:

On Thu, 9 Apr 2026 23:04:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:

And nobody wants to recreate systemd on their own systems, do they?
Because they surely have something better already.

I have.

But I have never bothered to publish it because it is so fucking simple.

Systemd is useful only to those who can't do anything for themselves,
i.e. a distro lackey.

Yeah, sure.
--
Cheers, Carlos.
ES🇪🇸, EU🇪🇺;
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

At Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:39:58 +0200, "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:

On 2026-04-10 03:01, Distro Lackey wrote:

On Thu, 9 Apr 2026 23:04:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:

And nobody wants to recreate systemd on their own systems, do they?
Because they surely have something better already.

I have.

But I have never bothered to publish it because it is so fucking simple.

Systemd is useful only to those who can't do anything for themselves,
i.e. a distro lackey.

Yeah, sure.

Word on the street is that he ripped off his "personal init system"
from LFS.

Loopy Larry also runs his system with no cgroups, MAC, or security
mitigations in his kernel. Indeed, he's apparently never heard
of sysctl(8). I don't think he's as familiar with Linux as he
plays at...

He also can't build vanilla kernels and run them, because he
relies on his distro to feed him his kernels. Nom-nom-nom,
just like a "distro lackey" should...
--
-v ASUS TUF DASH F15 x86_64 Mem: 15.9G
OS: Linux 6.17.0-20-generic D: Mint 22.3 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (6G) 580.126.09
"Unless you're the lead dog, the view never changes."
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 4/8/2026 11:46 PM, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

Hello!

The good days are over also for Linux fan boyz! Read this thriller
review - probably this is near future!

<https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20260406#origami>

So... What're the most important features this distribution offering? :)

I rather stick with the original root of all these derived distributions.
--

@~@ Simplicity is Beauty! Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch!
/ v \ May the Force and farces be with you! Live long and prosper!!
/( _ )\ https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/
^ ^ https://github.com/changmw/changmw
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 4/9/2026 12:45 AM, c186282 wrote:

3) I'm not gonna buy all new hardware just to
run their distro (and half my computing is
on PIs these days anyhow).

You can build perfectly good and secure servers
on top of vanilla Debian, Arch derivs or even
Centos (if you can stand the Gnome DT (I can't))
or some of the BSDs. In short the world doesn't
need Origami or their weird schemes.

Wanna bring in FreeBSD to compare? :)
--

@~@ Simplicity is Beauty! Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch!
/ v \ May the Force and farces be with you! Live long and prosper!!
/( _ )\ https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/
^ ^ https://github.com/changmw/changmw
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Sat, 11 Apr 2026 12:27:03 +0800, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:

Wanna bring in FreeBSD to compare? :)

No smiley. Somebody already did that.

Chapter 1 <https://www.zdnet.com/article/freebsd-linux-review/>, full
of effusive praise:

Sure, I talk a lot about how reliable Debian is, but even Debian
can't touch the stability of FreeBSD.

Chapter 2 <https://www.zdnet.com/article/freebsd-linux-review/>,
enthusiasm waning ever so slightly:

Once you get FreeBSD up and running, you can absolutely rely on
it.

Getting it up and running is the issue.

and

However, upon glancing at the start menu, there were very few apps
installed. So, I fired up KDE Discover, only to find out it
wouldn't work. The reason for this is PackageKit, an open-source
software suite that simplifies the installation and management of
software packages on Linux systems. Simplify, being the operative
word.

Unfortunately, PackageKit continually crashed, so KDE Discover was
useless, and all app installations had to be done via the command
line. Given I'm very comfortable with the command line, that's
perfectly fine.

On a whim, I installed GNOME, but the GDM login manager wouldn't
start, so I stuck with KDE Plasma.

Then finally, Chapter 3 <https://www.zdnet.com/article/best-linux-server-distros-for-your-home-lab/>:

The primary reason I would recommend Debian as your server OS is
its legendary stability. There simply is not a more stable OS on
the planet. Some people might argue that Slackware is more stable
because of its Unix-like nature. I say this call is too close to
make, but either OS is solid. However, Debian is easier to use.

No more mention of FreeBSD at all ...
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

Le 08-04-2026, Distro Lackey <dl@lackey.com> a écrit :

All GNU/Linux distros are fucking worthless junk

The only one distro in the world which is a fucking worthless junk is
yours because it's the only one who require a Microsoft Windows VM to be
able to access Internet. You are the only one who never managed to avoid Microsoft when everyone else in the world can.

because all distros
completely stifle the most important aspect of GNU/Linux which is

To be able to use it to do whatever one wants to do. On some usages
(mostly games, but it's improving) Windows can be requested. But there
is no reported case where your distro can do something without requesting Microsoft when another couldn't. But there is at least one reporting
case of what your distro can't do without requesting Microsoft where
others have not that limitation. So, this case is so baffling that I'm
sure it would be easy to find a lot of other cases in favor of
mainstream distro against yours.

the ability to CONFIGURE.

That's one of your biggest lies. The distro doesn't remove the
configuration files. If you know nothing about real useful distros (well
anyone except the one you are using), you should avoid proving anyone
you are the most limited boy in the world.

Any brainless child in the world could configure a mainstream distro
more usefully than you.

The fact that you can't find the configuration files or the
configuration options doesn't mean they don't exist. That mean you are
not designed to learn anything about computers. And that proves at the
same time that I was right to say I don't believe that you can learn
anything reading a book on advanced assembly concepts.

Without the ability to configure a distro can only create a stunted
and hollow shell of an OS.

It looks that's the definition of your distro. It's clearly not the
definition of a mainstream distro.

Of course, the motherfucking distro lackeys cannot care because all motherfucking distro lackeys are stupid and intellectually lazy fucks.

The truth is they care about the configurations possibilities but they
don't fight what is given to them because they know how to do
effortlessly what you are so unable to do that you have to claim it's impossible.

One of my machines, based on a 12-year-old Core i7-4770, can
rival any more recent machines due to superior configuration,
and this is proven beyond doubt via benchmarks.

Test: buy your own food on a website.
On any modern machine: start it, launch a web browser, process, done.
On your own old machine: start it, launch a VM, start Microsoft Windows,
launch a browser, process, done.

There are no real benchmark in the world which can be in favor of your
machine. Either you dreamed the benchmark or you falsify the numbers. To
be in favor of your machine the only possibility would be to have more
power to compensate the VM.

Only Gentoo allows the user to configure.

It's just a lie.

Only Gentoo.

Repeating the same lie doesn't make it true.

Brother,

I'm not your brother.

if you ain't using Gentoo then you are one sick fuck.

Before following your advice, anyone sane in one's head should require
you to have a full working computer first. Which will never happen. So
doing the opposite of that is the wisest advice one can get.
--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

Le 10-04-2026, DFS <nospam@dfs.com> a écrit :

On 4/9/2026 9:01 PM, Distro Lackey wrote:

On Thu, 9 Apr 2026 23:04:00 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:

And nobody wants to recreate systemd on their own systems, do they?
Because they surely have something better already.

I have.

No, you don't.

But I have never bothered to publish it because it is so fucking simple.

No, it's because it doesn't work. And it would show if you published it.

And because you lifted it directly from LFS.

No, he didn't because it would work.
--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 11 Apr 2026 10:36:11 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

the ability to CONFIGURE.

That's one of your biggest lies. The distro doesn't remove the
configuration files.

I do not refer to the configuration of RUN TIME behavior.

I refer to the ability to configure BUILD TIME behavior.

For one thing, programs do not run in RAM; they run in
cache. The software supplied by distros is not optimized
for cache. How could it be? Each brand of processor
has different cache sizes. Optimizing for cache does
make a significant difference.

With gcc it is possible to specify the exact cache sizes:

--param l1-cache-size=
--param l1-cache-line-size=
--param l2-cache-size=
-malign-data=cacheline

At first I did not believe that it would make a difference
but benchmarks have convinced me otherwise.

Also, distro software is crippled with security "features."

Try the "checksec" command on any executable or library.
The ideal results are shown here:

checksec file /bin/bash

RELRO Stack Canary NX PIE RPATH RUNPATH Symbols FORTIFY Fortified Fortifiable Name
No RELRO No Canary Found NX enabled PIE Disabled No RPATH No RUNPATH No Symbols No 0 12 /bin/bash

As is seen, my custom-built files show no security.
Distro files would show complete (i.e. crippling)
security.

Note the absence of a "stack canary" which, if present,
would significantly degrade performance.

At first I did not believe that it would make a difference
but benchmarks have convinced me otherwise.

YOU, however, have a LOT to learn, but it is doubtful
that you will ever learn anything. You will always
be totally dependent on a distro to make your choices.

Test: buy your own food on a website.
On any modern machine: start it, launch a web browser, process, done.
On your own, start Microsoft Windows,
launch a browser, process, done.

This needs to be debugged. It could be as simple as
changing a setting in about:config.

However, I have much better things to do than to debug
how a particular browser is handling a malformed commercial
website that does not adhere to standards.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 11 Apr 2026 10:38:59 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:

I have.

No, you don't.

But I have never bothered to publish it because it is so fucking simple.

No, it's because it doesn't work. And it would show if you published it.

You are obviously very JEALOUS.

You observe someone that is entirely free of all distros and
you wish that you could be the same.

But you can't. You NEVER will be free. You NEVER will be
in total control of your machine. NEVER.

You are destined to be forever at the mercy of RedHat/Ubuntu/Etc.


--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 4/11/26 9:57 AM, Distro Lackey wrote:

You observe someone that is entirely free of all distros and
you wish that you could be the same.

But you can't. You NEVER will be free. You NEVER will be
in total control of your machine. NEVER.

You are destined to be forever at the mercy of RedHat/Ubuntu/Etc.

Linus Torvalds likes Fedora, dummy.
--
Joel W. Crump
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

c186282 wrote:

On 4/8/26 11:46, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

Hello!

The good days are over also for Linux fan boyz! Read this thriller
review - probably this is near future!

<https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20260406#origami>

  1) I don't love Fedora/RHEL derivs very much

  2) Fuck "MOK" ... sounds like the Ubuntu scheme
     to entrap everyone in their cloud services.

  3) I'm not gonna buy all new hardware just to
     run their distro (and half my computing is
     on PIs these days anyhow).

I am still using Skylake/Kaby Lake with similar vintage GPU 2 or 4 GB.
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

Woozy Song wrote:

c186282 wrote:

On 4/8/26 11:46, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

Hello!

The good days are over also for Linux fan boyz! Read this thriller
review - probably this is near future!

<https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20260406#origami>

   1) I don't love Fedora/RHEL derivs very much

   2) Fuck "MOK" ... sounds like the Ubuntu scheme
      to entrap everyone in their cloud services.

   3) I'm not gonna buy all new hardware just to
      run their distro (and half my computing is
      on PIs these days anyhow).

I am still using Skylake/Kaby Lake with similar vintage GPU 2 or 4 GB.

figures
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

c186282 wrote:

??Jacek Marcin Jaworski?? wrote:

Hello!

The good days are over also for Linux fan boyz! Read this thriller
review - probably this is near future!

<https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20260406#origami>

Good review, even though he clearly doesn't like it.

1) I don't love Fedora/RHEL derivs very much

2) Fuck "MOK" ... sounds like the Ubuntu scheme
to entrap everyone in their cloud services.

3) I'm not gonna buy all new hardware just to
run their distro (and half my computing is
on PIs these days anyhow).

You can build perfectly good and secure servers
on top of vanilla Debian, Arch derivs or even
Centos (if you can stand the Gnome DT (I can't))
or some of the BSDs. In short the world doesn't
need Origami or their weird schemes.

But then everybody thinks they have the Better Plan.

It probably is a Better Plan, for some subset of the market. As the
reviewer says, this distro "underlines how important it is to have
multiple distributions in the world. Not only because I very much want
to use an operating system which is the polar opposite of Origami
Linux, but also because I'm aware there are probably lots of people in
the world who will be delighted to have a bleeding-edge,
Flatpak-focused, Wayland-powered, immutable, build-optimized
distribution. People should have the freedom to choose what they want,
whether I like it or not. Just as I would like to have options which
match my workflow and preferences."
--
"i<=22? Look at the clueless wonder go! That bit of shit-code does
two int comparisons on each iteration of the loop" - "DFS", putting
his ignorance on display
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

% wrote:

I am still using Skylake/Kaby Lake with similar vintage GPU 2 or 4 GB.

figures

What do you use, nose-picker?

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 4/16/26 11:03, % wrote:

Woozy Song wrote:

c186282 wrote:

On 4/8/26 11:46, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱 wrote:

Hello!

The good days are over also for Linux fan boyz! Read this thriller
review - probably this is near future!

<https://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20260406#origami>

   1) I don't love Fedora/RHEL derivs very much

   2) Fuck "MOK" ... sounds like the Ubuntu scheme
      to entrap everyone in their cloud services.

   3) I'm not gonna buy all new hardware just to
      run their distro (and half my computing is
      on PIs these days anyhow).

I am still using Skylake/Kaby Lake with similar vintage GPU 2 or 4 GB.

figures

They work !

And fairly low-end laptops and PIs do everything I need
these days. Don't do video games. Don't do 8k streaming.
Not running a corporate web server.

Still have a working Core2-Quad ... and it runs quite
well with Linux. WILL run 8/16 bit apps, you can boot
CP/M-86. Also has plugs for floppies on board. A keeper.

--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

chrisv wrote:

% wrote:

I am still using Skylake/Kaby Lake with similar vintage GPU 2 or 4 GB.

figures

What do you use, nose-picker?

i use your face , goop gobbler
--- Synchronet 3.21f-Linux NewsLink 1.2