1. Forum
  2. Newsgroups
  3. comp.os.linux.advocacy

  • Re: 'Nuther Programming Challenge

    From DFS@nospam@dfs.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy on Tue Feb 3 10:34:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 4/2/2025 8:03 AM, Lying' Lameass Larry Pietraskiewicz wrote:

    On 2 Apr 2025 11:28:44 GMT, vallor wrote:


    Why bother?


    See first sentence.

    Then enroll in a remedial reading program.



    The last of your "programming challenges" I bothered with was using libgmp >> for computing subfactorials. When I published my answer, not only
    did you not acknowledge it, but you never published _your_ answer.


    Oh but I did publish:

    https://www.rocksolidbbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=18113&group=comp.os.linux.advocacy#18113

    My solution, however, being the ultimate, was so much better
    than yours that you became extremely flustered and blotted
    it out of your mind.

    Your solution was half-ass, like everything programming-related that you do.

    You said: "we ignore N = 1, 2 as they are trivial"

    Liar. You ignored them because you didn't know how to handle 1 and 2.
    That's the kind of devious, evasive wanker you are.

    You also said "you missed a definite error in the code that I
    deliberately placed to catch any sharp eyes, but no catch."

    Along with "prototype" and "typo", this is another devious lie you use
    to excuse mistakes in your shit-code.

    FU

    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2