I never claimed to be a BMW expert - I simply claimed to own a bimmer
and a beemer and because of that, I know a lot about those two
vehicles.
I'm ignorant as to the difference between a "bimmer" and a "beemer" so
maybe you can explain it to me. Why don't people just say BMW? It's
not like that's a long acronym.
I may have mentioned this once. My mother who is German made sure I
knew how to pronounce Audi correctly. She hated when people pronounced
it "au-di" and said it's pronounced "ow-di".
There's a prescient observation for Apple trolls of...
Q: Why do Apple trolls know nothing about anything?
A: ?
Least of all about Apple products.
For example, Alan Baker claims to know about BMWs and yet, he clearly
doesn't know the first thing about them - down to not even knowing what the the parts are on the engine that make bimmers work the way they do.
All Alan Baker knows is the bullshit that BMW marketing fed him.
badgolferman wrote on Sat, 9 Nov 2024 18:25:11 -0000 (UTC) :
If only they had built
in an access panel for the air filter...
Same with the CCV on my 525i which is merely a PCV but with a far morecomplex design such that BMW decided to call it, instead, a CCV.
It's horribly complicated.
And as a result, it *always* eats itself up in just a few years.
So *everyone* with that bimmer model has to replace it.
Like your Gold%20Wing/Gold-Wing/Goldwing/etc. air filter joke, it's as if
BMW started with a CCV and then built the entire engine around that one emissions component.
It wouldn't be so bad if it didn't fail emissions - but it often does.
So everyone who knows anything about that bimmer model is well acquainted with the CCV (among other horridly designed engine components).
If they claim to be knowledgeable in that model, and if they don't know
about the CCV, then it's clear that they're just posers playing games.
Like Alan Baker who never knew what a catenary was until I explained it to him in terms of sweeping around curves at constant speeds.
Alan Baker was so stupid, even after he looked it up - he thought it was about bridges - which proves yet again my point these Apple trolls are incredibly uneducated, and hence ignorant of everything - especially Apple products.
Even when told a catenary had to do with taking curves at speed, these
Apple trolls insisted a catenary has only to do with suspension bridges.
That's how stupid these Apple trolls truly are.
They read Wikipedia, which I'm sure mentions suspension bridges, and they don't have the education to flip the terms 90 degrees to sweeping out
curves at constant speed.
You don't take curves at constant speeds when racing, doofus.
_____________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Please do not |
/ O O\__ | feed the |
/ \ | Trolls |
/ \ \|_____________________|
That's where his power exists, in pushing your buttons.
Your Name wrote on Tue, 12 Nov 2024 10:12:52 +1300 :I only "claim" it, because:
Bimmer is the slang for BMW's automobiles;
Beemer is the slang for BMW's motorcycles.
Doesn't work. Many people call the cars "Beemers".
Just like nobody who owns a motorcycle "drives" it, anyone calling their
car a "beamer" is instantly recognizable as a poser who knows nothing.
Which was my point that Alan G. Baker claimed to own a bimmer and to teach racing and yet he doesn't know the very first thing about either topic.
*Hemidactylus* wrote on Mon, 11 Nov 2024 19:17:30 +0000 :Is there some reason you have to post the same thing several times, doofus?
That's where his power exists, in pushing your buttons.
The Apple trolls like Hemidactylus own a kindergarten view of the world.
When Apple trolls *leave* this newsgroup, it will return to normal again.
Is there some reason you have to post the same thing several times, doofus?
On 2024-11-11 22:13, RoadRacer wrote:
Is there some reason you have to post the same thing several times,
doofus?
_____________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Please do not |
/ O O\__ | feed the |
/ \ | Trolls |
/ \ \|_____________________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `'
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
And sorry if the EU directly forced Apple to never again sell a new iPhone >> lower than the iPhone 15 because they *all* failed the EU lifetime test.
The fact is Apple batteries must follow the same laws of physics as other
batteries, and the fact is the Apple batteries are of an el cheapo design.
So I tried to look up the EU banning sales of iPhones older than the 14 version. Can't find anything. What I did find was the regulation that
forced USB C charge port effective with the iPhone 15.
Please supply the reference to banning sales of iPhone 14 and prior.
Worse... it's a fact that those very few Apple iPhones which meet the EU's >> minimum battery life requirements *barely* meet them (which again shows
Apple's propensity for the absolute minimum required by law for customers).
And these EU regulators had independent & objective criteria for setting this standard, which was done double-blind to how products performed ...
...right?
On 2024-11-11 22:13, RoadRacer wrote:
Is there some reason you have to post the same thing several times,
doofus?
_____________________
/| /| | |
||__|| | Please do not |
/ O O\__ | feed the |
/ \ | Trolls |
/ \ \|_____________________|
/ _ \ \ ||
/ |\____\ \ ||
/ | | | |\____/ ||
/ \|_|_|/ | _||
/ / \ |____| ||
/ | | | --|
| | | |____ --|
* _ | |_|_|_| | \-/
*-- _--\ _ \ | ||
/ _ \\ | / `'
* / \_ /- | | |
* ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________
Sysop: | DaiTengu |
---|---|
Location: | Appleton, WI |
Users: | 991 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 81:24:50 |
Calls: | 12,949 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 186,574 |
Messages: | 3,264,666 |