• On stack-based languages (was: on Perl)

    From Axel Reichert@mail@axel-reichert.de to comp.lang.misc on Thu Apr 18 07:33:50 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.misc

    John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> writes:

    On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 07:34:41 +0200
    Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> wrote:

    Really? It is a very small language and has almost no syntax.
    I thought it was one of the easiest languages toe learn ib comparison
    to C++ or Java.

    *Syntactically* it's very simple, but explicit stack-orientation with reverse-Polish notation is a *very* different programming paradigm than practically everything else out there; even Lisp is closer to "normal,"
    at least for functional-programming types.

    That was my impression also, when I played around with "factor",

    https://factorcode.org/

    a modern take on Forth, some years back. Kind of opposite of Lisp: no parentheses, post-fix. I liked many of the ideas and concepts when
    reading about them, but it was awfully difficult for a (historically imperatively minded) hobby programmer to wrap my head around them and
    even get trivial exercises done. Fascinating, though.

    Best regards

    Axel
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114