From Newsgroup: comp.lang.misc

On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:05:23 -0700, John Ames wrote:

*Syntactically* it's very simple, but explicit stack-orientation with reverse-Polish notation is a *very* different programming paradigm than practically everything else out there ...

The only really tricky part of stack-based programming is keeping track of what’s on the stack.

I did some messing about with a reboot of PostScript which tried to add
some niceties, like stack guards and lexical binding. Here’s an example of the sort of thing I was able to get working (“ddef” and “dstore” define
and assign to dynamically-bound variables, while “ldef” and “lstore” correspondingly work on lexically-bound ones):

/Count 99 ddef

/metatry
{ % provides context for nonlocals
dup
/Name exch ldef
/Count 0 ldef
{ % actual proc
/Count dup lload 1 add lstore
/Count dup dload 1 add dstore
Name =
(local Count = ) print /Count lload =
(global Count = ) print /Count dload =
(whichever Count = ) print Count =
}
}
ddef

/try1 metatry ddef
/try2 metatry ddef

try1
try2
try1
try2

Output:

try1
local Count = 1
global Count = 100
whichever Count = 1
try2
local Count = 1
global Count = 101
whichever Count = 1
try1
local Count = 2
global Count = 102
whichever Count = 2
try2
local Count = 2
global Count = 103
whichever Count = 2
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.misc

On 18/04/2024 09:55, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:05:23 -0700, John Ames wrote:

*Syntactically* it's very simple, but explicit stack-orientation with
reverse-Polish notation is a *very* different programming paradigm than
practically everything else out there ...

The only really tricky part of stack-based programming is keeping track of what’s on the stack.

I did some messing about with a reboot of PostScript which tried to add
some niceties, like stack guards and lexical binding. Here’s an example of the sort of thing I was able to get working (“ddef” and “dstore” define
and assign to dynamically-bound variables, while “ldef” and “lstore” correspondingly work on lexically-bound ones):

I think I have only ever heard of one person who actually uses
PostScript for programming by hand, rather than as a print output
format. That is Don Lancaster, an electronics engineer who is a big fan
of "magic sines" (binary strings with low harmonics) and does all his
coding in PostScript. Anyone wanting to see a significant library of PostScript code might be interested.

<https://www.tinaja.com/magsn01.shtml>


--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.misc

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 10:37:47 +0200, David Brown wrote:

I think I have only ever heard of one person who actually uses
PostScript for programming by hand, rather than as a print output
format. That is Don Lancaster ...

I know, I have seen his site.

The PostScript graphics model has long been superseded by worthy
successors, like Cairo. I did my own Python binding for Cairo <https://gitlab.com/ldo/qahirah>, which adds things like vectors, matrices
and colours as first-class objects--beyond what Cairo itself, as a C- language-based library, can do.

What I am interested in here is the PostScript language itself, and how it
can be modernized.
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.misc

David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:

I think I have only ever heard of one person who actually uses
PostScript for programming by hand, rather than as a print output
format.

I think I got a postscript program from Usenet or somewhere to print CD
covers once upon a time. Never used it though. I think the idea was to
edit track and artist names directly into the code and send it to a
printer.

The author may have been Jamie Zawinski but I'm not sure.
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.misc

On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 08:44:44 -0000 (UTC)
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

The PostScript graphics model has long been superseded by worthy
successors, like Cairo.

Yes and no. I believe Keith Packard describes Cairo as PostScript
without the syntax: it shares the same page-display model, but is
presented as a set of C functions instead of a language.

--jkl
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.misc

On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:16:28 +0000, James K. Lowden wrote:

I believe Keith Packard describes Cairo as PostScript
without the syntax ...

The PostScript graphics model (even Display PostScript) never progressed beyond the concept of putting marks on paper.

While Cairo is clearly inspired by PostScript, it is also clearly an improvement on it, adding features specifically to support interactive graphics on a display screen, like operators and alpha channels. It also
has better Unicode support.
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114