1. Forum
  2. Newsgroups
  3. comp.lang.c

  • Re: [OT] weak_ptr? shared_ptr?

    From Mr. Man-wai Chang@toylet.toylet@gmail.com to comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c on Thu Jun 11 21:54:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.c

    On 6/2/2026 5:52 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
    On 6/1/2026 7:35 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
    Am 01.06.2026 um 15:12 schrieb Mr. Man-wai Chang:

    On 6/1/2026 6:19 PM, boltar@caprica.universe wrote:

    I have a system that has a block of central shared_ptrs each of which is >>>> references by numerous weak_ptr's all over the place.....

    It's funny to see these labels. Pointers are always just pointers,
    from the perspective of C. "weak" and "shared" have no meaning at all. :) >>
    And this makes more work than having shared_ptr<> and weak_ptr in C.[...]

    ;^) shared_ptr<> is a fat ass piece of shit anyway?


    BTW... you were posting in comp.lang.c++, not comp.lang.c!! ;)
    --

    @~@ Simplicity is Beauty! Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch!
    / v \ May the Force and farces be with you! Live long and prosper!!
    /( _ )\ https://sites.google.com/site/changmw/
    ^ ^ https://github.com/changmw/changmw
    --- Synchronet 3.22a-Linux NewsLink 1.2