Hi all,
Long time awk user here who hasn't really read this mailinglist, but I was looking for fellow awk enthusiasts to share my code with.
Hopefully I won't come across as too spammy on my first post, but I'd like to share my latest creation with you and who knows, maybe get some feedback.
Recently I finished writing my first old-skool style 'demo' in awk, which took me a while to complete. I hope you all like it and as said feedback on the code is always welcome.
https://github.com/patsie75/awk-demo
Ps. the rest of my github repo is also full of awk stuff :)
On 3/29/2022 2:46 AM, Patsie wrote:
Hi all,
Long time awk user here who hasn't really read this mailinglist, but I
was looking for fellow awk enthusiasts to share my code with.
Hopefully I won't come across as too spammy on my first post, but I'd
like to share my latest creation with you and who knows, maybe get
some feedback.
Recently I finished writing my first old-skool style 'demo' in awk,
which took me a while to complete. I hope you all like it and as said
feedback on the code is always welcome.
https://github.com/patsie75/awk-demo
Ps. the rest of my github repo is also full of awk stuff :)
If you'd like to post some code for peer review there's a forum for that
at https://codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/tagged/awk. Not sure
how much participation it gets though.
Ed.
On 3/29/2022 2:46 AM, Patsie wrote:
Recently I finished writing my first old-skool style 'demo' in awk,
which took me a while to complete. I hope you all like it and as said
feedback on the code is always welcome.
https://github.com/patsie75/awk-demo
Ps. the rest of my github repo is also full of awk stuff :)
I haven't inspected the awk stuff behind the link but generally I'd
say that he can post awk code (and specs or descriptions) also in this newsgroup (c.l.a). I share the doubts about interest and participation especially since there seems no description (neither in the post nor
at the webpage) what this demo is all about.
For something like "Hey, I have something cool, just click it to see!" there's probably better places, though.
Janis
On Friday, April 1, 2022 at 10:29:40 AM UTC+2, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
On 3/29/2022 2:46 AM, Patsie wrote:
Recently I finished writing my first old-skool style 'demo' in awk,
which took me a while to complete. I hope you all like it and as said >>>> feedback on the code is always welcome.
https://github.com/patsie75/awk-demo
Ps. the rest of my github repo is also full of awk stuff :)
I haven't inspected the awk stuff behind the link but generally I'd
say that he can post awk code (and specs or descriptions) also in this
newsgroup (c.l.a). I share the doubts about interest and participation
especially since there seems no description (neither in the post nor
at the webpage) what this demo is all about.
For something like "Hey, I have something cool, just click it to see!"
there's probably better places, though.
Janis
I'm sorry you feel that way. I thought both my post here and my
github page were quite clear on what this code is about. Namely an
"old-skool style demo".
If that doesn't say anything to you, then that's OK.
The github page even has a video of what the code does.
I
just thought that fellow AWK enthusiasts could appreciate the effort
that was put into this. But it seems that I was wrong.
I'm sorry to have posted here and will not do this again. Goodbye.
Patsie
I'm sorry you feel that way. I thought both my post here and my github
page were quite clear on what this code is about. Namely an "old-skool
style demo". If that doesn't say anything to you, then that's OK. The
github page even has a video of what the code does.
I just thought that fellow AWK enthusiasts could appreciate the effort
that was put into this. But it seems that I was wrong.
I'm sorry to have posted here and will not do this again. Goodbye.
You should just ignore them (I have both killfiled)
On Friday, April 1, 2022 at 10:29:40 AM UTC+2, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
On 3/29/2022 2:46 AM, Patsie wrote:
Recently I finished writing my first old-skool style 'demo' in awk,
which took me a while to complete. I hope you all like it and as said
feedback on the code is always welcome.
https://github.com/patsie75/awk-demo
Ps. the rest of my github repo is also full of awk stuff :)
I haven't inspected the awk stuff behind the link but generally I'd
say that he can post awk code (and specs or descriptions) also in this
newsgroup (c.l.a). I share the doubts about interest and participation
especially since there seems no description (neither in the post nor
at the webpage) what this demo is all about.
For something like "Hey, I have something cool, just click it to see!"
there's probably better places, though.
Janis
I'm sorry you feel that way. I thought both my post here and my github page were quite clear on what this code is about. Namely an "old-skool style demo". If that doesn't say anything to you, then that's OK.
The github page even has a video of what the code does.
I just thought that fellow AWK enthusiasts could appreciate the effort that was put into this. But it seems that I was wrong.
I'm sorry to have posted here and will not do this again. Goodbye.
Patsie
Recently I finished writing my first old-skool style 'demo' in awk, which took me a while to complete. I hope you all like it and as said feedback on the code is always welcome.
In article <c8f927ef-5c0d-492b...@googlegroups.com>,@Kenny : I'd say this about Ed : he's a very amusing guy……………..as in …. it's rather amusing to many of us he managed to dwell on sites for years at a time, and in a recent solution he offered (that I was observing),
Patsie <you...@patsie.nl> wrote:
...
I'm sorry you feel that way. I thought both my post here and my github >page were quite clear on what this code is about. Namely an "old-skool >style demo". If that doesn't say anything to you, then that's OK. The >github page even has a video of what the code does.
I just thought that fellow AWK enthusiasts could appreciate the effort >that was put into this. But it seems that I was wrong.Both "Janis" and "Ed" are total buzz-killers. Their motto is clearly "If I don't have anything nasty to say, I'm not trying hard enough".
You should just ignore them (I have both killfiled)
I'm sorry to have posted here and will not do this again. Goodbye.See above.
--
The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4
lines long. As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs. In order to remain in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL:
http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/WeekendAwayFromHome
On Friday, April 1, 2022 at 7:38:11 AM UTC-4, Kenny McCormack wrote:
In article <c8f927ef-5c0d-492b...@googlegroups.com>,
Patsie <you...@patsie.nl> wrote:
...
I'm sorry you feel that way. I thought both my post here and my githubBoth "Janis" and "Ed" are total buzz-killers. Their motto is clearly "If I >> don't have anything nasty to say, I'm not trying hard enough".
page were quite clear on what this code is about. Namely an "old-skool
style demo". If that doesn't say anything to you, then that's OK. The
github page even has a video of what the code does.
I just thought that fellow AWK enthusiasts could appreciate the effort
that was put into this. But it seems that I was wrong.
You should just ignore them (I have both killfiled)
I'm sorry to have posted here and will not do this again. Goodbye.See above.
--
The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4
lines long. As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs. In order to remain >> in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL:
http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/WeekendAwayFromHome
@Kenny : I'd say this about Ed : he's a very amusing guy……………..as in …. it's rather amusing to many of us he managed to dwell on sites for years at a time, and in a recent solution he offered (that I was observing),
he still only knows how to associate CRLF \r \n questions with RS itself, while utterly lacking any amount of mental agility to even be able to rotate his "guru" mind by 2^-1074 degrees and realize one can also use FS to deal with it if FS is idling around anyway.
Sysop: | DaiTengu |
---|---|
Location: | Appleton, WI |
Users: | 790 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 193:12:00 |
Calls: | 11,043 |
Files: | 186,065 |
Messages: | 1,743,693 |