• Re: on Ada abtract data type vs. OOP.

    From =?UTF-8?Q?Niocl=C3=A1s_P=C3=B3l_Caile=C3=A1n_de_Ghloucester?=@Master_Fontaine_is_dishonest@Strand_in_London.Gov.UK to comp.lang.ada on Fri Apr 19 18:25:35 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada

    This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
    while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

    --8323329-399133474-1713543877=:2204759
    Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
    Content-ID: <48ae0686-6c8e-158e-b5d3-078a3a19f437@insomnia247.nl>

    On Fri, 9 Sep 2022, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
    "What do other think about this subject? Do you think it is
    better to do it as OOP,"

    OOP is poop.

    A lecturer who professes to be an OO lecturer used to lecture us=20
    putatively on OO. He lectured on "They Write The Right Stuff" about the=20 space shuttles' software. This subsidy fraudster chose to not publish that=
    =20
    the space shuttles' software is not even supposedly OOP code. (It is also=
    =20
    not in Ada. This putative university never even mentions the name of the=20 language of space-shuttle software.) As we used to have only 1=20
    Ada-engineer student, this lecturer said that for an OOP assessment, we=20
    were permitted to use "Ada at a pinch."

    With best regards.
    Niocl=C3=A1s P=C3=B3l Caile=C3=A1n de Ghloucester --8323329-399133474-1713543877=:2204759--
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@ldo@nz.invalid to comp.lang.ada on Fri Apr 19 22:05:17 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada

    On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 18:25:35 +0200, Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester wrote:

    OOP is poop.

    Is Ada becoming a poopy language?
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114