From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
--8323329-328323417-1721556449=:1616845
Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Content-ID: <
ada43a20-2889-c406-95f2-4c438192e9b2@insomnia247.nl>
On Sun, 21 Jul 2024, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
"Yup, however some crackpot could always suggest an attack on bounds checki= ng,=20
e.g. exception vs. not, index to bounds comparison dependent on the actual=
=20
values etc, and then produce a lengthy paper on a constructed absolutely=20 unrealistic scenario... (:-))"
Hello,
Supposedly scientific journals are rife with evil unrealistic fraudulent=20 papers which cause really deadly consequences. Cf. inter alia
@article {fulltext6.pdf,
author =3D {Labb\'{e}, Cyril and Labb\'{e}, Dominique},
pages=3D{379--396},
year=3D{2013},
volume=3D{94},
issue=3D{1},
title =3D {{Duplicate and fake publications in the scientific literatur= e:=20
how many SCIgen papers in computer science?}},
journal =3D {Scientometrics},
abstract =3D {Two kinds of bibliographic tools are used to retrieve=20 scientific publications and make them available online. For one kind,=20
access is free as they store information made publicly available online.=20
For the other kind, access fees are required as they are compiled on=20 information provided by the major publishers of scientific literature. The=
=20
former can easily be interfered with, but it is generally assumed that the=
=20
latter guarantee the integrity of the data they sell. Unfortunately,=20 duplicate and fake publications are appearing in scientific conferences=20
and, as a result, in the bibliographic services. We demonstrate a software=
=20
method of detecting these duplicate and fake publications. Both the free=20 services (such as Google Scholar and DBLP) and the charged-for services=20 (such as IEEE Xplore) accept and index these publications.},
}
and=20
@online{dieHimmelistschoen,
author =3D {{Schlangemann (pseudonym)}, Herbert},
title =3D {{The Official Herbert Schlangemann Blog}},
url =3D {
HTTP://dieHimmelistschoen.BlogSpot.com},
year =3D {2008--2010}
}
and
HTTP://Gloucester.Insomnia247.NL/Evil_which_is_so-called_science/
I myself wrote on 13th April 2012:
"On February 19th 2012, Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouce=C5=BFter wrote: |--------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------|
|"Dear Sir/Madam: =
|
| =
|
|[. . .] =
|
| =
|
|I am a whistleblower and as such I am a victim of fraud, =
|
|much of which the Association for Computing Machinery =
|
|provided to people without publishing any of my attempts to =
|
|expose misconduct. Shame on you. =
|
| =
|
|I tried to expose fraud which I discovered when I applied =
|
|for a George Michael Memorial HPC Fellowship. An anonymous =
|
|reviewer wished me well and he or she advised me that I have =
|
|"other methods to ask for redress" but he or she left the =
|
|message too vague for me to take my complaints further. I =
|
|asked the Association for Computing Machinery for help in =
|
|obtaining more details as to which "other methods to ask for =
|
|redress" I have. I did not receive an answer to this =
|
|question. Why? =
|
| =
|
|Why does your website contain no warning that the paper =
|
|"OCCN: A Network-On-Chip Modeling and Simulation Framework", =
|
|DATE '04 is fraudulent? Shame on you. =
|
| =
|
|Yours sincerely, =
|
|Colin Paul Gloster =
|
| =
|
| =
|
|On October 6th, 2011, Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouce=C5=BFter =
|
|sent questions to
ACMhelp@ACM.org without receiving =
|
|answers: =
|
|"On October 5th, 2011, Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON-ACM26-3@ACM.=
|
|claimed: =
| ||---------------------------------------------------------------------| =
|
||"The original message was received at Wed, 05 Oct 2011 04:51:54 -0400| =
|
|| | =
|
|| ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- | =
|
||<
lathrop@mcs.anl.gov> | =
|
|| | =
|
|| ----- Transcript of session follows ----- | =
|
||.. while talking to mailgateway.anl.gov | =
|
RCPT To:<lathrop@mcs.anl.gov> | =
|
||<<< 550 #5.1.0 Address rejected." | =
| ||---------------------------------------------------------------------| =
|
| =
|
| =
|
|Gloster sent to
hpc-fellowship-questions@ACM.org on October 5th, =
|
|2011: =
| ||---------------------------------------------------------------------| =
|
||"Dear Sir/Madam, | =
|
|| | =
|
||As you would be aware, my application for a George Michael | =
|
||Memorial HPC Fellowship for 2011 failed. | =
|
|| | =
|
||Reviewer 3 was nice to comment: | =
|
||"Good luck with your research. A word of advice, this typy a | =
|
||submission is the forum to air the grievances you indicate. You have | =
|
||other methods to ask for redress." | =
|
|| | =
|
||I hope to be informed of details of how to proceed with airing the | =
|
||aforementioned grievances. What "other methods to ask for redress" do| =
|
||I "have"? | =
|
|| | =
|
||Yours faithfully, | =
|
||Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouce=C5=BFter" =
| | ||---------------------------------------------------------------------| =
|
| =
|
| =
|
|Dear Sir/Madam: =
|
| =
|
|I emailed
hpc-fellowship-questions@ACM.org and so I received a bounce re= port |
|for
lathrop@mcs.anl.gov . =
|
|Has anyone actually received the email which I had sent to =
|
|
hpc-fellowship-questions@ACM.org ? =
|
| =
|
|I mentioned in one of the online surveys which you requested me to partake=
in |
|after I left Italy that I am a victim of fraud published by ACM. In the =
|
|fellowship application I mentioned two fraudulent papers published by ACM = which |
|a so-called "tutor" had ordered me to praise (he and the coauthors are fri= ends |
|to each other). He himself had coauthored a similar fraudulent paper. I re= fused |
|to participate in this unethical activity. He censored my findings that th=
ey are|
|fraudsters and he said that if I would not quit then I would be failed for=
not |
|having a publication. =
|
| =
|
|I tried to expose this in "ACM Computing Surveys" and "The Journal of the = ACM" |
|but the manuscripts were rejected. =
|
| =
|
|It seems that one reviewer for the fellowship cared, but the advice given = was |
|not explicit enough for me to enact. Has the question reached that reviewe=
r? |
| =
|
|Shall ACM retract fraudulent publications? When shall ACM =
|
|begin adhering to its own Code of Ethics? =
|
| =
|
|Yours faithfully, =
|
|Nicholas Collin Paul de Glouce=C5=BFter"" =
| |--------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------|
Dear Sir/Madam:
Why have I not yet received answers to any of the questions above?
Why does the ACM Portal of the Association for Computing Machinery show=20 so-called "research" which was reported and proven to be fraudulent=20
without warning that it is fraudulent?
Yours faithfully,
Colin Paul Gloster"
The ACM let be sent: |--------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------|
|"25-Aug-2010 =
|
| =
|
|Dear Mr. de Glouce=C5=BFter, =
|
| =
|
|I am sorry to inform you that your paper has been rejected. Unfortunately,=
ACM Computing |
|Surveys is able to accept only a rather small percentage of the submission=
s it receives. |
| =
|
|I have read your paper. It is clear that you feel that you have a grievan=
ce against the |
|University of Pisa and the SHAPES group. I am not prepared to let you use=
ACM Computing |
|Surveys as a vehicle for publicising that grievance. The language that yo=
u have used in the|
|paper is intemperate and would potentially lead to legal problems for the = ACM if we were to |
|publish it. =
|
| =
|
|Sincerely, =
|
| =
|
|Chris Hankin =
|
|Editor-in-Chief =
|
|ACM Computing Surveys" =
| |--------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------------------|
"[. . .]
* 7. Why did you let your membership to ACM lapse? Please select all that=
=20
apply.
I didn=E2=80=99t see the value in my membership
[. . .]
Too expensive
[. . .]
Other (please specify)
I had complained to you about subsidy fraud which you publish (I used to=20 work under a coauthor fraudster). You refuse to retract it so you are=20 accomplices so a subsidy fraudster got away with perpetrating perjury=20 covering up this fraud so he went on to murder 3 men.
[. . .]
* 9. Would you consider renewing your ACM membership in the future?
[. . .]
No
[. . .]
10. Please share what would compel you to become a member of ACM again.
Please publish errata and retractions and apologies. Testify against=20 scientific malconduct instead of pretending that you adhere to your "Code=
=20
of Ethics". Resurrect the victims whose murders you are guilty of in 2nd=20
or 3rd degrees. Repair my reputation. Refuse to publish baloney. Arrange a=
=20
fair PhD exam for me (I whistleblow against a PhD so-called "tutor" so I=20
am denied even a dissertation defense!). Make amends."
wrote I myself on
HTTPS://WWW.research.net/r/FPSC3KH
on April 20th, 2024. This survey stated that the Association for Computing=
=20
Machinery wants to contact me afterwards to try to get me to join, but 3=20 months and 1 day afterwards I still do not get a follow-up.
Note by the way that a court made a final unappealable court order for a=20
PhD scholarship to be paid to myself but such a defendant refuses to obey=
=20
such an order. Note also that a court made orders to allow me to go to a=20 university but such a putative university disobeyed such orders and=20
instead got armed professional combatants to hit me out even though I did=
=20
not threaten (confirmed by a district attorney); I myself did not fight=20 (confirmed by CCTV); and I did not have a weapon (confirmed by policemen).=
=20
Cf.
HTTPS://WWW.COE.int/fr/web/cpt/portugal
Sinc=C3=A8res salutations.
Nicolas Paul Colin de Glocester
--8323329-328323417-1721556449=:1616845--
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114