From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada

This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--8323329-1384882658-1729107632=:3768553
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE

On Wed, 4 Oct 2023, Jeffrey R.Carter sent:
"=E2=80=9C[A]bout half the patterns in the 'Gang of Four'
book only exist because of defects in C++ ...=E2=80=9D
Brian Drummond
174"

"As this book is from before the effort to define Ada 9X, it contains=20
claims that Ada 83 is OO. The object based decompositions in the book=20
lack inheritance and polymorphism. For areas of his solutions where=20
classes or abstract data types are not needed, Grady Booch had=20 abstract-state machines: which he had much more easily represented by Ada=
=20
packages than the insecure, inflexible awkwardness of the Singleton=20
pattern in C++ in Gamma's; Helm's; Johnson's and Vlissides's "Design=20 Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software"."
says
HTTPS://ACCU.org/bookreviews/2004/gloster_1288

A so-called university course demanded us to buy "Design Patterns:=20
Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software" and implement patterns=20 thereof. This so-called course fraudulently boasts to be about "They=20
[i.e. Space-Shuttle-software programmers]" Write The Right Stuff" but this=
=20
course in no way is suitable for aerospace and instead is about the UML=20
and curlily braced poop.
--8323329-1384882658-1729107632=:3768553--
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024 21:40:26 +0200, Nioclásán Caileán de Ghlostéir wrote:

"As this book is from before the effort to define Ada 9X, it contains
claims that Ada 83 is OO. The object based decompositions in the book
lack inheritance and polymorphism. ..."

What about metaclasses?
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada

On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
"What about metaclasses?"

Hi,

This book is dated 1987. Its author abandoned Ada for C++. I reviewed it
in 2004. I do not readily remember metaclasses in it. I do not still have
a copy and Google Books did not show me a copy. Google Books offers to
search its 1994 edition
( HTTPS://WWW.Google.com/books/edition/Software_Engineering_with_Ada/iPZGJRW9bKgC?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Software+Engineering+with+Ada%22&printsec=frontcover
)
and it showed no result for "metaclass" and "metaclasses".
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada

On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:36:26 +0200, Nioclásán Caileán de Ghlostéir wrote:

This book is dated 1987.
...
I do not readily remember metaclasses in it.

In 1987, I think the only language that used the term “metaclass” was Smalltalk, and that was just as a hack mechanism on which to hang what we
now call “classmethods”.

Python has metaclasses in a much more useful sense: being fully OO, every value that a variable can hold is an object. Since functions and classes
are first-class objects, they, too, must be instances of some class(es).
The class that a class is an instance of is called its “metaclass”.
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada

Smalltalk systems are bloated with code clones. So much for reuse!

Smalltalk and Python codes crash while attemptings to run because they do
not check against faults during compilings.

"How Python and Rust handle errors is entirely different. Python will
throw an exception when an error is encountered. Rust will return a value
when an error is found, while Python will simply throw an error without providing any suggestions on how to fix it. Meanwhile, Rust will provide
some recommendations to easily pinpoint and fix the issues."
says @misc{Python-will-simply-throw-an-error-without-providing-any-suggestions-on-how-to-fix-it.htm,
title = {{Python vs Rust: Choosing Your Language - Teach Sector}},
year={2022},
url = {HTTPS://TeachSector.com/python-vs-rust-choosing-your-language/},
author = {Victor Porton}
}

Cf.

@misc{finding-bugs-in-your-Python-software-Have-you-ever-mistyped-an-identifier.html,
title = {{Best Programming Language \texttt{|} Teach Sector}},
year={2022},
url = {HTTPS://TeachSector.com/dforpython},
author = {Victor Porton}
}

and

@misc{dynamic-nature-of-Python-usually-leads-to-many-programming-errors.htm, title = {{The Best Python Alternative You Can Find <E2><80><93> Course and Certifications - Teach Sector}},
year={2022},
url = {HTTPS://TeachSector.com/the-best-python-alternative-you-can-find-course-and-certifications/},
author = {Victor Porton}
}

and

@inproceedings{3383583.3398514.pdf,
author = {Fu, Yuanxi and Schneider, Jodi},
title = {{Towards Knowledge Maintenance in Scientific Digital Libraries
with the Keystone Framework}},
year = {2020},
isbn = {9781450375856},
publisher = {Association for Computing Machinery},
address = {New York, NY, USA},
url = {HTTPS://DOI.org/10.1145/3383583.3398514},
doi = {10.1145/3383583.3398514},
abstract = {Scientific digital libraries speed dissemination of scientific publications, but also the propagation of invalid or unreliable knowledge. Although many papers with known validity problems are highly cited, no auditing process is currently available to determine whether a citing
paper's findings fundamentally depend on invalid or unreliable knowledge.
To address this, we introduce a new framework, the keystone framework, designed to identify when and how citing unreliable findings impacts a
paper, using argumentation theory and citation context analysis. Through
two pilot case studies, we demonstrate how the keystone framework can be applied to knowledge maintenance tasks for digital libraries, including addressing citations of a non-reproducible paper and identifying
statements most needing validation in a high-impact paper. We identify
roles for librarians, database maintainers, knowledgebase curators, and research software engineers in applying the framework to scientific
digital libraries.},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital
Libraries in 2020},
pages = {217--226},
numpages = {10},
keywords = {knowledge claims, citation of retracted papers, scientific literature, citation, argumentation theory, citation contexts, knowledge maintenance, retraction of research, argument retrieval},
location = {Virtual Event, China},
series = {JCDL '20}
}

and

@article{Python-is-missing-some-of-these,
author = {Jeffrey R. Carter},
title = {{Subject: Re: Is Python higher level than Ada?}},
journal = {news:comp.lang.ada},
volume = {2016},
year = {2016},
note = {Message-ID: \texttt{<o0i099$fg8$1@dont-email.me>} ag \url{HTTPS://Archive.LegitData.Co/comp.lang.ada/o0i099$fg8$1@dont-email.me/} mar shampla Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:08:37 -0700}
}

and

@article{Ada-had-records-from-day-one-only-40-years-ago,
author = {Nasser M. Abbasi},
title = {{Subject: Java and Python have just discovered \texttt{"}record\texttt{"} type finally after 40 years.}},
journal = {news:comp.lang.ada},
volume = {2023},
year = {2023},
note = {Message-ID: \texttt{<u3lu8o$1p3li$1@dont-email.me>} ag \url{HTTPS://Archive.LegitData.Co/comp.lang.ada/u3lu8o$1p3li$1@dont-email.me/} mar shampla Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 12:50:14 -0500}
}

and

@article{assuming-Python-implements-them-correctly-which-I-honestly-doubt,
author = {Dmitry A. Kazakov},
title = {{Subject: Re: Is Python higher level than Ada?}},
journal = {news:comp.lang.ada},
volume = {2016},
year = {2016},
note = {Message-ID: \texttt{<o0h7tt$1o9f$1@gioia.aioe.org>} ag \url{HTTPS://Archive.LegitData.Co/comp.lang.ada/o0h7tt$1o9f$1@gioia.aioe.org/} mar shampla Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:12:29 +0100}
}
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114

From Newsgroup: comp.lang.ada

On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 10:23:33 +0200, Nioclásán Caileán de Ghlostéir wrote:

Smalltalk and Python codes crash while attemptings to run because they
do not check against faults during compilings.

So, those are dynamic languages. You can add static type annotations to Python, if you want.
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114