Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/Linux distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
of the latest exclamations of Linus Torvalds:
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus! Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-facing sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
On 10/21/2024 15:07, Lester Thorpe wrote:
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
of the latest exclamations of Linus Torvalds:
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely
theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in
practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus! Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-
facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
Original Post is here: https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
On 10/22/24 07:44, Phillip Frabott wrote:
On 10/21/2024 15:07, Lester Thorpe wrote:
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their
GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
of the latest exclamations of Linus Torvalds:
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely
theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in
practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus! Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-
facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
Original Post is here:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
On 22/10/2024 13:32, bad sector wrote:
On 10/22/24 07:44, Phillip Frabott wrote:And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
On 10/21/2024 15:07, Lester Thorpe wrote:
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/
Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note >>>> of the latest exclamations of Linus Torvalds:
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely
theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in
practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus! Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing! >>>>
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-
facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
Original Post is here:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
On 10/22/24 07:44, Phillip Frabott wrote:
On 10/21/2024 15:07, Lester Thorpe wrote:
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their
GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note
of the latest exclamations of Linus Torvalds:
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely
theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in
practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus! Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-
facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
Original Post is here:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
On 22/10/2024 13:32, bad sector wrote:
On 10/22/24 07:44, Phillip Frabott wrote:And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
On 10/21/2024 15:07, Lester Thorpe wrote:
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their
GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note >>>> of the latest exclamations of Linus Torvalds:
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely
theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in
practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus! Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing! >>>>
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-
facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
Original Post is here:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
On 2024-10-22 8:34 a.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 22/10/2024 13:32, bad sector wrote:
On 10/22/24 07:44, Phillip Frabott wrote:And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
On 10/21/2024 15:07, Lester Thorpe wrote:
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their
GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take
note
of the latest exclamations of Linus Torvalds:
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and
completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in
practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus! Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing! >>>>>
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have >>>>> to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the
public- facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
Original Post is here:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
On 22/10/2024 14:18, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 8:34 a.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:well a lot of Muricans seem to be in favour of letting Putin destroy Ukraine so tthey pay 21c a year less in income tax.
On 22/10/2024 13:32, bad sector wrote:
On 10/22/24 07:44, Phillip Frabott wrote:And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
On 10/21/2024 15:07, Lester Thorpe wrote:
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their
GNU/Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take >>>>>> note
of the latest exclamations of Linus Torvalds:
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and
completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in
practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds- >>>>>> growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus! Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop
computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have >>>>>> to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the
public- facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
Original Post is here:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
On 22/10/2024 13:32, bad sector wrote:
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
On 22/10/2024 13:32, bad sector wrote:
On 10/22/24 07:44, Phillip Frabott wrote:And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
On 10/21/2024 15:07, Lester Thorpe wrote:
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their GNU/
Linux
distros with performance degrading security "features" should take note >>>> of the latest exclamations of Linus Torvalds:
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and completely
theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in
practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds-
growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus! Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop computing! >>>>
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have
to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it.
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the public-
facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots.
Original Post is here:
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
On 2024-10-22 9:25 a.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 22/10/2024 14:18, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 8:34 a.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:well a lot of Muricans seem to be in favour of letting Putin destroy
On 22/10/2024 13:32, bad sector wrote:
On 10/22/24 07:44, Phillip Frabott wrote:And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
On 10/21/2024 15:07, Lester Thorpe wrote:
Distro maintainers, and their lackey consumers, who bloat their >>>>>>> GNU/LinuxOriginal Post is here:
distros with performance degrading security "features" should
take note
of the latest exclamations of Linus Torvalds:
"Honestly, I'm pretty damn fed up with buggy hardware and
completely theoretical
attacks that have never actually shown themselves to be used in >>>>>>> practice."
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/24/10/21/1533228/linus-torvalds- >>>>>>> growing-frustrated-by-buggy-hardware-theoretical-cpu-attacks
Tell 'em, Linus! Those paranoid freaks are ruining desktop
computing!
To keep my workstation free of these ridiculous "mitigations" I have >>>>>>> to devote some slightly significant time -- and I don't like it. >>>>>>>
At the very least, separate the desktop workstation from the
public- facing
sever as these have COMPLETELY DIFFERENT "security" concerns.
I am sick of these "the sky is falling" security-obsessed idiots. >>>>>>
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Torvalds-Frustrated-Buggy-HW
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
Ukraine so tthey pay 21c a year less in income tax.
Funny enough, despite being Polish
and knowing Russia's history with my
ancestral country, I too think that he should go ahead and demolish
Ukraine. For one, he has a right to defend his borders and Ukraine's geography is an important part of that. Second, Ukraine's contested
regions already decided that they wanted to be a part of Russia but both Ukraine and its American allies decided that democracy didn't matter.
Third, Ukraine remains a corrupt country which allows Western
politicians to launder their fortunes. That last reason alone is a good reason to get rid of the administration.
I truly believe that anyone defending Zelensky and American involvement
in the war is easily manipulated by propaganda.
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:32:13 -0400, bad sector wrote:
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost- effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing customers
to pay more. Which would you prefer?
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:32:13 -0400, bad sector wrote:
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost- effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing customers
to pay more. Which would you prefer?
On 22/10/2024 14:18, CrudeSausage wrote:
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
That's what undocumented migrants are for.
On 2024-10-22 4:47 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:32:13 -0400, bad sector wrote:
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market
capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a presence
in North America.
But Raspberry Pi is clearly an outlier ...
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
Illegal aliens.
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 19:36:08 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 4:47 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:32:13 -0400, bad sector wrote:
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production) >>>> to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market
capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back
manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a presence
in North America.
Easy way around that: set up an empty office like those in East Texas to
get jurisdiction under the patent-friendly courts there. There’s your “presence”. Business continues from overseas as usual.
What’s your next move?
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:18:00 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
Strange. I thought you wanted to take jobs away from those running those manufacturing lines in the third world. Now you’re trying to sympathize with them as “slave labour”?
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 19:49:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
Illegal aliens.
Declaring somebody “illegal” ... I wonder what that means? That they have no legal right to exist?
(They used to do that--declaring somebody “illegal”--in Apartheid South Africa.)
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 19:49:24 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
Illegal aliens.
Declaring somebody “illegal” ... I wonder what that means? That they have >no legal right to exist?
(They used to do that--declaring somebody “illegal”--in Apartheid South >Africa.)
On 2024-10-22 7:57 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 19:36:08 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 4:47 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:32:13 -0400, bad sector wrote:
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market
capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back
manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a presence
in North America.
Easy way around that: set up an empty office like those in East Texas
to get jurisdiction under the patent-friendly courts there. There’s
your “presence”. Business continues from overseas as usual.
What’s your next move?
A manufacturing presence. The company would have to produce whatever it
sells on the continent it is selling to.
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:19:57 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 7:57 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 19:36:08 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 4:47 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:32:13 -0400, bad sector wrote:
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market >>>>> capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back
manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a presence >>>> in North America.
Easy way around that: set up an empty office like those in East Texas
to get jurisdiction under the patent-friendly courts there. There’s
your “presence”. Business continues from overseas as usual.
What’s your next move?
A manufacturing presence. The company would have to produce whatever it
sells on the continent it is selling to.
How much of it? Disassembled parts? Or all the way back to raw ore?
IF the US is in fact the biggest> market then the US calls the shots,
all of them, period.
On 2024-10-22 8:02 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
(They used to do that--declaring somebody “illegal”--in Apartheid South >> Africa.)
And they were right to do so. South Africa used to be a country of laws
and social order.
On 2024-10-22 6:50 p.m., Donald Trump wrote:
On 22/10/2024 14:18, CrudeSausage wrote:
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
That's what undocumented migrants are for.
Illegal aliens. Anyone who uses the above term does not deserve to be read.
< snip >
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:28:13 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 8:02 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
(They used to do that--declaring somebody “illegal”--in Apartheid South >>> Africa.)
And they were right to do so. South Africa used to be a country of laws
and social order.
The whites were nutcases, let's face it. They had “whites-only” hospitals, so somebody who needed care but wasn’t “white” had to be taken elsewhere -- if they were lucky.
As a 20-something singer touring with the Manhattan Brothers, the
biggest Black band in South Africa, [Miriam Makeba] was involved
in a crash with a white family’s car that left the white father
and one of his children dead. The whites were bundled into an
ambulance and the Blacks were left to die on the side of a
provincial road. The local “white” hospital refused to treat them
and one of Makeba’s companions ended up dying an entirely
preventable death when he finally reached Johannesburg two days
later.
<https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2024/10/20/why-shouldnt-power-be-black-how-miriam-makeba-won-and-lost-the-us>
Whoever did whatever in South Africa never did, never will, and
certainly doesn't define what is meant by any term elsewhere and that >includes 'illegal alien'. Illegal = unauthorised, unlawful; alien =
foreign, potentially hostile. Nothing complicated really i.e. a squatter >from elsewhere as would be someone who just waltzes into your
living-room and pitches tent there uninvited.
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:19:57 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 7:57 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 19:36:08 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 4:47 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:32:13 -0400, bad sector wrote:
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost-
effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market >>>>> capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back
manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a presence >>>> in North America.
Easy way around that: set up an empty office like those in East Texas
to get jurisdiction under the patent-friendly courts there. There’s
your “presence”. Business continues from overseas as usual.
What’s your next move?
A manufacturing presence. The company would have to produce whatever it
sells on the continent it is selling to.
How much of it? Disassembled parts? Or all the way back to raw ore?
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:28:13 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 8:02 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
(They used to do that--declaring somebody “illegal”--in Apartheid South >>> Africa.)
And they were right to do so. South Africa used to be a country of laws
and social order.
The whites were nutcases, let's face it. They had “whites-only” hospitals, so somebody who needed care but wasn’t “white” had to be taken elsewhere -- if they were lucky.
As a 20-something singer touring with the Manhattan Brothers, the
biggest Black band in South Africa, [Miriam Makeba] was involved
in a crash with a white family’s car that left the white father
and one of his children dead. The whites were bundled into an
ambulance and the Blacks were left to die on the side of a
provincial road. The local “white” hospital refused to treat them
and one of Makeba’s companions ended up dying an entirely
preventable death when he finally reached Johannesburg two days
later.
<https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2024/10/20/why-shouldnt-power-be-black-how-miriam-makeba-won-and-lost-the-us>
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 6:50 p.m., Donald Trump wrote:
On 22/10/2024 14:18, CrudeSausage wrote:
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
That's what undocumented migrants are for.
Illegal aliens. Anyone who uses the above term does not deserve to be
read.
< snip >
This is the truth. "Migrant" is a weasel word created by the left in
order to slip in the unstated assumption that they somehow have the
right to stay where ever they choose to settle down. It is incorrect and dishonest.
Illegal alien is what they are. Period.
bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> wrote:
Whoever did whatever in South Africa never did, never will, and
certainly doesn't define what is meant by any term elsewhere and that
includes 'illegal alien'. Illegal = unauthorised, unlawful; alien =
foreign, potentially hostile. Nothing complicated really i.e. a squatter >>from elsewhere as would be someone who just waltzes into your
living-room and pitches tent there uninvited.
Uh huh. You ever hear of Christopher Columbus?
Was he born in the
Americas? Or did he just declare land to be the property of Spain,
without any rational basis? What the fuck do you think crackers
coming here were, if not "illegal immigrants"?
Just because the
indigenous people hadn't created a system of government to make a law, against their arrival? Despite the fact whities massacred indigenous
people, to gain territory here?
Wake the fuck up.
On 2024-10-22 8:45 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:19:57 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 7:57 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 19:36:08 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 4:47 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:32:13 -0400, bad sector wrote:
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost- >>>>>> effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market >>>>>> capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back
manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a
presence in North America.
Easy way around that: set up an empty office like those in East Texas
to get jurisdiction under the patent-friendly courts there. There’s
your “presence”. Business continues from overseas as usual.
What’s your next move?
A manufacturing presence. The company would have to produce whatever
it sells on the continent it is selling to.
How much of it? Disassembled parts? Or all the way back to raw ore?
This statement demonstrates ...
On 22/10/2024 13:32, bad sector wrote:
On 10/22/24 07:44, Phillip Frabott wrote:And then a raspberry Pi will cost $1000 instead of $100
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual production)
to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
On 2024-10-22 8:45 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:19:57 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 7:57 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 19:36:08 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 4:47 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:32:13 -0400, bad sector wrote:
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost- >>>>>> effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market >>>>>> capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back
manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a presence >>>>> in North America.
Easy way around that: set up an empty office like those in East Texas
to get jurisdiction under the patent-friendly courts there. There’s
your “presence”. Business continues from overseas as usual.
What’s your next move?
A manufacturing presence. The company would have to produce whatever it
sells on the continent it is selling to.
How much of it? Disassembled parts? Or all the way back to raw ore?
This statement demonstrates how much progressives care about the people being enslaved in foreign countries to produce the goods we Westerners purchase at low prices.
They have a huge heart until you tell them that
their cell phone might cost $50 more because 'Bile in Africa is suddenly getting a living wage.
On 2024-10-23, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2024-10-22 8:45 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 20:19:57 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 7:57 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 19:36:08 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 4:47 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:32:13 -0400, bad sector wrote:
It's time for HW manufacturing (all development AND actual
production) to return to the USA/CXanada and Europe.
It went away in the first place because it could not be done cost- >>>>>>> effectively in those “first-world” countries -- basic free-market >>>>>>> capitalism in action.
To bring it back would require Government subsidies, or forcing
customers to pay more. Which would you prefer?
Considering the largest market for those products is the West,
particularly the United States, it would be possible to bring back >>>>>> manufacturing by blocking sales of products that don't have a presence >>>>>> in North America.
Easy way around that: set up an empty office like those in East Texas >>>>> to get jurisdiction under the patent-friendly courts there. There’s >>>>> your “presence”. Business continues from overseas as usual.
What’s your next move?
A manufacturing presence. The company would have to produce whatever it >>>> sells on the continent it is selling to.
How much of it? Disassembled parts? Or all the way back to raw ore?
This statement demonstrates how much progressives care about the people
being enslaved in foreign countries to produce the goods we Westerners
purchase at low prices.
Indeed, it shows that progressives consider policy while conservatives
are only interested in rhetoric.
This statement demonstrates how much progressives care about the people being enslaved in foreign countries ...
On Wed, 10/23/2024 10:06 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
This statement demonstrates how much progressives care about the people being enslaved in foreign countries ...
Once you offshore, THERE IS NO TURNING BACK.
On 2024-10-23 11:25 p.m., Jasen Betts wrote:
Indeed, it shows that progressives consider policy while conservatives
are only interested in rhetoric.
Complete bullshit.
On 2024-10-24 11:56 a.m., Paul wrote:
On Wed, 10/23/2024 10:06 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
This statement demonstrates how much progressives care about the
people being enslaved in foreign countries ...
Once you offshore, THERE IS NO TURNING BACK.
Only if you don't care about your people. I am a nationalist so my own people will always come first.
You don't even have to be a nationalist, motherboards and gpu's (some research, automated printed circuit production and little more) costing
$1000 up are well within domestic margins as it is.
This is the truth. "Migrant" is a weasel word created by the left in order >to slip in the unstated assumption that they somehow have the right to
stay where ever they choose to settle down. It is incorrect and dishonest.
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:44:38 -0400, bad sector wrote:
You don't even have to be a nationalist, motherboards and gpu's (some
research, automated printed circuit production and little more) costing
$1000 up are well within domestic margins as it is.
Why is Taiwan the world capital for computer hardware? Because the
Government had the foresight to support private investment in hardware manufacturing back in the 1980s, which didn’t fully pay off for close to another decade. But when it did pay off, it effectively killed off most PC hardware manufacturing in the US and elsewhere.
You don’t even
believe in the idea that Government can be helpful to businesses, as
opposed to being an obstacle to them.
Why is Taiwan the world capital for computer hardware? Because the
Government had the foresight to support private investment in hardware manufacturing back in the 1980s, which didn’t fully pay off for close to another decade. But when it did pay off, it effectively killed off most PC hardware manufacturing in the US and elsewhere.
On 10/24/24 18:23, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Why is Taiwan the world capital for computer hardware? Because the
Government had the foresight to support private investment in hardware
manufacturing back in the 1980s, which didn’t fully pay off for close
to another decade. But when it did pay off, it effectively killed off
most PC hardware manufacturing in the US and elsewhere.
That money allowed them to cut prices ...
On Thu, 24 Oct 2024 16:44:38 -0400, bad sector wrote:
You don't even have to be a nationalist, motherboards and gpu's (some
research, automated printed circuit production and little more) costing
$1000 up are well within domestic margins as it is.
Why is Taiwan the world capital for computer hardware? Because the Government had the foresight to support private investment in hardware manufacturing back in the 1980s, which didn’t fully pay off for close to another decade. But when it did pay off, it effectively killed off most PC hardware manufacturing in the US and elsewhere.
Who in the US is going to take the risk of such a long-term investment?
They weren’t capable then, they’re even less capable now. You don’t even
believe in the idea that Government can be helpful to businesses, as
opposed to being an obstacle to them.
Whoever did whatever in South Africa never did, never will, and
certainly doesn't define what is meant by any term elsewhere and that
includes 'illegal alien'. Illegal = unauthorised, unlawful; alien =
foreign, potentially hostile. Nothing complicated really i.e. a squatter >>>from elsewhere as would be someone who just waltzes into your
living-room and pitches tent there uninvited.
Uh huh. You ever hear of Christopher Columbus?
Sure, far too much even; he was a paper christian if at all whom the
vatican was about to BBQ so he quickly found himself a sweetheart deal
with the spanish queen to get the fuck outta Dodge and just in time.
Was he born in the
Americas? Or did he just declare land to be the property of Spain,
without any rational basis? What the fuck do you think crackers
coming here were, if not "illegal immigrants"?
What DECIDED whom the land belonged to was the size of the Spanish navy, >also the British, the French, and the German to name the top guns. When
did you get off the boat?
Just because the
indigenous people hadn't created a system of government to make a law,
against their arrival? Despite the fact whities massacred indigenous
people, to gain territory here?
Laws without power mean didley shit, but who was talking about the USA?
What is it with Americans that unless someone specifically says 'this is
not about the USA' they always think that everyone on usenet is by
default thinking and talking about them? The illegal migrant problem is
at crisis levels in Europe for example, far worse than stateside.
Wake the fuck up.
Land is like a woman, belongs to the last man standing subject only to
her wanting any of him regardless. There is no ancestral 'right' that I
know of or would accept.
On 10/24/24 13:30, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-24 11:56 a.m., Paul wrote:
On Wed, 10/23/2024 10:06 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
This statement demonstrates how much progressives care about the
people being enslaved in foreign countries ...
Once you offshore, THERE IS NO TURNING BACK.
Only if you don't care about your people. I am a nationalist so my own
people will always come first.
You don't even have to be a nationalist, motherboards and gpu's (some research, automated printed circuit production and little more) costing $1000 up are well within domestic margins as it is. It's just a question
of someone taking a swipe at it and THEN (because offshore WILL start slashing prices if challenged) sticking to a strategic PLAN.
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 00:05:13 -0400, bad sector wrote:
On 10/24/24 18:23, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
Why is Taiwan the world capital for computer hardware? Because the
Government had the foresight to support private investment in hardware
manufacturing back in the 1980s, which didn’t fully pay off for close
to another decade. But when it did pay off, it effectively killed off
most PC hardware manufacturing in the US and elsewhere.
That money allowed them to cut prices ...
Where did they get the money from?
What I didn't mention, is we have none of the humans discussed above.
We have no skilled workers. Once their jobs were offshored, they
became Uber drivers and UPS delivery people. They're not coming back.
we don't have enough professors with the right backgrounds, to
teach a new generation of people. There is a long period
of rebuilding the industry.
Consider a conversation I had with an HR person once, over a beer.
we were joking about something, and she tells me "when the resumes
come in, if a tech worker has been out of work for a year, I just
throw out their resume". She didn't read the resume, to find out
what skills she is throwing away. That gives you some idea, of the opinion
of HR to the state of the tech workers. Even if there were old farts
sitting around typing posts to USENEt, you would not hire them, because... their resume was already thrown in the garbage :-) None of you
should be particularly surprised by this. Seeing the barrier yet ?
Seeing how difficult it is to bootstrap anything ? That's why my
estimate is, it would take twenty years effort to even get close
to rebuilding an industry. No business man is that patient. Sorry.
It's so sad that HR departments spend so much time and effort
looking for someone with a highly-specific set of skills that
exactly matches their needs, rather than hiring people who can
quickly learn the skills necessary for not only the current
project but also the next one.
bad sector <forgetski@_INVALID.net> wrote:
Whoever did whatever in South Africa never did, never will, and
certainly doesn't define what is meant by any term elsewhere and that
includes 'illegal alien'. Illegal = unauthorised, unlawful; alien =
foreign, potentially hostile. Nothing complicated really i.e. a squatter >>> >from elsewhere as would be someone who just waltzes into your
living-room and pitches tent there uninvited.
Uh huh. You ever hear of Christopher Columbus?
Sure, far too much even; he was a paper christian if at all whom the
vatican was about to BBQ so he quickly found himself a sweetheart deal
with the spanish queen to get the fuck outta Dodge and just in time.
Was he born in the
Americas? Or did he just declare land to be the property of Spain,
without any rational basis? What the fuck do you think crackers
coming here were, if not "illegal immigrants"?
What DECIDED whom the land belonged to was the size of the Spanish navy,
also the British, the French, and the German to name the top guns. When
did you get off the boat?
Just because the
indigenous people hadn't created a system of government to make a law,
against their arrival? Despite the fact whities massacred indigenous
people, to gain territory here?
Laws without power mean didley shit, but who was talking about the USA?
What is it with Americans that unless someone specifically says 'this is
not about the USA' they always think that everyone on usenet is by
default thinking and talking about them? The illegal migrant problem is
at crisis levels in Europe for example, far worse than stateside.
Wake the fuck up.
Land is like a woman, belongs to the last man standing subject only to
her wanting any of him regardless. There is no ancestral 'right' that I
know of or would accept.
You're a fucking pig.
Eve and when justice is thus structurally impossible but injustice is virtually guaranteed it's all non-avenue. There has to be negotiation,
war unfortunately being the last and loudest form of which.
On 25/10/2024 22:33, bad sector wrote:
records don't go back to Adam and
Eve and when justice is thus structurally impossible but injustice isThis is why it is far better to simply kill all the menfolk and use the women folk for sex slaves.
virtually guaranteed it's all non-avenue. There has to be negotiation,
war unfortunately being the last and loudest form of which.
No one is left to pay reparations to...
If I did that today, the teenager watching TikTok vids on his phone
would look up and say "what is solder?".
Consider a conversation I had with an HR person once, over a beer.
we were joking about something, and she tells me "when the resumes come
in, if a tech worker has been out of work for a year, I just throw out
their resume". She didn't read the resume, to find out what skills she
is throwing away. That gives you some idea, of the opinion of HR to the
state of the tech workers.
No problem, the politicians have the answer: immigration.
On 10/25/24 17:47, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 25/10/2024 22:33, bad sector wrote:
records don't go back to Adam and
Eve and when justice is thus structurally impossible but injustice isThis is why it is far better to simply kill all the menfolk and use
virtually guaranteed it's all non-avenue. There has to be
negotiation, war unfortunately being the last and loudest form of which. >>>
the women folk for sex slaves.
No one is left to pay reparations to...
Only one snag, they like hebrews and a few others trace descendence
through the mother.
That said, there is much we could/should have
learned from them: "Taking only what you need on your journey, otherwise leave the land as you had found it". Haitians have clear-cut the
mountains and the rains have washed all the soil off them. No tree will
EVER grow there again.
On 25/10/2024 23:09, bad sector wrote:
On 10/25/24 17:47, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 25/10/2024 22:33, bad sector wrote:
records don't go back to Adam and
Eve and when justice is thus structurally impossible but injusticeThis is why it is far better to simply kill all the menfolk and use
is virtually guaranteed it's all non-avenue. There has to be
negotiation, war unfortunately being the last and loudest form of
which.
the women folk for sex slaves.
No one is left to pay reparations to...
Only one snag, they like hebrews and a few others trace descendence
through the mother.
A clear case of making the women adopt a culture that doesn't
That said, there is much we could/should have learned from them:
"Taking only what you need on your journey, otherwise leave the land
as you had found it". Haitians have clear-cut the mountains and the
rains have washed all the soil off them. No tree will EVER grow there
again.
Well that of course is plan juvenile.
We did that years ago in Britain to build ships with.
The trees however are recovering pretty well
On 25/10/2024 23:09, bad sector wrote:
On 10/25/24 17:47, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
On 25/10/2024 22:33, bad sector wrote:
records don't go back to Adam and
Eve and when justice is thus structurally impossible but injustice isThis is why it is far better to simply kill all the menfolk and use
virtually guaranteed it's all non-avenue. There has to be
negotiation, war unfortunately being the last and loudest form of
which.
the women folk for sex slaves.
No one is left to pay reparations to...
Only one snag, they like hebrews and a few others trace descendence
through the mother.
A clear case of making the women adopt a culture that doesn't
That said, there is much we could/should have learned from them:
"Taking only what you need on your journey, otherwise leave the land as
you had found it". Haitians have clear-cut the mountains and the rains
have washed all the soil off them. No tree will EVER grow there again.
Well that of course is plan juvenile.
We did that years ago in Britain to build ships with.
The trees however are recovering pretty well
There would not be a line on the requisition "Must know Microsoft Office", which is a popular bit of silliness.
On 2024-10-25, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:
There would not be a line on the requisition "Must know Microsoft
Office",
which is a popular bit of silliness.
Then there were the ads in 1997 calling for people with 5 years'
experience in Windows 95...
Not only in Britain, Quebec was "150 foot tall white pines as far as the
eye could see". Then your navy requisitioned AND harvested them all for
ship masts while no Quebecer had a right to touch them.
On 2024-10-22 8:00 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:18:00 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
Strange. I thought you wanted to take jobs away from those running those
manufacturing lines in the third world. Now you’re trying to sympathize
with them as “slave labour”?
Do you purposefully misunderstand what you read? It is very clear that
the labour being used to produce less expensive computers is slave
labour. I have _always_ been in favour of products being sold in the
West being produced in the West. I would _never_ advocate for anything
sold here to be manufactured anywhere else, especially since it turns
out to be slave labour.
On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 04:38:45 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
On 2024-10-25, Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:
There would not be a line on the requisition "Must know Microsoft
Office",
which is a popular bit of silliness.
Then there were the ads in 1997 calling for people with 5 years'
experience in Windows 95...
My favorites were the ads in the Boston Sunday Globe in the early '80s looking for several years of Ada experience. At the time there wasn't a working Ada compiler.
We never paid attention to the ads HR would place for programmers until
one interviewee asked about the requirements like 'able to run copier'
that they had cut'n'pasted from their office drone template.
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 20:38:47 -0400, bad sector wrote:
Not only in Britain, Quebec was "150 foot tall white pines as far as the
eye could see". Then your navy requisitioned AND harvested them all for
ship masts while no Quebecer had a right to touch them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pine_Tree_Riot
The people of New Hampshire disputed that. I enjoyed living there until it started drifting left and I sought greener pastures.
The responsibility for protecting its own falls on sovereign governments
so when oriental cheap-labour combined with subsidies allowed them to undercut then western governments should have countered not by
subsidising (you cannot cut out a hole) but by completely interdicting
those imports.
On 10/22/24 8:21 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2024-10-22 8:00 p.m., Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024 09:18:00 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
So you're in favour of slave labour because you can get your hobby
computer for less?
Strange. I thought you wanted to take jobs away from those running those >>> manufacturing lines in the third world. Now you’re trying to sympathize >>> with them as “slave labour”?
Do you purposefully misunderstand what you read? It is very clear that
the labour being used to produce less expensive computers is slave
labour. I have _always_ been in favour of products being sold in the
West being produced in the West. I would _never_ advocate for anything
sold here to be manufactured anywhere else, especially since it turns
out to be slave labour.
With Linux, it's less "slave" labor as "dedicated volunteer"
labor.
What the volunteers have been able to accomplish is quite impressive,
either way.
On Sat, 26 Oct 2024 19:27:34 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
What the volunteers have been able to accomplish is quite impressive,
either way.
And Torvalds has to bear his share of credit (or blame, if you prefer) for >that.
On 10/26/24 16:41, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 08:47:01 -0400, bad sector wrote:
The responsibility for protecting its own falls on sovereign
governments so when oriental cheap-labour combined with subsidies
allowed them to undercut then western governments should have
countered not by subsidising (you cannot cut out a hole) but by
completely interdicting those imports.
That’s how things used to be done in the bad old days, when most of the
“consumer” goods we take for granted were rare and expensive luxuries
that could be afforded only by the rich. That is, where they existed at
all.
Do you really want to go back to those days?
Probably, people were DIY qualified then.
Sysop: | DaiTengu |
---|---|
Location: | Appleton, WI |
Users: | 991 |
Nodes: | 10 (1 / 9) |
Uptime: | 76:07:42 |
Calls: | 12,949 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 186,574 |
Messages: | 3,264,538 |