Shadow <Sh@dow.br> news:email@example.com
Tue, 11 Apr 2017 14:18:58 GMT in alt.2600, wrote:
On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:46:16 +0100, "David B."
Betty was right! :-) I HAVE seen this before.
Betty has been right about him the entire time. Despite his
apologies, she knows they are fake and he has alterior motives in
making them. Just as he did when he responded to my post about
copyrights and pictures. He *only* admitted he was in error because
i'd previously posted he would be filtered from here on out. He has
been since that post was sent out. He's pissed off about it, so he
thinks he'll get a response (which isn't directly possible since I
can't see his posts anymore, unless some quotes and/or emails the
ones they think I should read; keep your enemies closer line of
thought) by name dropping me and accusing me of things I didn't do.
Yes, I know about those posts where he claims I'm a liar, etc, using
my full name. Usually done in response to one of your (any of you
really) posts calling him out for the stalking, #######, that he is.
It's called deflection and google ####ing; weak attempts at it.
Infact, I've been overly concerned about the google ####ing anyhow.
Unless you use specific search terms, I don't even come up
professional skier and some people I've never met do, instead. So,
the anontard is once again, wasting his time effort and energy on a
mission that can not be completed.
Who takes somebody who uses
elementary school name calling seriously anyway? Answer: no adult
that I know of.
I don't mind forking this information over to the
anontard at this point. They don't listen when I try to provide them
sound advice, anyhow.
Oh, one more thing, Yes, I got the email of BD trying to claim I
inferred that posts 'drop off' usenet with the one I wrote discussing >retention times.
I inferred NOTHING OF THE SORT. I'm well aware that
some posts can still be recovered for a considerable amount of time.
The remailer obviously uses some posts from the 90s primary for it's
And, I think I may know who's behind the remailing
Looking over some old posts, I couldn't help but notice a
particular user got busted trying to forge a post of mine, but,
managed to ####up when they posted under their own usual handle with
matching (No kidding) header information to the fake posts that were
supposed to be from me.
If it turns out that information is solid,
the semi regular individual of this newsgroup is going to get a very
harsh lesson in proper manners, and, an opportunity to demonstrate
some actual hacking skills, else, I'm going to own them AND EVERYBODY
they are related to, irl. What I've done to BD and so far to Eagle
will pale by comparison. I'm done playing around with various people.
I'll make an example out of this individual that will makeeverybody >rethink any stupid decisions concerning me they have in
about to get very real for a select few individuals. and, nobody can
say they didn't have this coming, or, that I went too far. No, ####
that ####. I haven't either. I've put up with the anontard for a few
years now. Enough is enough.
While I'm very much a grayhat by nature and am! one of the good guys,
I'm not somebody you can walk all over either. retired does NOT mean,
forgot how to get down and dirty.
Many of my hpavc peers called me a
dangerous as #### lone wolf for a very good reason. And, a few people
are about to learn that, first hand.
I'd go with both. It's obvious he has a drinking problem. He was
quite pissed? about me finding out about it as well as being able to
semi prove it.
Well, prove about as good as one can via this medium,
anyhow. I was able to inflitrate his rl circle of friends.
His buddy David Eagle is up #### creek without a paddle, too. I
honored his request to back off after the doxing exchange a couple of
years ago. When I dox'd his tree, but, good, without the assistance
of anyone else (I didn't even tell ANYBODY what I was upto, so he
can't fault ANYONE here for what happened) or a credit/debit card,
didn't want to keep going with me. I agreed to let him slink off,
wounded, instead of destroyed. Awhile later, when the anontard fired
up again, Eagle decided it was time to step back onto the battle
field and take a pot shot at me. Clearly, it was a vindictive (but
very stupid) move on his part.
That shows not only his comment concerning backing down, but, my
And, true to my word, I meant every single word of it. I let
him go once when I shouldn't have.
He's not getting a walking pass
this time. I'm going to do to him what I knew I should have done the
first time he wanted a cease fire. Some people you just can't
teach...He clearly did NOT learn his lesson when I dox'd the Eagle
tree in response to his taking a shot at me and involving family
members who had nothing to do with the problem he and I have. It was
all fun and games when they dox'd people right and left thanks to an
obituary post. Now, it's my turn.
Sorry about the 'wordwall' (that isn't), but, that's how things are.
And by isn't a word wall,
I've tried and tried to just let it go, but, sometimes, you do
have stand up for yourself and deal with the bully aggressor in
a language they understand and will not soon forget.
|Nodes:||10 (1 / 9)|