Since Infoworld is apparently concerned with accuracy, I would recommend changing the name to something more reflecting the truth behind the poll. Perhaps:
Infoworld's Less Than 0.1% Of The Print Subscription Reader's ONLY Choice (That Sandy Reed Agrees With) Awards
It seems to be more in keeping with the spirit of the poll.
To be honest, yes, theoretically 0.1% of the users is a statistically valid sample, but any kind of anomaly would be significanly magnified, IMHO. Especially when it's only 300 users.
-steve
For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor