Handle huge swells of information with the S/390. Click here. IBM!
| Navigational map -- for text only please go to the bottom of the page ||Forums|
Readers' Choice Awards (siteadm) Fri, 13 Jun
Less validity than the first (Ken Hamlett) Mon, 16 Jun
That's actually beside the point. (acagle) Mon, 16 Jun
Can't argue with that (Ken Hamlett) Mon, 16 Jun

The needed to.

Posted by: cjoffe
Date posted: Tue Jun 17 8:54:17 PDT 1997

>> For the life of me I can't understand why they even bothered with the survey.

They needed to be able to show answers and numbers which would reinforce their existing editorial stance, not contradict it. It seems to have taken extraordinary amounts of massage to get it to look "right".

Chris


Respond | Search | Help


For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor

kristin_kueter@infoworld.com