inquiry.com--Answers for IT Professionals. Click now!
| Navigational map -- for text only please go to the bottom of the page ||Forums|
Readers' Choice Awards (siteadm) Fri, 13 Jun
Ha! Ha! Ha! (gmella) Tue, 17 Jun
Speak for yourself (Alan Laing) Wed, 18 Jun
You may exclude yourself (gmella) Wed, 18 Jun

Sorry but it does make it untrue

Posted by: Alan Laing
Date posted: Thu Jun 19 6:07:49 PDT 1997

and I excluded myself with my post. All I'm asking is that you state your opinion.

I have read all of the posts in both forums and whereas I may be the only one who does not think that IW is not an MS schill, I would suspect that there are others.

In logic and science it only takes one single instance, a minority of one out of zillions, to make a statement, hypothesis, or theory not true. So if you wish to use the inclusive we to state your opinion instead of I, then qualify it with we, meaning people who think like I do and don't have the guts, time, or whatever to express their opinion for themselves and so they have given me permission to speak for them etc. It would be a whole lot easier to use I.

Thanks


Pick this nit! (CRConrad) Today

Respond | Search | Help


For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor

kristin_kueter@infoworld.com