Come off it. I know almost all the pro-MS arguments backwards and forwards: you were employing a classic. The entire second half of the post was aimed squarely at blasting OS/2. Its the same argument you guys use against the Mac, Linux, Amiga, anything that isn't Microsoft. Its also an easily refuteable position. Hence the one-line response: you have made the classic blunder: mistaking popularity for quality.
This is usually followed up by a quarter page of logical arguments leading to the conclusion to uninstall your MS software and burn the installer CD, followed by another half page of technical reasons why MS stuff ain't up to snuff. I'm not gonna do that here, tho.
You are also employing another pro-MS classic strategy: pose as an advocate of another OS who has "seen the light", and act all indignant when someone pegs you right off for a MS FUD sower. (FUD = Fear Uncertainty Doubt; MS' famous anti-competitive marketing strategy)
Get a new act, would you?
For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor