IBM Click Here!
| Navigational map -- for text only please go to the bottom of the page ||Forums|
Readers' Choice Awards (siteadm) Fri, 13 Jun
survey != poll (sunnychung) Sat, 14 Jun
Thus we see the problem. (acagle) Mon, 16 Jun
Cynicism misplaced (rparker) Mon, 16 Jun
Not your adverts... (khasim) Mon, 16 Jun
The hole in your circle (rparker) Tue, 17 Jun
But without advertisers.... (khasim) Tue, 17 Jun
I'm sure you love your job but ... (rparker) Wed, 18 Jun
So that is what the Reader's Choice is! (lmalates) Wed, 18 Jun

I agree

Posted by: khasim
Date posted: Thu, 19 Jun 1997

Why not publish the raw numbers?

At least that way, everyone can draw their own conclusions about how many votes were cast intelligently.

And stop referring to the ballot that was published before. Can't you make a link to it? If people want to know what was asked, give them the questions.

You really aren't helping InfoWorld regain any credibility.


Respond | Search | Help


For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor

kristin_kueter@infoworld.com