You still don't get it.
If you want to be seen as fair and accurate, you have
to be fair and accurate. If "technology, timing and
funding" don't allow this, then you shouldn't do it. Not
being able to be fair and accurate due to those reasons
is just a reason - not a good reason.
I'm also disturbed by your "Falling on this sword
repeatedly isn't going to yield any cyber blood"
comment. It seems to imply that no matter what we
say, you're just going to dismiss it. Why have the
forums, then?
Rachel, doesn't it *bother* you that the overwhelming
consensus in this forum is that this new survey is just
a complete failure? Couldn't it be possible - just
possible - that many if not most of the criticisms
leveled here are accurate and that you are wrong?
If I were in your shoes I'd be worried - very worried.
Aren't you? If not, why not?
BTW, I'd like to thank you again for your response.
For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor