Alan, you write:
> In logic and science it only takes . . .
Hey, for somebody who is so concerned with logic etcetera, you
certainly seem to be a little over-generous with your negations! :-)
A couple of lines higher, you wrote:
> . . . and whereas I may be the only one who does not think that IW is not an MS schill . . .
Oh no, I agree! I also do _n_o_t_ think that IW is _n_o_t_ an MS shill . . . ! ;->
Now lighten up a bit; stop whining, please. OK?
Thank you.
Christian R. Conrad
For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor