Need help building your intranet? Click here!
| Navigational map -- for text only please go to the bottom of the page ||Forums|
Readers' Choice Awards (siteadm) Fri, 13 Jun
What Poll? (forum) Sat, 14 Jun
Both Polls are Equally Bogus (os2hq) Sat, 14 Jun
Some understand, some don't (khasim) Sat, 14 Jun
Our methodology (rparker) Mon, 16 Jun
Not so representative. (alunj) Mon, 16 Jun
Contact Circulation (rparker) Mon, 16 Jun
Details? (alunj) Mon, 16 Jun
Buying InfoWorld (rparker) Tue, 17 Jun

Buy it???

Posted by: cjoffe
Date posted: Tue, 17 Jun 1997

Considering the perceived bias we're discussing here, why would I pay a lot of money for what I already feel is bad information and biased coverage. The amount you quote might be valid for an information source which was above reproach. IW is not. We have all (most anyway) reached the conclusion that IW is no longer a Trusted Information Provider. I debate now revolves around "How Bad".

Why would I pay good money for what your people have proven to me is valueless.

Sorry,
Chris


Respond | Search | Help


For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor

kristin_kueter@infoworld.com