Please click here to learn about Microsoft Solution Providers!
| Navigational map -- for text only please go to the bottom of the page ||Forums|
Readers' Choice Awards (siteadm) Fri, 13 Jun
What Poll? (forum) Sat, 14 Jun
Both Polls are Equally Bogus (os2hq) Sat, 14 Jun
Some understand, some don't (khasim) Sat, 14 Jun
Our methodology (rparker) Mon, 16 Jun
Another Flaw In Your Methodology (Ron Findling) Tue, 17 Jun

This isn't new

Posted by: rparker
Date posted: Tue, 17 Jun 1997

Folks: We said back in March that we would do a telephone survey of print subscribers -- our original intent was and is to honor the products that our regular readers feel are valuable in their work. Responding as we were to a situation we had not prepared ourselves for, we did the best we could to collect information we were confident reflected the views of our readership. We were pleasantly surprised when the survey participants indicated that they also participate in InfoWorld Electric. At no time did we lead anyone to believe that the second survey would be of those people who read InfoWorld on Electric only. It was a limitation of the technology, timing, and funding we had available.

Falling on this sword repeatedly isn't going to yield any cyber blood.

Rachel Parker
Guest Host


Reasons Are Not Good Reasons (Ron Findling) Tue, 17 Jun

Respond | Search | Help


For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor

kristin_kueter@infoworld.com