>> We try to advocate for these readers.
Maybe you should just print the unvarnished facts on ALL options and let them make the decisions.
>> But, we are not about to start serving Bill Gates's personal reading requirements
You are already serving nothing but.
>> We are trying to better understand our Electric readership
Judging by the continued tone of your responses here, you understand nothing.
>> If the value of our product reviews, columns and news are diminished by the fact that readers outside of our core audience did not vote for the Product of the Year, I'm sorry.
The value of the reviews/columns/news didn't decrease because of the survey, it was just the last indicator that all integrity had left. The value of the reviews/columns/news decreased because of the continued slant/bias evident in the reporting.
>> But, I still maintain that our methodology was appropriate given our mission.
You are the only one who can't seem to see how horribly flawed the methodology was NO MATTER WHAT the mission. Even if your mission really was solely to advocate(your word) NT, the way the categories were assembled made EVEN THAT into a sick joke.
Keep fishing.
For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor