You seem to avoid one thing: critical coverage of Microsoft products is still a coverage. I.e. when reader sees 10 raving articles on NT, 3 critical on NT and only one (no matter raving, critical or neutral) on Linux, he/she thinks "OK, NT has some faults, but there is no alternative".
Look at "Top news stories" page of your site:
Microsoft | 5 times |
NT | 3 times |
[Windows]95 | 1 time |
Office | 1 time |
Overall Microsoft | 10 times |
Sun | 3 times |
Java | 5 times |
Solaris | 0 times |
SPARC | 0 times |
Overall Sun | 8 times |
Apple | 0 times |
Mac | 3 times |
Overall Apple | 3 times |
IBM | 3 times |
Lotus | 1 times |
OS/2 | 0 times |
Other IBM OSes | 0 times |
Overall IBM | 4 times |
Linux | 0 times |
Unix | 0 times |
For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor