Let me make it perfectly
clear (Nixon-speek) if
InfoWorld can't bear the
possibility of its Reader's
deciding that they prefer
a product or products that
the management can't accept
for whatever reason ( you
can bet it is ALWAYS the
bottom line of advertisers)
they have a moral and ethical
duty to rename the awards:
the Editor's Choice Awards.
We never voted on these
awards in this second fiasco.
Therefore they can't be
Reader's Choice Awards, that
is the bottom line. The
Dragon Queen will never
admit the validity of this
position because it would
render her a 2 time loser and
further strain her
credibility NOT with the
Readers (it is long lost with
the Reader's), but with her
revenue base of major isv's.
She is a shameless
journalistic whore.
For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor