What keeps the Open site open? Click for a free copy of IBM's load balancing software!
| Navigational map -- for text only please go to the bottom of the page ||Forums|
Readers' Choice Awards (siteadm) Fri, 13 Jun
New Poll = Hypocricy In Exemplar (up_yours) Tue, 17 Jun
Did I offend? (rparker) Tue, 17 Jun
Why not show results? (FatBrother) Tue, 17 Jun
Why I'm not releasing the first results (Sandy Reed) Wed, 18 Jun

What drivel...

Posted by: RobertBolton
Date posted: Fri, 20 Jun 1997

"Publishing information we know to be tainted is worse than not publishing the tainted information. That's why I'm not releasing the results of the first survey."

You've managed to be self serving and condescending all in one response. Give us the data, give us your take on it, and let us make up our own minds. Until you give up the data, one can only assume it won't show any "taint" other than the fact that MS didn't win.
BTW - I've never used OS/2, so don't lump me in with the "zealots," just lump me in with the skeptical.

R. Bolton
Director, IS
ASC
Washington, DC


Respond | Search | Help


For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor

kristin_kueter@infoworld.com