Handle huge swells of information with the S/390. Click here. IBM!
| Navigational map -- for text only please go to the bottom of the page ||Forums|
Readers' Choice Awards (siteadm) Fri, 13 Jun

Call for another scientific survey

Posted by: kdenehy
Date posted: Sat Jun 14 7:35:28 PDT 1997

You've gone to so much trouble to ensure that you had a scientific survey for your Readers' Choice awards. Now let's see you use an outside company to conduct another telephone survey:


SURVEYOR: Hello, may I please speak to Mr. John Smith?

IW SUBSCRIBER: This is John Smith.

SURVEYOR: Mr. Smith, may I please have the name and phone number of your immediate supervisor?

IW SUBSCRIBER: (hesitantly - thinks he's in trouble for something) Ummmm, OK. It's Tom Jones, at 123-555-1234, but I can transfer you if you'd like.

SURVEYOR: That would be great, thanks.

SUBSRIBER'S BOSS: This is Tom Jones.

SURVEYOR: Mr. Jones, I understand you're John Smith's supervisor, is that correct?

SUBSCRIBER'S BOSS: Uh, yes, that's correct, why, what has he done now?

SURVEYOR: Oh, nothing Mr. Jones. I'm actually calling on behalf of InfoWorld. We're researching the accuracy of our free subscription request forms. Do you have a couple of minutes?

SUBSRIBER'S BOSS: I guess so.

SURVEYOR: Thanks. It says here that Mr. Smith is a staff member with IS/MIS/Data Processing - Centralized. Is that correct?

SUBSRIBER'S BOSS: Yes, that's correct.

SURVEYOR: And over the course of one year, Mr. Smith buys, specifies, recommends, or approves the purchase of large systems totaling $5,000,000 - $9,999,999?

SUBSRIBER'S BOSS: Huh? John Smith is a clerical worker. He doesn't even have the authority to use the restroom without permission.

SURVEYOR: So I take it that over the course of one year, Mr. Smith doesn't buy, specify, recommend, or approve the purchase of Client Computers or Networking Products including Servers totaling $5,000,000 - $9,999,999, and $2,500,000 - $4,999,999, respectively?

SUBSRIBER'S BOSS: Don't be ridiculous.

SURVEYOR: Um, OK, thanks for your time, Mr. Jones. I think I've got enough information. Good-bye.


I was once a subscriber to InfoWorld, but after changing jobs and filling out a new form, I never received it (I was rejected!)

A little while later, a subordinate started receiving InfoWorld. Although I was a little pissed, I could a least borrow his copy to keep up with current events.

After a while, a guy stopped by our office to interview the aforementioned subordinate regarding InfoWorld. This was basically for market research regarding the effectiveness of InfoWorld advertising, etc. The subordinate wasn't there, so I offered to step in. I gave InfoWorld high marks, and told the interviewer it was more trustworthy than its competitors. In the course of the conversation, I mentioned being rejected for a new subscription. The guy told me I should really embellish my responsibilities, etc., on the form. When I replied that I didn't think InfoWorld would appreciate that, he stated "they don't care. They want their subscribers to look as good as possible, so they can charge more from their advertisers."

I know of many people who receive InfoWorld, and very few of them have much actual authority. I just don't think your free subscription survey is very scientific, but somehow I doubt that will change. The word "hypocrisy" springs to mind.


Yep... (warp1) Sat, 14 Jun
Yep again (rbagwell) Sat, 14 Jun
and Again... (cjoffe) Mon, 16 Jun

Respond | Search | Help


For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor

kristin_kueter@infoworld.com