Considering the perceived bias we're discussing here, why would I pay a lot of money for what I already feel is bad information and biased coverage. The amount you quote might be valid for an information source which was above reproach. IW is not. We have all (most anyway) reached the conclusion that IW is no longer a Trusted Information Provider. I debate now revolves around "How Bad".
Why would I pay good money for what your people have proven to me is valueless.
Sorry,
Chris
For questions or comments, email the Forums Editor