Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?G=F6del's?= 1931 Incompleteness and Tarski'sTrue(x)

By Ben Bacarisse on Tue Feb 12 11:29:28 2019

Latest reply by Ben Bacarisse on Wed Feb 13 21:38:01 2019

=?UTF-8?Q?G=c3=b6del=27s_1931_Incompleteness_and_Tarski=27s_True=28?==?UTF-8?Q?x=29?=

By peteolcott on Mon Feb 11 16:01:57 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Wed Feb 13 15:17:19 2019

Re: a wave of hyperkooks washing over sci.lang

By peteolcott on Wed Feb 13 09:00:18 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Wed Feb 13 09:02:30 2019

Re: Everybody is the Same Person.

By peteolcott on Wed Feb 13 08:41:17 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Wed Feb 13 09:02:11 2019

=?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_I_am_the_Lord=2c_and_there_is_none_else_=28G=c3=b6d?==?UTF-8?Q?el_Incompleteness=29?=

By peteolcott on Sat Feb 9 11:25:20 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Tue Feb 12 19:40:40 2019

Test Bank GEN COMBO LOOSELEAF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING: CONNECT AC5th Edition By Timothy Doupnik Solution Manual

By getcheapsmtb on Tue Feb 12 10:40:55 2019

Latest reply by getcheapsmtb on Tue Feb 12 10:40:55 2019

Deep learning applied to natural language semantics

By peteolcott on Sat Feb 2 10:05:50 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Tue Feb 12 00:22:47 2019

=?UTF-8?Q?Re=3a_I_am_the_Lord=2c_and_there_is_none_else---G=c3=b6de?==?UTF-8?Q?l_Incompleteness_and_True=28x=29?=

By peteolcott on Mon Feb 11 13:19:27 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Mon Feb 11 13:19:27 2019

=?UTF-8?Q?Re:_I_am_the_Lord=2c_and_there_is_none_else_=28G=c3=b6del?==?UTF-8?Q?_Incompleteness=29?=

By Peter Percival on Sun Feb 10 15:07:07 2019

Latest reply by Peter Percival on Sun Feb 10 17:12:06 2019

I am the Lord, and there is none else

By peteolcott on Mon Jan 21 09:38:29 2019

Latest reply by Peter Percival on Sat Feb 9 21:18:36 2019

Testbank Essentials of Federal Taxation 2019, 10e Spilker, SolutionsEssentials of Federal Taxation

By tbsm4u on Thu Feb 7 05:48:40 2019

Latest reply by tbsm4u on Thu Feb 7 05:48:40 2019

Re: a wave of hyperkooks washing over sci.lang (deep learning appliedto natural language semantics)

By peteolcott on Fri Feb 1 12:15:40 2019

Latest reply by Peter Percival on Sun Feb 3 15:27:06 2019

Call for Papers: The World Congress on Engineering WCE 2019

By iaeng_imecs_wce_wcecs_c on Thu Jan 31 23:15:21 2019

Latest reply by iaeng_imecs_wce_wcecs_c on Thu Jan 31 23:15:21 2019

USENET seems to be dropping messages.

By peteolcott on Thu Jan 31 13:54:06 2019

Latest reply by Jens Stuckelberger on Thu Jan 31 20:45:23 2019

Testbank Human Resource Management, 16th Edition by Dessler, SolutionManual Human Resource Management, 16th Edition by Dessler

By tbsm4u on Fri Jan 25 23:24:05 2019

Latest reply by tbsm4u on Fri Jan 25 23:24:05 2019

Off-Topic: A (Legal) Threat, If It Is Not Over By Feb 1, 2019

By DV on Sun Dec 30 12:35:17 2018

Latest reply by DV on Fri Jan 25 11:40:22 2019

Re: Off-topic: Price of SDI for companies

By DV on Tue Jan 1 07:41:11 2019

Latest reply by DV on Mon Jan 21 14:05:07 2019

computable reals, P vs NP

By Newberry on Sun Jan 20 16:03:09 2019

Latest reply by Newberry on Sun Jan 20 16:03:09 2019

Re: A Possible "solution" to the Halting Problem

By peteolcott on Tue Jan 8 01:21:30 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Sat Jan 19 12:33:24 2019

My refutation of the Linz Halting Problem Proof

By peteolcott on Tue Jan 15 09:34:34 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Fri Jan 18 01:06:48 2019

Re: Principle of Explosion (Refutation of Halting Problem proofs)(Iam God)

By peteolcott on Tue Jan 15 00:32:24 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Tue Jan 15 09:49:21 2019

Re: Principle of Explosion (Halting Problem proof refutation)

By peteolcott on Sat Jan 5 23:58:55 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Tue Jan 15 09:39:31 2019

Re: Principle of Explosion (Proof that Ben lied)

By peteolcott on Mon Jan 14 12:27:55 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Mon Jan 14 17:15:53 2019

Re: Close as one can get the a universal Halt Decider

By peteolcott on Tue Jan 8 01:11:48 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Sat Jan 12 20:38:52 2019

STOP WITH THE SLEEP DEPRIVATION.

By DV on Wed Jan 9 06:36:04 2019

Latest reply by DV on Fri Jan 11 12:34:26 2019

Re: Refutation of Halting Problem proofs

By peteolcott on Tue Jan 8 22:31:59 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Wed Jan 9 21:17:43 2019

Re: Principle of Explosion Refutation

By peteolcott on Tue Jan 8 11:31:01 2019

Latest reply by Peter Percival on Wed Jan 9 20:14:03 2019

Correct NP programs must be #P programs, else answers get ignored.

By Daniel Pehoushek on Wed Jan 9 08:10:44 2019

Latest reply by Daniel Pehoushek on Wed Jan 9 08:10:44 2019

Off-Topic: Fine and Forgive or Welcome and Forgive - Which SuperiorAlternative to Trump's Immigration Policy is Better?

By DV on Tue Jan 8 13:01:49 2019

Latest reply by DV on Tue Jan 8 13:01:49 2019

Re: Principle of Explosion (Criterion measure of correct haltingproblem proof refutation)

By peteolcott on Tue Jan 8 12:47:54 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Tue Jan 8 12:47:54 2019

Re: Principle of Explosion (Halting Problem proof refutation)(humour)

By Mike Terry on Tue Jan 8 03:57:00 2019

Latest reply by Mike Terry on Tue Jan 8 03:57:00 2019

Re: Fallacy of equivocation of halting problem proof

By peteolcott on Tue Jan 8 01:18:44 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Tue Jan 8 01:18:44 2019

Re: Principle of Explosion rejected-by-formalized-semantic-constraints Version(4) (best proof yet)

By Alan Smaill on Sun Dec 30 18:20:51 2018

Latest reply by Ben Bacarisse on Sun Jan 6 13:05:16 2019

Re: Off-Topic: Is Improper Distribution of Wealth the Cause of Recessions?

By DV on Tue Jan 1 10:56:47 2019

Latest reply by DV on Sun Jan 6 12:25:44 2019

Re: Principle of Explosionrejected-by-formalized-semantic-constraints Version(4) (best proof yet)

By peteolcott on Sat Dec 29 10:02:21 2018

Latest reply by Mike Terry on Sun Jan 6 04:06:08 2019

Re: Principle of Explosionrejected-by-formalized-semantic-constraints Version(5) (rewrite based on EFQbeing a figure-of-speech)

By peteolcott on Thu Jan 3 00:10:36 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Fri Jan 4 09:51:14 2019

Principle of Explosion rejected-by-formalized-semantic-constraintsVersion(6) (Does everyone's brain have a short-circuit?)

By peteolcott on Thu Jan 3 07:37:37 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Thu Jan 3 10:42:04 2019

Re: Principle of Explosionrejected-by-formalized-semantic-constraints Version(5) (Principle ofnon-contradiction)

By peteolcott on Thu Jan 3 00:26:48 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Thu Jan 3 00:26:48 2019

Principle of Explosion rejected-by-formalized-semantic-constraintsVersion(5) (rewrite based on EFQ being a figure-of-speech)

By peteolcott on Wed Jan 2 23:38:59 2019

Latest reply by peteolcott on Wed Jan 2 23:38:59 2019

Re: Principle of Explosion rejected-by-formalized-semantic-constraintsVersion(2) (relevance logic)

By David Kleinecke on Tue Dec 25 11:25:02 2018

Latest reply by peteolcott on Mon Dec 31 11:40:09 2018

Improper Police Intimidation Threat (warning: It might be atrap/black box test.)

By DV on Sun Dec 30 18:18:01 2018

Latest reply by DV on Sun Dec 30 18:18:01 2018

Re: Principle of Explosionrejected-by-formalized-semantic-constraints Version(2) (relevance logic)

By peteolcott on Tue Dec 18 18:36:06 2018

Latest reply by peteolcott on Sat Dec 29 22:50:27 2018

Re: Principle of Explosionrejected-by-formalized-semantic-constraints Version(3) (best proof yet)

By peteolcott on Fri Dec 21 23:00:34 2018

Latest reply by peteolcott on Fri Dec 28 23:39:26 2018

Re: Principle of Explosionrejected-by-formalized-semantic-constraints Version(2) (refutation of HPproofs)

By peteolcott on Fri Dec 28 23:33:36 2018

Latest reply by peteolcott on Fri Dec 28 23:33:36 2018

Re: Principle of Explosionrejected-by-formalized-semantic-constraints Version(2) (best proof yet)

By peteolcott on Thu Dec 20 11:33:50 2018

Latest reply by peteolcott on Fri Dec 28 22:58:44 2018

Re: Principle of Explosion rejected-by-formalized-semantic-constraints Version(2) (best proof yet)

By Ben Bacarisse on Thu Dec 20 18:30:45 2018

Latest reply by Ben Bacarisse on Sat Dec 22 20:44:49 2018

Re: Principle of Explosion rejected-by-formalized-semantic-constraints Version(3) (best proof yet)

By Ben Bacarisse on Sat Dec 22 13:08:03 2018

Latest reply by Ben Bacarisse on Sat Dec 22 18:25:14 2018

Equivalence Theorem: Validity implies NP = #P

By Daniel Pehoushek on Fri Dec 21 10:09:37 2018

Latest reply by Daniel Pehoushek on Fri Dec 21 10:09:37 2018

Principle of Explosion rejected-by-formalized-semantic-constraintsVersion(3) (best proof yet)

By peteolcott on Thu Dec 20 11:48:52 2018

Latest reply by peteolcott on Thu Dec 20 11:48:52 2018

Re: Validity Implies Equality: coNP = NP = #P, a short proof.

By Daniel Pehoushek on Wed Dec 19 07:15:43 2018

Latest reply by Ben Bacarisse on Wed Dec 19 17:30:08 2018