From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

Freedom is an innate right which humans have since their birth. Freedom is not something that can be touched, seen, felt or reached. All this gives a vague idea about freedom. What exactly does freedom mean?
Different people have different opinion, definition and thoughts about the idea of freedom. Some talk about freedom in political sense, some talk about social freedom, some about personal independence and some define it as religious freedom. But the fact that everyone wants to be free, holds true in all cases.
definition essay about freedom
Download File https://tlniurl.com/2wJ3Us
Freedom has certainly no particular definition. While some think of it as the opportunity to act freely and personify ideas, others are of the view that it is about the possibility of doing what you want to do regardless of the impact on the other people.
Similarly to a youngster or a teen, freedom may be about hanging out with friends, enjoying group activities. Some teens may want to involve in social service and contribute freely to the cause of underprivileged or poor. It may mean freedom to them. Old people may seek security of health and life, spend good time with grandchildren, involve in religious and social activities and believe it to be their freedom.
Welcome to Shareyouressays.com! Our mission is to provide an online platform to help students to discuss anything and everything about Essay. This website includes study notes, research papers, essays, articles and other allied information submitted by visitors like YOU.
Various individuals have distinctive assessment, definition, and musings about the possibility of Freedom. Some discussion about Freedom in a political sense, some talk about social Freedom, some about close to home autonomy, and some characterize it as strict Freedom. Yet, the way that everybody needs to be free remains constant in all cases.
One of the most common essay assignments is on the topic of freedom. Although the essay assignment occurs frequently, many students are unfamiliar with what to write about or how to structure the topic. To get started on the essay, students should first consider a unique angle. Rather than just define what freedom means, the student should write about what it means to them, examples of freedom or the importance of freedom. By approaching the topic from a unique angle, they can create an entirely unique essay.
Anyone who wants the definition of freedom can easily look it up in the dictionary. What makes the freedom essay unique is that it utilizes one student's perspective on the topic. Immigrants can write about their journey to the United States. Likewise, the children and grandchildren of veterans may have unique viewpoints on the topic. Students should consider their past and examples of freedom mattering in their own lives.
One of the easiest ways to get ideas about freedom is to look up the Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights contains the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. Within this document, students will find examples of the rights that American citizens are granted by the government. From freedom of speech to freedom to assemble, these rights were entirely unique when the Constitution was drafted. They gave citizens across the nation rights that were mostly unheard of in the monarchies and dictatorships that previously defined most governments.
For an essay on freedom, students should stick with writing about one of the amendments. Most essays are too short to really cover the entirety of single amendment. If the freedom essay is longer than average, it may be possible to cover more than one amendment.
The idea of freedom changes from person to person. Although everyone is free to do what they want, there are limits on this freedom. As a society, humans deliberately choose to give up some freedoms so that society is more harmonious. Americans cannot just live anywhere; they must buy land. It is against the law to threaten someone with harm. Although these technically violate an individual's freedom, they also ensure that people are safe and protected from harm. Considering this factor and other information about freedom can help students decide what they want to write an essay about.
Perhaps no other single contribution Mr. Kirk makes is so valuable as his emphasis on the importance in academic freedom of academic dignity and, by implication, academic trust. Too often earnest defenders of academic freedom speak as if the academic community were full of Einsteins about to be prevented by Grand Inquisitors from announcing intellectual discoveries of the greatest magnitude. This tends to make the whole idea of academic freedom ridiculous, because anyone can glance at the academic community and see that it is not full of Einsteins. The rights of the Einsteins and the potential Einsteins must be looked to, of course, but so must the day-to-day rights of the mass of teachers, including the right to be treated as dignified and trusted members of a community of learning. Mr. Kirk recognizes that academic freedom ought not to be only a code by which the academic community can defend itself against depredators from without, but that it should also be a code by which members of the academic community can live together in seemliness.
In one definition, something is "free" if it can change easily and is not constrained in its present state. In philosophy and religion, freedom is sometimes associated with free will, without undue or unjust constraints on that will, such as enslavement. It is an idea closely tied with the concept of negative liberty.
Charles Taylor resolves one of the issues that separate "positive" and "negative" theories of freedom, as these were initially distinguished in Isaiah Berlin's seminal essay, "Two concepts of liberty". Taylor sees it as undeniable that there are two such families of conceptions of political freedom. Negative liberty is a concept that is often used in political philosophy. It is the idea that freedom means an ability to do what one wants, without external obstacles. This concept has been called too simplistic for discounting the importance of individual self-realization. Positive liberty is the ability to fulfill one's purposes.[1][2]
The existence of freedom in the world has been one of the most controversial topics in the world. This controversy arises due to the multidimensional and widely differing perspectives on defining freedom (Juillard 327). As such, it becomes crucial to discuss it with the aim to conceptualize its definition, the supportive factors, and the aspects that pose threats to freedom. In this light, it is every crucial to consider some of these perspectives in order to understand the meaning of freedom in a broad sense. In this case, therefore, this paper will explore some of the thoughts expressed by scholars in order to conceptualize and make a compromise as far as the meaning of freedom is concerned.
Another perspective of viewing freedom is related to the ability and willingness to think liberally. Raymo discusses the human believes towards truths. As such, he indicated that everyone believes he or she is the guardian of absolute truth while the rest are wrong. He stated that people are so convinced about their truth that they can easily engage in suicide bombing to eliminate their counterparts (Raymo 2). In addition, he observes that some individuals are convinced that God is on their side and against the other humans. As such, Raymo rejected the use of conventions as the truths that guide the world without liberal thinking.
In accordance with the authors, freedom is threatened by various factors in human life. First, human beings are identified as the main enemies of freedom. They limit freedom through discrimination, propagation of oppression, and refusal to think liberally. The interesting part about this argument is embedded in the fact that a person can limit their own freedom. As such, a person who fails to think liberally and considers absolute conventions does not freedom. When such a person decided to think liberally, he can be termed as a free human being.
It is evident that there are various diverse definitions and perspectives of viewing freedom. It can be viewed from the perspective of liberal mindedness, lack of injustice, and the willingness to let people express themselves without unreasonable limits. In addition, it was indicated that freedom is wrongly equated to feeling free rather than being active and alive.
Beyond legal definitions, several non-governmental organizations use other criteria to judge the level of press freedom around the world. Some create subjective lists, while others are based on quantitative data:
Every year, Reporters Without Borders establish a subjective ranking of countries in terms of their freedom of the press. Press Freedom Index list is based on responses to surveys sent to journalists that are members of partner organizations of the RWB, as well as related specialists such as researchers, jurists, and human rights activists. The survey asks questions about direct attacks on journalists and the media as well as other indirect sources of pressure against the free press, such as non-governmental groups.
According to the New York Times, "Britain has a long tradition of a free, inquisitive press", but "[u]nlike the United States, Britain has no constitutional guarantee of press freedom."[21] Freedom of the press was established in Great Britain in 1695, with Alan Rusbridger, former editor of The Guardian, stating: "When people talk about licensing journalists or newspapers the instinct should be to refer them to history. Read about how licensing of the press in Britain was abolished in 1695. Remember how the freedoms won here became a model for much of the rest of the world, and be conscious how the world still watches us to see how we protect those freedoms."[22]
Critics argue that the Communist Party in China has failed to live up to its promises about the freedom of the mainland Chinese media. Freedom House consistently ranks China as 'Not Free'[56] in its annual press freedom survey, including the 2014 report. PRC journalist He Qinglian says that the PRC's media are controlled by directives from the Communist Party's propaganda department, and are subjected to intense monitoring which threatens punishment for violators, rather than to pre-publication censorship. In 2008, ITV News reporter John Ray was arrested while covering a 'Free Tibet' protest.[57] International media coverage of Tibetan protests only a few months before the Beijing Olympics in 2008 triggered a strong reaction inside China. Chinese media practitioners took the opportunity to argue with propaganda authorities for more media freedom: one journalist asked, 'If not even Chinese journalists are allowed to report about the problems in Tibet, how can foreign journalists know about the Chinese perspective about the events?' Foreign journalists also reported that their access to certain websites, including those of human rights organizations, was restricted.[58]
eebf2c3492
--- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114