• Re: Rapid Security Responses for iOS 16.5.1 and iPadOS 16.5.1

    From Wally J@walterjones@invalid.nospam to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Tue Jul 11 20:38:49 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    Joerg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.ch> wrote

    Embarrassing!

    According to reports on the MacRumors forums, Facebook, Instagram,
    WhatsApp, Zoom, and other websites started giving a warning about not
    being supported on the Safari browser following the Rapid Security
    Response updates.

    https://www.macrumors.com/2023/07/10/apple-pulls-ios-16-5-1-macos-13-4-1-rsrs/

    Minimal testing can be expected before releasing.

    What people who are intelligent have to first consider is that up until iOS
    16 Apple took on average three to six months to fix a single zero-day bug.

    No other common operating system was as inefficient as the iOS release was.

    During that huge time period (which only Apple incurs because only Apple
    fixed bugs by releasing an entire new release stream), exploits happened.

    Which is why *the iPhone is exploited _ten times more* than is Android* https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog

    In light of the fact the iPhone is exploited _because_ Apple's horribly inefficient release mechanism allowed those exploits to occur, I, for one, applaud Apple in adding to iOS 16 the capability to patch a single bug.

    Just like every other platform except Apple platforms has done for years.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Wally J@walterjones@invalid.nospam to comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps on Thu Jul 13 23:08:55 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    You're Kidding <yk@yahoo.com> wrote

    I say "bull crap". If you believe that, you also believe the tooth fairy and Santa Clause is real. Most Android users don't know any more or care about how
    it works than iPhone users.

    Two completely different buyer mindsets.

    First off, you have to understand that people who buy the iPhone are like people who buy a fancy car just because they feel it's fancy to others.

    They have no other reason for buying the phone except by Apple's ads.
    They don't know anything about the phone - they don't care about the phone.

    They only care about style.

    Nothing wrong with that - but they almost never know anything about it
    because they bought it because of an advertisement that it was Red or
    Yellow. If you don't believe me, look at how Apple advertises it.

    Apple makes a big deal of the color of the phone.
    As if that matters.

    And it does.
    To most Apple buyers.

    Otherwise Apple wouldn't be able to charge more for a red iPhone.

    That is the typical Apple buyer.
    People who buy Android are NOT buying anywhere near that way.

    For example, they don't care what colors the phone is, while the color is
    the most important thing to Apple owners if you look at Apple ads lately.

    They buy their devices based on price,
    recommendations, and what they perceive what is best, from what they have been
    told or read, Most iPhone users are the same.

    Nope. Android owners buy on price performance metrics.
    Apple owners do not because Apple iPhones can't meet any common performance metric when you compare prices.

    For example, take the fact that the iPhone can't run thousands upon
    thousands upon thousands upon thousands of apps that Android easily runs.

    The battery sucks on all iPhones.
    Apple can't even figure out how to integrate the modem, which every other
    major Android manufacture figured out how to do many years ago already.

    Apple is extremely far behind in the performance curve.
    And always was.

    There's no performance on an iPhone.
    Just price.

    Completely different kind of buyers.

    You delude yourself into
    thinking that most of the rest of the world is as interested in technology as the people who post here.

    People who buy the iPhone buy it for the color.
    If not the color of the phone case, then the colors of the bubbles.

    If you don't believe that, then look at Apple's own advertisements.
    They even charge more for a red phone.

    And they tell you the biggest thing to happen to the iPhone 14 is yellow.

    Nobody on Android buys their phone that way.
    It's a completely different type of buyer.

    I have worked in a mixed environment for 40 years
    and I have found most users of technology just want things that work for them,
    as trouble free as possible.

    Apple is simply copying what every other operating system has always done. Patch a bug as fast as possible.

    Instead of taking three to six months to build & test a single-slab iOS.
    This is a good thing, whether or not you iMorons even know how it works.

    What's no longer amazing, actually, is how little you iKooks know of Apple.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps on Thu Jul 13 22:48:36 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-13 20:08, Wally J wrote:
    You're Kidding <yk@yahoo.com> wrote

    I say "bull crap". If you believe that, you also believe the tooth fairy and >> Santa Clause is real. Most Android users don't know any more or care about how
    it works than iPhone users.

    Two completely different buyer mindsets.

    First off, you have to understand that people who buy the iPhone are like people who buy a fancy car just because they feel it's fancy to others.

    I don't know if my car is "fancy" or not...

    (2012 BMW 135i)

    ...but I like it because of what it DOES...

    ...not because of anything anyone else feels about it.

    Same as my last car: a 1990 Mazda Miata.


    They have no other reason for buying the phone except by Apple's ads.
    They don't know anything about the phone - they don't care about the phone.

    Most people who buy smartphones know next to nothing about them.

    That's AS IT SHOULD BE.


    They only care about style.

    Nothing wrong with that - but they almost never know anything about it because they bought it because of an advertisement that it was Red or
    Yellow. If you don't believe me, look at how Apple advertises it.

    Sorry, but that doesn't follow.


    Apple makes a big deal of the color of the phone.
    As if that matters.

    Apple makes a deal of colour in the middle of a product cycle.


    And it does.
    To most Apple buyers.

    Nope.


    Otherwise Apple wouldn't be able to charge more for a red iPhone.

    Apple DOESN'T charge more for "(PRODUCT)RED" iPhones, putz.


    That is the typical Apple buyer.
    People who buy Android are NOT buying anywhere near that way.

    For example, they don't care what colors the phone is, while the color is
    the most important thing to Apple owners if you look at Apple ads lately.

    Most normal consumers care about the colour of the products they purchase.


    They buy their devices based on price,
    recommendations, and what they perceive what is best, from what they have been
    told or read, Most iPhone users are the same.

    Nope. Android owners buy on price performance metrics.

    Almost no owners even know what "price performance metrics" mean.

    Apple owners do not because Apple iPhones can't meet any common performance metric when you compare prices.

    For example, take the fact that the iPhone can't run thousands upon
    thousands upon thousands upon thousands of apps that Android easily runs.

    The battery sucks on all iPhones.

    And yet they are among the longest running phones.

    Apple can't even figure out how to integrate the modem, which every other major Android manufacture figured out how to do many years ago already.

    No Android manufacturer figured that out.

    They bought a chip to do it...

    ...just as Apple did.


    Apple is extremely far behind in the performance curve.
    And always was.

    There's no performance on an iPhone.
    Just price.

    iPhones absolutely kill on performance benefits.


    Completely different kind of buyers.

    You delude yourself into
    thinking that most of the rest of the world is as interested in technology as
    the people who post here.

    People who buy the iPhone buy it for the color.
    If not the color of the phone case, then the colors of the bubbles.

    If you don't believe that, then look at Apple's own advertisements.
    They even charge more for a red phone.

    You're repeating yourself...


    And they tell you the biggest thing to happen to the iPhone 14 is yellow.

    Nobody on Android buys their phone that way.
    It's a completely different type of buyer.

    I have worked in a mixed environment for 40 years
    and I have found most users of technology just want things that work for them,
    as trouble free as possible.

    Apple is simply copying what every other operating system has always done. Patch a bug as fast as possible.

    Instead of taking three to six months to build & test a single-slab iOS.
    This is a good thing, whether or not you iMorons even know how it works.

    What's no longer amazing, actually, is how little you iKooks know of Apple.

    <yawn>
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From badgolferman@REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com to comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps on Fri Jul 14 12:47:48 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    Wally J wrote:

    They even charge more for a red phone.

    I had to take my maroon colored car to the body shop for some repairs.
    All the estimates I got made mention that the colors red and pearl
    white cost more. Something about that red pigment that makes it more
    expensive than other colors.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Chris@ithinkiam@gmail.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Fri Jul 14 13:34:04 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
    You're Kidding <yk@yahoo.com> wrote

    I say "bull crap". If you believe that, you also believe the tooth fairy and >> Santa Clause is real. Most Android users don't know any more or care about how
    it works than iPhone users.

    [snip]

    If you don't believe that, then look at Apple's own advertisements.
    They even charge more for a red phone.

    Utter rubbish. Just look at the prices for the 13/14 mini/base/pro; they're exactly the same regardless of colour. This isn't new either; my previous iphone was a red one.

    And they tell you the biggest thing to happen to the iPhone 14 is yellow.

    Nobody on Android buys their phone that way.
    It's a completely different type of buyer.

    Then why is the Pixel 7a available in four colours and the Galaxy S23 Ultra
    in *eight*?

    Android buyers aren't really colourblind, are they?
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Bob Campbell@nunya@none.none to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Fri Jul 14 14:02:39 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote:
    Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
    You're Kidding <yk@yahoo.com> wrote

    I say "bull crap". If you believe that, you also believe the tooth fairy and
    Santa Clause is real. Most Android users don't know any more or care about how
    it works than iPhone users.

    [snip]

    If you don't believe that, then look at Apple's own advertisements.
    They even charge more for a red phone.

    Utter rubbish. Just look at the prices for the 13/14 mini/base/pro; they're exactly the same regardless of colour. This isn't new either; my previous iphone was a red one.

    And they tell you the biggest thing to happen to the iPhone 14 is yellow.

    Nobody on Android buys their phone that way.
    It's a completely different type of buyer.

    Then why is the Pixel 7a available in four colours and the Galaxy S23 Ultra in *eight*?

    Android buyers aren't really colourblind, are they?

    Arlen does not believe in Actual Facts. Only Arlen Facts.


    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Wally J@walterjones@invalid.nospam to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Fri Jul 14 11:28:47 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote

    If you don't believe that, then look at Apple's own advertisements.
    They even charge more for a red phone.

    Utter rubbish. Just look at the prices for the 13/14 mini/base/pro; they're exactly the same regardless of colour. This isn't new either; my previous iphone was a red one.

    Like I said, you iMorons don't know a single thing about what Apple does.

    While the main point is that Apple makes a big deal about the mere
    meaningless RED or YELLOW color of the iPhone because extremely many Apple customers care more about the color than anything else in the world.

    Apple marketing isn't stupid.

    Apple wouldn't charge more for a red phone if they didn't know people cared more about the color of the phone than anything else about that same phone.

    If you wanted RED when it first came out, you couldn't buy anything but the more expensive models - which cost you extra to get that RED! iPhone.

    But even so, the fact that Apple makes such a huge deal about something as completely meaningless as the color of a phone, is what's important here.

    You'll have to pay at least $100 more for the red iPhone 7 https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-red-iphone-7-price-2017-3

    "Apple announced a new red iPhone 7 with a matte metallic texture on
    Tuesday, and it looks gorgeous.

    Apple announced a new red iPhone 7 with a matte metallic texture on
    Tuesday, and it looks gorgeous.

    My colleague Rob Price thinks it's exactly the kind of break we need from
    the monotonous metal body, available in silver/gold/black and glass designs we've recently seen on many smartphones.

    Yet, there's a caveat to breaking away from that monotony, and it takes the form of a higher price tag.

    The Special Edition (Product) RED iPhone 7 starts at $750, and the red
    iPhone 7 Plus at $870, both of which are at least $100 more than the base
    price of the other iPhone 7 models (with the exception of the jet black
    color).

    That's because the red iPhone 7 is only available in the pricier 128GB and 256GB options. It's not available in the cheaper 32GB option, which costs
    $650 for the iPhone 7 and $770 for the iPhone 7 Plus.

    This isn't the first time Apple limited a certain color option to more expensive iPhone models.

    When it released the jet black iPhone 7 last year, arguably the most
    desirable new color option at the time, it also announced that it was only available in the 128GB and 256GB options. That made the Jet Black iPhone 7 inherently more expensive than the other color options, which is still the
    case today.

    For many, 128GB of storage is overkill, especially when cloud storage and
    cloud services are becoming more and more prominent. Think Google Photos
    for free unlimited photo storage, or Spotify for music streaming. The need
    to store photos and music locally on your phone, two of the biggest storage hogs you could have on your phone, is diminishing.

    At the same time, limiting the most desirable colors, including the red
    model, to the more expensive 128GB and 256GB options adds to its Special Edition vibe.

    The red iPhone 7 models will be available to buy on Friday, March 24."

    But even so, the fact that Apple makes such a huge deal about something as completely meaningless as the color of a phone, is what's important here.

    What it means is Apple customers tend to be absolutely clueless morons.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Fri Jul 14 08:30:42 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-14 08:28, Wally J wrote:
    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote

    If you don't believe that, then look at Apple's own advertisements.
    They even charge more for a red phone.

    Utter rubbish. Just look at the prices for the 13/14 mini/base/pro; they're >> exactly the same regardless of colour. This isn't new either; my previous
    iphone was a red one.

    Like I said, you iMorons don't know a single thing about what Apple does.

    While the main point is that Apple makes a big deal about the mere meaningless RED or YELLOW color of the iPhone because extremely many Apple customers care more about the color than anything else in the world.

    Apple marketing isn't stupid.

    Apple wouldn't charge more for a red phone if they didn't know people cared more about the color of the phone than anything else about that same phone.

    They don't charge more for RED phones.


    If you wanted RED when it first came out, you couldn't buy anything but the more expensive models - which cost you extra to get that RED! iPhone.

    The RED phones are a way to donate money to AIDS research.


    But even so, the fact that Apple makes such a huge deal about something as completely meaningless as the color of a phone, is what's important here.

    You'll have to pay at least $100 more for the red iPhone 7 https://www.businessinsider.com/apple-red-iphone-7-price-2017-3


    6 YEARS out of date.


    "Apple announced a new red iPhone 7 with a matte metallic texture on Tuesday, and it looks gorgeous.

    Apple announced a new red iPhone 7 with a matte metallic texture on
    Tuesday, and it looks gorgeous.

    My colleague Rob Price thinks it's exactly the kind of break we need from
    the monotonous metal body, available in silver/gold/black and glass designs we've recently seen on many smartphones.

    Yet, there's a caveat to breaking away from that monotony, and it takes the form of a higher price tag.

    The Special Edition (Product) RED iPhone 7 starts at $750, and the red
    iPhone 7 Plus at $870, both of which are at least $100 more than the base price of the other iPhone 7 models (with the exception of the jet black color).

    That's because the red iPhone 7 is only available in the pricier 128GB and 256GB options. It's not available in the cheaper 32GB option, which costs $650 for the iPhone 7 and $770 for the iPhone 7 Plus.

    This isn't the first time Apple limited a certain color option to more expensive iPhone models.

    When it released the jet black iPhone 7 last year, arguably the most desirable new color option at the time, it also announced that it was only available in the 128GB and 256GB options. That made the Jet Black iPhone 7 inherently more expensive than the other color options, which is still the case today.

    For many, 128GB of storage is overkill, especially when cloud storage and cloud services are becoming more and more prominent. Think Google Photos
    for free unlimited photo storage, or Spotify for music streaming. The need
    to store photos and music locally on your phone, two of the biggest storage hogs you could have on your phone, is diminishing.

    At the same time, limiting the most desirable colors, including the red model, to the more expensive 128GB and 256GB options adds to its Special Edition vibe.

    The red iPhone 7 models will be available to buy on Friday, March 24."

    But even so, the fact that Apple makes such a huge deal about something as completely meaningless as the color of a phone, is what's important here.

    What it means is Apple customers tend to be absolutely clueless morons.

    Appearance matters to consumers.

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Wally J@walterjones@invalid.nospam to comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps on Fri Jul 14 11:35:45 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote

    They even charge more for a red phone.

    I had to take my maroon colored car to the body shop for some repairs.
    All the estimates I got made mention that the colors red and pearl
    white cost more. Something about that red pigment that makes it more expensive than other colors.

    If you assume that Apple has one of the finest marketing operations in the world (other than the tobacco and soda companies), then you have to look at how Apple advertises the iPhone to people who care ONLY about the color.

    Apple introduces iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus (PRODUCT)RED Special Edition https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2018/04/apple-introduces-iphone-8-and-iphone-8-plus-productred-special-edition/

    It's not only Apple that makes a huge deal of out the mere color of their iPhone since news outlets also consider the Apple customer to be stupid.

    Apple iPhone 8 RED Official: 1st Photos, Prices And All You Need To Know http://forbes.com/sites/davidphelan/2018/04/09/apple-iphone-8-productred-official-1st-photos-and-all-you-need-to-know-release-date-price-pictures-photos/

    More recently, Apple spent a half a year's work "improving" the iPhone 14.

    Hello, yellow! Apple introduces new iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2023/03/hello-yellow-apple-introduces-new-iphone-14-and-iphone-14-plus/
    "A beautiful yellow joins the lineup"

    If you assume Apple marketing isn't stupid, you're forced to conclude that Apple marketing rather obviously thinks its own iPhone customer is stupid.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps on Fri Jul 14 08:48:00 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-14 08:35, Wally J wrote:
    badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote

    They even charge more for a red phone.

    I had to take my maroon colored car to the body shop for some repairs.
    All the estimates I got made mention that the colors red and pearl
    white cost more. Something about that red pigment that makes it more
    expensive than other colors.

    If you assume that Apple has one of the finest marketing operations in the world (other than the tobacco and soda companies), then you have to look at how Apple advertises the iPhone to people who care ONLY about the color.

    Apple introduces iPhone 8 and iPhone 8 Plus (PRODUCT)RED Special Edition https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2018/04/apple-introduces-iphone-8-and-iphone-8-plus-productred-special-edition/

    Simpleton:

    'Product Red, stylized as (PRODUCT)RED or (PRODUCT)RED, is a licensed
    brand by the company Red, stylized as (RED), that seeks to engage the
    private sector in raising awareness and funds to help eliminate HIV/AIDS
    in eight African countries, namely Swaziland, Ghana, Kenya, Lesotho,
    Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania, and Zambia.[1] It is licensed to partner companies including Apple Inc., Nike, American Express (UK), The
    Coca-Cola Company, Starbucks, Converse, Electronic Arts, Primark, Head, Buckaroo, Penguin Classics (UK & International), Gap, Armani, FIAT,
    Hallmark (US), SAP, Beats Electronics, and Supercell.

    The concept was founded in 2006 by U2 frontman and activist Bono,
    together with Bobby Shriver of the One Campaign and DATA. The Global
    Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria is the recipient of Product
    Red's money.'

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_Red>
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Bob Campbell@nunya@none.none to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Fri Jul 14 19:23:35 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:


    What it means is Androidiots tend to be absolutely clueless morons.


    Yes, we know that.



    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Jolly Roger@jollyroger@pobox.com to comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sat Jul 15 03:15:19 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-14, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-07-13 20:08, Wally J wrote:
    You're Kidding <yk@yahoo.com> wrote

    I say "bull crap". If you believe that, you also believe the tooth
    fairy and Santa Clause is real. Most Android users don't know any
    more or care about how it works than iPhone users.

    Two completely different buyer mindsets.

    First off, you have to understand that people who buy the iPhone are
    like people who buy a fancy car just because they feel it's fancy to
    others.

    I don't know if my car is "fancy" or not...

    (2012 BMW 135i)

    ...but I like it because of what it DOES...

    ...not because of anything anyone else feels about it.


    Arlen can't imagine a world where people buy things because they
    actually do things they want them to do, because he projects his own
    shitty feelings onto everyone else, and his only reason for buying
    anything is to feel "superior" to them. 😉 It literally drives him,
    which is why he spends literal hours every day insulting and belittling complete strangers how dare to use Apple products. He's a sad excuse of
    a human being.
    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Jolly Roger@jollyroger@pobox.com to comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sat Jul 15 03:16:28 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-14, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
    Wally J wrote:

    They even charge more for a red phone.

    I had to take my maroon colored car to the body shop for some repairs.
    All the estimates I got made mention that the colors red and pearl
    white cost more. Something about that red pigment that makes it more expensive than other colors.

    You've gleefully fallen for bullshit. Apple doesn't charge more for red products. The reason you gleefully fell for it is because you enjoy
    Arlen's trolls.
    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Chris@ithinkiam@gmail.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sat Jul 15 08:50:42 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    Wally J <walterjones@invalid.nospam> wrote:
    Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> wrote

    If you don't believe that, then look at Apple's own advertisements.
    They even charge more for a red phone.

    Utter rubbish. Just look at the prices for the 13/14 mini/base/pro; they're >> exactly the same regardless of colour. This isn't new either; my previous
    iphone was a red one.

    Like I said, you iMorons don't know a single thing about what Apple does.


    [snip]

    The Special Edition (Product) RED iPhone 7 starts at $750, and the red
    iPhone 7 Plus at $870, both of which are at least $100 more than the base price of the other iPhone 7 models (with the exception of the jet black color).

    That's because the red iPhone 7 is only available in the pricier 128GB and 256GB options. It's not available in the cheaper 32GB option, which costs $650 for the iPhone 7 and $770 for the iPhone 7 Plus.

    Idiot that's not charging more for a colour. If it is then Samsung do
    exactly same: only some colours are available in the Ultra models.

    This was also six years ago. The Red models also include a donation to
    charity, which was a factor in buying it last time around.

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan Browne@bitbucket@blackhole.com to comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sat Jul 15 10:48:33 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-14 11:35, Wally J wrote:
    badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote

    They even charge more for a red phone.

    I had to take my maroon colored car to the body shop for some repairs.
    All the estimates I got made mention that the colors red and pearl
    white cost more. Something about that red pigment that makes it more
    expensive than other colors.

    If you assume that Apple has one of the finest marketing operations in the world (other than the tobacco and soda companies), then you have to look at how Apple advertises the iPhone to people who care ONLY about the color.

    Showing your vast ignorance about marketing and advertising. You're
    harping over a mid-year "booster" campaign to lift sales. The sales
    will not be of yellow phones alone - indeed that will be the lesser
    portion of the sales.

    Advertising is about getting attention to the product line / company.

    But of course you obsess over the colour - because that's all you've got.

    "Apple is an ungodly well managed company."
    -Charlie Munger.
    --
    “If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything."
    -Ronald Coase

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Wally J@walterjones@invalid.nospam to comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sat Jul 15 16:32:01 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote

    But of course you obsess over the colour

    Don't get mad at me for pointing out Apple thinks its customer is stupid.
    Apple (& tobacco & soda) marketing is well known to be the finest around.

    They know EXACTLY what drives their customers to buy more of their product.

    You whooshed that it was Apple whose advertisements I had pointed out. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2018/04/apple-introduces-iphone-8-and-iphone-8-plus-productred-special-edition/

    If you don't like that Apple obsesses over color, take it up with them. https://youtu.be/1S8L7t2tu0U (Hello YELLOW! - ONLY FROM APPLE!!!!!!!)

    The fact remains Apple makes a big deal about their RED & YELLOW color.
    Which means Apple thinks its customers care greatly only about the color.

    If you don't like what Apple thinks of its customers take it up with Apple.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sat Jul 15 21:49:25 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-15 13:32, Wally J wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote

    But of course you obsess over the colour

    Don't get mad at me for...

    ...choosing a new posting nym twice a week, Arlen?

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan Browne@bitbucket@blackhole.com to comp.mobile.ipad,misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sun Jul 16 09:30:51 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-15 16:32, Wally J wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote

    But of course you obsess over the colour

    Don't get mad at me

    I wouldn't waste energy being mad at you.

    Obviously you don't understand marketing and advertising. You obsess
    over the colour presented rather than why there was that marketing
    campaign. And of course you snip all that out as it distracts from your
    core diatribe.

    "Apple is an ungodly well managed company."
    - Charlie Munger
    --
    “If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything."
    -Ronald Coase

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Bob Campbell@nunya@none.none to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sun Jul 16 16:48:13 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:

    "Apple is an ungodly well managed company."
    - Charlie Munger

    And THAT is what drives Arlen the Androidiot crazy. If Apple was selling Android phones, Arlen the Androidiot would LOVE Apple.

    But Alas, Apple does not sell Windows PCs and Apple does not sell Android phones. Thus, being a good little troll kiddie, Arlen the Androidiot has
    been having a 5 year long public tantrum.


    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Wilf@wilf@postingx.uk to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sun Jul 16 18:03:12 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 16/07/2023 at 17:48, Bob Campbell wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:

    "Apple is an ungodly well managed company."
    - Charlie Munger

    And THAT is what drives Arlen the Androidiot crazy. If Apple was selling Android phones, Arlen the Androidiot would LOVE Apple.

    But Alas, Apple does not sell Windows PCs and Apple does not sell Android phones. Thus, being a good little troll kiddie, Arlen the Androidiot has been having a 5 year long public tantrum.



    Jeez, you guys really obsess over this Arlen character. As if he's the Anti-Christ or something. Or the sort of mythical hate figure needed
    to control the masses which Goldstein was set up to be in the book
    Nineteen Eighty-Four.
    --
    Wilf

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sun Jul 16 10:45:05 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-16 10:03, Wilf wrote:
    On 16/07/2023 at 17:48, Bob Campbell wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:

    "Apple is an ungodly well managed company."
    - Charlie Munger

    And THAT is what drives Arlen the Androidiot crazy.   If Apple was
    selling
    Android phones, Arlen the Androidiot would LOVE Apple.

    But Alas, Apple does not sell Windows PCs and Apple does not sell Android
    phones.  Thus, being a good little troll kiddie, Arlen the Androidiot has >> been having a 5 year long public tantrum.


    Jeez, you guys really obsess over this Arlen character.  As if he's the Anti-Christ or something.    Or the sort of mythical hate figure needed to control the masses which Goldstein was set up to be in the book
    Nineteen Eighty-Four.

    It's not obsession.

    It's amusement.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan Browne@bitbucket@blackhole.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sun Jul 16 14:41:31 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-16 13:03, Wilf wrote:
    really obsess over this Arlen character.  As if he's the Anti-Christ or something.    Or the sort of mythical hate figure needed to control the masses which Goldstein was set up to be in the book Nineteen Eighty-Four.

    You're quite right - we should absolutely ignore it, but we seem to be weak.
    --
    “If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything."
    -Ronald Coase

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sun Jul 16 13:27:30 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-16 11:41, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 13:03, Wilf wrote:
    really obsess over this Arlen character.  As if he's the Anti-Christ
    or something.    Or the sort of mythical hate figure needed to control >> the masses which Goldstein was set up to be in the book Nineteen
    Eighty-Four.

    You're quite right - we should absolutely ignore it, but we seem to be
    weak.


    Ignoring it has never ever worked as a strategy.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan Browne@bitbucket@blackhole.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sun Jul 16 16:43:15 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-16 16:27, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 11:41, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 13:03, Wilf wrote:
    really obsess over this Arlen character.  As if he's the Anti-Christ
    or something.    Or the sort of mythical hate figure needed to
    control the masses which Goldstein was set up to be in the book
    Nineteen Eighty-Four.

    You're quite right - we should absolutely ignore it, but we seem to be
    weak.


    Ignoring it has never ever worked as a strategy.

    It's actually the most successful way of dealing with trolls. However
    as soon as 1 person answers it, it gets oxygen to keep on going.
    --
    “If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything."
    -Ronald Coase

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sun Jul 16 14:44:06 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-16 13:43, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 16:27, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 11:41, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 13:03, Wilf wrote:
    really obsess over this Arlen character.  As if he's the Anti-Christ >>>> or something.    Or the sort of mythical hate figure needed to
    control the masses which Goldstein was set up to be in the book
    Nineteen Eighty-Four.

    You're quite right - we should absolutely ignore it, but we seem to
    be weak.


    Ignoring it has never ever worked as a strategy.

    It's actually the most successful way of dealing with trolls.  However
    as soon as 1 person answers it, it gets oxygen to keep on going.


    But that's a flaw you can NEVER eliminate.

    There will always be new people who come in and provide the oxygen.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From badgolferman@REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sun Jul 16 23:02:43 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 13:43, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 16:27, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 11:41, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 13:03, Wilf wrote:
    really obsess over this Arlen character.  As if he's the Anti-Christ >>>>> or something.    Or the sort of mythical hate figure needed to
    control the masses which Goldstein was set up to be in the book
    Nineteen Eighty-Four.

    You're quite right - we should absolutely ignore it, but we seem to
    be weak.


    Ignoring it has never ever worked as a strategy.

    It's actually the most successful way of dealing with trolls.  However
    as soon as 1 person answers it, it gets oxygen to keep on going.


    But that's a flaw you can NEVER eliminate.

    There will always be new people who come in and provide the oxygen.


    According to some people in this group, a troll is someone you disagree
    with. That would mean they are trolls for disagreeing as well.

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Minoru Osaka@minoru.osaka@asahi.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Mon Jul 17 08:31:39 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:02:43 -0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote:

    According to some people in this group, a troll is someone you disagree
    with. That would mean they are trolls for disagreeing as well.

    What's funny is they are disagreeing with what Apple marketing does.

    They call every Apple marketing campaign, a troll.

    Instead of accepting that it's Apple who "obsesses" over the color of the iPhone, they call everyone who dares to post a URL to the Apple marketing campaigns where Apple obsesses over the iPhone color, as a troll.

    Simply for pointing out what Apple does.

    Apple clearly obsesses over the iPhone color.
    What does that tell you about what Apple thinks of its iPhone consumer?
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan Browne@bitbucket@blackhole.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sun Jul 16 20:04:16 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-16 17:44, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 13:43, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 16:27, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 11:41, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 13:03, Wilf wrote:
    really obsess over this Arlen character.  As if he's the
    Anti-Christ or something.    Or the sort of mythical hate figure >>>>> needed to control the masses which Goldstein was set up to be in
    the book Nineteen Eighty-Four.

    You're quite right - we should absolutely ignore it, but we seem to
    be weak.


    Ignoring it has never ever worked as a strategy.

    It's actually the most successful way of dealing with trolls.  However
    as soon as 1 person answers it, it gets oxygen to keep on going.


    But that's a flaw you can NEVER eliminate.

    There will always be new people who come in and provide the oxygen.

    Doesn't mean the "regulars" need to.
    --
    “If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything."
    -Ronald Coase

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan Browne@bitbucket@blackhole.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sun Jul 16 20:25:43 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-16 19:31, Minoru Osaka wrote:

    Apple clearly obsesses over the iPhone color.

    You're obsessing over the colour because you have no clue what marketing
    and advertising is for. That campaign probably helped sell 25 -
    50,000,000 iPhones - of which very few were yellow. Also helped sell
    many other Apple products from Watches to Earpods to iPads and even Macs.

    They probably spent about $25M on that campaign and it probably boosted
    income (with eye watering margins) about $20B. Spit balling here, mind.

    Huge ROI for that campaign.

    But - you don't understand marketing/advertising, so don't worry too much.

    What does that tell you about what Apple thinks of its iPhone consumer?

    That we keep offering our clients the best there is and they will come
    back again and again and again because they prefer the best product that
    has the best integrated eco-system of them all.

    Rumour amongst top value investors is that Apple is an ungodly well
    managed company.
    --
    “If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything."
    -Ronald Coase

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sun Jul 16 17:30:18 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-16 16:31, Minoru Osaka wrote:
    On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 23:02:43 -0000 (UTC), badgolferman wrote:

    According to some people in this group, a troll is someone you disagree
    with. That would mean they are trolls for disagreeing as well.

    What's funny is they are disagreeing with what Apple marketing does.

         They call every Apple marketing campaign, a troll.

    Instead of accepting that it's Apple who "obsesses" over the color of the iPhone, they call everyone who dares to post a URL to the Apple marketing campaigns where Apple obsesses over the iPhone color, as a troll.

         Simply for pointing out what Apple does.

    Apple clearly obsesses over the iPhone color.
    What does that tell you about what Apple thinks of its iPhone consumer?

    Oh, look!

    Arlen has a new posting nym!

    :-)
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Sun Jul 16 17:31:11 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-16 17:04, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 17:44, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 13:43, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 16:27, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 11:41, Alan Browne wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 13:03, Wilf wrote:
    really obsess over this Arlen character.  As if he's the
    Anti-Christ or something.    Or the sort of mythical hate figure >>>>>> needed to control the masses which Goldstein was set up to be in
    the book Nineteen Eighty-Four.

    You're quite right - we should absolutely ignore it, but we seem to >>>>> be weak.


    Ignoring it has never ever worked as a strategy.

    It's actually the most successful way of dealing with trolls.
    However as soon as 1 person answers it, it gets oxygen to keep on going. >>>

    But that's a flaw you can NEVER eliminate.

    There will always be new people who come in and provide the oxygen.

    Doesn't mean the "regulars" need to.


    It means that the regulars have to deal with the facts.

    I choose to deal with them by amusing myself.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Jolly Roger@jollyroger@pobox.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Mon Jul 17 01:34:22 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-16, Wilf <wilf@postingx.uk> wrote:
    On 16/07/2023 at 17:48, Bob Campbell wrote:
    Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:

    "Apple is an ungodly well managed company." - Charlie Munger

    And THAT is what drives Arlen the Androidiot crazy. If Apple was
    selling Android phones, Arlen the Androidiot would LOVE Apple.

    But Alas, Apple does not sell Windows PCs and Apple does not sell
    Android phones. Thus, being a good little troll kiddie, Arlen the
    Androidiot has been having a 5 year long public tantrum.

    Jeez, you guys really obsess over this Arlen character.

    No, Arlen obsesses over Apple, to the extent that he literally creates
    hundreds of new nyms a month, regularly impersonates existing nyms, and
    spends literal hours every day trolling the Apple news groups. The
    normal people in the Apple news groups are simply reacting to his
    constant disruptions. Nice try at victim blaming, but no cigar.

    As if he's the Anti-Christ or something.

    Nope, just a complete loser who trolls endlessly.

    Or the sort of mythical hate figure needed to control the masses which Goldstein was set up to be in the book Nineteen Eighty-Four.

    Not that either. Three strikes, you're out.
    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Jolly Roger@jollyroger@pobox.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Mon Jul 17 01:35:43 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-16, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 16:27, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 11:41, Alan Browne wrote:

    You're quite right - we should absolutely ignore it, but we seem to
    be weak.

    Ignoring it has never ever worked as a strategy.

    It's actually the most successful way of dealing with trolls. However
    as soon as 1 person answers it, it gets oxygen to keep on going.

    You're ignoring the fact that Arlen regularly creates new nyms to answer himself. Ignoring him does nothing.
    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Jolly Roger@jollyroger@pobox.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Mon Jul 17 01:37:44 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-16, badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:

    According to some people in this group, a troll is someone you
    disagree with.

    You're projecting as usual. And you *regularly* side with Arlen and sms
    in their obvious trolls. You gleefully participated in the recent
    "ERRMEGHERD, Apple dared to release a YELLOW iPHONE" troll threads, even creating one or two of your own as just one example.
    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Minoru Osaka@minoru.osaka@asahi.net to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Mon Jul 17 23:00:22 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 20:25:43 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

    Apple clearly obsesses over the iPhone color.

    You're obsessing over the colour because you have no clue what marketing
    and advertising is for.

    You do not seem to be stupid, so I will attempt to discuss how Apple
    markets the iPhone at the next level - to see if you can keep up. OK?

    I agree that the dumb "Hello Yellow" campaign was likely simply a way for
    Apple to say something (anything!) in the mid-year cycle for the iPhone 14.

    But what does _that_ say about what Apple thinks of its own customers?

    Apple had nothing else to say about the iPhone 14 so in reality, if Apple didn't want to "obsess" over the color, they should have said nothing.

    That campaign probably helped sell 25 -
    50,000,000 iPhones - of which very few were yellow. Also helped sell
    many other Apple products from Watches to Earpods to iPads and even Macs.

    I agree with you that part of advertising is to simply make it appear that Apple has something different to offer its iPhone customers that's unique.

    For example, Apple marketing obsessed over the RED! color quite a few
    times, mainly as a sleazy way for Apple to promote a specific charity.

    Again, I ask you to delve into the question of why Apple stooped that low. Consider, for example, Apple could have donated directly to the charity.

    But they didn't (as far as we know from their advertisements).
    They used the obsession over the RED! iPhone as their donation messaging.

    What does that say about what Apple thinks of its own customer base?

    They probably spent about $25M on that campaign and it probably boosted income (with eye watering margins) about $20B. Spit balling here, mind.

    Huge ROI for that campaign.

    But - you don't understand marketing/advertising, so don't worry too much.

    Actually I do understand marketing rather well, whether you know it or not. Apple marketing is one of the finest on this planet at understanding you.

    You, for example, read an Apple white paper as if it's gospel. Admit it.
    You can't fathom, for example, zero-click holes abound on Apple devices.

    You think to yourself, "If Apple's sandbox is so great", and "If Apple's
    Secure Enclave is so great" and "If Apple's encryption is so great"...

    Then how can it be there are so many zero-click exploits on Apple devices.

    I would wager I understand you better than you understand yourself.
    You believed white papers (which said all these exploits are impossible).

    What does that tell you about what Apple thinks of its iPhone consumer?

    That we keep offering our clients the best there is and they will come
    back again and again and again because they prefer the best product that
    has the best integrated eco-system of them all.

    You think it's they best product because you _believe_ the white papers.
    And yet, you _ignore_ that iOS is the most exploited smartphone OS around.

    You don't know that you don't understand a single thing about iOS.
    For example, you vehemently will deny that the walled garden even exists.

    Am I right?

    What does that mean to a person who is intelligent & who understands Apple?
    It means you're incredibly ignorant about everything that Apple does today.

    What you don't realize is you only believe what Apple told you to believe.
    And Apple never once said that the walled garden exists.

    Everyone else _knows_ the walled garden is very real. Except you.
    Since Apple didn't tell you the walled garden exists, you say it doesn't.

    Even though almost all the flaws in Apple products are due to those walls.
    Am I right about you?

    Rumour amongst top value investors is that Apple is an ungodly well
    managed company.

    Again we agree that Apple plays ignorant people like a fiddle, with the
    classic joke of 'laughing all the way to the bank befitting' of them.

    If Apple actually thought their customer wasn't incredibly stupid, then the Apple marketing campaigns wouldn't be obsessing over what they obsess over.

    I wonder if you can step up to the level which I upped the conversation to?
    We will know if you can play at the next league level by your response.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan Browne@bitbucket@blackhole.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Mon Jul 17 10:42:11 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-16 21:35, Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2023-07-16, Alan Browne <bitbucket@blackhole.com> wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 16:27, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-07-16 11:41, Alan Browne wrote:

    You're quite right - we should absolutely ignore it, but we seem to
    be weak.

    Ignoring it has never ever worked as a strategy.

    It's actually the most successful way of dealing with trolls. However
    as soon as 1 person answers it, it gets oxygen to keep on going.

    You're ignoring the fact that Arlen regularly creates new nyms to answer himself. Ignoring him does nothing.

    I disagree - if he gets into a shouting match with himself, both are
    easily KF'd - but everyone needs to lean that way for it to be
    effective. Troll-lites like badg don't matter.
    --
    “If you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything."
    -Ronald Coase

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Alan@nuh-uh@nope.com to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Mon Jul 17 08:33:07 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    On 2023-07-17 07:00, Minoru Osaka wrote:
    On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 20:25:43 -0400, Alan Browne wrote:

    Apple clearly obsesses over the iPhone color.

    You're obsessing over the colour because you have no clue what
    marketing and advertising is for.

    You do not seem to be stupid, so I will attempt to discuss how Apple
    markets the iPhone at the next level - to see if you can keep up. OK?

    I agree that the dumb "Hello Yellow" campaign was likely simply a way for Apple to say something (anything!) in the mid-year cycle for the iPhone 14.

    But what does _that_ say about what Apple thinks of its own customers?

    That they are like people?

    Because they are people, Arlen?


    Apple had nothing else to say about the iPhone 14 so in reality, if Apple didn't want to "obsess" over the color, they should have said nothing.

    How would that have helped them, Arlen?

    That campaign probably helped sell 25 - 50,000,000 iPhones - of which
    very few were yellow.  Also helped sell many other Apple products from
    Watches to Earpods to iPads and even Macs.

    I agree with you that part of advertising is to simply make it appear that Apple has something different to offer its iPhone customers that's unique.

    That's part of ANYONE's advertising, Arlen.


    For example, Apple marketing obsessed over the RED! color quite a few
    times, mainly as a sleazy way for Apple to promote a specific charity.

    What in the world is "sleazy" about it, Arlen?


    Again, I ask you to delve into the question of why Apple stooped that low. Consider, for example, Apple could have donated directly to the charity.

    Who says that Apple doesn't?

    And selling a product for the same price as the non-charity version (and
    you can check online and see that that's what they do) but then donating
    some of the price to a charity IS Apple donating to that charity directly.


    But they didn't (as far as we know from their advertisements).

    Weasel words, Arlen.

    They used the obsession over the RED! iPhone as their donation messaging.

    What does that say about what Apple thinks of its own customer base?

    They probably spent about $25M on that campaign and it probably
    boosted income (with eye watering margins) about $20B.  Spit balling
    here, mind.

    Huge ROI for that campaign.

    But - you don't understand marketing/advertising, so don't worry too
    much.

    Actually I do understand marketing rather well, whether you know it or not. Apple marketing is one of the finest on this planet at understanding you.

    You, for example, read an Apple white paper as if it's gospel. Admit it.
    You can't fathom, for example, zero-click holes abound on Apple devices.

    You can't fathom that zero-click holes appear in everyone's products, Arlen.


    You think to yourself, "If Apple's sandbox is so great", and "If Apple's Secure Enclave is so great" and "If Apple's encryption is so great"...
    Then how can it be there are so many zero-click exploits on Apple devices.

    Show that they appear with any greater frequency than the norm, Arlen.


    I would wager I understand you better than you understand yourself.
    You believed white papers (which said all these exploits are impossible).

    What does that tell you about what Apple thinks of its iPhone consumer?

    That we keep offering our clients the best there is and they will come
    back again and again and again because they prefer the best product
    that has the best integrated eco-system of them all.

    You think it's they best product because you _believe_ the white papers.
    And yet, you _ignore_ that iOS is the most exploited smartphone OS around.

    You don't know that you don't understand a single thing about iOS.
    For example, you vehemently will deny that the walled garden even exists.

    Am I right?

    What does that mean to a person who is intelligent & who understands Apple? It means you're incredibly ignorant about everything that Apple does today.

    What you don't realize is you only believe what Apple told you to believe. And Apple never once said that the walled garden exists.

    Everyone else _knows_ the walled garden is very real. Except you.
    Since Apple didn't tell you the walled garden exists, you say it doesn't.

    Even though almost all the flaws in Apple products are due to those walls.
    Am I right about you?

    Rumour amongst top value investors is that Apple is an ungodly well
    managed company.

    Again we agree that Apple plays ignorant people like a fiddle, with the classic joke of 'laughing all the way to the bank befitting' of them.

    If Apple actually thought their customer wasn't incredibly stupid, then the Apple marketing campaigns wouldn't be obsessing over what they obsess over.

    I wonder if you can step up to the level which I upped the conversation to? We will know if you can play at the next league level by your response.

    LOL!

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Bob Campbell@nunya@none.none to misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.ipad,comp.sys.mac.apps on Mon Jul 17 17:49:47 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.apps

    Minoru Osaka <minoru.osaka@asahi.net> wrote:

    I wonder if you can step up to the level which I upped the conversation to?

    There is no “step up” in your drivel, Arlen. This is the exact same level you ALWAYS operate at: Apple customers are stupid. Geniuses buy Android phones.

    That’s it.

    If you would actually talk about facts instead of your childish opinions,
    THAT would be a step up. But as long as you continue with your S.O.B. (Standard Operational Bullshit), then we will continue to laugh at you.

    If you want to be treated like an adult, then stop acting like a child.


    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114