• 7 most Windows-like Linux distros - if you're ready to ditchMicrosoft

    From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Sep 9 23:13:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Good starting point <https://www.zdnet.com/article/7-most-windows-like-linux-distros-if-youre-ready-to-ditch-microsoft/>
    for those looking for the best alternative when switching from
    Windows. Did you know Bazzite isn’t just for gaming? Note also the immutability option, to give you a level of security that Microsoft
    and Apple have yet to discover.

    Also related: “5 ways to run Windows apps on macOS - and 2 are free” <https://www.zdnet.com/article/5-ways-to-run-windows-apps-on-macos-and-2-are-free/>.
    Unfortunately, as seems all too typical with the Mac, the “free”
    options are not so straightforward to set up.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Tue Sep 9 20:08:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 9/9/2025 7:13 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:

    Good starting point <https://www.zdnet.com/article/7-most-windows-like-linux-distros-if-youre-ready-to-ditch-microsoft/>
    for those looking for the best alternative when switching from
    Windows. Did you know Bazzite isn’t just for gaming? Note also the immutability option, to give you a level of security that Microsoft
    and Apple have yet to discover.

    Also related: “5 ways to run Windows apps on macOS - and 2 are free” <https://www.zdnet.com/article/5-ways-to-run-windows-apps-on-macos-and-2-are-free/>.
    Unfortunately, as seems all too typical with the Mac, the “free”
    options are not so straightforward to set up.


    I found CrossOver to be useful with macOS, then OS X Snow Leopard 10.6.
    With Linux, though, typically using generic Wine is better.
    --
    Joel W. Crump
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tyrone@none@none.none to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 04:34:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Sep 9, 2025 at 7:13:58 PM EDT, "Lawrence D´Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    Also related: “5 ways to run Windows apps on macOS - and 2 are free” <https://www.zdnet.com/article/5-ways-to-run-windows-apps-on-macos-and-2-are-free/>.
    Unfortunately, as seems all too typical with the Mac, the “free”
    options are not so straightforward to set up.

    Unfortunately, as seems all too typical with Linux users, Macs are deemed
    "hard to use".

    Add VMware Fusion to the list of free VM solutions for Macs. You install VMWare, create the VM (you decide the size of the drive, how much RAM to assign, how many CPUs, how to network or just accept the defaults), point it
    to the Windows Arm ISO you downloaded from MS, and install Windows 11. All
    very normal for VM solutions. So much for "not so straightforward to set up".


    BTW a Windows 11 license can be bought for $15 - $20. Good for 2 installs.

    64GB drive, 4 CPUs and 6GB RAM are plenty to install Windows. They can all be changed later. That's the beauty of VMs. "Upgrading the hardware" is just a matter of changing the settings.

    Of course, this all assumes you have enough RAM (and drive space) in the Mac
    to run Windows in a VM. 16GB RAM is the realistic minimum. If you don't have
    at least 64GB free drive space then forget it. I have 32GB RAM on both my M2 MacBook Pro and my M4 Mac Mini (and 2TB SSDs), so I have no problems with any of this. I bought both knowing I was going to run VMs.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 05:39:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:34:53 +0000, Tyrone wrote:

    Of course, this all assumes you have enough RAM (and drive space) in the
    Mac to run Windows in a VM. 16GB RAM is the realistic minimum. If you
    don't have at least 64GB free drive space then forget it.

    If you don’t have enough space, it’s easy enough to upgrade, isn’t
    it ... ?

    ... oh, wait.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From vallor@vallor@cultnix.org to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 06:43:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:39:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <109r2v6$1en64$1@dont-email.me>:

    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:34:53 +0000, Tyrone wrote:

    Of course, this all assumes you have enough RAM (and drive space) in
    the Mac to run Windows in a VM. 16GB RAM is the realistic minimum. If
    you don't have at least 64GB free drive space then forget it.

    If you don’t have enough space, it’s easy enough to upgrade, isn’t it ... ?

    ... oh, wait.

    With Thunderbolt, the drive additions can be external with
    no penalty.
    --
    -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090Ti 24G
    OS: Linux 6.16.5 D: Mint 22.2 DE: Xfce 4.18
    NVIDIA: 580.82.07 Mem: 258G
    "Should I weed the lawn or say it's a garden?"
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 03:52:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 9/10/2025 2:43 AM, vallor wrote:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:39:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <109r2v6$1en64$1@dont-email.me>:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:34:53 +0000, Tyrone wrote:

    Of course, this all assumes you have enough RAM (and drive space) in
    the Mac to run Windows in a VM. 16GB RAM is the realistic minimum. If
    you don't have at least 64GB free drive space then forget it.

    If you don’t have enough space, it’s easy enough to upgrade, isn’t it >> ... ?

    ... oh, wait.

    With Thunderbolt, the drive additions can be external with
    no penalty.


    Yup, creating the illusion in MacTards' minds that their systems are
    simply better, from the ground up. Heh. Windows 11 and Linux are both
    light years beyond macOS.
    --
    Joel W. Crump
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 05:05:27 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 9/10/2025 12:34 AM, Tyrone wrote:
    On Sep 9, 2025 at 7:13:58 PM EDT, "Lawrence D´Oliveiro" <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    Also related: “5 ways to run Windows apps on macOS - and 2 are free”
    <https://www.zdnet.com/article/5-ways-to-run-windows-apps-on-macos-and-2-are-free/>.
    Unfortunately, as seems all too typical with the Mac, the “free”
    options are not so straightforward to set up.

    Unfortunately, as seems all too typical with Linux users, Macs are deemed "hard to use".


    Lawrence is critiquing macOS for resembling Linux, in effect? Yeah, I
    would dispute that, installing generic Wine on a Mac can't be that much
    harder than on most Linux distros. They have competent instructions,
    anyway.


    Add VMware Fusion to the list of free VM solutions for Macs. You install VMWare, create the VM (you decide the size of the drive, how much RAM to assign, how many CPUs, how to network or just accept the defaults), point it to the Windows Arm ISO you downloaded from MS, and install Windows 11. All very normal for VM solutions. So much for "not so straightforward to set up".


    BTW a Windows 11 license can be bought for $15 - $20. Good for 2 installs.

    64GB drive, 4 CPUs and 6GB RAM are plenty to install Windows. They can all be changed later. That's the beauty of VMs. "Upgrading the hardware" is just a matter of changing the settings.

    Of course, this all assumes you have enough RAM (and drive space) in the Mac to run Windows in a VM. 16GB RAM is the realistic minimum. If you don't have at least 64GB free drive space then forget it. I have 32GB RAM on both my M2 MacBook Pro and my M4 Mac Mini (and 2TB SSDs), so I have no problems with any of this. I bought both knowing I was going to run VMs.


    What in God's name did you pay those bastards, to get those specs?
    --
    Joel W. Crump
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From vallor@vallor@cultnix.org to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 09:23:40 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 03:52:45 -0400, "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com>
    wrote in <h7awQ.1489247$xyt3.295508@fx15.iad>:

    On 9/10/2025 2:43 AM, vallor wrote:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:39:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <109r2v6$1en64$1@dont-email.me>:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:34:53 +0000, Tyrone wrote:

    Of course, this all assumes you have enough RAM (and drive space) in
    the Mac to run Windows in a VM. 16GB RAM is the realistic minimum. If
    you don't have at least 64GB free drive space then forget it.

    If you don’t have enough space, it’s easy enough to upgrade, isn’t it >>> ... ?

    ... oh, wait.

    With Thunderbolt, the drive additions can be external with no penalty.


    Yup, creating the illusion in MacTards' minds that their systems are
    simply better, from the ground up. Heh. Windows 11 and Linux are both
    light years beyond macOS.

    Some people like chocolate ice cream, some people like strawberry.

    Personally, I prefer Linux. YMMV.
    --
    -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090Ti 24G
    OS: Linux 6.16.5 D: Mint 22.2 DE: Xfce 4.18
    NVIDIA: 580.82.07 Mem: 258G
    "I have a rock garden. 3 of them died last week."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 05:31:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 9/10/2025 5:23 AM, vallor wrote:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 03:52:45 -0400, "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in <h7awQ.1489247$xyt3.295508@fx15.iad>:
    On 9/10/2025 2:43 AM, vallor wrote:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:39:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <109r2v6$1en64$1@dont-email.me>:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:34:53 +0000, Tyrone wrote:

    Of course, this all assumes you have enough RAM (and drive space) in >>>>> the Mac to run Windows in a VM. 16GB RAM is the realistic minimum. If >>>>> you don't have at least 64GB free drive space then forget it.

    If you don’t have enough space, it’s easy enough to upgrade, isn’t it
    ... ?

    ... oh, wait.

    With Thunderbolt, the drive additions can be external with no penalty.

    Yup, creating the illusion in MacTards' minds that their systems are
    simply better, from the ground up. Heh. Windows 11 and Linux are both
    light years beyond macOS.

    Some people like chocolate ice cream, some people like strawberry.

    Personally, I prefer Linux. YMMV.


    I prefer an ice cream that's competitively priced. Nothing Apple sells is.
    --
    Joel W. Crump
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From vallor@vallor@cultnix.org to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 11:53:36 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:31:45 -0400, "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com>
    wrote in <5AbwQ.58675$rQG1.26673@fx37.iad>:

    On 9/10/2025 5:23 AM, vallor wrote:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 03:52:45 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
    <joelcrump@gmail.com>
    wrote in <h7awQ.1489247$xyt3.295508@fx15.iad>:
    On 9/10/2025 2:43 AM, vallor wrote:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:39:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <109r2v6$1en64$1@dont-email.me>:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:34:53 +0000, Tyrone wrote:

    Of course, this all assumes you have enough RAM (and drive space)
    in the Mac to run Windows in a VM. 16GB RAM is the realistic
    minimum. If you don't have at least 64GB free drive space then
    forget it.

    If you don’t have enough space, it’s easy enough to upgrade, isn’t >>>>> it ... ?

    ... oh, wait.

    With Thunderbolt, the drive additions can be external with no
    penalty.

    Yup, creating the illusion in MacTards' minds that their systems are
    simply better, from the ground up. Heh. Windows 11 and Linux are
    both light years beyond macOS.

    Some people like chocolate ice cream, some people like strawberry.

    Personally, I prefer Linux. YMMV.


    I prefer an ice cream that's competitively priced. Nothing Apple sells
    is.

    Apple's workstation-class machines are competitively priced with
    Linux workstations.

    https://system76.com/workstations/

    https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/desktop-computers/precision-7875-tower-workstation/spd/precision-t7875-workstation/xctopt7875mtusai_vp

    https://www.apple.com/mac-pro/

    Still, I'd rather have a Linux workstation.
    --
    -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090Ti 24G
    OS: Linux 6.16.5 D: Mint 22.2 DE: Xfce 4.18
    NVIDIA: 580.82.07 Mem: 258G
    "NUMBER CRUNCHING: Jumping on a Computer."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From -hh@recscuba_google@huntzinger.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 07:55:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 9/10/25 05:31, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 9/10/2025 5:23 AM, vallor wrote:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 03:52:45 -0400, "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com>
    wrote in <h7awQ.1489247$xyt3.295508@fx15.iad>:
    On 9/10/2025 2:43 AM, vallor wrote:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:39:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <109r2v6$1en64$1@dont-email.me>:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:34:53 +0000, Tyrone wrote:

    Of course, this all assumes you have enough RAM (and drive space) in >>>>>> the Mac to run Windows in a VM. 16GB RAM is the realistic minimum. If >>>>>> you don't have at least 64GB free drive space then forget it.

    If you don’t have enough space, it’s easy enough to upgrade, isn’t it
    ... ?

    ... oh, wait.

    With Thunderbolt, the drive additions can be external with no penalty.

    Yup, creating the illusion in MacTards' minds that their systems are
    simply better, from the ground up.  Heh.  Windows 11 and Linux are both >>> light years beyond macOS.

    Some people like chocolate ice cream, some people like strawberry.

    Personally, I prefer Linux.  YMMV.


    I prefer an ice cream that's competitively priced.  Nothing Apple sells is.


    Big talk from a PC user who's spent more trying to cobble together his
    cheap system than it would have just cost him to buy a more capable Mac mini...

    & that was before dropping even more coin for their fried motherboard.


    -hh
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 07:59:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 9/10/2025 7:53 AM, vallor wrote:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:31:45 -0400, "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote in <5AbwQ.58675$rQG1.26673@fx37.iad>:
    On 9/10/2025 5:23 AM, vallor wrote:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 03:52:45 -0400, "Joel W. Crump"
    <joelcrump@gmail.com>
    wrote in <h7awQ.1489247$xyt3.295508@fx15.iad>:
    On 9/10/2025 2:43 AM, vallor wrote:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:39:50 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D’Oliveiro
    <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <109r2v6$1en64$1@dont-email.me>:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:34:53 +0000, Tyrone wrote:

    Of course, this all assumes you have enough RAM (and drive space) >>>>>>> in the Mac to run Windows in a VM. 16GB RAM is the realistic
    minimum. If you don't have at least 64GB free drive space then
    forget it.

    If you don’t have enough space, it’s easy enough to upgrade, isn’t >>>>>> it ... ?

    ... oh, wait.

    With Thunderbolt, the drive additions can be external with no
    penalty.

    Yup, creating the illusion in MacTards' minds that their systems are
    simply better, from the ground up. Heh. Windows 11 and Linux are
    both light years beyond macOS.

    Some people like chocolate ice cream, some people like strawberry.

    Personally, I prefer Linux. YMMV.

    I prefer an ice cream that's competitively priced. Nothing Apple sells
    is.

    Apple's workstation-class machines are competitively priced with
    Linux workstations.

    https://system76.com/workstations/

    https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/desktop-computers/precision-7875-tower-workstation/spd/precision-t7875-workstation/xctopt7875mtusai_vp

    https://www.apple.com/mac-pro/

    Still, I'd rather have a Linux workstation.


    Plainly, Apple's offerings fall short.
    --
    Joel W. Crump
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 08:10:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 9/10/2025 7:55 AM, -hh wrote:

    I prefer an ice cream (computer system) that's competitively priced.  Nothing Apple
    sells is.

    Big talk from a PC user who's spent more trying to cobble together his
    cheap system than it would have just cost him to buy a more capable Mac mini...

    & that was before dropping even more coin for their fried motherboard.


    My non-Apple mini PC, now, is great, Windows 11 24H2 is magic, my
    disaster with my computer opened my eyes to this, it's pretty great,
    elite even. I can switch to Linux on this device, if I want, but
    Microsoft has pretty sold me on what might have been Windows 12.
    --
    Joel W. Crump
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 08:19:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 9/10/2025 8:10 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:

    I can switch to Linux on this device, if I want, but
    Microsoft has pretty sold me on what might have been Windows 12.


    *pretty much sold me on
    --
    Joel W. Crump
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rudy Canoza@rudy.can@jllkone.not to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 10:13:08 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Joel W. Crump wrote:
    I prefer an ice cream that's competitively priced.


    You prefer a cock up your ass, most men don't.

    https://postimg.cc/7ChyqNL6
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 10:16:50 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 9/10/2025 10:13 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:

    You prefer a cock up your ass, most men don't.

    https://postimg.cc/7ChyqNL6


    If I were worried about what "most men" do and don't, I'd be lamer than
    your dumb ass.
    --
    Joel W. Crump
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rudy Canoza@rudy.can@jllkone.not to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 10:17:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Joel W. Crump wrote:
    Windows 11 24H2 is magic, my
    disaster with my computer opened my eyes to this, it's pretty great,
    elite even.  I can switch to Linux on this device, if I want, but
    Microsoft has pretty sold me on what might have been Windows 12.


    After all these years of you whining like a little bitch
    about "Winblows", you pillow biting fruitcake hypocrite?

    You have shit for brains.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rudy Canoza@rudy.can@jllkone.not to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 10:18:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 9/10/2025 10:13 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:

    You prefer a cock up your ass, most men don't.

    https://postimg.cc/7ChyqNL6


    If I were worried about what "most men" do and don't, I'd be lamer than
    your dumb ass.


    You wouldn't have to take your daily AIDS meds either, sissy.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Wed Sep 10 10:42:21 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 9/10/2025 10:17 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:

    Windows 11 24H2 is magic, my disaster with my computer opened my eyes
    to this, it's pretty great, elite even.  I can switch to Linux on this
    device, if I want, but Microsoft has pretty sold me on what might have
    been Windows 12.

    After all these years of you whining like a little bitch
    about "Winblows", you pillow biting fruitcake hypocrite?

    You have shit for brains.


    Nope, 24H2 uses AI in a new way, it was an unknown unknown to me, until
    I fell into using this mini PC. I'm a convert.
    --
    Joel W. Crump
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Wed Sep 10 19:36:13 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 07:55:50 -0400, -hh wrote:

    Big talk from a PC user who's spent more trying to cobble together his
    cheap system than it would have just cost him to buy a more capable Mac mini...

    At least you *can* actually “cobble together” a Linux-running PC system from your choice of parts, instead of having to pick from the fixed set of choices that Apple offers.

    And you can change your mind and upgrade bits afterwards, too, so it
    becomes “more capable” over time, than it was when you first got it.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Wed Sep 10 19:38:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Wed, 9/10/2025 10:42 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 9/10/2025 10:17 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:

    Windows 11 24H2 is magic, my disaster with my computer opened my eyes to this, it's pretty great, elite even. 
    I can switch to Linux on this device, if I want, but Microsoft has pretty sold me on what might have been Windows 12.

    After all these years of you whining like a little bitch
    about "Winblows", you pillow biting fruitcake hypocrite?

    You have shit for brains.


    Nope, 24H2 uses AI in a new way, it was an unknown unknown to me, until I fell into using this mini PC.  I'm a convert.


    I think I saw this happen on Star Trek.

    They put Joel in the Transporter, and after a malfunction
    two Joel are produced. A Linux Joel. And a Windows Joel.

    *******

    The AI even makes its own advertising copy, even though
    if you ask the AI what its capabilities are, it doesn't
    know the answer.

    [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/4xykz7wy/Im-so-confused.gif

    The AI has apparently doctored a photo for us, removing
    two cars from the scene. But it doesn't say exactly, where
    on the PC you are doing that.

    After viewing the promo video on that web page, the
    application being used is

    Paint
    CoPilot Icon
    Image Creator (Create stunning images with just a few words)
    Generative erase (Remove objects with background fill) <=== could be this one
    Remove background (Remove the background from your image)

    So it does appear there are AI functions (remote ones).

    At one time, image creation was done by CoPilot Studio module
    (part of the module set on the remote CoPilot). And I asked it to
    produce a picture of two seals basking on a rock in the sun at the
    beach. And the image produced, was photorealistic. A reasonably good
    likeness of seals at the beach. Somehow, I fumbled the handling of the
    image, so I gave the exact same instructions a second time. The image produced had a "ground fog" applied to the ocean surface, the seals were on
    the rock alright, but the "sunning themselves" part of the request was
    kinda botched by the fog the AI added. While there is an image
    creation capability (and the "irritating noise effect" has been removed),
    the images can be hit and miss, so you need time to burn to work with it.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Joel W. Crump@joelcrump@gmail.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Wed Sep 10 19:50:26 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 9/10/2025 7:38 PM, Paul wrote:
    On Wed, 9/10/2025 10:42 AM, Joel W. Crump wrote:
    On 9/10/2025 10:17 AM, Rudy Canoza wrote:

    Windows 11 24H2 is magic, my disaster with my computer opened my eyes to this, it's pretty great, elite even.
    I can switch to Linux on this device, if I want, but Microsoft has pretty sold me on what might have been Windows 12.

    After all these years of you whining like a little bitch
    about "Winblows", you pillow biting fruitcake hypocrite?

    You have shit for brains.

    Nope, 24H2 uses AI in a new way, it was an unknown unknown to me, until I fell into using this mini PC.  I'm a convert.

    I think I saw this happen on Star Trek.

    They put Joel in the Transporter, and after a malfunction
    two Joel are produced. A Linux Joel. And a Windows Joel.


    There's no doubt I'm bisexual not only in terms of having sex but in
    OSes, I've had a connection to Microsoft going back a long time. But
    yet I treasure Linux for being Linux. It's just that deleting Win11 off
    this thing would be sacrificing something so sweet, that I want to hold
    onto.
    --
    Joel W. Crump
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Lloyd@not.email@all.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Sep 11 18:15:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 19:38:28 -0400, Paul wrote:

    [snip]

    I think I saw this happen on Star Trek.

    They put Joel in the Transporter, and after a malfunction two Joel are produced. A Linux Joel. And a Windows Joel.

    There is an episode ("The Enemy Within") where a transporter malfunction
    that splits Kirk into good and evil versions. They eventually discover
    they need each other.

    One of the early novels ("Spock Must Die") has the same thing happen to
    Spock.

    [snip]
    --
    105 days until the winter celebration (Thursday, December 25, 2025 12:00
    AM for 1 day).

    Mark Lloyd
    http://notstupid.us/

    "History has the relation to truth that theology has to religion -- i.e.
    none to speak of." [Lazarus Long]
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From -hh@recscuba_google@huntzinger.com to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Fri Sep 12 09:26:21 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 9/10/25 15:36, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
    On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 07:55:50 -0400, -hh wrote:

    Big talk from a PC user who's spent more trying to cobble together his
    cheap system than it would have just cost him to buy a more capable Mac
    mini...

    At least you *can* actually “cobble together” a Linux-running PC system from your choice of parts, instead of having to pick from the fixed set of choices that Apple offers.

    Sure, but as Joel's case study illustrates, it doesn't always cost tons
    less ... in his case, it cost more even before he fried his motherboard.


    And you can change your mind and upgrade bits afterwards, too, so it
    becomes “more capable” over time, than it was when you first got it.

    Sure, but this expansion argument is old and by today's standards very
    much overblown: most people buy laptops over desktops because their capabilities are good enough, plus these users never have any particular
    need or desire to upgrade like we did with desktops 30 years ago.

    As we've discussed before it is because PC technology improved to be
    "good enough" for mainstream: there no longer are big enough performance changes in new gear in each ~9 month new product release cycle for there
    to be a positive ROI for upgrading hardware that rapidly.

    With them now being more stable appliances, the market has changed to be
    to buy "as is" and run them effectively unchanged until they complete
    their tax depreciation life-cycles of 5+ years. Similarly, business IT department policies became that if one broke down out of warranty, it
    was more cost effective to just replace the entire laptop, not repair...

    ...and this technology transition point was passed over a decade ago; we
    all need to stop living in the past of our youth and accept that even if
    we have not, the world has changed around us.

    FYI, an implication of this is that if within a year of us buying new
    gear that we discover that it isn't good enough such that we need better
    gear, its not the fault of the product: it means that we failed in our
    user capability requirements assessment prior to buying.


    -hh



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.os.ms-windows.advocacy,comp.sys.mac.advocacy on Fri Sep 12 21:19:40 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On Fri, 12 Sep 2025 09:26:21 -0400, -hh wrote:

    On 9/10/25 15:36, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:

    And you can change your mind and upgrade bits afterwards, too, so it
    becomes “more capable” over time, than it was when you first got it.

    Sure, but this expansion argument is old and by today's standards very
    much overblown: most people buy laptops over desktops because their capabilities are good enough, plus these users never have any particular
    need or desire to upgrade like we did with desktops 30 years ago.

    Look at the success Framework has been having, with its upgradeable laptop concept.

    As we've discussed before it is because PC technology improved to be
    "good enough" for mainstream ...

    But look at Apple’s range: if you want a reasonably-priced model, you have to settle for less persistent storage, for example. You have to decide up front how much of that you will need. That’s why upgrading the hard drive
    or SSD is such a common aftermarket option.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2