• 10 Most Used Linux Distributions of All Time

    From Internetado@internetado@alt119.net to comp.os.linux.misc on Wed Mar 27 22:56:40 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    In this article, we will review the 10 most used Linux distributions
    based on the huge availability of software, ease of installation and
    use, and community support on web forums.

    https://www.linuxtoday.com/developer/10-most-used-linux-distributions-of-all-time-2/
    --
    [s]
    Internetado.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From John McCue@jmccue@magnetar.jmcunx.com to comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Mar 28 15:06:50 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    Internetado <internetado@alt119.net> wrote:
    In this article, we will review the 10 most used Linux distributions
    based on the huge availability of software, ease of installation and
    use, and community support on web forums.

    https://www.linuxtoday.com/developer/10-most-used-linux-distributions-of-all-time-2/


    Interesting but since it is titled "10 Most Used Linux
    Distributions of *All Time*", why Zorin or Elementary as
    opposed to Slackware.

    Nothing against those 2 distros, but in the 90s, in
    reality, there were really 2 Linuxes, Slackware and Debian.
    In the early days, Linux was Slackware then others started
    to get popular in the late 90s.
    --
    [t]csh(1) - "An elegant shell, for a more... civilized age."
    - Paraphrasing Star Wars
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Mar 28 20:13:42 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On 2024-03-28 16:06, John McCue wrote:
    Internetado <internetado@alt119.net> wrote:
    In this article, we will review the 10 most used Linux distributions
    based on the huge availability of software, ease of installation and
    use, and community support on web forums.

    https://www.linuxtoday.com/developer/10-most-used-linux-distributions-of-all-time-2/


    Interesting but since it is titled "10 Most Used Linux
    Distributions of *All Time*", why Zorin or Elementary as
    opposed to Slackware.

    Nothing against those 2 distros, but in the 90s, in
    reality, there were really 2 Linuxes, Slackware and Debian.
    In the early days, Linux was Slackware then others started
    to get popular in the late 90s.

    The section on openSUSE is not fully correct. I can't say about the
    other sections.

    First, it is openSUSE, not OpenSUSE. They spell it 3 times wrong and two correct.

    Then they say that the enterprise version is based on openSUSE. This is
    is not fully correct; it derives loosely from the factory version, but
    the free stable version, Leap, derives closely from the enterprise
    version (binary compatible). Things change over the years, though.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Eli the Bearded@*@eli.users.panix.com to comp.os.linux.misc on Thu Mar 28 20:38:45 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    In comp.os.linux.misc, John McCue <jmclnx@SPAMisBADgmail.com> wrote:
    Nothing against those 2 distros, but in the 90s, in
    reality, there were really 2 Linuxes, Slackware and Debian.
    In the early days, Linux was Slackware then others started
    to get popular in the late 90s.

    Debian is only a couple of months younger than Slackware. But earlly
    days I remember a lot more Yggdrasil than Debian.

    Elijah
    ------
    recalls using Redhat in late nineties
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From g@g@nowhere.invalid to comp.os.linux.misc on Fri Mar 29 10:01:08 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> wrote:
    In comp.os.linux.misc, John McCue <jmclnx@SPAMisBADgmail.com> wrote:
    Nothing against those 2 distros, but in the 90s, in
    reality, there were really 2 Linuxes, Slackware and Debian.
    In the early days, Linux was Slackware then others started
    to get popular in the late 90s.

    Debian is only a couple of months younger than Slackware. But earlly
    days I remember a lot more Yggdrasil than Debian.

    Oh boy, Yggdrasil! That brings me back, my first Linux installation from
    around 20 floppy on a Compaq with a massive (Massive! I say) 10MB HD.

    Elijah
    ------
    recalls using Redhat in late nineties

    And that was my second... I actually bought the box.

    G
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.misc on Fri Mar 29 10:52:45 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On 29/03/2024 10:01, G wrote:
    Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> wrote:
    In comp.os.linux.misc, John McCue <jmclnx@SPAMisBADgmail.com> wrote:
    Nothing against those 2 distros, but in the 90s, in
    reality, there were really 2 Linuxes, Slackware and Debian.
    In the early days, Linux was Slackware then others started
    to get popular in the late 90s.

    Debian is only a couple of months younger than Slackware. But earlly
    days I remember a lot more Yggdrasil than Debian.

    Oh boy, Yggdrasil! That brings me back, my first Linux installation from around 20 floppy on a Compaq with a massive (Massive! I say) 10MB HD.

    Elijah
    ------
    recalls using Redhat in late nineties

    And that was my second... I actually bought the box.

    G

    Only two versions I knew back in the day were Debian and Red Hat, a
    friend had SUSE.

    When the time came I tried out everything and Debian worked OK, but was lacking in desktop frills, so I tried Ubuntu, but for whatever reason
    the installation failed, so I tried mint Mate.

    And have never seen any reason to try anything else.
    --
    "And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch".

    Gospel of St. Mathew 15:14


    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Rich@rich@example.invalid to comp.os.linux.misc on Fri Mar 29 17:48:12 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 29/03/2024 10:01, G wrote:
    Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> wrote:
    In comp.os.linux.misc, John McCue <jmclnx@SPAMisBADgmail.com> wrote:
    Nothing against those 2 distros, but in the 90s, in reality, there
    were really 2 Linuxes, Slackware and Debian. In the early days,
    Linux was Slackware then others started to get popular in the late
    90s.

    Debian is only a couple of months younger than Slackware. But
    earlly days I remember a lot more Yggdrasil than Debian.

    Oh boy, Yggdrasil! That brings me back, my first Linux installation
    from around 20 floppy on a Compaq with a massive (Massive! I say)
    10MB HD.

    Elijah
    ------
    recalls using Redhat in late nineties

    And that was my second... I actually bought the box.

    Only two versions I knew back in the day were Debian and Red Hat, a
    friend had SUSE.

    When the time came I tried out everything and Debian worked OK, but
    was lacking in desktop frills, so I tried Ubuntu, but for whatever
    reason the installation failed, so I tried mint Mate.

    And have never seen any reason to try anything else.

    Began with SLS [1], installed Slackware when it first appeared as an "improved" SLS, still using Slackware (now V15) today.

    [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Softlanding_Linux_System
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Charlie Gibbs@cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid to comp.os.linux.misc on Sat Mar 30 17:00:57 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On 2024-03-29, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 29/03/2024 10:01, G wrote:

    Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> wrote:

    In comp.os.linux.misc, John McCue <jmclnx@SPAMisBADgmail.com> wrote:

    Nothing against those 2 distros, but in the 90s, in
    reality, there were really 2 Linuxes, Slackware and Debian.
    In the early days, Linux was Slackware then others started
    to get popular in the late 90s.

    Debian is only a couple of months younger than Slackware. But earlly
    days I remember a lot more Yggdrasil than Debian.

    Oh boy, Yggdrasil! That brings me back, my first Linux installation from
    around 20 floppy on a Compaq with a massive (Massive! I say) 10MB HD.

    Elijah
    ------
    recalls using Redhat in late nineties

    And that was my second... I actually bought the box.

    Only two versions I knew back in the day were Debian and Red Hat, a
    friend had SUSE.

    When the time came I tried out everything and Debian worked OK, but was lacking in desktop frills, so I tried Ubuntu, but for whatever reason
    the installation failed, so I tried mint Mate.

    And have never seen any reason to try anything else.

    The first Linux I ran was Slackware, for a simple pragmatic reason:
    I looked at the Linux books in the local bookstore, and the book I
    liked best was by Patrick Volkerding and came with a Slackware 3.5
    CD. I stayed with Slackware for some time, but eventually got tired
    of chasing dependencies when installing or updating software. Maybe
    it had a package manager, but I didn't know about it. At that point
    I tried a number of other distributions on my laptop, leaving my
    main machine alone until I made a decision. I stayed with CrunchBang
    (with BlackBox) for a while (lean and mean), then tried Mint, which
    was OK but had nothing that really excited me. Mageia didn't last
    long; KDE was beautiful but heavyweight, and I kept getting console
    messages from strange processes I had never asked for and didn't want.
    Ubuntu was pretty and easy to use, but release 10 went to the Unity
    desktop, which I didn't like. Eventually I settled on Debian (with
    Xfce) and have been happily there ever since.
    --
    /~\ Charlie Gibbs | The Internet is like a big city:
    \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | it has plenty of bright lights and
    X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | excitement, but also dark alleys
    / \ if you read it the right way. | down which the unwary get mugged.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From The Natural Philosopher@tnp@invalid.invalid to comp.os.linux.misc on Sat Mar 30 18:22:29 2024
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On 30/03/2024 17:00, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
    On 2024-03-29, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 29/03/2024 10:01, G wrote:

    Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> wrote:

    In comp.os.linux.misc, John McCue <jmclnx@SPAMisBADgmail.com> wrote:

    Nothing against those 2 distros, but in the 90s, in
    reality, there were really 2 Linuxes, Slackware and Debian.
    In the early days, Linux was Slackware then others started
    to get popular in the late 90s.

    Debian is only a couple of months younger than Slackware. But earlly
    days I remember a lot more Yggdrasil than Debian.

    Oh boy, Yggdrasil! That brings me back, my first Linux installation from >>> around 20 floppy on a Compaq with a massive (Massive! I say) 10MB HD.

    Elijah
    ------
    recalls using Redhat in late nineties

    And that was my second... I actually bought the box.

    Only two versions I knew back in the day were Debian and Red Hat, a
    friend had SUSE.

    When the time came I tried out everything and Debian worked OK, but was
    lacking in desktop frills, so I tried Ubuntu, but for whatever reason
    the installation failed, so I tried mint Mate.

    And have never seen any reason to try anything else.

    The first Linux I ran was Slackware, for a simple pragmatic reason:
    I looked at the Linux books in the local bookstore, and the book I
    liked best was by Patrick Volkerding and came with a Slackware 3.5
    CD. I stayed with Slackware for some time, but eventually got tired
    of chasing dependencies when installing or updating software. Maybe
    it had a package manager, but I didn't know about it. At that point
    I tried a number of other distributions on my laptop, leaving my
    main machine alone until I made a decision. I stayed with CrunchBang
    (with BlackBox) for a while (lean and mean), then tried Mint, which
    was OK but had nothing that really excited me. Mageia didn't last
    long; KDE was beautiful but heavyweight, and I kept getting console
    messages from strange processes I had never asked for and didn't want.
    Ubuntu was pretty and easy to use, but release 10 went to the Unity
    desktop, which I didn't like. Eventually I settled on Debian (with
    Xfce) and have been happily there ever since.

    I was watching a lot of video and listening to auidio as well and Mint
    came with all the right codecs installed

    That was key to my staying with it
    Debian +xfce is a neat choice if you don't want to run videos etc.
    --
    WOKE is an acronym... Without Originality, Knowledge or Education.

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114