On Oct 30, 2025 at 12:13:48 PM MST, ""David B."" wrote <mmhrncFkesiU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 30/10/2025 18:35, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 30, 2025 at 9:54:42 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mmhjiiFj3p8U1@mid.individual.net>:
On 30/10/2025 16:06, Brock McNuggets wrote:...
On Oct 30, 2025 at 9:01:43 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mmhgf8Fijr7U1@mid.individual.net>:
Gremlin says it is "lying" to quote him -- and he focuses on these two quotes
of his:
Gremlin <XnsAB6D6F1BFA61HT1@3dOIZISX3.IwU6R1OH8iz29MMTN26bF08TPFtT157gyFB5>:
-----
It needs to be recoded anyway, it's a seriously piss poor >>>>>> example of writing software.
-----
Gremlin <XnsAB6E44E6AFE1AHT1@ZdS859K14.7p1JRyU90Zyd>
-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're
provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're >>>>>> given looks nothing like the original source code, but it >>>>>> still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----
Those are his exact quotes... where he presented himself as having insider
info to Carroll's flood bot. Did he? Who knows? He has since backed away from
that idea. But his own inconsistencies is not OTHERS lying.
I checked out your MIDs
Here's one of them as a direct, clickable, link:-
https://al.howardknight.net/?ID=158278349300
Thank you. There is NO doubt he posted those things, unless he wants to say
someone was pretending to be him. But he does not say that -- he just says it
is a lie to say he said that and to actually (gasp!) understand what he said.
There is NO way with the info publicly known of Carroll's flood bot if it was
"a seriously piss poor example of writing software". It is one of the few
places Carroll has stood up to disagree with Gremlin (which is funny -- >>>> Carroll denies it is his but then gets defensive when Gremlin says that). And
you simply CANNOT disassemble something without having it TO disassemble. At
first I thought Gremlin changed the topic to code in general, but he has >>>> repeatedly denied it.
But now he denies what he says and claims to quote him, with MID, is to >>>> somehow "lie".
The things which sadden me most of all is that Dustin has never BEEN a >>> dad and (according to you) Steve is estranged from his children.
Having an active family life is one of the best joys of humanity.
It is not just me. How often does Carroll speak of his family?
NEVER!
In the past he used to from time to time.
There is a
reason for that. Keep in mind he has NOBODY making threats as Gremlin does >> against me, nor doxxing and lying about him as he (and Gremlin and others) do
against me.
I've never threatened you - or SC - or Gremlin!
Nor I. To the contrary, I have repeatedly noted I will NEVER sink to their level.
From what I have seen, since I mentioned that Jenna spoke to me he has backed
off. I will not say much about her -- publicly or privately -- based on her
request. He knows I respect requests of privacy. But she is the second person
in his personal circle to reach out to me based on his obsession.
Is Steve ill? He doesn't behave in a normal fashion.
He has some serious mental health issues -- addictions and obsessions. I know some of his past substance abuse issues and based on his online behavior think
they might still be a part of his life. I am not in continued contact with any
of his family (I never reach out first).
I only mention her name in Usenet because it is not a super common one and >> provides proof of having contact. I would have had no way of knowing who she
was or how she was connected to Carroll if she had not reached out.
*HOW* did "Jenna" reach out to you?
She found me on FB based on things Carroll talked about (and her own subsequent research). She shared some of his behavior behind the scenes. I gave very little personal opinion about him, but pointed her to some of his online posts (via Howard Knight). She was not surprised, but was appalled.
In article <6903bdbc$4$4166$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Oct 30, 2025 at 12:13:48 PM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mmhrncFkesiU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 30/10/2025 18:35, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Oct 30, 2025 at 9:54:42 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mmhjiiFj3p8U1@mid.individual.net>:
On 30/10/2025 16:06, Brock McNuggets wrote:...
On Oct 30, 2025 at 9:01:43 AM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mmhgf8Fijr7U1@mid.individual.net>:
Gremlin says it is "lying" to quote him -- and he focuses on these two quotes
of his:
Gremlin <XnsAB6D6F1BFA61HT1@3dOIZISX3.IwU6R1OH8iz29MMTN26bF08TPFtT157gyFB5>:
-----
It needs to be recoded anyway, it's a seriously piss poor >>>>>>>> example of writing software.
-----
Gremlin <XnsAB6E44E6AFE1AHT1@ZdS859K14.7p1JRyU90Zyd>
-----
Do you think when you disassemble something that you're >>>>>>>> provided the original source code that was
compiled/assembled by the author? You aren't, what you're >>>>>>>> given looks nothing like the original source code, but it >>>>>>>> still tells you *everything* about the program.
-----
Those are his exact quotes... where he presented himself as having insider
info to Carroll's flood bot. Did he? Who knows? He has since backed away from
that idea. But his own inconsistencies is not OTHERS lying.
I checked out your MIDs
Here's one of them as a direct, clickable, link:-
https://al.howardknight.net/?ID=158278349300
Thank you. There is NO doubt he posted those things, unless he wants to say
someone was pretending to be him. But he does not say that -- he just says it
is a lie to say he said that and to actually (gasp!) understand what he said.
There is NO way with the info publicly known of Carroll's flood bot if it was
"a seriously piss poor example of writing software". It is one of the few
places Carroll has stood up to disagree with Gremlin (which is funny -- >>>>>> Carroll denies it is his but then gets defensive when Gremlin says that). And
you simply CANNOT disassemble something without having it TO disassemble. At
first I thought Gremlin changed the topic to code in general, but he has >>>>>> repeatedly denied it.
But now he denies what he says and claims to quote him, with MID, is to >>>>>> somehow "lie".
The things which sadden me most of all is that Dustin has never BEEN a >>>>> dad and (according to you) Steve is estranged from his children.
Having an active family life is one of the best joys of humanity.
It is not just me. How often does Carroll speak of his family?
NEVER!
In the past he used to from time to time.
There is a
reason for that. Keep in mind he has NOBODY making threats as Gremlin does >>>> against me, nor doxxing and lying about him as he (and Gremlin and others) do
against me.
I've never threatened you - or SC - or Gremlin!
Nor I. To the contrary, I have repeatedly noted I will NEVER sink to their >> level.
Of course not.
You have already sunk to a level far below any other
poster.
You have landed in the bottom of the cesspool snit.
From what I have seen, since I mentioned that Jenna spoke to me he has backed
off. I will not say much about her -- publicly or privately -- based on her
request. He knows I respect requests of privacy. But she is the second person
in his personal circle to reach out to me based on his obsession.
Is Steve ill? He doesn't behave in a normal fashion.
He has some serious mental health issues -- addictions and obsessions. I know
some of his past substance abuse issues and based on his online behavior think
they might still be a part of his life. I am not in continued contact with any
of his family (I never reach out first).
I do not see either of them asking for advice for mixing
script drugs on public forums.
Yet you have snit.
Multiple times in fact.
I don't see either of them posting to mental health forums
where you admit to carrying around a teddy bear to comfort
you.
You you do snit.
So who is the person suffering from drug abuse and mental
health issues?
Hint: the person lives in Prescott Arizona.
Look in the mirror for the answer snit.
I only mention her name in Usenet because it is not a super common one and >>>> provides proof of having contact. I would have had no way of knowing who she
was or how she was connected to Carroll if she had not reached out.
*HOW* did "Jenna" reach out to you?
She found me on FB based on things Carroll talked about (and her own
subsequent research). She shared some of his behavior behind the scenes. I >> gave very little personal opinion about him, but pointed her to some of his >> online posts (via Howard Knight). She was not surprised, but was appalled.
LMAO!
This one tops your explanation for socking up as sigmond
where you claimed someone snuck into your home and somehow
figured out how to post messages to usenet from your
computer.
How stupid do you think people are snit?
So you expect people to believe your fairy tale of some
relative named Jenna who contacted you and just happens to
know about usenet, HK and your claims against Steve?
That is laughable snit.
And almost as laughable as your Ryan Sullivan sock puppet.
BTW, where Ryan these days?
How about Sigmond?
Tmelmosfire?
Desk Rabbit?
Larry Washington?
Walmart Jeramy?
And dozens of other sock puppets you have posted as?
Why do they all, everyone of them, seem to disappear once
outed?
On 2025-10-31, Creon <creon@creon.earth> wrote:
At Fri, 31 Oct 2025 12:24:02 -0000 (UTC), Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noone.none> wrote:
On 2025-10-31, David B. <BD@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
On 30/10/2025 22:28, Apd wrote:
"David B." wrote:
On 30/10/2025 21:28, Apd wrote:
"David B." wrote:
On 30/10/2025 20:30, David B. wrote:
https://i.ibb.co/qFJjYSqh/Screenshot-2025-10-30-at-20-44-33.png >>>>>>>>
Progress?
Yes. From that you should easily see the answer to the rhyme.
What is it.
*Inspiron*
At last, although SC had already posted it.
I had to do it for myself!
You copied and pasted it for yourself. It's obvious you read our
posts, you immediately went from 38 Special's "Unison" to the win ;)
P.S. Why are you encouraging Glasser's mental illness (that even *YOU*
have recognized on multiple occasions)? Make up a puzzle for us to try
(any time you spend doing stuff like 'this' is time you don't spend
doing stuff like 'that'... you lose at 'that').
Because he's mentally-ill himself.
I don't believe he's anywhere near Glasser's level (save for some of his paranoia).
Threatening posters with firearms? Glad they searched his house.
I actually tracked that post down at one point... and, 'yes' to your
comment that Glasser essentially has no problem with *whatever* DSB
('Double Standard Brooks') says or does. Notably, in the other
direction, DSB has called out Glasser numerous times... then he
'forgets' (trolls).
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,075 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 90:40:50 |
| Calls: | 13,798 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 186,989 |
| D/L today: |
5,347 files (1,540M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,438,213 |
