Andrew <andys@nospam.com> wrote:
They think these facts will go away if they call people an "it".
Who is that stupid?
When I was growing up, those who were not clearly a “he” or “she” were
often referred to as an “it”. With the prevalence of transsexuals and wokism today, not to mention DEI initiatives in the federal and corporate worlds, people have been indoctrinated into the idea that there are more physical genders than just male and female. Yet when you go to the doctor’s office and fill out forms, they always want to know what your real sex is
and not what you want to be “identified” as.
In any case, since this is Usenet and it’s hard to actually see people, he may be using gender ambiguous terms such as “it” to describe people he doesn’t really know. Maybe he’s trying to be respectful in the same manner
as when someone addresses a lady as Ms. rather than Miss or Mrs. when not knowing their marital status.
Or maybe you’re actually right about him and I’m wrong to give him the benefit of the doubt.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2024-11-29 04:20, badgolferman wrote:
Andrew <andys@nospam.com> wrote:
They think these facts will go away if they call people an "it".
Who is that stupid?
When I was growing up, those who were not clearly a “he” or “she” were
often referred to as an “it”. With the prevalence of transsexuals and >>> wokism today, not to mention DEI initiatives in the federal and corporate >>> worlds, people have been indoctrinated into the idea that there are more >>> physical genders than just male and female. Yet when you go to the doctor’s
office and fill out forms, they always want to know what your real sex is >>> and not what you want to be “identified” as.
In any case, since this is Usenet and it’s hard to actually see people, he
may be using gender ambiguous terms such as “it” to describe people he >>> doesn’t really know. Maybe he’s trying to be respectful in the same manner
as when someone addresses a lady as Ms. rather than Miss or Mrs. when not >>> knowing their marital status.
Or maybe you’re actually right about him and I’m wrong to give him the >>> benefit of the doubt.
That you would be bigoted about trans people seems completely on-brand
for you.
I don’t think it’s kind and loving to lie to people with mental health issues.
Just the other day I had to fill out paperwork for an online pharmacy and also paperwork for a Red Cross blood donation. They both asked for my assigned sex at birth. That pretty much tells you what the medical field thinks about it.
Your Name wrote on Sat, 30 Nov 2024 12:50:47 +1300 :
I think it's funny when the Apple trolls assume I hate Apple or that I >>>> don't own plenty of Apple products since they assume anyone who knows
what's s anything about Apple must not own any Apple products. They're strange.
What's strange is you hate Apple and keep buying their products!
Even if he wasn't already a well-known moronic troll, anyone who thinks
$250 is a "stocking stuffer" is obviously an insane idiot anyway.
It's well known on this newsgroup for years that I've given out electronics as stocking stuffers, and that I own plenty of Apple products myself.
That's why I find it intriguing that you Apple trolls constantly claim that
I know so much about Apple products because you think I don't own them.
Only Apple trolls are *that* stupid.
But I understand why you Apple trolls say that.
It's because it's you Apple trolls who hate what Apple is - not me.
So to make the truth about Apple go away, you low IQ uneducated Apple
trolls come up with the first childish excuse you can think of.
Which is that you state I can't possibly own Apple products simply because
I know so much more about them than any of you Apple trolls who own them.
But the fact simply is you Apple trolls know nothing about anything.
| Sysop: | DaiTengu |
|---|---|
| Location: | Appleton, WI |
| Users: | 1,075 |
| Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
| Uptime: | 81:56:22 |
| Calls: | 13,797 |
| Files: | 186,989 |
| D/L today: |
1,479 files (498M bytes) |
| Messages: | 2,441,057 |