• Re: ----JAN BURSE BARRED FROM comp.lang.prolog ---- RFD

    From Archimedes Plutonium@plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com to comp.lang.prolog on Wed Apr 26 22:28:34 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.prolog

    Kibo on Rensselaer Polytech as splitter splatter fart shittee. Why Kibo? Is it because they kicked you out with your moron 938 is 12% short of 945??
    On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 10:01:43 AM UTC-5, Michael Moroney wrote: >"Splitter-Splatter-Fart-Shittee"
    Kibo on Rensselaer's "howling crazy fuckdog" Drs.Persans,Schroeder,Shur for failing Kibo with his 938 is 12% short of 945
    On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 10:21:48 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    "Putin's minion"
    "howling crazy fuckdog"
    Re: 1.2-Did Kibo-Parry-Maroney fail Rensselaer or was kicked out due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938, the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole
    by Patricio J. Whackmember Sep 13, 2019, 5:43:28 PM
    Re: 1.9-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton=840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Korniss,Toh-Ming Lu,Martin
    By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:57:15 AM
    Re: 2.0-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Michael,Newberg,N'Gom
    By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:57 AM
    Kibo on his 30 years Kook monitor when Kibo is the largest kook in the world. Re: 2.1-Did Kibo-Parry-Moroney fail Rensselaer due to such math failings as percentage-- kibo's 938 is 12% short of 945// and why Rensselaer cannot confirm real proton is 840MeV not 938; .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, why Drs.Persans,Schroeder,Shur
    By Dingus Dirtbag McGee Sep 15, 2019, 9:56:39 AM Beijing,Moscow▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂ mushroom cloud, Xi as Putin's stooge when Russia vaporizes Shanghai with its RS-28 Sarmat "Satan II", all because Xi was too dumb to realize you can never trust an insane person
    Kibo aka Moroney aka Volney
    On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 9:35:06 PM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    On 4/26/2023 2:45 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    Kibo, what is the translation in Russian and Chinese of your word Kook??? Russian = "chudak"
    Chinese = "Fengzi"
    Now starting with chudak to English = weirdo
    Now starting with Fengzi to English = madman

    MitchR is Haishenwai eternal for Xi and the Chinese Communist party?
    On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 1:03:45 PM UTC-5, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
    On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 10:32:55 AM UTC-7, Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
    Xi masses troops on Russian border to take back Outer Manchuria. If you do not know the history, Russia stole Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok from China.

    MitchR, is this the same Baby Xi, surrounded by concubines in the reeds and meadows of Haishenwai?

    ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
    Radio Wave & Laser Rifle to shoot down GLONASS and BeiDou satellites >>>>
    Xi masses troops on Russian border to take back Outer Manchuria. If you do not know the history, Russia stole Outer Manchuria and Vladivostok from China.

    While Putin is too busy with his personal war, Xi thinks time is ripe to get back what belongs to China in the first place. OUTER MANCHURIA and especially Vladivostok.

    Xi gives the Chinese people a Christmas gift--- Outer Manchuria-- the beloved Old China

    I am not positive we can take out GLONASS and BeiDou from ground based radio and microwaves and laser waves, even jamming.

    But I am certain that we can put a satellite in orbit that is a wrecking ramming satellite that does take out GLONASS and BeiDou. I am certain of this because several countries have robotic satellites that maintenance their fleet of satellites. And to this end, we need such a wrecking ball satellite immediately up there.

    [Note, graphics found in sci.physics when Nomen Nescio used to spam sci.physics with a fake FAQ.]



    ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
    ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
    I███████████████████].
    ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...
    Satellite RIFLE to shoot down GLONASS, Iran,and BeiDou satellites.
    Hooray

    Hooray!! End the Ukraine war

    Easiest way to end the Ukraine invasion by Russia, start felling GLONASS satellites, fell them directly with radar laser pulses or jam them to fall.

    Now I thought GLONASS Russian satellites numbered in the thousands, for the Internet is lousy on this question of how many satellites, for recently BBC was vague with a estimate of 600 satellites, yet another web site said 42,000. But apparently only 24 are operational for GLONASS. And my take on this is that satellites are precarious vessels and easily for something to go wrong and be inoperative. All the better to look for flaws in engineering to down all 24 GLONASS Russian satellites.

    So, easy easy Achilles tendon in all of the Russian ICBM military strategy, for knock out the 24 and you in a sense, knock out the entire Russian ICBM arsenal, for they no longer have any navigation.

    And if the West is on its top shape and form in technology, we want the West Scientists to figure out how to intercept the Russian ICBM and cause it to fall upon Russia and explode upon Russia.

    Get the best electronics and electrical engineers of the West to figure out how to cause all Russian launched and Chinese launched ICBMs to explode on home territory.

    Caveat: if the West can do it, mind you, the Chinese and Russians will want to steal those secrets from the West and that should never be allowed--Ultimate Top Secret classification that not even a punk weirdo president like Trump cannot see, nor mention to him for he would likely sell it for a golf course in some foreign enemy country.

    Google search reveals
    24+
    GLONASS (Globalnaya Navigazionnaya Sputnikovaya Sistema, or Global Navigation Satellite System) is a global GNSS owned and operated by the Russian Federation. The fully operational system consists of 24+ satellites.Oct 19, 2021

    Other Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) - GPS.govhttps://www.gps.gov › systems › gnss
    About featured snippets

    Feedback
    People also ask
    How many satellites are in the GLONASS?
    As of 15 October 2022, 143 GLONASS navigation satellites have been launched, of which 131 reached the correct orbit and 24 are currently operational.

    List of GLONASS satellites - Wikipediahttps://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › List_of_GLONASS_sa...
    Search for: How many satellites are in the GLONASS?
    Archimedes Plutonium's profile photo
    Archimedes Plutonium
    Nov 5, 2022, 11:02:21 PM
    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
    Radio Wave--Laser Rifle felling BeiDou satellites

    From what I gather on internet, Russia has 24 satellites in operation while BeiDou China has 35.
    ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
    I███████████████████].
    ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...
    Radio Wave-- LASER RIFLE to shoot down the premier BeiDou satellite. >>>> Ending the dumb and stupid petty dictators launching rockets from North Korea.

    It is respectfully request help from engineers in Japan to help fell the BeiDou satellites that navigate the illegal North Korea launches.


    --- quoting Wikipedia ---
    The BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS; Chinese: 北斗卫星导航系统; pinyin: Běidǒu Wèixīng Dǎoháng Xìtǒng) is a Chinese satellite navigation system. It consists of two separate satellite constellations. The first BeiDou system, officially called the BeiDou Satellite Navigation Experimental System and also known as BeiDou-1, consisted of three satellites which, beginning in 2000, offered limited coverage and navigation services, mainly for users in China and neighboring regions. BeiDou-1 was decommissioned at the end of 2012. The second generation of the system, officially called the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS) and also known as COMPASS or BeiDou-2, became operational in China in December 2011 with a partial constellation of 10 satellites in orbit. Since December 2012, it has been offering services to customers in the Asia-Pacific region.

    In 2015, China launched the third generation BeiDou system (BeiDou-3) for global coverage. The first BDS-3 satellite was launched on 30 March 2015. On 27 December 2018, BeiDou Navigation Satellite System started providing global services. The 35th and the final satellite of BDS-3 was launched into orbit on 23 June 2020. It was said in 2016 that BeiDou-3 will reach millimeter-level accuracy (with post-processing). On 23 June 2020, the final BeiDou satellite was successfully launched, the launch of the 55th satellite in the Beidou family. The third iteration of the Beidou Navigation Satellite System provides full global coverage for timing and navigation, offering an alternative to Russia's GLONASS, the European Galileo positioning system, and the US's GPS.

    According to China Daily, in 2015, fifteen years after the satellite system was launched, it was generating a turnover of $31.5 billion per annum for major companies such as China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation, AutoNavi Holdings Ltd., and China North Industries Group Corp. The industry has grown an average of over 20% in value annually to reach $64 billion in 2020 according to Xinhua citing data.

    Domestic industry reports forecast the satellite navigation service market output value, directly generated and driven by the Beidou system, will be worth 1 trillion yuan ($156.22 billion) by 2025, and $467 billion by 2035.

    Archimedes Plutonium
    Nov 5, 2022, 11:20:20 PM
    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
    Radio Wave--Laser Rifle felling Iran satellites

    From what I gather on internet, Russia has 24 satellites in operation while BeiDou China has 35, that would indicate Iran has but a few satellites.
    ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
    I███████████████████].
    ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...
    Radio Wave-- LASER RIFLE to shoot down the premier BeiDou satellite. >>>>> Ending the dumb and stupid petty dictator sending drones to Russia to down Ukraine power utility electric lines.

    How many of the Iran satellites are used in drones destroying Ukraine electric grid. We should immediately fell those satellites.

    --- quoting Wikipedia on Iran satellites ---
    On 22 April 2020, Iran successfully launched "Noor" (Farsi for "Light"), a military satellite, into a 426 x 444 km / 59.8° orbit.

    On 8 March 2022, Iran reportedly sent its second “Nour-2” military satellite into 500 km orbit.[55][56]
    The Khayyam, a high resolution imaging satellite, was successfully launched into orbit by a Russian Soyuz rocket on 9 August 2022
    Unlaunched satellites
    Nahid (1), satellite with folding solar panels.
    Toloo, is the first of a new generation of reconnaissance satellites being built by Iran Electronics Industries with SIGINT capabilities. It will be launched by a Simorgh.
    Nasir 1, Iran's indigenously designed satellite navigation system (SAT NAV) has been manufactured to find the precise locations of satellites moving in orbit.

    Zohreh, is a geosynchronous communication satellite which was originally proposed before the Revolution in the 1970s as part of a joint Indian-Iranian project of four Iranian satellites to be launched by the then upcoming NASA Space Shuttles. Iran had also negotiated with France to build and launch the satellites but the project never materialized. In 2005, Iran negotiated with Russia to build and launch the first Zohreh satellite under an agreement worth $132 million with the satellite launch date stipulated as 2007–2008. The new agreement had followed the earlier failed negotiations with Russia in 2003 when Russia cancelled the project under US pressures.
    Ekvator, a geosynchronous communications satellite built by ISS Reshetnev for Iran in a continuation of previous Russia-Iran space cooperation efforts. As of October 2022, Ekvator is expected to be launched on a Proton-M rocket in early 2024.


    Archimedes Plutonium
    Nov 5, 2022, 11:38:31 PM
    to Plutonium Atom Universe
    ███۞███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▃
    Radio Wave--Laser Rifle felling North Korean satellites

    From what I gather on internet, Russia has 24 satellites in operation while BeiDou China has 35, that would indicate Iran has but a few satellites. And North Korea fewer yet.


    ▂▄▅█████████▅▄▃▂
    I███████████████████].
    ◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤...

    Radio Wave-- LASER RIFLE to shoot down the 3 North Korean satellites. >>>>

    Ending the dumb and stupid petty dictator with his endless illegal missile launches. Launches that do nothing of good for anyone. Not even the idiot petty dictator.

    Internet search reveals 3 satellites for North Korea. I suspect though, that North Korea launches Chinese missiles and uses BeiDou satellites.

    Kwangmyongsong -4

    Kwangmyongsong -3

    Kwangmyongsong -2

    Knock all 3 satellites out with the radio-Laser Wave gun. And that will put an end to the petty dictators toys.

    Asking for help from Japan in assistance.

    Two Ellipses are eternal. cylinder and conic...
    hyperbola does not manifest as a real world curve.

    Kookfight!!!!!
    Kibo the 30 year stalker kook, failure of science, Rensselaer kicked him out for his 938 is 12% short of 945. Think of that giving a kook like Kibo a degree in engineering and he fails percentages, something that High School kids master, not Kibo.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Archimedes Plutonium@plutonium.archimedes@gmail.com to comp.lang.prolog on Sun Apr 30 07:51:26 2023
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.prolog

    Jan Burse why cannot Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, help Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else turn the light switch off in Slow Light rather than play ad hominem games.
    Re: 2-PHYSICSOPEDIA -- List of 132 fakes and mistakes of Old Physics. AP's 175th book; soon to be published as a Kindle book. Last revision was 3Oct2021. Latest correction and revision was the error found in Electromagnetic theory of their units.
    18 views
    by Jan Burse aka Mostowski Collapse
    Mostowski Collapse's profile photo
    Mostowski Collapse
    Oct 4, 2021, 7:47:16 AM
    Kibo's>I want to fuck her corpse>Heidi Jo Newberg,Elizabeth Kam,Esther A. Wertz,Kristin Bennett
    On Sunday, April 30, 2023 at 12:02:51 AM UTC-5, Volney wrote:
    I want to fuck her corpse
    The never ending stalker and character defiler, paid to stalk Kibo Parry aka Moroney-Volney along with his friend and ally Jan Burse, 30 years nonstop attack on others.
    Why Kibo, because no-one at Rensselaer can admit slant cut of cone is Oval not ellipse. Or because no-one at Rensselaer can ask the question, which is the Atom's true electron-- muon or 0.5MeV particle??
    On Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 12:08:26 PM UTC-5, j4n bur53 wrote:
    Re: _Donald Schwendeman, Rensselaer,Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Joseph Ecker, is the reason you failed to confirm .5MeV was not the atom's electron but Dirac's monopole because you failed science like kibo

    Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Physics dept
    Vincent Meunier, Ethan Brown, Glenn Ciolek, Julian S. Georg, Joel T. Giedt, Yong Sung Kim, Gyorgy Korniss, Toh-Ming Lu, Charles Martin, Joseph Darryl Michael, Heidi Jo Newberg, Moussa N'Gom, Peter Persans, John Schroeder, Michael Shur, Shawn-Yu Lin, Humberto Terrones, Gwo Ching Wang, Morris A Washington, Esther A. Wertz, Christian M. Wetzel, Ingrid Wilke, Shengbai Zhang

    Rensselaer math department
    Donald Schwendeman, Jeffrey Banks, Kristin Bennett, Mohamed Boudjelkha, Joseph Ecker, William Henshaw, Isom Herron, Mark H Holmes, David Isaacson, Elizabeth Kam, Ashwani Kapila, Maya Kiehl, Gregor Kovacic, Peter Kramer, Gina Kucinski, Rongjie Lai, Fengyan Li, Chjan Lim, Yuri V Lvov, Harry McLaughlin, John E. Mitchell, Bruce Piper, David A Schmidt, Daniel Stevenson, Yangyang Xu, Bulent Yener, Donald Drew, William Siegmann


    Instead of doing Physics where AP proves that Light Waves are pencil ellipse closed loop circuits not straightline arrow rays, both Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Else want to play games of ad hominem. Whenever physics proves AP is correct, neither Harvard's Dr. Hau nor Berkeley's Sylvia Else want to complete or perform the experiment because they do not want to credit AP. They want physics such that it gives credit to those people they like. Just the opposite of what Feynman warned of-- physics does not care who the person is that discovers the truth. But in modern times, physics at Harvard, MIT, Berkeley is first concern is who gets credit and the actual physics involved-- be damned.

    So, Dr. Hau and Sylvia-- why not learn to do the physics rather than your utter hatred of AP.

    Time for Harvard's Dr. Hau to finish her experiment, or have UC Berkeley Sylvia Else finish the experiment.

    The Internet indicates a Sylvia Else is a physics graduate of Berkeley.

    So then, Berkeley has to stand up to the challenge that AP throws into their court yard. I throw into your court yard that if Harvard's Dr. Hau set up her slow light experiment. And sees a column of slow light in BEC medium with entrance light at normal speed and exit light at normal speed, only the BEC cold region with slow light. Now, now Dr. Hau, now Sylvia Else, turn the source light off. And to your fascination and the fascination of the entire world, watch and see that the slow light vanishes instantly along with the normal fast light. The entire column of light vanishes simultaneously.

    Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Sylvia? Why does it vanish all at once Dr. Hau? Why does it vanish all at once Harvard Univ and Berkeley physics? Why does it vanish all at once simultaneously Berkeley UC?

    It vanishes all at once because light waves are closed loop circuits around a source and no matter how fast those closed loop circuits in a region of the circuit, the moment the source is gone -- the entire light is gone.

    Dumb and ignorant Harvard Dr. Hau and dumb and ignorant Berkeley Sylvia Else think Light Waves are arrow like single rays with a head and tail on a arrow ray. But that is only because they are ignorant in physics. They cannot turn off the light for it proves AP correct-- that the Light Wave is a closed loop circuit with the source of the light always in the closed loop circuit. So if and when those two incompetents Dr. Hau and Sylvia Else turn off the light source, all the light the fast light the Slow Light, the fast light exiting the BEC medium, all the Light vanishes simultaneously.

    The ignorant Hau and Else think that the SLOW LIGHT will still be visible, still be crawling slow in the BEC. But no, it vanishes instantly as all the other light from that source. But Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else do not want to report that truth, no, they want to never report any true science that is connected with Archimedes Plutonium, because Harvard's Dr. Hau and Berkeley's Sylvia Else are not scientists at all-- but suppression jerks.

    What have we proven here Sylvia? What have we proven here Harvard's Dr. Hau. You have proven that light waves, like electricity are closed loop circuits, like a hoola hoop. And this is the reason you can have light as a constant maximum speed, yet slow light down in a region of the circuit of light.

    So, Harvard's Dr. Hau, get off your lazy butt and complete your experiment, throw the switch off-- and see for yourself that light all vanishes simultaneously. And report your experiment to the world-- that light is a closed loop circuit, not what you believed all along before-- light is a single ray with head and tail. No, light was never a single ray of head of tail, like a arrow. Light is like a closed loop circuit, a pencil ellipse.

    Or have Sylia Else in Berkeley California set up the slow light experiment and have Sylvia finish and complete the experiment.

    Times a wasting, with your chit chat Sylvia, time for you to roll up your sleeves and burn the midnight oil.

    AP, King of Science, especially Physics

    Re: a second forgery post by Jan Burse-- time to pull the plug on him
    by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse) Feb 24, 2017, 6:00:53 AM


    Re: someone in sci.math is using the trick of delaying AP posts from reaching the viewing board--
    by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse)
    Dec 24, 2018, 4:33:44 PM


    Re: 2Terence Tao flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
    by Mostowski Collapse (Jan Burse)
    Jun 9, 2018, 6:35:36 PM

    Re: Proof of Kepler Packing//Jan Burse-Alzheimer faggot//ETH Zurich, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, looking at it
    by Dan Christensen Jul 9, 2017, 11:34:05 PM

    Re: Shit for brains in Logic Morons of logic George Boole, William Jevons, Bertrand Russell, Kurt Godel, Rudolf Carnap, Jan Burse& Dan Christensen as moronette cadets of Boole, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Willard Quine, Alfred North Whitehead, Irving Copi
    by zelos...@gmail.com Mar 25, 2021, 12:55:15 AM


    Re: Zurich's ETH Dr.Thomas Willwacher's stupid all his life in teaching Calculus, never a picture diagram of FTC// as evidence- Jan Burse
    4 posts by 3 authors
    12/13/17
    by Dan Christensen


    Re: Thomas Hales flunked the Math Test of a lifetime-generation test
    By Jan 25 posts 653 views updated 2:26 PM


    John Baez, Ben Bullock, Edward Witten missed the boat on Angular Momentum, but do they deserve a hate-sheet each and every day from Moroney, Christensen, Burse et al
    by j4n bur53 12/29/18




    Apr 11
    Re: Dr.Giovanni Felder, Zurich ETH, Jan Burse says that farting is taught before geometry, after counting in Switzerland/is that true??
    By Jan 3 posts 35 views updated 2:59 AM


    Re: Dr.Tom Ilmanen Zurich ETH, Jan Burse asks if you read Page10 of Atom Totality Re: PAGE10, 1-10, Evidence....
    By Jan 5 posts 27 views updated 2:52 AM

    Re: Jan Burse says ETH is a wheelchair Walter Thurnherr, Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg //no picture diagram of Calculus proof// still believing proton is 938MeV electron .5MeV when they are 840MeV, 105MeV
    By Jan 7 posts 45 views updated 2:41 AM


    Drs.Martin Schweizer,Mete Soner,Michael Struwe-- Zurich ETH, are you as dumb in Calculus, no Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, as is math failure Jan Burse??
    by
    Zelos Malum
    12/30/17



    Re: 1Why cannot John Baez, Ben Bullock, Edward Witten ever have a thread in usenet without a hate sheet from the insane troop Christensen,Moroney,Jan Burse, Jan Bielawski,qwbr,Franz,Eastside,Zelos Malum,Earle Jones,Konyberg?
    6 posts by 5 authors
    12/29/18
    by j4n bur53



    Re: John Baez, Ben Bullock, Edward Witten missed the boat on Angular Momentum, but do they deserve a hate-sheet each and every day from Moroney, Christensen, Burse et al
    12/29/18
    by j4n bur53


    Re: Andrew Beal owes Archimedes Plutonium $1 million in prize money for proving Generalized Fermat's Last Theorem
    54 posts by 4 authors
    8/1/18
    by j4n bur53


    Re: 8) Is Princeton's John Conway, Gabriele Di Cerbo, Hansheng Diao, Theodore Drivas as dumb as John Gabriel, unable to ever recognize the flaws of sqrt2 irrational
    By j4n bur53 10 posts 53 views updated 2:40 PM



    Re: 4- Is ETH Zurich's Wendelin Werner, Thomas Willwacher, as dumb and stupid as Jan Burse, who cannot even complete a division
    3 posts by 2 authors
    10/15/17
    by j4n bur53


    Re: 4) ETH Zurich, Paul Biran, not a single line of math for 30 years, asks Jan Burse// I am just trying to confirm that the Oval is a conic, never an ellipse
    3 posts by 2 authors
    9/27/17
    by Jan On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 2:17:36 AM UTC-7,

    Re: World's 4 dumbest math Abel Prize winners-- Wiles, Deligne, Grothendieck, Milnor
    4 posts by 3 authors
    3/7/17
    by j4n bur53

    Re: ETH Zurich student math guide// math failure Jan Burse (is he Swiss) mocking everyone
    6 posts by 5 authors
    9/6/17
    by j4n bur53


    Re: Andrew Beal owes Archimedes Plutonium $1 million for proof of Generalized FLT, and no charge for throwing out Trigonometry unto math garbage dump
    6 posts by 3 authors
    8/3/18
    by Jan

    Re: Drs.Michael Floater, Kim Froyshov, Bjorn Gjevik of Oslo Univ.-never a Picture of Fundamental Theorem of Calculus//are you as dumb as Konyberg about calculus//your students deserve better
    2 posts by 2 authors
    12/30/17
    by j4n bur53

    Re: Gregory Berkolaiko, Harold Boas, Kathryn Bollinger, Texas A&M, are you stupid as Garry Denke who thinks a ellipse is a conic section when it never was-- the oval is the slant cut in a cone (see proof below)
    4 posts by 4 authors
    Feb 3
    by j4n bur53

    Re: _Gunnar Carlsson, Moses Charikar, Sourav Chatterjee, Stanford Univ are you as stupid and screwed up as Erik Eastside over trigonometry, never realizing the sine function is actually a semicircle wave? See proof below
    2 posts by 2 authors
    Feb 3
    by j4n bur53

    Re: Karoly Holczer, Huan Huang, Eric Hudson, George Igo, of UCLA// Is the reason you have not confirmed the true proton is 840MeV, true electron=muon= 105MeV and the .5MeV particle is Dirac's monopole, because time spent on spamming robot Reber??
    2 posts by 2 authors
    Feb 3
    by j4n bur53


    Re: 4Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS, seller Jan Burse
    26 posts by 5 authors
    7/25/17
    by j4n bur53

    Re: 7Der_FartMouth Births-comics for Eric FartFrancis, with snickering by George FartWitte published by ST FARTMARTINS
    29 posts by 3 authors
    12/27/17
    by Jan




    AP writes: I do not know what the definition of petty criminal is-- but I see it as anyone who cuts into the time of another person, having to chase their deeds down and fix the situation, such as ripping out my Wikipedia site, or forgery to Math Stack Exchange.

    Here is where petty criminal Jan Burse tore down Archimedes Plutonium wikipedia page

    • (cur | prev) 14:09, 6 March 2017‎ DMacks (talk | contribs)‎ . . (20,500 bytes) (+1,287)‎ . . (unexplained removal of on-topic and somewhat-cited content Undid revision 768910666 by Janburse (talk)) (undo)
    • (cur | prev) 13:51, 6 March 2017‎ Janburse (talk | contribs)‎ . . (19,213 bytes) (-1,287)‎ . . (→‎Eccentric believers) (undo)

    At about the same time as Burse tearing down AP's Wikipedia page a forgery in the name of Archimedes Plutonium to Math Stack Exchange, MSE, in that same year, and since both Burse and Christensen posted to sci.math saying they approved of the forgery makes one suspicious that Burse and Christensen are connected to the forgery::

    Here is the nonsense appearing under my name---

    Archimedes Plutonium
    438 ●10
    Profile
    Activity
    This user has not filled their about me section yet.
    4
    answers
    20
    questions
    ~1k
    people reached
    Communities (2)
    Mathematics
    438 ●10
    MathOverflow
    101 ●3
    Top Tags (12)
    complex-analysis
    10
    score
    14
    posts
    58
    posts %
    proof-verification
    6
    score
    15
    posts
    62
    posts %
    proof-writing
    4
    score
    9
    posts
    38
    posts %
    real-analysis
    3
    score
    3
    posts
    12
    posts %
    uniform-convergence
    1
    score
    2
    posts
    8
    posts %
    absolute-convergence
    1
    score
    2
    posts
    8
    posts %
    View all tags →
    Top Posts (24)
    Sort
    8
    Prove that ∑∞n=0anzn
    n
    0

    a
    n
    z
    n
    converges absolutely and uniformly in D
    D
    .
    Sep 5 '17
    4
    Munkres Topology, page 102, question 19:a
    Sep 5 '17
    4
    What is the closure of (0,1)
    0
    1
    in Rk
    R
    k
    ?
    Aug 28 '17
    4
    If the complex series ∑∞

    Still there-- the forged entry Mr. Atwood & Spolsky, still there

    User Archimedes Plutonium - Mathematics Stack ...
    Stack Exchange › math › users › archime...
    archimedes plutonium from math.stackexchange.com
    Archimedes Plutonium top 56% overall. Apparently, this user prefers to keep an air of mystery about them. 4 answers. 20 questions. ~1k people reached. Member for 6 months; 113 profile views; Last seen Nov 9 '17 at ...

    Jan Burse, insane petty criminal stalker Swiss

    ..
    .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
    , . `.' ' `.
    .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
    . ; .' . `. ;
    ; . ' `. . '
    . ' ` `. |
    . '. '
    . 0 0 ' `.
    ' `
    ; `
    .' `
    ; U `
    ; '; `
    : | ;.. :` `
    : `;. ```. .-; | '
    '. ` ``.., .' :' '
    ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' Hi, I am the petty thug Swiss criminal who tears down web sites and loves to see forgeries of innocent victims to Math Stack Exchange. I failed math and logic and so spends the time attacking people. If you catch me, please do not put me into a Swiss prison for I have my buddies Dan Christensen, Zelos Malum, qbwr, Jan Bielawski, Franz, Michael Moroney, Erik Eastside, Earle Jones to teach how to be a petty criminal
    ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
    ` ` ; ; ' '
    ` ` ; ; ' '
    ` `. ````'''''' ' '
    ` . ' '
    / ` `. ' ' .
    / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
    / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
    / .'' ; ` .' `
    ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
    "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
    ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
    :' | ' ` , `. `
    | ' ` ' `. `
    ` ' ` ; `. |
    `.' ` ; `-'
    `...'






    Burse says ///////// physicists////////////// too stupid to understand AP's theory that true real proton is 840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for Chemistry covalent bonding

    Burse says ETH physicists,Charalampos Anastasiou,
    Niklas Beisert too stupid to understand AP's theory that true real proton is 840MeV, electron=muon, in order for Angular Momentum to allow for Chemistry covalent bonding

    why Moroney & Burse just ask Drs. Jerome Faist,
    Matthias Gaberdiel, Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder why they still believe proton is 938MeV electron .5MeV when they are 840MeV, 105MeV in order to have chemistry bonding


    AP writes: why does not Burse & Moroney simply ask Mr Thurnherr, and professors of physics at ETH why they think the real proton is not 840MeV and real electron = 105MeV with .5 MeV the Dirac Magnetic Monopole



    Jan Burse 8 year insane stalker Swiss

    ..
    .- " `-. ,..-''' ```....'`-..
    , . `.' ' `.
    .' .' ` ` ' `.. ;
    . ; .' . `. ;
    ; . ' `. . '
    . ' ` `. |
    . '. '
    . 0 0 ' `.
    ' `
    ; `
    .' `
    ; U `
    ; '; `
    : | ;.. :` `
    : `;. ```. .-; | '
    '. ` ``.., .' :' '
    ; ` ;'.. ..-'' ' ' I am Jan Burse, a Swiss that hates and attacks everyone in sci.math, because I failed math. So stupid is Burse he still believes a ellipse is a conic and believes in Boole logic which says 3 OR 2=5 with AND as subtraction. Jan is a Swiss imp of math with never a single line of math for 30 years
    ` ` ; ````'''""' ; ' '
    ` ` ; ; ' '
    ` ` ; ; ' '
    ` `. ````'''''' ' '
    ` . ' '
    / ` `. ' ' .
    / ` .. ..' .'"""""...'
    / .` ` ``........-' .'` .....'''
    / .'' ; ` .' `
    ...'.' ; .' ` .' `
    "" .' .' | ` .; \ `
    ; .' | `. . . . ' . \ `
    :' | ' ` , `. `
    | ' ` ' `. `
    ` ' ` ; `. |
    `.' ` ; `-'
    `...'



    ETH Zurich

    Paul Biran, Marc Burger, Patrick Cheridito, Manfred Einsiedler, Paul Embrechts, Giovanni Felder, Alessio Figalli, Norbert Hungerbuhler, Tom Ilmanen, Horst Knorrer, Emmanuel Kowalski, Urs Lang, Rahul Pandharipande, Richard Pink, Tristan Riviere, Dietmar Salamon, Martin Schweizer, Mete Soner, Michael Struwe, Benjamin Sudakov, Alain Sznitman, Josef Teichmann
    Wendelin Werner, Thomas Willwacher

    Zurich ETH, physics dept
    Charalampos Anastasiou, Niklas Beisert, Adrian Biland,
    Gianni Blatter, Marcella Carollo, Christian Degen, Leonardo Degiorgi, Gunther Dissertori, Klaus Ensslin,
    Tilman Esslinger, Jerome Faist, Matthias Gaberdiel,
    Aude Gehrmann-De Ridder, Vadim Geshkenbein, Christophorus Grab, Michele Graf, Jonathan Home,
    Roland Horisberger, Sebastian Huber, Thomas Markus Ihn, Atac Imamoglu, Steven Johnson, Ursula Keller, Klaus Kirch, Simon Lilly, Joel Mesot, Renatto Renner,
    Andre Rubbia, Werner Schmutz, Thomas Schulthess, Manfred Sigrist, Hans-Arno Synal, Matthias Troyer, Andreas Vaterlaus, Rainer Wallny, Andreas Wallraff,
    Werner Wegscheider, Audrey Zheludev, Oded Zilberberg

    University Bern
    Christian Leumann, Walter Benjamin, Emil Theodor Kocher, Kurt Wuthrich, Friedrich Durrenmatt, Daniel Vassella, Rene Fasel, Mani Matter


    Why can no-one at ETH help Dr. Hau turn the light switch off and prove that the Light wave is a circuit pencil ellipse not a arrow ray of head and tail which everyone except AP believes.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114