From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:33:25 -0500, olcott wrote:

https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

Stochastic parrots are token predictors, they do not understand things.

/Flibble
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:33:25 -0500, olcott wrote:

https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

https://chatgpt.com/share/6890f0cd-2258-800b-bec9-3efa8a50ee3d
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

On 8/4/2025 12:36 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:

On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:33:25 -0500, olcott wrote:

https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

Stochastic parrots are token predictors, they do not understand things.

/Flibble

*None-the-less this is irrefutable*

*From the bottom of page 319 has been adapted to this* https://www.liarparadox.org/Peter_Linz_HP_317-320.pdf

Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.∞,
if Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ halts, and
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qn
if Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ does not halt.

"The contradiction in Linz's (or Turing's) self-referential
halting construction only appears if one insists that the
machine can and must decide on its own behavior, which is
neither possible nor required."

https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:43:22 -0500, olcott wrote:

On 8/4/2025 12:36 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:

On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:33:25 -0500, olcott wrote:

https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

Stochastic parrots are token predictors, they do not understand things.

/Flibble

*None-the-less this is irrefutable*

*From the bottom of page 319 has been adapted to this* https://www.liarparadox.org/Peter_Linz_HP_317-320.pdf

Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.∞,
if Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ halts, and
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qn
if Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ does not halt.

"The contradiction in Linz's (or Turing's) self-referential
halting construction only appears if one insists that the machine
can and must decide on its own behavior, which is neither possible
nor required."

https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

You have completely lost it: you are using this same reply to different authors in completely different threads: you have no interest in debate at all, you just want to shout your baseless assertions at people.

/Flibble
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

On 8/4/2025 12:42 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:

On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:33:25 -0500, olcott wrote:

https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

https://chatgpt.com/share/6890f0cd-2258-800b-bec9-3efa8a50ee3d

I have proved that the traditional proofs do not
prove undecidability. I have not proved decidability.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.ai.philosophy

On 8/4/2025 12:46 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:

On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:43:22 -0500, olcott wrote:

On 8/4/2025 12:36 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:

On Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:33:25 -0500, olcott wrote:

https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

Stochastic parrots are token predictors, they do not understand things.

/Flibble

*None-the-less this is irrefutable*

*From the bottom of page 319 has been adapted to this*
https://www.liarparadox.org/Peter_Linz_HP_317-320.pdf

Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.∞,
if Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ halts, and
Ĥ.q0 ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.embedded_H ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⟨Ĥ⟩ ⊢* Ĥ.qn
if Ĥ applied to ⟨Ĥ⟩ does not halt.

"The contradiction in Linz's (or Turing's) self-referential
halting construction only appears if one insists that the machine
can and must decide on its own behavior, which is neither possible
nor required."

https://chatgpt.com/share/6890ee5a-52bc-8011-852e-3d9f97bcfbd8

You have completely lost it: you are using this same reply to different authors in completely different threads: you have no interest in debate at all, you just want to shout your baseless assertions at people.

/Flibble

Every thread that I have responded to is a thread
about my halting problem proof rebuttal.

Every post that I have made is about my halting
problem proof rebuttal.

Maybe you are confused of the difference between
threads within a group and the groups themselves?
My posts are only indirectly related to sci.logic.
--
Copyright 2025 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2