• Accessing Windoes Shares from Linux

    From Jeff Gaines@jgnewsid@outlook.com to alt.os.linux on Sat Apr 6 14:56:27 2024
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux


    As I had decided what I wanted on my new Linux box I thought I would do a clean install (the original had some failed app installs) so I did, very
    quick (with Ventoy).

    I then discovered I couldn't browse my Windows shares :-(

    I can get to the QNAP NAS and to the Internet but not to my main PC. I had this first time round and I think I solved it by enabling SMB1 on the
    Windows box but I tried so many things I can't be sure.

    Samba is running on the Linux box and "smbclient -L host" does come up
    with a list of shares but the Linux file manager can't find it.

    I did it once but seem lost now, any hints/clues/advice please?
    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    There are 3 types of people in this world. Those who can count, and those
    who can't.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Joerg Walther@joerg.walther@magenta.de to alt.os.linux on Sat Apr 6 17:10:40 2024
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I can get to the QNAP NAS and to the Internet but not to my main PC. I had >this first time round and I think I solved it by enabling SMB1 on the >Windows box but I tried so many things I can't be sure.

    Samba is running on the Linux box and "smbclient -L host" does come up
    with a list of shares but the Linux file manager can't find it.

    I did it once but seem lost now, any hints/clues/advice please?

    Version mismatch. SMB1 is very old should no longer be used since it is
    unsafe. Try to configure you windows box to SMB3.

    -jw-
    --
    And now for something completely different...
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sat Apr 6 12:29:02 2024
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 4/6/2024 10:56 AM, Jeff Gaines wrote:

    As I had decided what I wanted on my new Linux box I thought I would do a clean install (the original had some failed app installs) so I did, very quick (with Ventoy).

    I then discovered I couldn't browse my Windows shares :-(

    I can get to the QNAP NAS and to the Internet but not to my main PC. I had this first time round and I think I solved it by enabling SMB1 on the Windows box but I tried so many things I can't be sure.

    Samba is running on the Linux box and "smbclient -L host" does come up with a list of shares but the Linux file manager can't find it.

    I did it once but seem lost now, any hints/clues/advice please?


    Since you managed to contact the QNAP NAS, that suggests
    Linux is currently configured to do both SMBV1 and the others.

    In Windows

    Start : Run : control # Run control.exe

    "Programs and Features" control panel

    Windows Features (side link)

    There are three tick boxes for SMBV1, one being automatic
    removal and should not be ticked. The other two boxes
    should be ticked.

    We should have Alan (Pinterest) write up a procedure for you.
    He's been through this enough times, to help others.

    *******
    Breadcrumbs:

    bullwinkle@ZORO:~$ ls /etc/samba/smb.conf
    /etc/samba/smb.conf

    bullwinkle@ZORO:~$ ps aguwwwx | grep smbd
    root 6817 0.0 0.8 96888 24320 ? Ss 18:17 0:00 /usr/sbin/smbd --foreground --no-process-group

    bullwinkle@ZORO:~$ ps aguwwwx | grep nmbd

    root 6807 0.0 0.5 80520 15360 ? Ss 18:17 0:00 /usr/sbin/nmbd --foreground --no-process-group

    sudo gedit /etc/samba/smb.conf

    workgroup = WORKGROUP # Now we add some settings. The setting already there, assumes WORKGROUP is the one.

    server min protocol = NT1
    server max protocol = smb3
    client min protocol = NT1
    client max protocol = smb3
    client lanman auth = yes
    ntlm auth = yes

    Now, we add ourselves to some password thing,
    using the same password as our account. Or so.

    $ sudo smbpasswd -a bullwinkle

    [sudo] password for bullwinkle:
    New SMB password:
    Retype new SMB password:
    Added user bullwinkle.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Jeff Gaines@jgnewsid@outlook.com to alt.os.linux on Sun Apr 7 09:39:35 2024
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 06/04/2024 in message <xn0ok96vh7ggq3i00b@news.individual.net> Jeff
    Gaines wrote:

    I then discovered I couldn't browse my Windows shares :-(

    OK, hands up PEBKAC!

    I was trying smb:///etc - too many slashes.

    In my defence when I clicked on Go To Location in the file manage I think
    it put three slashes in but I wouldn't put money on it :-(

    Have DVDs playing, now got to get the AACS library on to play Blu Rays...
    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    The only thing necessary for evil to prevail is for good people to do or
    say nothing. (Edmund Burke)
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux on Sun Apr 7 05:52:18 2024
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 4/7/2024 5:39 AM, Jeff Gaines wrote:


    Have DVDs playing, now got to get the AACS library on to play Blu Rays...


    At HD 1920x1080 maybe, probably not at 4K native.
    Although you don't need 4K to enjoy a movie.

    To be honest with you, I don't really know of any
    USENETter who has a working BluRay. People are not
    going to tell me about their bootleg ISO9660 collections,
    but at least there's a slight hint when someone has
    a 40TB RAID array :-) No one seems to pipe up when
    a BD problem comes up. Maybe it's "just so easy"
    they don't bother ?

    I got the impression from some threads on the web,
    that BluRay is just a pain in the ass, rather than
    entertainment. For example, on a set top player with Ethernet
    connection, you can find an old selection that
    used to play on your box, the key was revoked
    and the disc you paid for, no longer plays.
    That's the BluRay story.

    Paul

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Jeff Gaines@jgnewsid@outlook.com to alt.os.linux on Sun Apr 7 11:19:45 2024
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 07/04/2024 in message <uutqck$2nd0a$1@dont-email.me> Paul wrote:

    On 4/7/2024 5:39 AM, Jeff Gaines wrote:


    Have DVDs playing, now got to get the AACS library on to play Blu Rays...


    At HD 1920x1080 maybe, probably not at 4K native.
    Although you don't need 4K to enjoy a movie.

    To be honest with you, I don't really know of any
    USENETter who has a working BluRay. People are not
    going to tell me about their bootleg ISO9660 collections,
    but at least there's a slight hint when someone has
    a 40TB RAID array :-) No one seems to pipe up when
    a BD problem comes up. Maybe it's "just so easy"
    they don't bother ?

    I got the impression from some threads on the web,
    that BluRay is just a pain in the ass, rather than
    entertainment. For example, on a set top player with Ethernet
    connection, you can find an old selection that
    used to play on your box, the key was revoked
    and the disc you paid for, no longer plays.
    That's the BluRay story.

    Paul

    I am inclined to agree with you. I like tech so bought a couple of TV
    series and films in Blu Ray but on my 32" TV I'm not sure I can see any difference from a DVD. In fact they often appear as a letter-box image
    unlike a DVD that usually manages to fill the screen.
    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it whether it exists
    or not, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedies.
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Joerg Walther@joerg.walther@magenta.de to alt.os.linux on Sun Apr 7 14:07:34 2024
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    Jeff Gaines wrote:

    I like tech so bought a couple of TV
    series and films in Blu Ray but on my 32" TV I'm not sure I can see any >difference from a DVD. In fact they often appear as a letter-box image >unlike a DVD that usually manages to fill the screen.

    Are these older series? If they weren't recorded on film but on magnetic
    tape the resolution of these might be not as high as the BluRay is
    capable of. You shouldn't see letter-boxes though, only pillar-boxes
    (black on the left and right). Depending on your BluRay player it may be possible to zoom/enlarge the picture.
    For films letter-boxes on a TV screen is quite the usual when you
    transfer a widescreen picture to 16:9.
    And btw: I see a big difference between DVD and HD quality on my 65" TV.

    -jw-
    --
    And now for something completely different...
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Jeff Gaines@jgnewsid@outlook.com to alt.os.linux on Sun Apr 7 12:59:30 2024
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 07/04/2024 in message <8n251jplg183ufb45t13f6d4700lv0c2fv@joergwalther.my-fqdn.de> Joerg Walther wrote:

    And btw: I see a big difference between DVD and HD quality on my 65" TV.

    You have a much bigger one than me :-)
    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    By the time you can make ends meet they move the ends
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Joerg Walther@joerg.walther@magenta.de to alt.os.linux on Sun Apr 7 15:49:46 2024
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    Jeff Gaines wrote:

    And btw: I see a big difference between DVD and HD quality on my 65" TV.

    You have a much bigger one than me :-)

    And it's OLED ;)

    -jw-
    --
    And now for something completely different...
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From J.O. Aho@user@example.net to alt.os.linux on Sun Apr 7 16:19:11 2024
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 07/04/2024 15.49, Joerg Walther wrote:
    Jeff Gaines wrote:

    And btw: I see a big difference between DVD and HD quality on my 65" TV.

    You have a much bigger one than me :-)

    And it's OLED ;)

    Mine is black :P

    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From =?UTF-8?B?YmFk8J+SvXNlY3Rvcg==?=@forgetski@_INVALID.net to alt.os.linux on Mon Apr 8 08:17:30 2024
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 4/7/24 10:19, J.O. Aho wrote:
    On 07/04/2024 15.49, Joerg Walther wrote:
    Jeff Gaines wrote:

    And btw: I see a big difference between DVD and HD quality on my 65"
    TV.

    You have a much bigger one than me :-)

    And it's OLED ;)

    Mine is black :P

    Me and mine are retired.
    --
    Some people cannot think outside the box, forever complaining that they
    cannot find it.




    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114
  • From Jeff Gaines@jgnewsid@outlook.com to alt.os.linux on Mon Apr 8 16:03:33 2024
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux

    On 08/04/2024 in message <PLadnfeK-brHfY77nZ2dnZfqnPoAAAAA@giganews.com> bad💽sector wrote:

    On 4/7/24 10:19, J.O. Aho wrote:
    On 07/04/2024 15.49, Joerg Walther wrote:
    Jeff Gaines wrote:

    And btw: I see a big difference between DVD and HD quality on my 65" >>>>>TV.

    You have a much bigger one than me :-)

    And it's OLED ;)

    Mine is black :P

    Me and mine are retired.

    Tell me about it :-(
    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    George Washington was a British subject until well after his 40th birthday. (Margaret Thatcher, speech at the White House 17 December 1979)
    --- Synchronet 3.20a-Linux NewsLink 1.114