1. Forum
  2. Newsgroups
  3. alt.bbs.pcboard

  • Re: PCBoard 15.3 source v0.008

    From corey blake@ainewslv@gmail.com to alt.bbs.pcboard on Mon Feb 17 07:40:34 2014
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.pcboard

    On Sunday, February 16, 2014 7:00:48 PM UTC-8, Trifle Menot wrote:
    Compiles and works. Archive includes compiler and library for building.



    v0.008:



    In pcbsrc\lib, reorganized #pragma inline statements to put them

    first in the source file, to start tasm without delay. The basm

    built into Borland C++ 3.1 can compile many of the files without

    calling tasm, so I commented out #pragma inline statements which

    were not needed.





    http://www.4shared.com/zip/uLT49g2Sce/PCBoard_153_source_code_v0008.html

    all of them?
    I could only comment out a few and it compiled.
    --- Synchronet 3.17a-Linux NewsLink 1.108
  • From Trifle Menot@triflemenot@protocol.invalid to alt.bbs.pcboard on Mon Feb 17 16:38:20 2014
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.pcboard

    On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:40:34 -0800 (PST), corey blake
    <ainewslv@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Sunday, February 16, 2014 7:00:48 PM UTC-8, Trifle Menot wrote:

    I commented out #pragma inline statements

    all of them? I could only comment out a few and it compiled.

    Why have bcc call tasm when it's not necessary? Simple asm statements
    can be compiled directly by basm, the built-in assembler in bcc.

    The code needs cleaning. I'm taking small, simple steps, to hopefully
    avoid breaking anything.

    That's the idea; don't break anything. Let me know if something does.


    --- Synchronet 3.17a-Linux NewsLink 1.108
  • From Fr Corey Blake@stbenedictmission@gmail.com to alt.bbs.pcboard on Tue Feb 18 08:04:32 2014
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.pcboard

    On Monday, February 17, 2014 8:38:20 AM UTC-8, Trifle Menot wrote:
    On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:40:34 -0800 (PST), corey blake

    <ainewslv@gmail.com> wrote:



    On Sunday, February 16, 2014 7:00:48 PM UTC-8, Trifle Menot wrote:



    I commented out #pragma inline statements



    all of them? I could only comment out a few and it compiled.



    Why have bcc call tasm when it's not necessary? Simple asm statements

    can be compiled directly by basm, the built-in assembler in bcc.



    The code needs cleaning. I'm taking small, simple steps, to hopefully

    avoid breaking anything.



    That's the idea; don't break anything. Let me know if something does.

    good luck.
    they had so many people working on it I am suprised they got it to compile all the time.
    --- Synchronet 3.17a-Linux NewsLink 1.108
  • From Trifle Menot@triflemenot@protocol.invalid to alt.bbs.pcboard on Tue Feb 18 18:01:20 2014
    From Newsgroup: alt.bbs.pcboard

    On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 08:04:32 -0800 (PST), Fr Corey Blake <stbenedictmission@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Monday, February 17, 2014 8:38:20 AM UTC-8, Trifle Menot wrote:

    That's the idea; don't break anything. Let me know if something does.

    good luck. they had so many people working on it I am suprised they got
    it to compile all the time.

    I don't release until my changes compile. So building it should always
    work.

    But there are so many things it does, it's impossible to test them all.
    The more people using and testing, the better.

    --- Synchronet 3.17a-Linux NewsLink 1.108